5 of the best fish and chip shops you should visit in Bolton
Whether you like yours plain or soaked in vinegar, fish and chips remains a popular meal in the UK, including in Bolton.
With lots of places providing the traditional British meal, we aren't short of choice when it comes to getting a chippy tea.
To help you pick a spot for some fish and chips, we've listed some of the best chippies you'll find in the town.
According to Google reviews, here are five of the best fish and chip shops in Bolton, all of which have at least a four-star rating.
Location: 29-31 New Lane, Breightmet, Bolton, BL2 5BN
Google Reviews rating: 4.8
One customer said: 'Best chippy I've had in a long time!Fish & chips is something I have from a proper chippy probably once every 6 months and I usually find the idea is better than the actual experience, however today the chips were crispy but fluffy, the fish was light and my children enjoyed their sausages.
'The curry sauce was also really nice, slightly sweet but not sickly, very tasty.They accept card payment which is rare for a traditional fish & chips shop.The guy who served us (I believe may have been Sunny) was very friendly.We live in Egerton but I think I'll be travelling to Breightmet fro now on.'
Another was also pleased with their food, saying: 'Absolutely outstanding chippy! It was my first time here, the staff were so friendly and lovely which is so refreshing to see, they seem to really care about their customers and have a smile on their face.
'The food is fresh and amazing, the quality is superb. Will definitely be back. Thank you!'
Location: 117 Bennetts Lane, Halliwell, Bolton, BL1 6JE
Google Reviews rating: 4.8
One customer said: 'Absolutely best chippy in Bolton by far, amazing FRESH food, brilliant friendly service and really good prices, have been going here for over 15 years and my husband over 20. Can't recommend enough'.
Another commented: 'Can't fault it, good size portions for a very reasonable price 👍'.
Location: 379 Deane Road, Bolton, BL3 5HL
Google Reviews rating: 4.7
This person shared their experience: 'This place is 10/15 minutes from where I live. I wouldn't normally travel that distance but the reviews were convincing. I wasn't disappointed, the place is very clean, well maintained and a credit to the owner.
'My meal was cooked to order and arrived hot. The owner is welcoming, friendly and lovely to chat to. I would say this restaurant exceeded my expectations. Highly recommended and worth the journey 👌'.
One customer said: 'The Best Chippy in Bolton!! Very Clean with 5 stars hygiene rating!! HIGHLY RECOMMENDED'.
Location: 14 Winter Hey Lane, Horwich, Bolton, BL6 7AA
Google Reviews rating: 4.7
One person said: 'Fabulous food, excellent service and you won't find anywhere better in Horwich to serve or deliver you great traditional English food (chippy tea) 🤣👍.'
Another customer commented: 'Great little chippy, delicious and piping hot chips and curry. Staff are respectful. Recommend.'
Mr Chips has impressed customers on Tripadvisor too with one saying: 'This chippy is one of the best around . Great food service value for money.. we go every Saturday now .. bang on chippy 👌🏻 staff are great too.'
It's worth noting that this chippy will be closed on June 6 and 7 but will reopen next week.
Recommended reading:
Bolton's highest-rated pub has 'great atmosphere' and 'nice prices'
Best spots for a fry up in Lancashire according to locals including 'hidden gem'
This is Lancashire's highest-rated cafe and it serves 'delicious' afternoon tea
Location: 108 Church Street, Blackrod, Bolton, BL6 5EG
Google Reviews rating: 4.7
This person shared their experience: 'Hey you… yes you reading this… have you not tried this fish & chip shop yet? Why not? Drop in for a fantastic fish, succulent sausage, beltin burgers and champion chips.
'My recommendation is a fish barm with a thin spread of mushy peas layered between. Don't just take my word for it, get yourself down there. You won't be disappointed. 😋'
Another was happy with the food served at this chippy: 'This could very well be the best chippy in the UK. The staff were lovely. The food just as good. The batter was perfect. And who knew that a battered chip barm was a thing. It was amazing.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
21 minutes ago
- Politico
5 questions for Sree Ramaswamy
Presented by With help from Anthony Adragna and Aaron Mak Hello, and welcome to this week's installment of the Future in Five Questions. This week we interviewed Sree Ramaswamy, a former senior policy adviser to the Biden administration's Commerce Department, whose work included facilitating the CHIPS and Science Act. Ramaswamy is now the chief innovation officer for NobleReach, a recently launched nonprofit that works to set up private-public partnerships through programs focused on talent and innovation, including at universities. He spoke about the changes under the new administration as well as the importance of securing supply chains against adversarial rivals, especially for critical technologies. An edited and condensed version of the conversation follows: What's one underrated big idea? I'm going to come at this from a national security standpoint. One of the things we have struggled with as a country is how to deal with the presence of adversarial inputs in our technology. That manifests in different ways. It manifests in people concerned about their chips coming from China. It manifests in people concerned about the fact that your printed circuit boards and the software that's flashed on them are done in Vietnam or in Malaysia by some third-party contractor, and we're like: Is there a back door here? Is somebody putting in a Trojan horse? We worry about the capability of the stack as it becomes larger and larger. We worry about the fact that we may have blind spots, both in terms of where adversaries can gain capabilities but also where they can insert vulnerabilities. What's a technology that you think is overhyped? The last few years, we've seen various aspects of the government come up with a list of critical technologies. Before we had the CHIPS Act, there was this thing called the Endless Frontiers Act, which had a list of critical technologies. I would say almost every single one of those technologies you could argue is overhyped. Take a look at those lists and ask yourself what technology is not on this list, and there's no answer to that question. Every single technology you can think of is on our list of the most critical technologies. It's sort of like saying I have 100 priorities — then you don't have any priorities. What I would like to see is a shift of attention away from the technologies themselves, and to the problems that the technologies can solve. What could the government be doing regarding technology that it isn't? What the government has traditionally done well is focus on the supply side of tech. It creates incentives, it builds infrastructure — the labs, test beds, it builds all of that stuff. It creates incentives that we've done with tax credits, subsidies and grant programs. What it is struggling to do is figure out how it can help on the demand side. It can tell you it needs warships, like right now. It needed them like a week ago, it needs them over the next year, or six months. It's also good at telling you in 15 years, this is how we think warfare is going to change. What it struggles to tell you is the in-between, because the in-between is where the tech stuff comes in. So when you say that you are trying to prioritize technology, what you're doing is you're prioritizing stuff that is in laboratories today. They're in university labs, they're in federal labs. They're going through proof of concept. They're going through early-stage validation. What that cohort needs to develop is what problem do you need to solve in like six years, seven years. It takes somewhere between five to eight years on average for some of these hard technologies to come to market. What you need is a demand signal sitting there saying, 'I don't need this warship now, but in seven years, I need my warships to have this capability.' And that's the missing piece. If we could get our government to start articulating that sort of demand, that could go a long way in helping develop technologies, de-risking them, and you'll be signaling that there's a customer for these things, which means that a bunch of VC guys will start crowding, because that's what VCs care about. They care about, do you have a path to get a customer? What book most shaped your conception of the future? [Laughs] I've forgotten how to read — my attention span is now three-minute-long YouTube videos. (Note: He later said the book that shaped his concept of the future was 'The Long Game' by Rush Doshi.) What has surprised you the most this year? I think what has surprised me the most this year is how easily and quickly things that we thought could not be changed are changing. And you know, you can take that both in a positive spirit and a negative spirit. When I was in the private sector, there were certain things that you feel are sort of off limits, both good and bad. There's a certain way of doing things, and if you stray beyond that, it's either illegal or it's immoral, or you're gonna get jeered by your peers. I definitely felt that in the government as well. There are certain things — even with something like CHIPS, these big investment programs — there were still spoken and unspoken things that you could do, things that you could not do, and I ran up against many of them. What I find surprising is how quickly many of those things are falling by the wayside. Changing the way federal agencies work, changing the way our allied relationships work, changing the way the trade regime works. In a broad sense, it's good, because it tells us that this country is capable of moving quickly. It does show you that if we need to, we can move. What I'm looking forward to, now that we've shown that you can move in big ways, including companies, can now add an end state to it and say, OK, we really need to be able to move in a big way to solve this problem: completely diversify our supply chains away from adversaries, completely have a clean AI tech stack in the next three years. I left government thinking about our inability to move quickly. So I'm glad to see it — I'm not happy with all of it — but I'm glad to see we can. Tech's heavy emissions footprint Carbon emissions for the world's leading tech company operations surged 150 percent between 2020 and 2023, according to a report from the United Nations' digital agency. Compared to a 2020 baseline, operational emissions for Amazon grew 182 percent in 2023 against 2020 levels, Microsoft's grew 155 percent, Meta's increased 145 percent, and Alphabet's grew 138 percent. This was all for 2023, the last year for which complete data is available. Demand for energy-intensive artificial intelligence and data centers has only surged since then. Just 10 tech companies accounted for half of the industry's electricity demand in 2023, according to the report. Those are China Mobile, Amazon, Samsung Electronics, China Telecom, Alphabet, Microsoft, TSMC, China Unicom, SK Hynix and Meta. Overall, however, the tech sector is a relatively small player in global emissions. The 166 companies covered in the report accounted for 0.8 percent of all global energy-related emissions in 2023, it concluded. Anthropic opposes AI moratorium Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei took what looked like a bold, independent stance on federal AI laws yesterday — but was it really so bold? In a New York Times op-ed, Amodei came out against the 10-year moratorium on state AI laws that Congress is proposing. He argued the moratorium is 'far too blunt an instrument,' and instead recommended that Congress first pass a federal transparency law. A tech CEO calling for federal regulation of his own industry? It's almost like 2023 again. But several critics have pointed out that this wasn't quite such a disinterested stance. The federal law he's looking for would — in his proposal — pre-empt all those inconvenient state laws. 'If a federal transparency standard is adopted,' Amodei wrote, 'it could then supersede state laws, creating a unified national framework.' Former OpenAI researcher Steven Adler critiqued the idea in an X post: 'Anthropic's CEO only says he wants regulation so he seems responsible. He knows there's no risk he'll actually get regulated.' And there's an argument that the law wouldn't change much. As Amodei himself notes, major AI companies like Google and OpenAI already have self-imposed transparency requirements. So does Anthropic – the company recently disclosed that its model tried to blackmail a user in a test run. DFD asked Anthropic about the criticisms. The company responded by clarifying that the transparency standard would mainly supersede state laws mitigating catastrophic AI risks, like cyberattacks. Amodei cautions that companies may abandon their transparency measures as their models get more complex, so the federal law might be necessary. Even so, current state AI laws have more teeth and specificity than the federal transparency standard that Amodei is proposing. South Dakota imposes civil and criminal liabilities on election deepfakes. Tennessee law prevents AI from impersonating musicians. New Hampshire prohibits state agencies from using AI to surveil the public. Alondra Nelson, a key architect of federal AI policy under President Joe Biden, wrote to DFD: '[A] federal requirement for industry to provide more information is a good foundation for states' laws to build upon, but it cannot replace them.' Amodei frames his proposal as a compromise between the goals of states and the federal government. In such a bargain, the big winner could be an industry that is already used to sliding through those gaps. post of the day THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS Stay in touch with the whole team: Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@ Steve Heuser (sheuser@ Nate Robson (nrobson@ and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@
Hamilton Spectator
38 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Catholic school board launches new construction co-op program
Hamilton's Catholic school board is launching a new carpentry co-op program amid soaring demand for skilled trades across the province. Students in Grade 11 and up can join the board's new enhanced construction program, offering an opportunity to explore careers in building and repairing homes and other infrastructure. 'It is specifically designed to provide participants with industry-recognized training, practical experience and direct pathways into careers in the skilled trades,' the Hamilton-Wentworth Catholic District School Board said in a May 29 post . Students will take classes at the United Brotherhood of Carpenters (UBC) Local 18 Training Centre on Stoney Church Road East. They will be assigned a co-op placement in either general carpentry or drywall, acoustical and lathing systems. Successful students will receive four high school credits — math, English and two construction technology — and placements could be paid. Students will also receive seven construction certifications, about $900 of personal protective equipment and tools, and apprenticeship hours toward a trade, setting them up for the next steps in a construction career. The board says ideal candidates are reliable, punctual, hardworking and 'committed to learning.' The new program, which will accept 20 students per semester, is a collaboration between UBC Local 18 and the Catholic board, and is funded in part by the provincial and federal governments. A student information session will be held at 6:30 p.m. on Monday at the Stone Church Road training centre. Co-op teachers and industry leaders say there's a growing interest among young people in the trades. There are also plans afoot to double an Ontario Youth Apprenticeship Program (OYAP) construction craft worker program at LIUNA Local 837's Grimsby training centre. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analyst Says Alphabet (GOOG) Trading at ‘Huge Discount' – Believes It Can ‘Absolutely' Compete with ChatGPT
Ted Thatcher, president of Bright Lake Wealth Management, explained in a recent program on Schwab Network why he is bullish on Alphabet Inc (NASDAQ:GOOG) and mentioned some of the key growth catalysts for the stock: "At least from a price to earnings ratio, you know, Google's trading around 18 times earnings. If you look at that compared to the other mega caps, it's like at a huge discount. And I understand we've had these concerns about whether Gemini versus Chat GPT usage is competitive or not. But we have to remember, you know, look at Google's revenue. Look at what happened out of their earnings calls. Even their blue link search revenue was up 10%. And then you look at Google more broadly, they have 270 million users, paid subscribers, between their YouTube platform and their Google One platforms. And so when you look at that level of user control that Google has and then you pair that with everything that they just announced at I/O with all these essentially AI apps, some of them authentic, some of them are AI mode with Google Search, you know, I think Google is going to be able to absolutely cram down Gemini through those users' throats, essentially, and absolutely compete with the Chat GPT user growth." Alphabet posted strong quarterly results, but the market remains reluctant about the stock amid threats to its search business due to the onslaught of AI tools like ChatGPT. However, Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) bulls believe these concerns are overstated. Google has an edge over competitors because it's easier for the billions of users of its search engine to switch to Gemini instead of opting for a completely new model. Google has over 1.5 billion monthly users interacting with its AI-powered Search overviews. OpenAI, Alphabet's biggest competitor now when it comes to AI search, has less than 5% of its users paying, and its business model is still developing. Google's first-quarter results showed continued strength in its cloud unit, with revenue up 28% year over year and solid operating income growth. This supports Google's broader AI strategy and underscores the scale advantages of its cloud business. RiverPark Large Growth Fund stated the following regarding Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) in its Q1 2025 investor letter: 'Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) shares declined in the first quarter despite solid business fundamentals. Investors reacted negatively to the company's AI product rollout relative to peers, expressing concern about potential market share loss in core search and cloud segments. Nevertheless, Alphabet continues to deliver strong cash flow from its dominant search and YouTube platforms while investing aggressively in its next-generation AI and cloud infrastructure. Trading at a valuation discount to many of its peers, we view Alphabet as a core holding with compelling upside as monetization of its newer initiatives accelerates.' READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
