logo
How Bill Gates thinks you should use AI

How Bill Gates thinks you should use AI

Fast Company8 hours ago

Brands that aren't using artificial intelligence will soon be left behind—but it's not too late to start, argues a new book, AI First: The Playbook for a Future-Proof Business or Brand.
The same way that business leaders once explored what it means to be digital first or mobile first or video first, digital strategists and authors Adam Brotman and Andy Sack pose the question: What does it mean to be AI first? Brotman and Sack, cofounders of the digital consultancy Forum3, interviewed some of the most influential leaders in technology for their book, including OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Microsoft cofounder Bill Gates, and Reid Hoffman, best known for cofounding LinkedIn. The book shares their insights as well as a playbook for businesses on how to integrate AI.
Brotman, the former chief digital officer for Starbucks who shaped the brand's highly successful mobile app and loyalty program, spoke to Fast Company about what he hopes readers will gain from their new book.
We had actually been asked by Harvard Business Review Press to write a book on digital loyalty, which is my background and our specialty. But we had just had a 'holy s—' moment, like a lot of other people, when we saw ChatGPT. We didn't understand what was really behind these generative AI systems and where the various frontier labs and systems were going with it. We thought, we better learn this. We asked Harvard if we could go on this journey and share it with our readers, and they said yes.
Why does AI feel different to you than other technological advances?
There are two ways. One is that we're talking about intelligence as a service, and that just felt like something that was always reserved for either science fiction or human beings. It wasn't just software that you programmed, that either worked or didn't work. The fact that it could think and reason—at least seemingly so—felt very human and unlike anything that we had seen. The second thing was how fast it was moving.
You brought up the 'holy-s— moment.' I've heard that you and Sack at one point wanted that to be the title of the book. Why?
We talked to Sam Altman as our first interview for the book. He said that the mission of OpenAI was to achieve artificial general intelligence. And by definition, that's when the AI can effectively do what any human can do, if not better, pretty much instantly and for free. We were like, 'Oh my God, you're focused on that. When do you think that's going to happen?' And he said, 'I can't predict it, but probably in around five years.' That was a holy-s— moment for us. We were sort of stunned. When you try this technology, I think everybody has their own aha moment, if you will. How do I take advantage of this? What is this going to mean for jobs? What is this going to mean for society? There's a lot of exciting things but there's also a lot of scary unknowns. We thought that was an appropriate name, but of course that's not the best name for a book published by an established publisher. So we compromised and called the introduction chapter 'The Holy-S— Moment' and the book is called 'AI First.'
Yeah, two things: One was that he likened the first time he saw ChatGPT4 to the first time he saw graphical user interface, before Microsoft came up and led the PC revolution with Windows. So he validated and confirmed the significance of this technology. The other thing Bill Gates said to us that was a key takeaway was about the contours of the concept of productivity. Most of us think of productivity as just quantitative, meaning output. He reminded us that productivity has a qualitative edge and dimension to it, and that if you have access to a tool like generative AI and you know how to harness it, you're going to not just up your productivity, but the quality of your work. I thought that was really interesting.
How should business leaders today be leveraging AI?
Most organizations want to skip to the AI innovation. They want to skip to the application, like the chatbot or the robot. What they're skipping over is the powerful effects of everybody using AI many times a day, every day, to enhance their decision-making and analysis and insights—frankly, to do their job better and faster. That's not as sexy as some advanced voice-mode, drive-thru technology you deploy across all your QSR [quick-service restaurant] locations. It's not as sexy as completely innovating your creative output through text-to-image, text-to-video capabilities. Those are really important AI use cases, but they're not the everyday, always-on superpower of letting every individual get that benefit of co-intelligence to make decisions faster. One of the key nuggets from the book is that AI-first organizations start with AI-first people.
Is that what you mean when you say that business owners should be thinking of AI as a colleague?
Yes. It's collaborating, soundboarding with the AI, inviting AI to the table, as [AI expert and Wharton] professor Ethan Mollick likes to say. It's thinking of it as a member of your team, a colleague.
Is there anything else you want readers to know about your book or AI in general?
I think a lot of people are intimidated or afraid of either not being able to keep up with the advancements in AI or of the implications of AI, given how fast-moving and powerful it is. What I would say is: It's absolutely not too late. There are so many business leaders in the same spot as you. This is the perfect time to develop a game plan to figure out how to make your organization keep up with what's going on. But don't wait—get started.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MrBeast is killing his video thumbnail generator after creators revolted — but it won't stop the AI tide
MrBeast is killing his video thumbnail generator after creators revolted — but it won't stop the AI tide

Business Insider

time30 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

MrBeast is killing his video thumbnail generator after creators revolted — but it won't stop the AI tide

MrBeast is shuttering an AI thumbnail generator after backlash from the creator community. YouTube's biggest star was receptive to criticism from his peers. Will Meta, TikTok, or YouTube listen if their AI tools spark similar outrage? The feature allowed users to generate video thumbnails by mimicking aspects of existing video art, including swapping in faces and other modifications. "You've made something that can steal my (and my artists) hard work without a thought," Twitch and YouTube streamer PointCrow (Eric Morino) wrote on X. Now, MrBeast is backpedaling. In a video posted Thursday, he said he's killing the AI feature and instead directing users of his Viewstats platform to hire human designers. "I care more than any of you could ever imagine about the YouTube community," he said. "It deeply makes me sad when I do something that people in the community are upset by." The backlash to MrBeast's tool shows the tightrope walk that companies must navigate when introducing AI features for creators. There's a fine line between automating work to help influencers save time, and offering shortcuts that creators view as displacing or stealing their work. AI is coming hard for creators MrBeast's thumbnail generator is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to disruptive AI tech hitting the creator community. Meta, TikTok, and YouTube are all marching forward with AI tools that will change how videos are made, and what ultimately gets watched. And I'd wager they're going to be less receptive than MrBeast to backlash. TikTok users can now turn static photos into AI-generated videos, and YouTube is planning to bring its AI video generator tool Veo 3 to Shorts this summer. If Veo 3 is good enough to produce a TV commercial, it's likely to make a big splash on YouTube. YouTube CEO Neal Mohan said earlier this month that he's "incredibly excited by the potential of AI tools to empower human creativity." You'd be hard pressed to find a creator platform that's not getting overrun with AI these days. Pinterest users are finding AI images are taking over their grid, and music streamer Deezer recently revealed that 18% of all new songs uploaded to its platform are fully AI-generated. There's even a wave of startups helping users automate the entire process of creating and uploading videos to TikTok. Creators can rage against MrBeast, but the biggest players in generative AI are racing ahead. Even as MrBeast has shuttered his short-lived AI thumbnail generator, it's still incredibly easy for creators to generate thumbnails using other AI tools from the likes of OpenAI and Midjourney.

The AI Education Gap: Why Schools Need Policies Now
The AI Education Gap: Why Schools Need Policies Now

Forbes

time40 minutes ago

  • Forbes

The AI Education Gap: Why Schools Need Policies Now

Schools need clearer AI policies that support teachers and students. American educators have rapidly adopted AI, but a critical gap has emerged: most schools aren't teaching students how to use these powerful AI tools responsibly. Sixty percent of teachers now report using AI in their lessons, yet a stark disconnect exists between AI adoption and implementation. Survey data from the RAND American Educator Panels indicate that only 25% of teachers have integrated AI into their instruction, while 35% stated that their school has established guidelines for AI use, and 27% reported that their school has no AI rules in place. This disparity reveals a concerning pattern across U.S. K-12 education: AI tools like ChatGPT are proliferating in classrooms without the necessary guardrails or educational frameworks to maximize their potential. Teachers Adopt AI, Schools Lag Behind The numbers tell a story of individual innovation outpacing institutional planning. While three in five teachers experiment with AI tools, only one in four has moved beyond casual use to meaningful classroom integration. Teachers describe using AI for lesson planning, generating discussion prompts, and creating differentiated materials. Some craft personalized math problems for students interested in sports statistics or business scenarios. Others use AI to translate materials for English language learners or generate reading comprehension questions at varying difficulty levels. However, this experimentation often occurs in isolation. Without formal training or institutional support, educators navigate AI implementation through trial and error. AI Policy Vacuum Creates Wild West Environment More than eight in ten schools operate without clear guidelines on when, how, or whether to use AI in educational settings. This approach leaves teachers uncertain about boundaries: The absence of guidance creates inconsistent experiences for students. AI use might be encouraged in one classroom, prohibited in another, and ignored entirely in a third—all within the same building. Missing the AI Educational Opportunity The real challenge isn't AI adoption—it's educating about AI. Schools that rush to implement tools without teaching responsible use miss a fundamental opportunity to prepare students for a technology-integrated future. Students require instruction on prompt engineering, understanding AI limitations, recognizing bias in AI-generated outputs, and maintaining academic integrity when utilizing AI assistance. These skills represent essential digital literacy for the next generation. Some forward-thinking educators have begun incorporating AI literacy into their curricula. Students learn to critically evaluate AI-generated content, understand when human expertise remains irreplaceable, and develop strategies for ethical collaboration with AI. The AI Integration Challenge Proper integration requires rethinking lesson design, assessment strategies, and learning objectives. It requires understanding how AI can enhance, rather than replace, critical thinking, creativity, and human connection in the educational process. Teachers deserve clear direction and dedicated time to master these tools effectively. Professional development cannot be a one-time workshop or brief orientation. Instead, educators deserve ongoing training that recognizes the rapidly advancing capabilities of AI. This includes practical sessions on tool selection, classroom management with AI present, and designing assignments that leverage AI strengths while developing student capabilities. Equally important is teaching students to develop discernment and ethical practices regarding the use of AI. Students must learn to critically evaluate AI-generated content, understanding when outputs may contain errors, bias, or inappropriate information. They need instruction on academic integrity boundaries—when AI assistance enhances learning versus when it undermines skill development. Successful AI integration also requires teaching students to ask better questions. The quality of AI responses depends heavily on prompt engineering skills. Students who learn to craft thoughtful, specific prompts develop stronger analytical thinking than those who rely on basic queries. Ethical considerations extend beyond cheating prevention. Students should understand AI's limitations, recognize when human expertise remains essential, and develop strategies for maintaining their own creative and critical thinking abilities while using AI as a collaborative tool. Without this foundation of discernment and ethics, AI tools risk becoming crutches rather than enhancement tools that prepare students for responsible AI use throughout their academic and professional careers. Building A Responsible AI Culture Schools that have successfully integrated AI share common characteristics: clear policies, comprehensive teacher training, and explicit instruction on responsible use. These institutions treat AI as they would any powerful educational tool—with intentionality, preparation, and ongoing evaluation. They establish guidelines that protect academic integrity while encouraging innovation. At WIT (Whatever It Takes), the educational organization I founded in 2009, we recognized early that AI adoption required proactive policy development and usage practices. This led us to create WITY, a platform that teaches AI usage with transparency and accountability. Our experience revealed how schools can effectively integrate AI tools while maintaining educational integrity. The AI Path Forward Schools can either harness AI's educational potential through thoughtful implementation or allow haphazard adoption, which can undermine learning outcomes. Three priorities emerge for educational leaders: Develop comprehensive AI policies that provide clear guidance for educators and students while remaining flexible enough to evolve with rapidly changing technology. Invest in educator training that moves beyond basic tool familiarity to pedagogical integration and ethical considerations. Develop AI literacy curricula that educate students to utilize these tools effectively, responsibly, and with a comprehensive understanding of their capabilities and limitations. The 60% adoption rate demonstrates educators' recognition of AI's potential. Now, schools must catch up with policies, training, and instruction that match this technological enthusiasm with educational wisdom. Students deserve more than exposure to AI tools—they need education about how to wield them thoughtfully. The future workplace will demand these AI skills. Schools that act now to build responsible AI integration will prepare students for success. Those that don't risk leaving graduates behind in an increasingly AI-integrated world. The AI technology has arrived in classrooms. The question now is whether schools will rise to meet the educational moment.

How much credit card debt is too much for debt settlement?
How much credit card debt is too much for debt settlement?

CBS News

time44 minutes ago

  • CBS News

How much credit card debt is too much for debt settlement?

We may receive commissions from some links to products on this page. Promotions are subject to availability and retailer terms. Debt settlement can offer significant relief to the right person, but there's a point when your debt might actually be too much for this approach. Getty Images There's no question that credit card debt has become a major issue over the last few years, with the total amount of credit card debt nationwide now sitting at a staggering $1.17 trillion. That equates to the typical cardholder owing about $8,000 at a time when the average credit card rate is nearly 22%. But for many households, these figures aren't just statistics. They represent a growing financial burden, one that's making it harder to stay current on their monthly card payments. As a result, many of the people who are struggling to pay down their card debt are now opting to explore their options for relief. While there are numerous debt relief strategies to consider, debt settlement, also known as debt forgiveness, can offer significant relief by allowing you to negotiate with creditors to try and settle for less than what you owe. That approach can work well for some, especially when balances are high and repayment options are limited. There's a catch, though. At a certain point, your debt may actually be too large for settlement to be effective. So, how do you know when you've crossed that threshold? Below, we'll detail what to consider before going all in. Start tackling your high-rate credit card debt today. How much credit card debt is too much for debt settlement? There's no hard cap on the amount of credit card debt that can be settled. In theory, you can try to settle $5,000 or $150,000 in credit card debt. But in practice, once you hit a certain threshold — usually around $100,000 — the risks and limitations of debt settlement become more pronounced. Why does this happen? There are a few key reasons: Creditors are less flexible when the stakes are higher If you owe one creditor $30,000 or more, they may be less willing to settle, especially if they believe they can recover the full amount through a lawsuit or collections. The bigger the balance, the more motivated they may be to go after you through legal means rather than negotiation. Explore your debt relief options and find the right strategy now. You need enough income to fund a settlement Debt settlement typically involves stopping payments while you save up enough money to fund lump-sum settlement offers. But the more debt you have, the more money you'll need to save — and fast. If you're settling $100,000 worth of credit card debt, for example, you may need to come up with $50,000 to $70,000 in a matter of months or a few short years. For many people, that's just not a realistic goal. The fees can get steep With a high amount of card debt, it makes sense to work with a debt relief company on your settlements. After all, their negotiation expertise and creditor relationships may come in handy when trying to settle big balances. However, most debt relief companies charge fees of between 15% to 25% of the enrolled debt in return for the work they do. So, if you're trying to settle $120,000 in credit card debt, you could be looking at $18,000 to $30,000 in debt relief fees alone. That doesn't include taxes you may owe on forgiven debt. The timeline can stretch out too long Settling a small amount of debt — let's say $15,000 — might take 24 to 48 months. But if you're trying to settle $100,000 or more, you're probably looking at a program that lasts five years or longer. That's five years of missed payments, credit damage and potential collection lawsuits. So what's the ideal range? Debt settlement tends to work best for people with between $7,500 and $75,000 in unsecured debt who have already fallen behind on payments and don't have the income or credit to qualify for debt consolidation loans. Once your debt exceeds $100,000, settlement can still be done, but it may not be the most efficient or cost-effective option. What are the debt settlement alternatives? Debt settlement can be useful, but it's not the only option, and may not be the best first step. Here are some alternatives worth considering: The bottom line Debt settlement can be a powerful tool, and if you're carrying $10,000 to $75,000 in credit card debt and are already behind on payments, it might be worth exploring. But if your balances are soaring past the $100,000 mark, the math starts to work against you. At a certain point, trying to settle huge balances can leave you facing high fees and potential lawsuits, all with no guarantee of success. In those cases, other types of debt relief may offer faster, cheaper, and more permanent solutions. The key is understanding what's available to you and choosing the solution that fits your financial reality — not just the one that sounds best in theory.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store