logo
Hemp regulations hazy after House workgroup wraps up its business

Hemp regulations hazy after House workgroup wraps up its business

Yahoo08-03-2025

Video display of questions the House working group on hemp asked at the end of their three-day workshop on March 6, 2025 (Photo by Mitch Perry/ Florida Phoenix)
The combined Florida House workgroup formed to study the hemp industry concluded its final meeting Thursday with two main conclusions:
They agreed they did not want to make any moves that might kill what has emerged as a multi-billion-dollar industry in the Sunshine State.
But they also determined that Florida has to change the status quo in regard to how the product is regulated.
The 24-member group, chaired by Escambia County Republican Michelle Salzman, was charged by House Speaker Danny Perez to 'gain knowledge and understanding of the subject matter' and not to make legislative recommendations.
The panel heard testimony, some of it jarring, from industry experts, regulators, and entrepreneurs.
Agriculture Commissioner Wilton Simpson, whose department oversees the hemp industry, kicked off the meetings this week when he said that while the hemp market is complicated, the facts surrounding it aren't.
'From my experience, the debate and advocacy often does not rely on the facts,' he said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Federal law defines the hemp plant as having less than 0.3% THC, the primary psychoactive ingredient in cannabis.
Hemp can produce cannabinoids that have intoxicating effects similar to THC in cannabis. But while medical marijuana is strictly regulated in Florida since it became legalized years ago, hemp isn't, leading to repeated claims heard this week that the landscape for the product was essentially 'the wild, wild west.'
'I'm not a huge regulation guy, but I think it's an area where we need more regulation … ,' said Southeast Republican Rep. Toby Oberdorf. 'You can have a bag of gummies from hemp that's actually stronger than a bag of gummies from THC, which we legalized here in the state of Florida with a prescription.'
Central Florida Republican Richard Gentry said what concerned him most was the proliferation of hemp-derived THC-infused drinks now being sold in stores like ABC Fine Wine & Spirits, the largest liquor store chain in Florida. Those drinks are not alcoholic but are still intoxicating.
Chas Bailes, president and CEO of ABC Fine Wine & Spirits, told the committee that his stores have begun stocking those drinks due to consumer demand over the past six months. The maximum dosage in the drinks sold in his stores is 10 milligrams of THC. Some beverages on the market can contain as much as 100 milligrams.
Surprising public testimony came from a testing lab owner who said his recent testing of hemp-derived products found a majority of them above that 0.3% THC limit.
George Fernandez is founder and CEO of Modern Canna Labs, a Lakeland laboratory contracted with the Florida Department of Agriculture to test cannabis and hemp products. He testified that over the past two quarters, his lab tested 50 out of 53 flower hemp samples from different smoke/hemp shops across the state that were over the 0.3% Delta 9 THC limit. All told, out of the 111 hemp samples his lab tested, 64% failed (a total of 71).
He added that he also found contaminants in these products.
Perhaps most alarming, 49 out of 111 (44%) of the samples failed for pesticides. Sixteen of the samples (14%) failed for microbials, and five out of the 111 samples (or 4.5%) failed for heavy metals.
'I'm in shock right now,' Salzman responded.
Fernandez said that a lot of the products sold in Florida are tested by out-of-state laboratories, using different testing processes and parameters. 'I think labs here are held to a higher standard,' he said.
The 2018 U.S. farm bill legalized hemp production, creating a large new industry in Florida (and across the country). It led to the development of products like Delta-8 and other cannabinoids derived from hemp plants. That's led to states across the country enacting their own regulations over the past few years, in some cases banning all intoxicating hemp products period.
Dr. Gillian Schauer with the Cannabis Regulators Association appeared remotely from Colorado to give lawmakers a detailed view of how different states are working to regulate the product. She listed some questions that legislators need to consider: What kind of market do you want for cannabinoids? Which cannabinoids do you want consumers to have access to? Should there be limits on the amount of intoxicating cannabinoids they can purchase in a serving? Should they tax the product?
I'm not a huge regulation guy, but I think it's an area where we need more regulation ... . You can have a bag of gummies from hemp that's actually stronger than a bag of gummies from THC, which we legalized here in the state of Florida with a prescription.
– Rep. Toby Oberdorf.
Polk County Republican Sen. Colleen Burton pushed through proposals to regulate hemp in both the 2023 and 2024 legislative sessions. The 2023 bill was stripped of the provisions that the hemp industry decried but did include a prohibition on the sale of hemp-extract products intended for human ingestion to anyone under 21. It also required that packaging of such products not be considered attractive to children.
In 2024, the Legislature passed a bill (SB 1698) that banned all Delta-8 products in the state and restricted Delta-9 THC levels in hemp products to 5 milligrams per serving and 50 milligrams per container. Gov. DeSantis vetoed the measure last June following heavy lobbying from the hemp industry.
But the governor said in his veto letter that he was encouraging the Legislature to reconsider the topic during the 2025 session.
'Sensible, non-arbitrary regulation will provide businesses and consumers alike with much-needed sensibility — safeguarding public health and safety, allowing legitimate industry to flourish, and removing bad actors from the market,' he wrote.
For the third year in a row, Burton has filed comprehensive legislation regulating hemp (SB 438) which includes limiting the amount of THC to 5 milligrams per serving and 50 milligrams per container and limiting THC-infused beverages to no more than 5 milligrams per unopened can or bottle.
Duval County Democratic Sen. Tracie Davis has filed her own version, as well, which would limit the amount of THC to 2 milligrams per serving and 20 milligrams per container. Meanwhile, Republicans Hillary Cassel (HB 601) and Dana Trabulsky (HB 1597) have filed corresponding measures in the House.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Legislature to repeal MinnesotaCare for undocumented adults
Legislature to repeal MinnesotaCare for undocumented adults

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Legislature to repeal MinnesotaCare for undocumented adults

Demonstrators gather for a protest organized by the Minnesota Immigrant Rights Action Committee calling for the continuation of MinnesotaCare for undocumented adults at the Minnesota State Capitol Tuesday, May 27, 2025. (Photo by Nicole Neri/Minnesota Reformer) Despite Democratic-Farmer-Labor control of the state Senate, the governor's office, and half of the House, Republicans forced Democrats to roll back one of their signature accomplishments from the 2023 legislative session: health care for undocumented people. The Legislature is expected to vote Monday to repeal undocumented adults' eligibility for MinnesotaCare, the state-subsidized health insurance program for the working poor. Children would still be covered. Republicans successfully used their leverage — the threat of a government shutdown starting July 1 — to force the Democrats' hand on an issue that is of supreme importance to GOP lawmakers. The DFL pulled out all nearly of the stops to avoid cutting health care access for undocumented adults. During negotiations, DFL leaders offered Republicans concessions related to paid leave, earned sick and safe time, and noncompete agreements — but Republicans didn't budge, said Sen. Alice Mann, DFL-Edina. 'They turned all of those things down, because all they wanted…was to make sure that the 17,000 people were left out to die, that we worsen our health care system and that we decrease our tax revenue,' Mann said at a press conference Monday decrying the move. When Gov. Tim Walz and legislative leaders announced a budget deal — contingent on repealing MinnesotaCare eligibility for undocumented adults — on May 15, lawmakers with the People of Color Indigenous Caucus protested outside the door. They told reporters later that they were blindsided by the deal. After the announcement, POCI caucus members brought alternatives to legislative leaders, said Rep. Liish Kozlowski, DFL-Duluth. The POCI caucus suggested capping undocumented enrollment in MinnesotaCare, raising premiums, allowing children currently enrolled to retain coverage instead of aging out, or making exceptions for elderly people or those with chronic conditions. None of those options made it into the bill, which is expected to be heard first on the House floor during a 21-hour special session beginning at 10 a.m. Republicans have repeatedly exaggerated the cost of providing health care to undocumented people enrolled in MinnesotaCare. Enrollment has exceeded the state's expectations, however, with more than 17,000 undocumented people currently enrolled. Meanwhile, per-person spending on the undocumented population has been lower than expected, according to the Department of Human Services. Federal politics and funding have complicated the issue: A budget bill passed by the GOP-controlled U.S. House would cut funding to states that provide health care to undocumented people, including Minnesota. And while the federal government pays for some of the cost of MinnesotaCare, it doesn't contribute any money for undocumented enrollees. Walz is expected to sign the bill into law.

After vowing ‘90 deals in 90 days,' the White House's rhetoric runs into reality
After vowing ‘90 deals in 90 days,' the White House's rhetoric runs into reality

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

After vowing ‘90 deals in 90 days,' the White House's rhetoric runs into reality

Donald Trump clearly wants the public to believe he recently struck a trade deal with China. The president did not actually reach such an agreement, but he's leaned into his fictional narrative with great enthusiasm lately. Last Thursday, for example, the Republican published an item to his social media platform, noting that he'd spoken to Chinese President Xi Jinping about 'the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, Trade Deal.' Soon after, during an Oval Office event, he again touted the same 'trade deal.' A day later, Trump posted a follow-up item, announcing the members of a delegation who would travel to London to meet with Chinese officials about 'the Trade Deal.' The bad news is that the 'trade deal' in question does not exist, no matter how many times the American president pretends otherwise. The good news is that administration officials will actually have some discussions with their Chinese counterparts. NBC News reported: Senior U.S. and Chinese officials will meet in London on Monday in an effort to de-escalate the bitter trade dispute between the world's two biggest economies that has roiled the global economy, with China's restrictions on critical minerals high on the agenda. About a month ago, Trump announced what he characterized as a 'deal' with China, but the closer one looked at the details, the more the truth came into focus. Georgetown University professor Abraham Newman wrote a great piece for MSNBC that explained, "While the U.S. did avoid a major economic calamity, this is not a deal. The U.S. blinked. ... Far from some diplomatic coup, the U.S. climb down reflects the economic risks of maintaining such high tariffs.' The editorial board of The Wall Street Journal came to the same conclusion, noting, '[T]he China deal is more surrender than Trump victory.' Complicating matters, while the White House and Beijing reached a tentative agreement that paused the two countries' tit-for-tat tariffs, both countries have since accused each other of violating the agreement. All of which brings to mind Peter Navarro, the White House's top trade adviser, who boasted in April, 'We're going to run 90 deals in 90 days.' Navarro added that such a plan 'is possible' in part because 'the boss is going to be the chief negotiator.' Roughly two months later, the grand total currently stands at zero. Generous observers might be inclined to give Trump credit for striking a deal with the U.K., but as The Washington Post's Dana Milbank summarized in his latest column, that deal is really more of a 'vaguely phrased framework with Britain that still hasn't been made public.' What's more, a new Politico report added that a month after the agreement was announced, the U.S.-U.K. duties 'remain in place' and 'there is still no clear timeline for when they'll lift.' Or to put it another way, two-thirds of the way into the '90 deals in 90 days' vow, the White House appears to be 90 deals short. Undeterred, Navarro returned to Fox Business late last week, where he was asked when the public should expect to see some breakthroughs. 'We will have deals,' Navarro said. 'It takes time. Usually, it takes months and years. In this administration, it's gonna take more like days.' On average, the typical timeframe for a U.S. trade deal is roughly 30 months. That didn't deter Navarro from pushing the '90 deals in 90 days' talking point in April, and it apparently didn't stop him from claiming again last week that Team Trump will produce amazing results in a matter of days. The White House's top trade adviser should be going out of his way right now to lower expectations after already having set an impossibly high bar. For reasons unknown, Navarro is doing the opposite, setting up the Trump administration for additional failure. This article was originally published on

Democrats have a dirty secret - they actually like some of the tax cuts in Trump's ‘big beautiful bill'
Democrats have a dirty secret - they actually like some of the tax cuts in Trump's ‘big beautiful bill'

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Democrats have a dirty secret - they actually like some of the tax cuts in Trump's ‘big beautiful bill'

Some of the sweeping tax cuts proposed in President Donald Trump's massive spending package have found support among Democrats — even as they are expected to oppose the legislation over proposed cuts to Medicaid and other government services when it comes up for debate in the Senate later this month, according to a new report. The gargantuan budget package, which House Republicans and the White House have dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, passed the House by a single vote last month and is now drawing heat from fiscal hawks in both chambers as well as Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who was fresh off his months-long stint as a special government employee when he began threatening to back challengers to any legislator who votes for the bill. Still, there are facets of the proposal that have appeal for some Democrats, the New York Times reports. Virginia Rep. Don Beyer, a Democrat who is also a wealthy car dealership owner, told the Times his party is 'in general very much in favor of reducing taxes on working people and the working poor' when asked about Trump's plan to end taxes on service workers' tips. 'Those people are living on tips,' he added. Trump's tip tax cut plan has also attracted attention from Sen. Jacky Rosen of Nevada, a state where service workers make up a large and powerful voting bloc that has traditionally supported Democrats but shifted to Trump in large numbers during the 2024 presidential election, handing him the Silver State's electoral votes. Rosen, a Democrat, took to the Senate floor last month to advance a bill approving Trump's 'no tax on tips' plan. It passed unanimously even though the measure was largely symbolic because the U.S. constitution requires tax laws to originate in the House 'I am not afraid to embrace a good idea, wherever it comes from,'. she said at the time in remarks on the Senate floor. Yet despite the support for some of the individual tax provisions in the plan, it's highly unlikely that it will be able to muster enough if any Democrats to ease the way to Trump's desk, even under a Senate procedure known as budget reconciliation, which fast-tracks some types of spending legislation without subjecting it to the upper chamber's de facto 60-vote threshold for passage. Democrats are expected to unanimously vote against the legislation in the upper chamber, where it has also attracted opposition from some Republicans who've complained that the cuts to spending in the package don't go far enough to offset the reduced revenue caused by provisions meant to enact Trump campaign promises to end taxes on tips for service workers, as well as taxes on overtime pay for hourly workers and on social security benefits for seniors. Nonpartisan experts such as those at the Congressional Budget Office have warned that the reduced tax receipts would blow a massive hole in the federal budget and jeopardize America's long-term fiscal outlook, but that hasn't stopped some prominent Democrats from getting behind the individuals tax cuts. Trump and his allies hope the prominent tax cut proposals will blunt Democrats' efforts to paint the One Big Beautiful Bill Act as a giveaway to wealthy GOP donors that will gut government services while only providing limited relief for working-class voters. To that end, the president and others in his camp have routinely taken to social media to argue that anyone who votes against the bill is effectively voting for tax increases because the legislation makes permanent a number of temporary tax cuts enacted in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which Trump signed into law during his first term. Democrats, meanwhile, remain opposed to the bill's massive cuts to Medicare and other measures that make it harder for people to claim tax credits meant to boost lower-income Americans' bottom lines. Rep. Brad Schneider, an Illnois Democrat, told the Times that the whole bill had to be considered rather than any individual provision or provisiosn. 'Any one thing — a tax credit or a tax cut — might make sense, but you've got to take a look at the whole picture,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store