Judge in Google antitrust trial presses DOJ on AI's role in future competition
The judge overseeing the landmark antitrust case against Google pressed Justice Department lawyers on whether potential search engine rivals will have room to grow amid the rise of artificial intelligence – a critical question as he considers the government's push to break up its illegal monopoly.
US District Judge Amit Mehta — who labeled Google a 'monopolist' in a separate trial that wrapped up last year — dug into the issue during closing arguments of the remedy phase in a Washington court on Friday.
'Do you think someone is going to come off the sidelines and build a new general search engine in light of what we are seeing?' Mehta asked, referring to the rise of AI-powered search tools offered by Google and others.
US District Judge Amit Mehta questioned what role AI would play in search engine competition.
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
DOJ lawyer David Dahlquist described so-called generative AI as the 'gateway to search,' while hammering home the agency's argument that any court-ordered remedies must address new and future technology, not just Google's past indiscretions.
'The reason we are so focused on Gen AI is because that is the new search access point,' Dahlquist said.
The DOJ has asked Mehta to force Google to sell off its Chrome web browser and ensure it cannot use its AI tools to further entrench its illegal monopoly over the industry – among other proposed fixes.
Mehta has said he will make a final decision by August.
Aside from a divestment of Chrome and AI-focused remedies, the DOJ has argued that Google should no longer be allowed to pay companies like Apple to ensure its search engine is set as the default option on most smartphones.
The feds also want to force Google to share search data with rivals. Their proposal also suggests requiring Google to sell off its Android operating system if initial remedies prove ineffective.
Google has pushed back, arguing the DOJ's proposals go far beyond the judge's initial ruling and would 'break these platforms.'
The company has gone as far as to suggest that a forced breakup would jeopardize US national security and allow China to beat the US in the race to build advanced AI.
Google faces a historic breakup of its search empire.
Thaspol – stock.adobe.com
Google also argued that it faces fierce competition from other AI-powered platforms, such as those offered by Sam Altman's OpenAI.
'DOJ's case ignores how intense competition has transformed the industry. Well-funded services like ChatGPT, Grok, DeepSeek, Perplexity and MetaAI are rapidly gaining users and distribution, and adding innovations at a breakneck pace,' Google vice president of regulatory affairs Lee-Anne Mulholland said in a blog post.
During closing arguments, Google attorney John Schmidtlein said the company has already addressed AI-related search concerns by no longer pursuing exclusivity deals with wireless carriers and smartphone makers, including Samsung.
Earlier in the remedy trial, an OpenAI executive said that the company would be interested in acquiring Chrome if it were up for sale. The executive also acknowledged that OpenAI would benefit if it had access to Google search data.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Individual investors account for 51% of Gibson Energy Inc.'s (TSE:GEI) ownership, while institutions account for 48%
Significant control over Gibson Energy by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions 45% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders Insiders have been buying lately AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. If you want to know who really controls Gibson Energy Inc. (TSE:GEI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 51% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn). And institutions on the other hand have a 48% ownership in the company. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Gibson Energy. View our latest analysis for Gibson Energy Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. We can see that Gibson Energy does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Gibson Energy's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. Gibson Energy is not owned by hedge funds. M&G Investment Management Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 17% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 5.1% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.0% by the third-largest shareholder. Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder. While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too. The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. Our information suggests that Gibson Energy Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around CA$14m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying. The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 51% stake in Gibson Energy, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio. I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Gibson Energy (of which 1 can't be ignored!) you should know about. But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's what Google Gemini will look like on your Android Auto dashboard
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Google Gemini is heading to Android Auto soon A new video shows how the integration will work The new AI will replace Google Assistant in cars Gemini is taking over from Google Assistant across all of Google's apps and devices, and Android Auto will be making the switch soon – as shown by a new demo video that gives us an idea of how the AI assistant is going to work on your car's dashboard. The video was captured at Google I/O 2025 and posted by 9to5Google, and you can see how Gemini slots in on the right-hand of the screen (or perhaps the left-hand, depending on the rules of the road in your country). If you've used Gemini on your phone, the interface will be familiar, with the glowing blue-ish ripples showing that Gemini is active. You're then free to ask whatever questions you have on the road, using natural language. You might want to see nearby gas stations for example, or have Gemini pull up the location of an event you're heading to from your Google Calendar. Anything you can do on your phone you can do through Gemini on Android Auto. One demo Google showed off was using Gemini to compile a list of ingredients for a particular meal in Google Keep, then asking for directions to the local grocery store to pick up the necessary supplies – all very impressive. Generally, it's much more flexible and more intelligent than Google Assistant. All of your in-car chats will be synced back to Gemini on the web and on your phone, so you can pick up where you left off on other devices and carry on the conversation. With Android Automotive (so the version built right into cars), the interface is a little more subtle, with a small pop-up bar showing Gemini. However, the exact look can vary depending on your vehicle and the dashboard screen configuration. It's not clear exactly when Gemini will show up on Android Auto, but Google has said it's coming soon, and we've seen numerous signs that it's on the way. Gemini is already the default AI assistant on new Android phones. Gemini 2.5 Flash promises to be your favorite AI chatbot A useful new Android Auto video feature has been spotted We've tried Google Pixel 9's new Gemini Astra upgrade
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stella-Jones Insiders Placed Bullish Bets Worth CA$1.07m
Usually, when one insider buys stock, it might not be a monumental event. But when multiple insiders are buying like they did in the case of Stella-Jones Inc. (TSE:SJ), that sends out a positive message to the company's shareholders. While insider transactions are not the most important thing when it comes to long-term investing, we would consider it foolish to ignore insider transactions altogether. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. Over the last year, we can see that the biggest insider sale was by the insider, James Manzi, for CA$464k worth of shares, at about CA$92.79 per share. We generally don't like to see insider selling, but the lower the sale price, the more it concerns us. It's of some comfort that this sale was conducted at a price well above the current share price, which is CA$77.59. So it may not shed much light on insider confidence at current levels. James Manzi was the only individual insider to sell shares in the last twelve months. Over the last year, we can see that insiders have bought 15.17k shares worth CA$1.1m. But insiders sold 11.00k shares worth CA$955k. Overall, Stella-Jones insiders were net buyers during the last year. You can see the insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last year depicted in the chart below. By clicking on the graph below, you can see the precise details of each insider transaction! See our latest analysis for Stella-Jones Stella-Jones is not the only stock insiders are buying. So take a peek at this free list of under-the-radar companies with insider buying. The last three months saw some Stella-Jones insider selling. insider James Manzi divested only CA$66k worth of shares in that time. It's not great to see insider selling, nor the lack of recent buyers. But the volume sold is so low that it really doesn't bother us. Another way to test the alignment between the leaders of a company and other shareholders is to look at how many shares they own. I reckon it's a good sign if insiders own a significant number of shares in the company. Insiders own 0.2% of Stella-Jones shares, worth about CA$7.2m, according to our data. Whilst better than nothing, we're not overly impressed by these holdings. An insider hasn't bought Stella-Jones stock in the last three months, but there was some selling. On the other hand, the insider transactions over the last year are encouraging. Still, insiders don't own a great deal of the stock. So we can't be sure that insiders are optimistic. In addition to knowing about insider transactions going on, it's beneficial to identify the risks facing Stella-Jones. For example, Stella-Jones has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is a bit unpleasant) we think you should know about. Of course Stella-Jones may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of high quality companies. For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
