Supreme Court Lets Trump Strip 500,000 Migrants of Legal Status
The Supreme Court let the Trump administration immediately strip the legal right to temporarily live and work in the US from as many as half a million people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela.
Over two dissents, the high court cleared the Department of Homeland Security to end so-called parole programs that gave migrants from those four countries temporary legal status. The justices put on hold a federal trial court order that had blocked the cancellation while litigation went forward.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
10 minutes ago
- Forbes
Elon Musk Doesn't Agree With Every Trump Administration Action
Elon Musk—a key adviser to President Donald Trump who left his formal role in the government Friday—said in an interview with CBS News earlier in the week he thought criticism of his Department of Government Efficiency was 'unfair' and said he doesn't want to 'take responsibility for everything this administration's doing.' President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference with Elon Musk on May 30, 2025 inside the ... More Oval Office at the White House in Washington. During an interview with CBS News, Musk initially shied away from questions about the impact of Trump's tariffs on his businesses before openly discussing DOGE and what he said were 'unfair' criticisms. 'If there was some cut, real or imagined, everyone would blame DOGE,' Musk told CBS News' David Pogue. He went on to discuss the administration more broadly, saying, 'it's not like I agree with everything the administration does … So it's like, I mean, I agree with much of what the administration does. But we have differences of opinion.' Musk said he doesn't want to 'take responsibility for everything this administration's doing,' but if he brought up his disagreements publicly it 'creates a bone of contention,' saying, 'I'm a little stuck in a bind.' On Tuesday, CBS News released a clip of the interview in which Musk criticized the 'big, beautiful bill' Trump has been advocating for in Congress. The clip showed Musk saying he was 'disappointed' about the bill, which he said 'increases the budget deficit, not just decreases it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing.' The comments quickly made headlines, and the following day Musk confirmed his official departure from the government. Musk endorsed Trump and became a megadonor after an assassination attempt on the president while he was campaigning in July, and Musk ended up giving more than $200 million to help Trump get elected. After he won a second term in November, Trump announced Musk would lead the Department of Government Efficiency, which the president said would 'slash excess regulations, cut wasteful expenditures, and restructure Federal Agencies.' Musk became a special government employee—which limited his service term to 130 days—when Trump was inaugurated, and he began the work of slashing the federal workforce and spending. DOGE's work—which included laying off hundreds of thousands of federal employees—drew bipartisan criticism and a number of legal challenges that are still playing out in court. Trump regularly praised Musk, though, and Friday when the pair were discussing Musk's government departure, Trump thanked Musk for the 'colossal change' DOGE spearheaded and said he thinks Musk will continue helping the government. 'I'll continue to be visiting here and be a friend and adviser' to Trump, Musk said Friday at a press conference with the president. $2 trillion. That's initially how much Musk said DOGE would save the government, though he later lowered the estimate to $1 trillion. DOGE's website claims it has so far saved the government an estimated $175 billion, though the website has frequently featured errors like counting contracts multiple times, using 'billions' when it meant to report 'millions,' and more, according to The New York Times. A reporter from CNN estimated last week that less than half of the $175 billion figure is supported with documentation on DOGE's sites. Trump privately questioned whether Musk and DOGE could follow through on the amount of cuts they said they would make, according to a report in The Wall Street Journal Saturday. Unnamed officials in the administration told the Journal Trump asked, 'was it all bullshit?' and wondered if Musk could actually cut $1 trillion in government spending. Forbes estimates Musk has a net worth of about $422.7 billion as of Sunday morning, making him the wealthiest person in the world. Trump Defends Spending Bill After Musk Says It 'Undermines' DOGE Cuts (Forbes) Elon Musk on DOGE and why he doesn't want to "take responsibility for everything the administration's doing" (CBS News) Trump Defends Spending Bill After Musk Says It 'Undermines' DOGE Cuts (Forbes) Trump Questioned Extent Of Musk's DOGE Cuts, Report Says (Forbes)
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Townhall with more than 100 attendees criticizes Senator Capito and Representative Moore
MORGANTOWN, (WBOY) — The Mountaineers Indivisible Citizen Action (MICA) held a town hall on Saturday where concerned citizens aired their grievances with the representation from Senator Shelley Moore Capito and Representative Riley Moore. MICA said of the event on Facebook that they invited Senator Capito and Representative Moore and described the event as a 'Town Hall with (or without) Our Representatives'. Senator Capito and Representative Moore were not at the event. Instead, over 100 people filed into First Presbyterian Church in Morgantown to present their questions, concerns, and anger at two pictures of the Senator and Representative on stage. The grievances of the attendees of the town hall included cuts to Medicaid and SNAP, the executive branch overstepping its power, the abuse of the rights of immigrants and what attendees generally saw as the failure of Senator Capito and Representative Moore to speak out against these actions. A number of speakers presented their views on the Trump Administration's actions over the last couple of months. Towards the beginning of the town hall, West Virginia University Professor of Law Allison Peck said that the administration is not respecting the balance of power outlined in the Constitution. Peck went on to use the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia as an example, saying that the Trump Administration is violating court orders to return Garcia and not respecting a congressional law passed in 1952 that Peck said Garcia had previously successfully invoked in immigration court. After Peck, social worker Danny Trejo, who said he works a lot with Latino families, spoke on the impact the last few months has had on the immigrant community in Morgantown. He said that after federal law-enforcement reach an immigrant, the family that remain face hard times. '[ICE] usually get the breadwinners,' Trejo said. 'A lot of the families I'm hearing of are having problems trying to make ends meet and trying to decide if they're going to stay here or if they're going to go back to Latin America, Mexico, or South America.' Trejo went on to say that he is trying to organize donations for these families. Trump tells US steelworkers he's going to double tariffs on foreign steel to 50% Attendees were also invited to speak their thoughts and questions into a microphone. One woman asked why Senator Capito and Representative Moore were not standing up to President Trump, who she saw as breaking the law. A scientist lamented what he sees as the Trump Administration's attack on science and research. An elderly man decried that Medicare is at risk of losing significant funding under the Trump Administration. One man voiced his anger that a family member, who is a legal resident of the United States but is from Central America, is afraid to leave the house due to the Trump Administration's crackdown on immigration. One of the organizers of the event, Mindy Holcomb, said she was heartened by the display shown at town hall. 'It's heartwarming, really, because they are concerned about their neighbors. They are concerned about their family. And they don't want to see people go hungry and they don't wanna see people suffer and die or become seriously ill.' Holcomb went on to say that MICA has tried to meet with Senator Capito and Representative Moore with little success, and that MICA will continue to put pressure on Senator Capito and Representative Moore to try to get them to hear their voices. 'When people have stories like you've heard today, when they have suffering, only they can convey that,' Holcomb said. 'Having someone write down notes about what they're saying and convey that in theory to the congressman or the senator, that's not the same thing. That's not answering their questions. That's not hearing the pain that they are going through.' Holcomb ended the interview by saying, '[Senator Capito and Representative Moore] don't work for the Trump Administration. They work for us. We are their boss, and they owe us answers.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Justice Thomas Nears Historic Milestone, Eyes Longest-Serving Supreme Court Record
Justice Clarence Thomas marked a major milestone Thursday, tying the late Justice Joseph Story as the ninth-longest-serving Supreme Court justice in U.S. history. The tie comes after 12,273 days on the nation's highest Court. Thomas, 76, has long been a pivotal and often polarizing figure on the bench, and his tenure shows no signs of ending soon. Barring retirement or health complications, Thomas is on track to rise even higher on the longevity list, potentially becoming the longest-serving justice in history by August 2028 — just months before the next presidential election. If he serves another 20 days beyond Thursday, Thomas will surpass Chief Justice William Rehnquist for the eighth-longest tenure. Within months, he would eclipse judicial giants, including Chief Justice John Marshall and Justice Hugo Black, the Alabamian who currently holds the fifth-longest term with 12,448 days. Thomas's longevity on the Court comes at a time when health and age are increasingly relevant topics for the justices. While Thomas is the oldest current member, fellow septuagenarian Justice Sonia Sotomayor has also faced health challenges in recent years. Retirement rumors occasionally swirl, but Thomas has given no public indication of stepping down. Appointed by President George H.W. Bush and confirmed in 1991 after a bruising and historic confirmation battle, Thomas has become the Court's longest-serving current justice and its most senior voice. Known for his textualist approach and willingness to question decades of precedent, Thomas has played a central role in reshaping American constitutional law, particularly in areas like gun rights, affirmative action, and administrative law. For much of his early tenure, Thomas was known for his silence during oral arguments, often going years without asking a single question. But in recent years, he has become more vocal from the bench. His writings have drawn both fierce criticism and admiration, particularly his concurrences and dissents, which often lay the groundwork for future rulings. Thomas will match the service of Joseph Story, an influential early justice appointed by President James Madison in 1811 at the age of just 32 — the youngest justice in Supreme Court history. Story helped shape foundational doctrines in American law and was especially influential in the development of maritime and commercial law. His writings, including Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, remain widely studied by legal scholars. Story served until his death in 1845 after nearly 34 years on the bench. As Thomas continues toward breaking more longevity records, the political implications loom. Justices in the modern era typically avoid retiring in the months leading up to a presidential election, in part to prevent their seat from becoming a flashpoint. But if Thomas is still on the bench in late 2028 — and if the presidential race is closely contested — the possibility of his successor may become a major issue for both parties and the electorate. Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death in 2020, just weeks before the presidential election, led to a contentious and rapid confirmation of Justice Amy Coney Barrett. That episode highlighted how crucial Court appointments can be to the political process, especially when timing intersects with electoral cycles. Whether Thomas seeks to retire or remain on the bench, one thing is increasingly clear: his presence — and the legacy he leaves — will remain a major part of the Court's history and the country's political conversation for years to come.
