What we know about claims Biden's Department of Energy handed out $93B in loans in its final months
In May 2025, U.S. Secretary of Energy Christopher Wright repeatedly claimed that the administration of former U.S. President Joe Biden lent or committed $93 billion to companies through the Department of Energy's Loan Programs Office (LPO) in the final 76 days of the administration.
It was unclear where Wright got this figure. According to our investigation, the LPO lent or committed anywhere from $68 billion to $77 billion between Nov. 5, 2024, and Jan. 20, 2025. According to usaspending.gov, the LPO awarded up to 27 loans during this period — around half the 53 the office said it announced during the Biden-Harris administration.
Wright also claimed that, before Election Day in November 2024, the LPO had awarded loans worth $43 billion. We did not independently confirm this figure, though the LPO said on its website that it had "financed" a $43.9 billion portfolio by September 2024. This could be the number Wright was referring to.
In late May 2025, claims (archived) circulated online that the administration of former U.S. President Joe Biden gave out $93 billion in loans to businesses during its last 76 days.
One X user wrote:
This will make your blood boil.
Yesterday the Dept of Energy Secretary Chris Wright testified that in the 76-day period between the day Trump was elected and the day Biden left office, Biden's Dept of Energy handed out $93 BILLION in taxpayer dollars in the form of loans—including to businesses and individuals who had no clear business plan or concept.
For the record, this $93 billion—handed out in a mere 76 days—is over twice as much as the Dept of energy has handed out in the PREVIOUS FIFTEEN YEARS.
Absolutely appalling.
The claim also appeared on Facebook (archived), Instagram (archived), Threads (archived), Bluesky (archived), Reddit (archived) and TikTok (archived). Snopes users searched our site for information about the claim.
The claim circulated after U.S. Secretary of Energy Christopher Wright testified (archived) at the Senate Appropriations Committee on May 21, 2025. However, we found no evidence the Department of Energy's Loan Programs Office (LPO) — which is the office claims are referring to — approved loans worth exactly $93 billion between Nov. 5, 2024 and Jan. 20, 2025. The office awards or guarantees loans to companies to advance clean energy, advanced transportation and Tribal energy projects in the United States.
According to the LPO's public press releases, the office announced loan guarantees or conditional commitments worth around $68 billion during this period. According to usaspending.gov, an open data source of federal spending information, new loans issued by the LPO during that period totaled around $77 billion.
On Jan. 17, 2025, the LPO said in its 2024 year-in-review that it had announced "53 deals totaling approximately $107.57 billion" during the entire Biden-Harris administration from January 2021 to January 2025. Though none of these figures corresponded exactly to Wright's claim, according to usaspending.gov, the LPO awarded 27 of the 53 loans on or after Nov. 5, 2024, indicating a flurry of activity in the administration's final months.
We reached out to the Department of Energy to ask how it evidenced Wright's statement. We also reached out to Biden administration Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm and Jigar Shah, who was at the time the head of the LPO, to ask if they could confirm the figure. We await replies to our queries.
Wright first made the claim during an interview (archived) with Blaze Media's Glenn Beck. Wright has since repeated the claim in an appearance on Fox Business (archived) and while testifying at the Senate Appropriations Committee on May 21, 2025.
Wright said during the May 21 hearing while speaking about the LPO (time code 37:43, our emphasis):
Christopher Wright: The Loan Programs Office is a key tool. We do need to make sure we have funding available in the Loan Programs Office because, used judiciously, it's a way to leverage private capital to make things happen fast. If your equity investors behind that debt are the six hyperscalers in the United States, they're great credit, the American taxpayers are going to be paid back. Alternatively, in the last administration — the Loan Programs Office in its 15-year history lent $43 billion —
Sen. Katie Britt: Wow.
CW: — In the 76 days since Election Day to Inauguration Day of the new President, the previous administration lent or committed $93 billion — two and a half times the 15-year total —
KB: You're kidding, tell me, tell me that time frame again?
CW: — 76 days from Election Day when the B — Biden lost the presidential election to President Trump's inauguration, in 76 days —
KB: That is absolute insanity.
CW: — they lent or committed $93 billion. So, there is a reason I'm moving slow and I'm doing evaluations of projects, yes, there's a very big reason.
Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana repeated the claim to Wright later in that same hearing (starting around time code 1:38:25).
While we could not document loan or commitment announcements from the LPO between Nov. 5, 2024 and Jan. 20, 2025 totaling exactly $93 billion, our investigation did find that the office announced a flurry of new activity during this period.
During that period the office announced loan guarantees or conditional commitments to 23 new companies totaling $68,836,640,000, according to the LPO's own press releases.
The largest was a $15 billion loan guarantee to Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E)'s Project Polaris, a portfolio of projects to expand hydropower in the company's service area. A loan guarantee is a promise by a third party (not the borrower or lender) to repay a loan if the borrower is not able.
According to usaspending.gov, between Nov. 5, 2024, and Jan. 20, 2025, the Department of Energy awarded 27 loans with a combined face value (the amount either lent directly or guaranteed) of $77,150,255,215. This number was likely higher because the LPO might not have publicly announced all the loans or guarantees it made on its website.
Though the higher loan total from USAspending.gov was in the ballpark of Wright's $93 billion — about $16 billion short — neither figure matched exactly. We await a reply from the LPO about the discrepancy between publicly available data and Wright's statement.
According to the Biden-era LPO itself, the office announced "53 deals totaling approximately $107.57 billion" during the Biden-Harris administration. According to usaspending.gov, the office made 27 of these commitments in its last three months. Therefore, while it was not possible to exactly match Wright's $93 billion figure, data shows the Biden administration did commit to around half the loans or guarantees made through the LPO in its last three months.
Then-Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm declared the office "open for business" in 2021, after it, according to reports citing Granholm, had been dormant during the first Trump administration.
Outlets like Politico, Bloomberg and the Financial Times reported in late 2024 that companies were rushing to finalize loan deals with the LPO amid uncertainty about what then President-elect Donald Trump would do with the office once in power.
Alongside his claim about $93 billion in loans given out in the final months of the Biden administration, Wright also claimed that this was "two and a half times the 15-year total" of $43 billion that the office had lent previously.
The LPO did likely lend or commit more than $43 billion during its last three months — as listed above, our estimates range up to around $77 billion during this period.
The office's website said in May 2025 that by September 2024 the LPO had financed "a $43.9 billion portfolio of innovative clean energy projects and advanced technology vehicle manufacturing facilities across the United States." This could be the figure Wright was referring to, though it would account for 19 years of the LPO's lifetime, not 15, as Wright had said. President George W. Bush founded the office in 2005, so a 15-year lifetime would only count up to 2020.
It was unclear whether "financed" on the LPO's website meant obligated or disbursed — and equally unclear whether Wright was referring to either or both of these terms when he said the LPO "lent" $43 billion. The LPO's own annual portfolio status report for fiscal year 2023 (Page 10) showed that the office has consistently obligated more than it has disbursed. For example, in FY23, the office had obligated nearly $40 billion in its lifetime, but disbursed nearly $35 billion.
By the end of March 2025, the LPO said on its website it had disbursed $47.3 billion in loans.
Ultimately, while it was uncertain where Wright got his figures from, it was clear that the Biden administration finalized a large number of the loans and commitments it made through the LPO after Election Day in November 2024, and that the value of these loans and commitments likely exceeded the office's previous lifetime cumulative total.
It remains uncertain what will happen to the $46.95 billion worth of active conditional commitments the LPO made under the Biden-Harris administration as Wright and the Trump Department of Energy turn their attention to the office. Wright said during the May 21 Senate appropriations hearing (time code 01:40:26): "Senator, the one complication in there too is, mixed in there, are good companies doing good things honestly with credible plans." Wright agreed that he was trying to "sort the wheat from the chaff."
"That's our job and we're doing it," Wright said.
Accelerating Portfolio Growth. Department of Energy Loan Programs Office, https://www.energy.gov/lpo/articles/fy-2023-apsr-downloadable-pdf.
An Overview of DOE's Loan Programs Office. U.S. Department of Energy, June 2021, https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2021-06/LPO-All-Programs-Overview_FINAL_June-2021.pdf.
Brady, Jeff. "After Solyndra Loss, U.S. Energy Loan Program Turning A Profit." NPR, 13 Nov. 2014. NPR, https://www.npr.org/2014/11/13/363572151/after-solyndra-loss-u-s-energy-loan-program-turning-a-profit.
Chu, Amanda. "Joe Biden Rushes to Issue Cleantech Loans in Bid to Secure Legacy." Financial Times, 26 Dec. 2024, https://archive.ph/QcW5J#selection-1803.0-1803.10.
Daly, Matthew. "AP Interview: DOE Reviving Loan Program, Granholm Says." AP News, 4 Mar. 2021, https://apnews.com/article/jennifer-granholm-interviews-energy-loans-5ceef97a73fc04fe3cca75bf84e91327.
"December 2024 Monthly Application Activity Report." Energy.Gov, https://www.energy.gov/lpo/articles/december-2024-monthly-application-activity-report. Accessed 28 May 2025.
"DOE Announces $15 Billion Loan Guarantee to Pacific Gas & Electric Company to Expand Hydropower Generation, Battery Energy Storage, and Transmission." Energy.Gov, 17 Jan. 2025, https://www.energy.gov/lpo/articles/doe-announces-15-billion-loan-guarantee-pacific-gas-electric-company-expand-hydropower.
DOE Loan Programs Office: 2023 Updates, Overview and Key Insights | Insights | Holland & Knight. https://www.hklaw.com/en/insights/publications/2023/02/doe-loan-programs-office-2023-updates-overview-and-key-insights. Accessed 28 May 2025.
Energy for America's Future. https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/infocus/energy/#:~:text=Under%20the%20new%20authority%2C%20up%20to%20%2442.5%20billion%20has%20been%20made%20available%20for%20innovative%20technology%20loan%20guarantees%2C%20of%20which%20%2418.5%20billion%20in%20loan%20guarantees%20will%20support%20construction%20of%20new%20nuclear%20plants%20and%20reduce%20interest%20costs%20for%20building%20plants.%C2%A0. Accessed 28 May 2025.
Forbes Breaking News. "Energy Secretary Chris Wright Testifies Before The Senate Appropriations Committee." YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlckzxM9Y2Y&t=5903s. Accessed 28 May 2025.
Friedman, Lisa. "Billions in Clean Energy Loans Go Unused as Coronavirus Ravages Economy." New York Times, 30 Apr. 2025, https://archive.ph/oAgez.
@glennbeck. "Trump's Energy Dept. Just Discovered Biden Rushed out $93 BILLION in Green Energy Loans in the 3 Months before Trump." X, 8 May 2025, https://x.com/glennbeck/status/1920293826599792828.
"LPO Year in Review 2024." Energy.Gov, 21 Jan. 2025, https://www.energy.gov/lpo/articles/lpo-year-review-2024.
Natter, Ari, and David R. Baker. "With Trump Looming, Biden's Green Bank Moves to Close Billions in Deals." Bloomberg, 13 Dec. 2024.
"November 2024 Monthly Application Activity Report." Energy.Gov, https://www.energy.gov/lpo/articles/november-2024-monthly-application-activity-report. Accessed 28 May 2025.
"October 2024 Monthly Application Activity Report." Energy.Gov, https://www.energy.gov/lpo/articles/october-2024-monthly-application-activity-report. Accessed 28 May 2025.
@SecGranholm. "The @Energy Department's Loan Programs Office Is Back in Business! ." X, 3 Mar. 2021, https://x.com/SecGranholm/status/1367234806904406024.
@SecretaryWright. "The Biden Administration Pushed out $93 BILLION in Green Energy Loans in the 3 Months before @POTUS Came into Office." X, 10 May 2025, https://x.com/SecretaryWright/status/1921229075479252995.
Storrow, Benjamin, et al. "Biden Inks Billion-Dollar Climate Deals to Foil Trump Rollbacks." POLITICO, 20 Nov. 2025, https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/20/biden-climate-trump-rollbacks-00190719.
USAspending.Gov. https://www.usaspending.gov/search?hash=0e83d66947534d463f14b3093bab5c03. Accessed 28 May 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
15 minutes ago
- Forbes
Fusion Energy Is The Key To World Hegemony
What would it take for the United States to lose its hegemony to a rising power like China? Right now, America appears to be ahead economically and militarily. However, there is a stark difference between America's national strategy (insofar as one exists) and China's. The US under President Trump calls for regression. It seeks to restore a manufacturing economy that peaked in the 1950s—like an elderly man trying to restore hair where it hasn't grown for decades. It is doubling down on domestic oil, gas and coal. Through tariffs, disparagement of NATO and aggression towards allies like Canada and Denmark, the administration has alienated partners that long supported a US-led world order. Fusion will be a key element to become an energy superpower. (Wal van Lierop) China, meanwhile, has a tremendous lead in developing the economy of the future. It has a near monopoly on rare earth minerals, which are needed for electronics, renewable energy systems, defense technologies and more. China leads in solar, wind and batteries, the energy systems growing at the fastest rate. It is ahead in electric vehicles, industrial robotics and drones as well. It probably has achieved parity in artificial intelligence and may surpass the US soon. If China were to take Taiwan, it would control the global market for advanced chip manufacturing. In the background, but probably most importantly, China may be on track to commercialize fusion energy before the US or its disgruntled allies. Unlike the US, China has no domestic energy industry with vocal lobbyists (and purchasable politicians) to slow progress. It is funding fusion as a national strategy while private fusion companies in the West are at the mercy of investors that, for the most part, chase low risk and quick returns. Fusion promises cheap, plentiful, baseload energy without carbon emissions. AI, data centers and industrial robotics powered by fusion would produce goods and services at much lower costs than value chains dependent on fossil-fired electricity. Militaries built on swarms of small, cheap, electronic drones and robots—powered by small, distributed fusion facilities deep underground, safe from attack—would have an edge over competitors using large, expensive, petroleum-powered vehicles with vulnerable supply chains. I cannot overstate the ramifications of China developing fusion first. As an analogy, imagine if Japan and Germany had uncovered vast reserves of oil at home in the 1920s. American and Soviet oil gave the Allies a strategic advantage over the Axis powers. Had the situation been reversed, World War II could have ended differently. While private fusion companies in the West have raised about $8 billion total, China is investing at least $1.5 annually into fusion projects—double what the US government spends. Japanese and German investments in fusion don't even come close. Canada, for the record, has no fusion funding strategy. Moreover, the government of British Columbia, home of industry leader General Fusion, seems not to understand the value of this crown asset.* On all fronts nuclear, China is leaping ahead. In April, its scientists added fresh fuel to an operational thorium molten salt reactor—a first. The thorium reserves found in Inner Mongolia, an autonomous region of China, could theoretically meet Chinese energy demand for thousands of years. The kicker: this reactor design originated in the US. As project lead Xu Hongjie put it, 'The US left its research publicly available, waiting for the right successor. We were that successor." Moreover, in January, China's Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) sustained a fusion reaction for 1,066 seconds, setting a new record. Its Burning Plasma Experimental Superconducting Tokamak (BEST) fusion reactor could come online by 2027 and is expected to produce five times the amount of energy it consumes. When BEST announces this milestone, Western fusion companies may be announcing that they've run out of funding. To China, fusion is not a startup project—it's a matter of national interest and security. Its scientists are patenting more fusion-related technologies than any other single country and graduating more doctorates in fusion-related fields. And because China is the top refiner and exporter of the critical minerals needed in fusion reactors (e.g., for magnets), no external force is going to slow their progress. In the meantime, China has a cheap gas station next door—Russia—supplying all the fossil fuels China could need in exchange for support in its war with Ukraine. That support includes critical minerals needed by Russian arms manufacturers. Is fusion energy, along with other Chinese-dominated technologies, enough to end US hegemony? In 1988, historian Paul Kennedy published The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, a book that tried to explain the relative success (and failure) of powerful states. According to Kennedy, their rise and fall '…shows a very significant correlation over the longer term between productive and revenue-raising capacities on the one hand and military strength on the other.' Essentially, states must balance economic prosperity with strategy. Technological breakthroughs are vital to both. Innovation creates wealth, which enables the state to invest in defense and win wars. While underinvestment in defense leaves the state vulnerable to other powers, overextension and overspending on defense can run an economy into the ground, leaving it unable to sustain a strong military. Now, picture a great power—China—with a military to rival the US and fusion reactors that provide virtually unlimited energy. Imagine the clout China would have in establishing ports, military bases and consumer markets around the world if it could license that fusion technology. A China that exceeds the US in energy, industry, intelligence, mobility and defense is positioned to usurp it. Of course, China could bungle its advantage. Authoritarian regimes have a habit of mismanaging internal dissent, falsifying reality and making preventable mistakes. The rise of China is inevitable, but the self-inflicted decline of the US and its allies isn't. Rather, it's a choice reflecting how societies invest their resources and envision their future. *Disclosure: The author is an investor in General Fusion and sits on its board of directors.
Bloomberg
24 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Bloomberg Intelligence: Trump Says Xi Call Yielded Rare Earths Progress, More Talks
Watch Alix and Paul LIVE every day on YouTube: Bloomberg Intelligence hosted by Paul Sweeney and Alix Steel Tyler Kendall, Bloomberg Television Washington Correspondent discusses US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping agreeing to further trade talks and clearing up disputes surrounding rare earth exports. Michael McKee, Bloomberg International Economics and Policy Correspondent, on U.S eco data. There was a Dovish shift in Fed-dated OIS seen in the aftermath of weekly jobless claims data, with markets now pricing in the first full quarter-point rate cut by the September policy meeting from October. Nathan Dean, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Policy Analyst, discusses political news stories of the day. Donald Trump and Republican senators discussed scaling back the $40,000 state and local tax deduction cap in the House version of the president's tax-cut bill. Michael Polsky, Founder and CEO of Invenergy, joins to discuss the fate of solar and wind in the U.S, and energy tax credits.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Open seat in northern Atlanta suburbs draws crowded field for special Georgia Senate election
Five candidates for Georgia state Senate District 21 participated in a candidate forum. From left, Lance Calvert, Stephanie Donegan, Brice Futch, Steve West and Brian Will. Ross Williams/Georgia Recorder. Georgia's state Senate will have a new face when lawmakers return to work next year, and seven people are vying to be the one posing for photos under the Gold Dome when the dust settles. The spot opened in this off-year election after Alpharetta Republican Sen. Brandon Beach stepped down following his appointment to serve as U.S. Treasurer under President Donald Trump. Election Day is scheduled for Aug. 26. Senate District 21 includes much of Cherokee County and some of north Fulton County. With seven candidates on the ballot, it's likely that none will win an outright majority, and the most probable outcome is a runoff between the top two vote getters regardless of their party. The runoff is planned for Sept. 23. Beach has been a stalwart ally to Trump – he was a leader in backing the false idea that the 2020 election was rigged and in pushing back against Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis' criminal case against Trump – and his former district rewarded him for his devotion. Beach, who had served in the Senate since 2013, won just over 70% of the vote against his Democratic opponents in 2024 and 2018, the only times he faced a challenge from the other party. In 2024, Beach slightly outperformed Trump in the district, earning 81,481 votes, good for just over 70%, compared with Trump's 78,544, or about 66.5%, according to data from the Georgia Secretary of State's office analyzed by the Georgia Recorder. So it's no surprise that six of the seven Senate hopefuls are running as Republicans. Five of them came to Canton Monday for a forum hosted by the conservative Americans for Prosperity and answered questions about their commitment to principles like smaller government and lower taxes. Policy-wise, there was not a whole lot of space between the candidates at the forum. Each said they support legislation expanding school vouchers, reducing or eliminating the state income tax and reducing government regulations – though the candidates did express some disagreement on accomplishing those goals. Lance Calvert is the founder and owner of a Canton-based maintenance and repair business for retail and restaurants who says he wants to help repair the country. 'God's going to fix this country, but he's got some people that he needs to participate with him. Trump got this thing started, whether he knew or not to begin with. But there's a lot of people who've been called forward, and they're going to answer the call, we're gonna do this. We're going to turn this country around.' While some candidates proposed a gradual approach to reducing the state income tax, suggesting a state equivalent to Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, Calvert advocated for a quick and direct approach. 'Eliminate it. We've got the money,' he said. Income taxes account for about half of state funds, according to the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute, with sales taxes making up the second largest revenue source at about a quarter. Stephanie Donegan, an entrepreneur and business strategist, said she's seen the effects of rising prices for things like health insurance and will support conservative fiscal policies she says will help people keep more of their income. 'I love Georgia, I love the people of Georgia, and what I've been seeing is that what the people in Georgia have been asking for and need, we have not been getting. I truly believe I am that person who can do it. I can clearly sit up here among a group of amazing men, but men nonetheless, and still have a voice,' she said.' Responding to a question about outreach to Latino voters, Donegan, who is Black, said Republicans have not done enough to reach minority voters. 'If we're not careful, we're going to become a blue state,' she said. 'We are purple. We have a lot of people moving in here from blue states, from Philadelphia, New York, California, and if we don't get people to understand that they have a place in this party and why they should vote for these conservative values, we're going to lose this state, and that's going to be a shame.' Brice Futch, a Cherokee County firefighter, said he'll push for expansive conservative policies, including replacing the state income tax with a consumption tax on goods and services purchased as well as expanding Georgia's school voucher program. 'I believe the next step is ESAs, education savings accounts,' he said. 'With that, the full amount of money that is given to the student over the life of the student would be loaded on a debit card. Parents would take their debit card and go to the education institution of their choice. If they decided they want to homeschool, they could also use that for homeschool curriculum as well. I also think it needs to apply to local funding and not just state funding.' Georgia's current school voucher program is available to students in low performing schools and provides funds based on the state's share of the cost to educate that student, with the local share of the money staying in the local district. Though Monday's discussion centered on economic policies, Futch also pledged to be a strong voice on cultural issues. 'I believe you have to look at broader moral values,' he said. 'If you want somebody that's going to stand up and introduce legislation to outlaw puberty blockers in 2026, I'm your guy.' A ban on the drugs that doctors prescribe to some transgender youths to delay the onset of puberty has been proposed but hasn't passed. Georgia prohibits gender affirming surgeries and hormone treatments for transgender minors. Steve West, the CEO of a metal fabrication company, stepped down from a seat on the Cherokee County Board of Commissioners to run for the seat. 'I want to run for the state Senate so I can go down to represent our district and cut taxes, bring business in, keep Georgia the best place to work, the best place to do business. You can tell I'm one that doesn't speak very well. But I love the county. I love District 21. I've been a life-long resident of this district.' West, who was first elected to the commission in 2014, said he may not be the slickest orator, but he says he has a record of serving the community and proposed ending the state film tax credit. 'I'm not the guy that wants to have his picture put in the paper every day. I want to be the one that goes down and fights for District 21 on the issues that we're talking about tonight,' he said. 'I want to go down and look at doing away with funding Hollywood and putting that money back into the income tax. Take away the income tax, quit funding Hollywood. Let's look at deregulation so we can get projects done.' Brian Will, an entrepreneur and author, resigned from a seat on the Alpharetta City Council to seek a place in the Senate. For a Republican candidate, Will took several unorthodox positions on popular conservative programs, including the school voucher program and eliminating the state income tax. In each case, Will supported the concept but found fault with how state leaders implemented them. He said he supports the voucher project but said not enough people can take advantage of it and fully funding it would be too expensive. He said eliminating the state income tax and instituting a consumption tax would harm low-income Georgians who spend a greater portion of what they earn. 'This is why we need Georgia DOGE. We've got to go find out where the money went, who got it, for what, and how much, and then start cutting what we're spending and come back and lowering the taxes.' Will also had different ideas on the bill sometimes billed as Georgia DOGE, the Red Tape Rollback Act supported by Lt. Gov. Burt Jones, which passed the Senate this year but stalled in the House. He argued the proposal would create more red tape. 'Simply put, we have 150,000 rules and regulations in the state of Georgia. We have 100 different agencies. Each agency is going to be required to go through every single one of those rules to determine if that rule costs more than $3 billion to implement over a five-year period. Now I've done math on this. I've done some research on it. It'll take us about four years to get through every single rule to figure out if it's a good rule that doesn't cost money. The problem now is that the clock starts again. We have to do this every four years.' One Republican candidate qualified with the Georgia Secretary of State's office to appear on the ballot but did not participate in Monday's forum. Jason Dickerson did not respond to a request for comment, but according to his qualifying documents, Dickerson is a Cherokee County investment manager. On his campaign website, he describes himself as 'A conservative Republican businessman – not a typical politician.' Attorney Debra Shigley is the sole Democrat in the race, who announced her candidacy last month. Members of her party are likely hoping that a crowded Republican field will split the conservative vote and put her into a runoff at a time when turnout could be low and Democrats are riled up to vote. In a phone call, Shigley said voters in the district are not happy with what they are seeing from the government and she's hoping to convince them she can help be a part of the solution. 'I know what it's like to be a hardworking Georgian raising a family and wanting to make sure that they have every opportunity in front of them. I have been raising my kids here in the district and I never thought I would get into this arena, but as a mom, as a lawyer, as a small business owner, I just felt I could not stay on the sidelines because what we're seeing here in our own community as well as in the state and even in our country is not going in the right direction, and something's got to change.' Reporter Maya Homan contributed to this report SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
