
Pac-Man Live: filching fruit and fleeing ghosts in human-sized video game
'There's no need to look so nervous,' says a beaming man in a radiant yellow suit, inside what is essentially a darkened warehouse.
Perhaps my game face is betraying my bewilderment. I'm only loosely familiar with the concept of Pac-Man, having played it a handful of times. There is something about being relentlessly pursued around an inescapable maze that I've always found quite stressful and I am fearing that the real-life experience will be that but on steroids.
Manchester's Pac-Man Live, which opened on Friday, is the latest in what is becoming a rapidly blossoming market for live experiences, following the success of immersive nostalgic exploits such as the Crystal Maze and life-size Monopoly.
A total of 45 years after Pac-Man launched, the game has chomped its way into our cultural hall of fame and there is no doubt the live version will be incredibly popular.
The game can accommodate up to eight players at a time – there are seven of us from the Guardian's Manchester office – and we're pitted against each other in a hyper-competitive high-energy arena with giddy lights and a barrage of sounds.
Our vibrant host introduces himself as Wakka Wakka Bob, a name I assume he wasn't born with. He says we can call him Bob.
We don what is perhaps best described as a digital tabard, with a yellow lit-up Pac-Man on the front, and we're handed an iPad to enter our names, which then appear on our backs.
Only one of us is imaginative enough to put in a nickname, 'Jess-Man', which prompts our host to jokingly ask in a mock-Geordie accent: 'Are you from Newcastle, like?'
'Yes I am actually,' comes the reply from the Guardian's social affairs correspondent, Jessica Murray.
Bob explains the rules, which are broadly the same as the traditional arcade game: each player aims to eat as many pellets as possible, collecting fruit and avoiding ghosts, which are projected on the ground.
He then gives a dizzying list of different types of fruit and explains the points values associated with them. I remember cherries are 100 points but after that I'm lost.
Strawberries are worth something, apples are worth more. The big one is something that looks like a grapefruit. And then there's a key and a bell? I soon realise I should probably have paid more attention to the details.
Each ghost has a name, says Bob, but I don't have the brain capacity to learn them. The only bit that sinks in about the ghosts is that the red one is the worst one. I make a mental note to avoid that specific one.
We stand in our spots in the maze. There's a dramatic countdown. And the game begins. Suddenly, I am no longer Robyn Vinter, the Guardian's north of England correspondent. I am a small yellow chomping machine. I am Pac-Man. Any loyalties to my colleagues are gone. It is me, alone in the maze, with a desperate hunger for fruit and a crippling terror of ghosts.
Gameplay comes in the form of short rounds, each a few minutes long. Rests are built in, with water available (and gratefully received).
The tabard buzzes constantly, I assume as a result of my many infractions, which include walking into the maze's walls, colliding with other players and, of course, being eaten by ghosts. Every time it does, I'm unable to score any points for a couple of seconds.
I work out fairly early on that the fruit mostly appears at the centre of the maze. But that is also where the ghosts are, and after a while, I can't help feeling I am particularly appetising to them. My cavalier, and frankly, reckless, gameplay puts me in constant contact, particularly with the red one.
Bob keeps telling us to pace ourselves – in theory it's walkable but we are sprinting. Time is somehow going both slower and faster. Before we know it, it's over and the final leaderboard is revealed.
'I ate so many ghosts,' says my colleague Hannah Al-Othman, uttering a sentence that does not make sense anywhere but here.
I am not ashamed of the sheen over my face. It is the pink, sweaty visage of a Pac-Man champion.
Pac-Man Live opens in Manchester on Friday 21 March, with tickets starting from £26 per person.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Rhyl Journal
42 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Diesel clothing advert banned for objectifying Katie Price
The ad, which appeared on the Guardian news website on March 26, included an image of Price wearing a bikini and holding a handbag in front of her chest. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received 13 complaints that the ad objectified and sexualised women and featured a model who appeared to be unhealthily thin. Diesel said the ad was part of a brand campaign called 'The Houseguests', which was designed to challenge stereotypes and support diversity and inclusion in the fashion industry by reflecting a wide range of body types. It believed the ad was compliant with the advertising rules but said it removed the ad from the Guardian website. The brand said Price was 46 years old and had a body type that was not usually included in high fashion campaigns, explaining that the average age for editorial models was between 16 and 23. Diesel believed the image was a 'celebration of Ms Price's sexuality and empowerment and was not objectifying, degrading or sexualising', and 'showed Ms Price clearly in control in an active and dynamic pose where she proudly showed off her body and the handbag'. Diesel added that Price was 'well-known for her exaggerated appearance and larger-than-life personality and her large lips and breasts formed part of her curated public image', and this 'exaggerated, eccentric and altered appearance' formed part of the creativity of the campaign. Finally, Diesel said although Price was slender, she had excellent muscle tone and was not unhealthily underweight. The Guardian said it received a complaint directly about the ad on April 4 and blocked it from appearing again because it did not consider it complied with their policies. Partly upholding the complaints, the ASA said the bikini only partially covered Price's breasts, and it considered the positioning of the handbag, in front of her stomach with the handle framing her chest, drew viewers' attention to, and emphasised, that part of her body. The ASA said: 'While we acknowledged that Ms Price was shown in a confident and self-assured pose and in control, we considered that because of the positioning of the handbag, which had the effect of emphasising and drawing attention to her breasts, the ad sexualised her in a way that objectified her. 'We therefore considered the ad was likely to cause serious offence, was irresponsible and breached the Code.' The ASA did not uphold complaints about Price appearing to be unhealthily thin, and concluded that the ad was not irresponsible on that basis. The watchdog ruled that the ad must not appear again, adding: 'We told Diesel to ensure their future ads were socially responsible and did not cause serious or widespread offence.' Diesel said: 'Diesel's latest Houseguests campaign continues its tradition of challenging norms and embracing individuality. A key image features model Katie Price, 46, showcasing a body type rarely seen in high fashion, proving that women of all shapes and ages deserve representation. The photo celebrates confidence and empowerment without objectification. 'Shared in over 100 countries, it has not received any regulatory complaints, highlighting Diesel's commitment to respectful, inclusive storytelling.'


Powys County Times
44 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Diesel clothing advert banned for objectifying Katie Price
An ad for clothing brand Diesel featuring the model Katie Price was irresponsible and likely to cause serious offence by objectifying and sexualising women, a watchdog has ruled. The ad, which appeared on the Guardian news website on March 26, included an image of Price wearing a bikini and holding a handbag in front of her chest. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received 13 complaints that the ad objectified and sexualised women and featured a model who appeared to be unhealthily thin. Diesel said the ad was part of a brand campaign called 'The Houseguests', which was designed to challenge stereotypes and support diversity and inclusion in the fashion industry by reflecting a wide range of body types. It believed the ad was compliant with the advertising rules but said it removed the ad from the Guardian website. The brand said Price was 46 years old and had a body type that was not usually included in high fashion campaigns, explaining that the average age for editorial models was between 16 and 23. Diesel believed the image was a 'celebration of Ms Price's sexuality and empowerment and was not objectifying, degrading or sexualising', and 'showed Ms Price clearly in control in an active and dynamic pose where she proudly showed off her body and the handbag'. Diesel added that Price was 'well-known for her exaggerated appearance and larger-than-life personality and her large lips and breasts formed part of her curated public image', and this 'exaggerated, eccentric and altered appearance' formed part of the creativity of the campaign. Finally, Diesel said although Price was slender, she had excellent muscle tone and was not unhealthily underweight. The Guardian said it received a complaint directly about the ad on April 4 and blocked it from appearing again because it did not consider it complied with their policies. Partly upholding the complaints, the ASA said the bikini only partially covered Price's breasts, and it considered the positioning of the handbag, in front of her stomach with the handle framing her chest, drew viewers' attention to, and emphasised, that part of her body. The ASA said: 'While we acknowledged that Ms Price was shown in a confident and self-assured pose and in control, we considered that because of the positioning of the handbag, which had the effect of emphasising and drawing attention to her breasts, the ad sexualised her in a way that objectified her. 'We therefore considered the ad was likely to cause serious offence, was irresponsible and breached the Code.' The ASA did not uphold complaints about Price appearing to be unhealthily thin, and concluded that the ad was not irresponsible on that basis. The watchdog ruled that the ad must not appear again, adding: 'We told Diesel to ensure their future ads were socially responsible and did not cause serious or widespread offence.' Diesel said: 'Diesel's latest Houseguests campaign continues its tradition of challenging norms and embracing individuality. A key image features model Katie Price, 46, showcasing a body type rarely seen in high fashion, proving that women of all shapes and ages deserve representation. The photo celebrates confidence and empowerment without objectification. 'Shared in over 100 countries, it has not received any regulatory complaints, highlighting Diesel's commitment to respectful, inclusive storytelling.'


Metro
10 hours ago
- Metro
Biggest ever Lottery win of £208,000,000 could be won tonight
The biggest lottery prize the UK has ever seen could be won today. Friday's National Lottery EuroMillions draw had no winners, meaning the £199million jackpot rolled over to Tuesday again. Today's jackpot is so large that a single ticket-holder would be wealthier than Dua Lipa, Adele and Spider-Man star Tom Holland. National Lottery says there will be 13 'guaranteed millionaires'. A whopping €250 million (£208million),. Andy Carter, senior winners' adviser at Allwyn, said: 'A win of this magnitude would create the biggest National Lottery winner this country has ever seen – making a single UK winner instantly richer than the likes of Dua Lipa and Harry Kane while also landing them at the number one spot on the National Lottery's biggest wins list. 'The EuroMillions jackpot is now capped, so any money that would have gone into increasing the jackpot now boosts prizes in the next winning prize tier, meaning that we could see multiple UK players banking huge prizes for matching just the five main numbers and one Lucky Star.' The largest win on Friday was a Briton becoming a millionaire after matching five main numbers and one Lucky Star, bagging £2.02million. No players won the £500,000 Thunderball jackpot by matching the five Thunderball numbers, 03, 14, 31, 32, 34, and the Thunderball number 06. Previous British winners include those who scooped £83,000,000 in January and the £65,000,000 jackpot in February. You enter five numbers and two Lucky Stars for each line you play, or you choose a Lucky Dip for five random numbers. Up to seven lines can be played on a single slip, costing £2.70 per line. You can choose which draws you play on – either or both Tuesday and Friday – as well as how many weeks for. Keep your ticket safe if you bought it at a retailer. There's space on the slip to jot down your name, address and signature, which prevents someone else from stealing it and claiming any cash you win. Tickets bought online are stored on your account. When the draw happens at 8.45pm tonight, you can either tune in online or visit the EuroMillions results page. The odds of scoring a prize in EuroMillions are 13 to one. They're this large because there are 13 prize tiers – the odds of winning the EuroMillions jackpot are 1 in 139,838,160, according to Euro-Millions. But winning the lottery isn't always what is cracked up to be. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Single lucky Lotto player scoops huge £4,000,000 jackpot MORE: Experts reveal how you could win Tuesday's £208,000,000 EuroMillions jackpot MORE: Euromillions results reveal huge £208,000,000 jackpot will rollover again to Tuesday