Legacy body ‘lacks powers of a public inquiry to examine Sean Brown murder'
The Irish Government is among those who have backed Mr Brown's family's long campaign for a public inquiry.
Earlier this month, the Court of Appeal in Belfast affirmed a previous court ruling, compelling the UK government to hold a public inquiry into his killing.
However, Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn has applied for a Supreme Court appeal on the judicial rulings.
Mr Brown, 61, the then chairman of Wolfe Tones GAA Club in the Co Londonderry town of Bellaghy, was ambushed, kidnapped and murdered by loyalist paramilitaries as he locked the gates of the club in May 1997.
No-one has ever been convicted of his killing.
Preliminary inquest proceedings last year heard that in excess of 25 people had been linked by intelligence to the murder, including several state agents.
It was also alleged in court that surveillance of a suspect in the murder was temporarily stopped on the evening of the killing, only to resume again the following morning.
In an interview earlier, Mr Brown's elderly widow Bridie, 87, said she does not know why her husband was killed, and reiterated her call for a public inquiry into his death to answer the questions her family has.
'I don't know why they chose Sean, I just do not know because he was the same with everybody,' she said during an interview on BBC's The GAA Social podcast.
'He treated everybody alike, he walked with both sides of the community.'
She also paid tribute to the turnout of thousands in Bellaghy last Friday evening to support her family's campaign for a public inquiry.
'It was emotional,' she said.
'Never in my wildest dreams had I thought about so big a turnout.'
Last month, Mr Benn said he is taking steps to ensure that the Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery (ICRIR) is capable of carrying out an independent and rigorous investigation into Mr Brown's murder.
During an appearance at the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee, ICRIR chief commissioner Sir Declan Morgan was pressed by SDLP leader Claire Hanna on the Brown case.
Sir Declan said if the case came to the ICRIR, his investigators would carry out a cold case review, a scoping exercise and would treat the case as a criminal investigation and gather all the evidence.
'But I agree that we could not do the next step which is subsequent to that, once the terms of reference have been set, and up to that point, we're definitely Article 2 compliant,' he told MPs at the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee.
'But the next bit is having identified what the issues are to then organise a hearing with proper representation by lawyers in relation to that, and also understanding that the sensitive information arrangements, in my view, need to be reviewed and the commission needs to be able to exercise proper challenge in relation to those.'
Speaking outside the meeting, Ms Hanna said the ICRIR in its current form 'cannot fully meet the needs of the family of Sean Brown'.
'Today's comments from Sir Declan Morgan are welcome and shine a light on where the ICRIR falls short,' she said.
'Any further delay to the resuming and restarting of inquests alongside the continued denial of a public inquiry to the Brown family is the British Government delaying truth and justice.
'The SDLP is committed to the delivery of legacy structures that families can buy into. Sir Declan's comments underline our key concerns about deficiencies relating to participation by families in proceedings and the continued existence of a veto on information by the Secretary of State.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
12 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Chris Brown's 'crazy tour budget' as he returns to the stage after UK arrest
Chris Brown has returned to the stage for the first time since his arrest in the UK as the singer entertained crowds at a concert in Amsterdam's Johan Cruyff Arena Chris Brown's fans reacted as the singer returned to the stage following his UK arrest last month. The singer was in Amsterdam to kick off his Breezy Bowl XX tour, which is celebrating 20 years of his career. Followers of the controversial star took to social media to share snippets from the Johan Cruyff Arena in Amsterdam which showed an impressive stage set up. Among his lavish designs was a huge human statue that toward over the surrounding, which the star is thought to have performed on. Uploading a clip to Twitter/X, one user wrote: "the budget for this chris brown tour is crazy, he's not playing about his 20 years of career," followed by a flame emoji. Another said: "Oh my GOD," as they showcased the set up in their own video. And a third added an image of the statue with the crowd looking up at the performer. His Amsterdam gig comes after he was arrested in the UK last month. His arrest came after he was accused of using a bottle to cause bodily harm to music producer Abe Diaw during a night out at London's Tape nightclub in Mayfair on February 19, 2023. On May 15 this year, Brown was arrested at the Lowry Hotel in Salford. He had recently jetted into nearby Manchester Airport to rehearse for his upcoming Breezy Bowl XX 20th anniversary tour. The singer has been charged with one count of grievous bodily harm. He was initially denied bail and is expected to appear in person at Southwark Crown Court next month. District Judge Joanna Hirst told the court that the charge was too serious to be dealt with at the magistrates ' court. However, the 36-year-old star was later granted bail following a court plea. He was ordered to pay a £5 million security fee to the court. The financial guarantee is to ensure a defendant returns to court and may be forfeited if they breach bail conditions. His lawyer, Grace Forbes, had argued that he was a public figure known worldwide as they pleaded for bail to be granted. As well as his Amsterdam performance, Brown is scheduled to perform in cities across the UK, including Manchester, Birmingham, Glasgow, London and Cardiff. Despite his arrest, Brown's bail conditions enable him to continue with his scheduled international tour this year, including in the UK later this month and July. Following his release on bail, the American singer took to Instagram to tell his 144million followers: "From the cage to the stage!!! Breezybowl." Brown's bold post was seemingly in reference to the fact his bail conditions allow him to honour his tour commitments and perform across Europe ahead of his court date next month.
Scotsman
a day ago
- Scotsman
Why Tories must stop agreeing with Farage and start attacking him to survive
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... On April 15, 2010, the UK held its first-ever televised general election debate, pitting Labour's Gordon Brown, the then Prime Minister, against David Cameron of the Conservatives, with Nick Clegg expected to do little more than make up the numbers. However, if that was the anticipated script, no one told Clegg, who spoke so persuasively that the catchphrase of the night was 'I agree with Nick' as both Cameron and Brown sought to side with him. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In a snap YouGov poll after the contest, 51 per cent declared the Liberal Democrat leader to be the winner, with Cameron on 29 and Brown on 19. While 'Cleggmania' proved short-lived, the clear lesson was that agreeing with a political opponent tends to benefit them. Delegates at the Conservative party conference in 2023 pose for a photograph with Nigel Farage (Picture: Oli Scarff) | AFP via Getty Images A political cataclysm looms Fifteen years later, and the Conservatives' current strategy to defeat Reform UK, by echoing its rhetoric, is backfiring even more badly. While the 2010 debate was a one-off event, the Tories have effectively been campaigning for Reform for years. In Thursday's Hamilton by-election, the Conservative candidate received just 1,621 votes, down from 6,332 at the last Scottish Parliament election, while Reform got 7,088, not far behind the winner, Labour's Davy Russell, and the SNP in second. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As the Scottish Tories prepare for their party conference this week, a major topic of discussion must be about finding ways to disagree with Reform, if they wish to survive what threatens to become a political event as cataclysmic as the collapse of the old Liberal party after the First World War. Farage is out to destroy the Tories, and they must be as determined and ruthless. There is much to go at. Many of Reform's policies are patently ridiculous and some are downright dangerous. Keir Starmer's claim that Farage would 'crash the economy' like Liz Truss was a good line, and the Conservatives need to find similarly resonant ways of highlighting the very real dangers of voting for Reform.
The National
a day ago
- The National
New Red Book reveals how distant Labour have become
Its cover is a photograph of the Upper Clyde Shipbuilders (UCS) 'work-in' of 1971-1972, led by Jimmy Reid. Five thousand copies of the book were printed by its publisher, Edinburgh University Students' Publications Board. Contributions were wide and varied from the likes of Jim Sillars, Robin Cook and Tom Nairn and 25 others – including no women. To say that Brown edited The Red Paper is a misnomer because he pretty much accepted all the contributions in their states of first draft. But when all is said and done, The Red Paper was the public political highpoint of post-war 'Scottish socialism', defined as social democracy through a form of labourism, meaning unions would deliver what they called 'socialism' through the parliamentary road – and not revolutionary road – and via the Labour Party. It was a time when, to mix metaphors, Brown was Red. READ MORE: 'Joy, celebration and warmth' of Palestinian art to be showcased at Edinburgh Fringe Such was the emphasis on socialism as social democracy in Scotland, it almost seemed to offer a version of 'socialism in one country'. And, though seldom read because of the tiny type, it was a book that 'lit up the murky Scottish political scene like a lightning-flash' according to Neal Ascherson in The Observer in 2000. This indicates the book had a profound psychological and political but not intellectual or practical impact. Brown introduced the chapters by saying: 'Scottish socialists cannot support a strategy for independence which postpones the meeting of urgent social and economic needs until the day after independence. But neither can they give unconditional support to maintaining the integrity of the United Kingdom – and all that that entails – without any guarantee of radical social change.' So, the argument was constitutional change via devolution could lead to social justice. For Labour in 1975, this was heretical because the Unionist Labour left was mesmerised by the party's pledge in its 1974 General Election manifestos to 'bring about a fundamental and irreversible shift in the balance of power and wealth in favour of working people and their families'. And Brown's perspective was not the 'devolution will kill nationalism stone dead' argument of right-wing Labour MP and Scottish Secretary George Robertson, 20 years later in 1995. At the time, Brown was more reflective and reasoned. With the SNP Westminster breakthrough in the October 1974 General Election with 11 seats, he did not regard nationalism as a cancer that needed to be cut out as many of his fellow Labour members did. He wrote: 'What this Red Paper seeks to do is to transcend that false and sterile antithesis which has been manufactured between the nationalism of the SNP and the anti-nationalism of the Unionist parties.' But, nonetheless, the attainment of social justice of the Blair-Brown 1997-2010 Labour governments and the Labour-LibDem coalition Scottish governments of 1999-2007 was not much in evidence. It certainly was not advanced by the Brown-initiated cross-party pledge of 'The Vow' promising further devolution on September 16 ,2014. Indeed, Brown not only junked his beliefs of using the state to ameliorate the outcomes of the market but then advocated using the state to make the market more efficient. Long gone were any ideas of workers' self-management and public ownership, including the oil industry. One of the organisers of a University of Aberdeen conference to assess The Red Paper in 2000 commented: 'It is surprising how many people have forgotten about it, including, perhaps, Gordon Brown himself. Unlike many of the other contributors to the Red Paper, he seems reluctant to recall the time when he advocated public ownership and community democracy.' Not everybody gave up on the ideas of this type of Scottish socialism, though. Within Scottish Labour, the Campaign for Socialism group was established in 1994 to fight against the removal of Clause IV on public ownership by Blair and Brown from Labour's constitution. The group has counted a handful of MPs in Scotland and MSPs among its members. READ MORE: Owen Jones: The UK media has ignored this hugely revealing scandal in Israel More significantly, those around the group worked with others on the left to produce a new version of The Red Paper on Scotland in 2005 for the 30th anniversary. This same formula was used by The Red Paper Collective to produce a further edition the year before the referendum in 2014 called Class, Nation And Socialism: The Red Paper On Scotland 2014. The Red Paper Collective was established in 2012. Now in 2025, we have a fourth iteration produced by it called Keep Left: Red Paper On Scotland 2025. Every Red Paper after the first has been more readable than the last. But the tide has gone out for its ideas: not in terms of their credibility or coherence but in terms of their traction inside Scottish Labour. This is the story of Thatcherism creating the creature that is 'New' Labour, in which Brown was a leading light. When asked in 2002 what her greatest achievement was, Thatcher replied: 'Tony Blair and New Labour. We forced our opponents to change their minds.' North and south of the Border, we are still living with that legacy. Professor Gregor Gall is a research associate at the University of Glasgow and editor of A New Scotland: Building An Equal, Fair And Sustainable Society (Pluto Press, 2022)
