Houma area homeless share stories as community looks for solutions
Gathered outside a low-rent housing shelter on the east side of Houma, 15 to 20 people get a free hot meal at 5 p.m.
'I'm homeless because my wife died next to me, and I lost my dad's house,' Daniel Howe, 33, said.
Howe was getting his meal at the Bunk House, 8424 E Main St., and said he's been homeless for five years. He recently moved under a bridge in Houma and said he spends most of the day walking around because there's nothing to do other than walk and sleep.
He was couch-surfing, but all the friends he was staying with moved away from Houma. According to Howe, there's nothing to help him because government programs require him to prove his identity, and he's having trouble with that.
'I've been trying to get it for the last year and a half but can't get it because they keep trying to tell me to prove I'm me,' he said. 'I've sent them my birth certificate… and it didn't work.'
Two meetings this year, one a community meeting and another a gathering of businesses, addressed Houma's homelessness. According to Homeless Services Coordinator Cassandra Adams of Start Corp., as of May 20, there were 48 homeless people in Houma. Many of them are in transitional housing, the Bunk House or other programs. Thirteen are living on the streets.
She said many other homeless people left after Hurricane Ida, helped by government housing programs.
'The majority of those people are older," she said. "We see a lot of elderly people that don't want to enter a nursing home or a group home. But they need the assistance.'
According to Adams, they cannot help someone who doesn't want to take part in their program. This could be due to any number of reasons, but the hardest to overcome is drug abuse.
'I would say it's probably 50/50, most of them have mental health situations,' she said.
Asked about the other 50%, she said, 'The other 50, I feel like it is probably co-occurring mental health and drug abuse.'
More: Houma's Freedom, Blackberry festivals
More: President Trump expresses strong opinions about House Speaker Mike Johnson of Shreveport
Each day her four outreach workers have case files on many of the homeless people, both those on the streets and in shelters. They meet with each person at least once a week, but some require extra visits. Workers often will give them rides to places like the Homeless Day Center, 420 Magnolia St., where the people can do their laundry, charge phones and watch some television.
Frank Sims, 62, said that's about all he does in a day, either watch television over there, walk the streets, or sleep. Sims is a resident of the Bunk House who identified himself as homeless. He pays $100 a week to stay there, which he pays with his Social Security. Sims was living with his brother in Houma when Hurricane Ida hit, and it took everything. Since then, he's been living at the Bunk House.
'I'm too old," he said. "I tried to go back to work when I was 55, and the woman said, 'No, we don't want nobody like you.''
According to Sims, a 20-year-old got the job instead of him. When the 20-year-old quit he said he felt vindicated.
'He quit them that same week, and that was a good feeling, you know,' Sims said.
Before he retired, Sims was a shipfitter with Quality Shipyards. He now has a fixed income, and because of inflation, he can't find a place that's within his budget, nor can he repair his car to expand his search. He said Start Corporation currently cannot help him either, because he can't switch from Medicare to Medicaid. He's in the process of switching it over, but it's a lot of phone calls. So for now, he's stuck.
'Money rules the world," he said. "If you ain't got it, you f-----. So you gotta take a little bit at a time, and that's what I'm doing.'
Many of the others who were getting a meal at the Bunk House had similar stories, but didn't want to give their names. Two said they weren't homeless at all but were, like Sims, retired and on a fixed income. The one hot meal a day helped with their bills. They were in their 80s, walked to the Bunk House together, got their meals, then sat in the shade under a tree socializing — one with a Colt 45 beer.
Their tree was cut down May 23.
Another man was in a recovery house. He chose to come to Houma to try to find a new start and is working on getting a Transportation Worker Identification Credential card, which is required to try to work offshore. He said the new location took him away from the influences he had back at home, and he's been in Houma for nearly a year. He didn't want to be named because he said it would hinder his fresh start.
Parish President Jason Bergeron said he attended the meetings of the concerned community members and the businesses. According to Bergeron, he is gathering mental health officials, volunteers, nonprofits, law enforcement, nuisance abatement and others, like Terrebonne Parish Coroner Dr. Patrick Walker, to look at what programs are available and try to address the gaps in those programs.
'When I look at what government's role in this is, it's to put people in a room,' Bergeron said. 'Because I feel like if we feel it's important, everyone else will feel like it's important.'
Bergeron said he thought whatever solutions were found for substance abuse and mental health problems also would help homeless people. And if the solution found took government action Bergeron said he would draft them and bring them before the Parish Council.
According to Bergeron, the unofficial group has met twice and includes representatives from Terrebonne General, Start Corp., Walker, the Brother's Keepers, the Oxford House and more. The members weren't the same in both meetings, but he intends to gather all of them together in the next month.
This article originally appeared on The Courier: Houma officials, community leaders seek to address homelessness

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Maryland must tackle interconnected land use, housing, transportation, economic challenges
Traffic on the Capital Beltway near the American Legion Bridge. Surveys show Marylanders want housing near jobs, but state policy doesn't always make that easy. (Photo by Dave Dildine/WTOP) Maryland is well-known for innovative state policies and reforms, including smart growth, but the state missed key opportunities this year to build on that legacy. While approving a half-billion-dollar package to close a major transportation funding gap, the legislature (primarily the Senate) failed to adopt bills that would ensure the funds shift the state in a new direction toward abundant and affordable housing and transportation choices. Maryland's land use, high housing costs, transportation challenges and economic doldrums are interconnected. They require new approaches, not just patching budget holes to fix. Homes are expensive in part because Maryland communities allow too little housing near transit, services and jobs. This contributes to sprawling, car-dependent development, further fueled by too much public spending on oversized roads and highways. The result is long commutes, more driving to reach stores and services, and higher transportation costs for families. The average new car in the U.S. costs almost $50,000, and last year 17% of American drivers said they had to take on a second job to help pay for their car. Instead of funding more of this status quo, Maryland needs to help families stay here, with affordable access to opportunity. Fostering walkable, vibrant activity centers with good transit and a range of housing types and prices near jobs will help current residents and also attract the next generation of skilled workers and industries. Maryland Matters welcomes guest commentary submissions at editor@ We suggest a 750-word limit and reserve the right to edit or reject submissions. We do not accept columns that are endorsements of candidates, and no longer accept submissions from elected officials or political candidates. Opinion pieces must be signed by at least one individual using their real name. We do not accept columns signed by an organization. Commentary writers must include a short bio and a photo for their bylines. Views of writers are their own. The House of Delegates passed several valuable smart growth bills: Transit-oriented development (House Bill 80) to remove obstacles to building housing and mixed-use development near rail stations; Transportation and Climate Alignment Act (House Bill 84), ensuring the state's transportation investments support its climate change goals while giving residents more travel options; Metro Funding Modification Act (House Bill 467), fixing dedicated state capital funding for the D.C.-area Metro system to account for inflation; and Gov. Wes Moore's Housing for Jobs Act (House Bill 503), which would have required the state's job centers to address housing needs, although it was watered down into largely a study bill. Unfortunately, the Maryland Senate did not advance any of these bills to a vote. The Senate, to its credit, did pass: Split-rate property tax enabling legislation (Senate Bill 472) that would allow local governments to create tax structures that capture the value of land near assets like rail stations while incentivizing new development, though the House did not pass it; and Accessory dwelling unit bill (House Bill 1466) that will require local governments to allow construction of a smaller independent home on a lot with a single-family detached house. The House concurred with the final bill and the governor signed it. We know that legislators had a lot on their plates, with a sizable budget gap and chaotic federal backdrop. However, most of the smart-growth bills that didn't pass would have cost little or nothing to government coffers – and would actually save the state money over time through reduced infrastructure and service costs. Realizing this vision provides interconnected benefits. For example: Smart growth has been key to attracting and retaining Fortune 500 firms like Marriott and Choice Hotels in transit-oriented locations. Maryland families on average would save over $3,000 per year in transportation costs if the state provided more opportunities for transit, walking, biking and accessible living. State-owned transit-oriented development sites could support 5,000 new housing units in the Baltimore region and 2,600 new housing units along the MARC Penn Line. These Penn Line sites could generate $800 million in new state and local revenue. Marylanders want these opportunities; 76% support more homes in job-rich areas. Before the next General Assembly session, the Moore administration can make progress: The Maryland Department of Transportation can adopt changes to its Chapter 30 project prioritization process to better maintain existing infrastructure, recognize good land use planning as a transportation solution, and ensure affordable and sustainable travel choices for residents. The Department of Housing and Community Development can provide further analysis on the state's housing shortage and the benefits of new homes in accessible locations. It could also work with local governments to improve land use review to reduce time and complexity, allowing more new homes to be built faster in transit-accessible locations. During the 2026 session, the General Assembly will have the opportunity to pass legacy-making legislation ahead of the elections. Gov. Moore, with the support of state senators and delegates, can help Marylanders address the everyday needs of housing and transportation in lasting ways, which also help the state's finances, climate resilience, and economic opportunity.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court gives DOGE access to millions of Americans' private Social Security data
The Brief The Supreme Court ruled DOGE can access personal data from the Social Security Administration. The case marks the first Supreme Court decision involving DOGE, once led by Elon Musk. The dissent warned the decision puts Americans' sensitive information at risk. WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Friday gave the green light for the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to access one of the country's most sensitive databases — the Social Security Administration's internal systems — which hold information on nearly every American. The 6–3 decision, split along ideological lines, marks the first major Supreme Court ruling involving DOGE, the controversial agency once led by Elon Musk. The Court's majority reversed a lower court's order that limited DOGE's access under federal privacy law, siding with the administration's argument that the restrictions were hampering its anti-fraud mission. Liberal justices dissented, warning the decision erodes vital privacy protections. The backstory The Department of Government Efficiency — or DOGE — was established during President Trump's second term and tasked with rooting out government waste and inefficiency. Its first director was Elon Musk, who called the Social Security program a "Ponzi scheme" and repeatedly targeted it as a key source of fraud. Although Musk has since stepped away from DOGE, the department has continued aggressive efforts to audit and investigate various federal programs. Social Security has remained a top priority. The administration argued that unfettered access to the SSA's internal systems was essential to detect abuse, duplication, and improper payouts — particularly in disability and survivor benefits. Dig deeper The case originated in Maryland, where U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander ruled that DOGE's demand for open access to Social Security data amounted to a "fishing expedition" based on limited evidence of wrongdoing. She blocked broad access but allowed DOGE staff with training and security clearance to view anonymized data, and permitted expanded access only if a specific need was documented. The Trump administration appealed, arguing the court was overstepping its role and interfering with executive branch operations. An appeals court upheld the partial block, but the Supreme Court has now lifted it entirely. Solicitor General John Sauer told the Court the restrictions "micromanaged" DOGE's work and undermined its mission. The other side Opponents of the ruling, including the plaintiffs represented by the advocacy group Democracy Forward, argue that the Social Security Administration contains deeply personal data: salary history, school records, family relationships, medical conditions, and more. They warned that handing this information to a politically driven agency without individualized review poses massive privacy risks. Labor unions and retiree groups joined the lawsuit, saying the system could be weaponized against vulnerable Americans. The dissenting justices agreed. "There is no meaningful check here on the breadth or use of the data," one wrote. "We risk turning privacy law into an empty promise." Why you should care This decision expands the Trump administration's ability to conduct sweeping audits across government agencies using personal data. While supporters frame it as a win for accountability and fraud reduction, critics say it weakens safeguards that prevent misuse of federal databases. It also sets a precedent for how much control the courts can — or cannot — exert over federal agency operations, a core issue as Trump's administration continues to consolidate executive power. What's next With the Supreme Court's backing, DOGE is expected to move quickly in analyzing Social Security data. Critics worry this could lead to mass denials of benefits or politically motivated reviews. Supporters say it could lead to cost-saving reforms. The agency, which has faced more than two dozen lawsuits, remains under scrutiny. Legal challenges are ongoing regarding its personnel decisions, data practices, and oversight authority. The Source This report is based on coverage from the Associated Press and court documents related to the Supreme Court decision in the DOGE v. Democracy Forward case. Additional background was gathered from statements by the U.S. Solicitor General, District Court Judge Ellen Hollander's original ruling, and legal filings from the plaintiff groups, including labor unions and the nonprofit Democracy Forward.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gov. Reynolds signs bill to extend cancer coverage for first responders
DES MOINES, Iowa — It's been years in the making, and now emergency responders will be getting more cancer benefits. House File 969 is a bill that has been trying to get passed to expand cancer coverage for firefighters, police officers, and emergency responders to cover all types of cancer, rather than just 14 types of cancer that are currently covered for disabilities and death benefits. The bill passed in the Senate 46-1 in April with a minor amendment, and then the final unanimous House vote got a standing ovation. Governor Kim Reynolds signed the bill Friday morning at the Shop Event Center, where many supporters gathered. This included many people who fought for this, and they had a reason behind it all. Three local firefighters recently passed away from cancer. 'Phillip Mike Broaderick, Brian Stoaks, and Malcolm Cortner were the main reason why we fought so hard for this,' the President of Des Moines Professional Firefighters Union, Joe Van Haalen said. 'We are part of a big family, and if you think we can't accomplish something, you're crazy. Because when we get together and take care of this, this is the stuff that we can do.' Exciting discovery brings historic Iowa 'birthing hospital' back to life, learn more during upcoming event 'Their selflessness is inspiring, and it deserves our greatest and deepest gratitude,' Reynolds said. 'This means thanking first responders for their service, but it also means ensuring that they receive the care that they deserve and the care that they've earned through years of selfless sacrifice.' A big reason this bill is becoming a law is the wives, families, and friends of those firefighters who passed. 'To be able to have this for the men and women that are serving at the end of their day, at the end of their battle and were able to they had every feeling, every option, every health care option accessible,' Sheena Cortner, who lost her firefighter husband to cancer, said. 'They were able to do everything they could in their own fight against cancer.' 'Moving forward to just know that no family is going to have to go through the mental anguish of that piece of the cancer battle,' widow Emily Broderick said. 'It is huge.' And no doubt, they helped finish the jobs that their husbands started. 'He would be beyond thrilled. He was able to help a little bit in the beginning with the fight, but as time went on and he got sicker, he was not able to,' Broderick said. 'But his message before he passed away was don't quit. And we didn't quit. And here we are.' 'He's so proud of us, of Local 4 Union Des Moines Fire Department,' Cortner added. 'He was really passionate about this, so I know that he is so happy that this day has finally come. This law will go into effect July 1st, 2025. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.