
Transgender people are about 1% of the US population. Yet they're a political lightning rod
On the campaign trail, Donald Trump used contentiousness around transgender people's access to sports and bathrooms to fire up conservative voters and sway undecideds. And in his first months back in office, Trump has pushed the issue further, erasing mention of transgender people on government websites and passports and trying to remove them from the military.
It's a contradiction of numbers that reveals a deep cultural divide: Transgender people make up less than 1% of the U.S. population, but they have become a major piece on the political chess board — particularly Trump's.
For transgender people and their allies — along with several judges who have ruled against Trump in response to legal challenges — it's a matter of civil rights for a small group. But many Americans believe those rights had grown too expansive.
The president's spotlight is giving Monday's Transgender Day of Visibility a different tenor this year.
'What he wants is to scare us into being invisible again,' said Rachel Crandall Crocker, the executive director of Transgender Michigan who organized the first Day of Visibility 16 years ago. 'We have to show him we won't go back.'
So why has this small population found itself with such an outsized role in American politics?
The focus on transgender people is part of a long-running campaign
Trump's actions reflect a constellation of beliefs that transgender people are dangerous, are men trying to get access to women's spaces or are pushed into gender changes that they will later regret.
The American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association and other major medical groups have said that gender-affirming treatments can be medically necessary and are supported by evidence.
Zein Murib, an associate professor of political science and women's, gender and sexuality studies at Fordham University, said there has been a decades-old effort 'to reinstate Christian nationalist principles as the law of the land' that increased its focus on transgender people after a 2015 U.S. Supreme Court ruling recognizing same-sex marriage nationwide. It took a few years, but some of the positions gained traction.
One factor: Proponents of the restrictions lean into broader questions of fairness and safety, which draw more public attention.
Sports bans and bathroom laws are linked to protecting spaces for women and girls, even as studies have found transgender women are far more likely to be victims of violence. Efforts to bar schools from encouraging gender transition are connected to protecting parental rights. And bans on gender-affirming care rely partly on the idea that people might later regret it, though studies have found that to be rare.
Since 2020, about half the states passed laws barring transgender people from sports competitions aligning with their gender and have banned or restricted gender-affirming medical care for minors. At least 14 have adopted laws restricting which bathrooms transgender people can use in certain buildings.
In February, Iowa became the first state to remove protections for transgender people from civil rights law.
It's not just political gamesmanship. 'I think that whether or not that's a politically viable strategy is second to the immediate impact that that is going to have on trans people," Fordham's Murib said.
Many voters think transgender rights have gone too far
More than half of voters in the 2024 election — 55% — said support for transgender rights in the United States has gone too far, according to AP VoteCast. About 2 in 10 said the level of support has been about right, and a similar share said support hasn't gone far enough.
Nevertheless, AP VoteCast also found voters were split on laws banning gender-affirming medical treatment, such as puberty blockers or hormone therapy, for minors. Just over half were opposed to these laws, while just under half were in favor.
Trump voters were overwhelmingly likely to say support for transgender rights has gone too far, while Kamala Harris' voters were more divided. About 4 in 10 Harris voters said support for transgender rights has not gone far enough, while 36% said it's been about right and about one-quarter said it's gone too far.
A survey this year from the Pew Research Center found Americans, including Democrats, have become more slightly more supportive of requiring transgender athletes to compete on teams that match their sex at birth and more supportive on bans on gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors since 2022. Most Democrats still oppose those kinds of measures, though.
Leor Sapir, a fellow at Manhattan Institute, a right-leaning think tank, says Trump's and Republicans ' positions have given them a political edge.
'They are putting their opponents, their Democratic opponents, in a very unfavorable position by having to decide between catering to their progressive, activist base or their median voter,' he said.
Not everyone agrees.
'People across the political spectrum agree that in fact, the major crises and major problems facing the United States right now is not the existence and civic participation of trans people,' said Olivia Hunt, director of federal policy for Advocates for Trans Equality.
And in the same election that saw Trump return to the presidency, Delaware voters elected Sarah McBride, the first transgender member of Congress.
The full political fallout remains to be seen
Paisley Currah, a political science professor at the City University of New York, said conservatives go after transgender people in part because they make up such a small portion of the population.
'Because it's so small, it's relatively unknown,' said Currah, who is transgender. 'And then Trump has kind of used trans to signify what's wrong with the left. You know: 'It's just too crazy. It's too woke.''
But Democratic politicians also know the population is relatively small, said Seth Masket, director of the Center on American Politics at the University of Denver, who is writing a book about the GOP.
'A lot of Democrats are not particularly fired up to defend this group,' Masket said, citing polling.
For Republicans, the overall support of transgender rights is evidence they are out of step with the times.
'The Democrat Party continues to find themselves on the wrong side of overwhelmingly popular issues, and it proves just how out of touch they are with Americans," National Republican Congressional Committee spokesperson Mike Marinella said.
Some of that message may be getting through. In early March, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, launched his new podcast by speaking out against allowing transgender women and girls competing in women's and girls sports.
And several other Democratic officials have said the party spends too much effort supporting transgender rights. Others, including U.S. Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, have said they oppose transgender athletes in girls and women's sports.
Jay Jones, the student government president at Howard University and a transgender woman, said her peers are largely accepting of transgender people.
'The Trump administration is trying to weaponize people of the trans experience … to help give an archenemy or a scapegoat,' she said. But 'I don't think that is going to be as successful as the strategy as he thinks that it will be.'
___
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Federal appeals court temporarily reverses decision on Trump's tariffs
A federal appeals court has ruled that President Trump's tariffs will remain in effect during the appeal process, temporarily reversing a lower court's decision. The decision applies to broad-based tariffs affecting most U.S. trading partners, as well as duties on imports from Canada, China, and Mexico. The court has not yet ruled on the legality of Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs, but will hear arguments on July 31. A lower court previously ruled that Trump had overstepped his authority, stating that the Constitution grants Congress the power to impose taxes and tariffs. The tariffs have created turbulence for global markets and American businesses, but the ruling does not impact tariffs implemented under separate legal frameworks, such as those on steel and aluminum.


The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
California governor says ‘democracy under assault'; ABC axes Q+A; and going back to the big screen
Good afternoon. The California governor, Gavin Newsom, said 'democracy is under assault' in a blistering evening address in which he accused the US president, Donald Trump, of 'pulling a military dragnet' across Los Angeles. As mass protests over Trump's immigration crackdown spread across the US, Newsom said Trump's decision to deploy the national guard without his support as governor was 'a brazen abuse of power' that has 'inflamed a combustible situation'. The mayor of Los Angeles, Karen Bass, has instituted a 8pm to 6am curfew in the city's downtown area, after the police department said it had carried out more than 300 arrests of protesters in the past two days. Follow all the latest developments in our US live blog. Meanwhile, the number of Australian journalists hit by law enforcement while covering the protests has climbed, with reporters for Nine, the ABC and the New York Times being hit with so-called 'less lethal' munitions. ABC confirms Q+A to be axed amid wider changes and scores of redundancies across broadcaster 'We won't give up': Kumanjayi White's family hold vigil demanding independent investigation Sydney Muslim cleric tells court Jewish people can't be offended by him calling them 'vile' as lectures were private Vulnerable Queenslanders might suffer more 'harassment' under expanded 'Jack's law' police powers, expert warns Fury over year 9 students in South Australia being asked to debate whether the tradwife movement is good for women Against the grain: as prices and temperatures rise, can Japan learn to love imported rice? Brisbane will be transformed into an outdoor gallery of brightly coloured inflatables and sculptures this September as part of Brisbane festival. Internationally renowned Australian duo Craig Redman and Karl Maier – AKA Craig & Karl – will create colourful, inflatable installations on three of the Queensland capital's central walking bridges and present a public art trail of sculptures, inflatable installations, projections and animations through the city. 'Sometimes, friends have to be clear with each other.' – Anthony Albanese The prime minister said 'Australia makes their own decisions' after being asked if he was concerned about the American response to his decision to sanction two extremist Israeli government ministers. The US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, said the travel bans and financial restrictions imposed by Australia, the UK, Canada, New Zealand and Norway 'do not advance' efforts toward a ceasefire in Gaza, while the shadow foreign affairs minister, Michaelia Cash, said the sanctioning of a key ally was a 'very serious development'. The Qantas group today announced the closure of Jetstar Asia, an offshoot of its low-cost carrier that flies 16 intra-Asia routes. The airline said it will redeploy 13 aircraft from those Asian routes to Australia and New Zealand, where about 100 jobs will be relocated. Sign up to Afternoon Update Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion 'I'm breaking free from watching TV on my laptop in bed. I'm going back to the big screen' 'I have screamed in unison with hundreds of people,' writes Caitlin Cassidy, 'and been moved by beautiful cinematography in a way that is so easy to miss on a small screen.' Today's starter word is: IRE. You have five goes to get the longest word including the starter word. Play Wordiply. Enjoying the Afternoon Update? Then you'll love our Morning Mail newsletter. Sign up here to start the day with a curated breakdown of the key stories you need to know, and complete your daily news roundup. And follow the latest in US politics by signing up for This Week in Trumpland. If you have a story tip or technical issue viewing this newsletter, please reply to this email. If you are a Guardian supporter and need assistance with regards to contributions and/or digital subscriptions, please email


The Guardian
38 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US and China ease trade war tensions by agreeing ‘framework' truce in London
Update: Date: 2025-06-11T06:23:08.000Z Title: Introduction: US and China agree to framework deal to restore trade war truce Content: Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets and the world economy. 'Jaw, jaw is better than war, war,' as Harold Macmillan once remarked. And after two days of talking in London, the US and China have managed to patch up their trade conflict truce. Just before midnight last night the two countries agreed a framework that, it is hoped, will ease tensions between the two economic superpowers. It will reinforce their initial agreement made in Geneva a month ago, once presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinping have approved it. Speaking at Lancaster House last night, US commerce scretary Howard Lutnick said the trade framework and implementation plan agreed with China in London should result in restrictions on rare earths and magents being resolved. That had been a key demand for the US side, worried that American companies were being starved of vital supplies. Lutnick told reporters the US negotiating team will take the framework back to Trump to get his approval, and then hope to implement it. Lutnick says they had to get the 'negativity out' first when it comes to the US-China trade relationship. 'It's been President Trump's fundamental goal to reduce the trade deficit and increase trade. So this was the first step that the framework by which we will then approach… China's vice commerce minister Li Chenggang described the talks as 'rational and candid', telling reporters: 'The two sides have, in principle, reached a framework for implementing the consensus reached by the two heads of state during the phone call on June 5th and the consensus reached at the Geneva meeting.' The talks, which began on Monday morning, took longer than expected – with the two sides sustained by deliveries from restaurant chain Ottolenghi, McDonald's, Burger King and KFC. Food update at the trade talks at Lancaster House— the Chinese delegation is bringing in McDonald's, Burger King and KFC. Investors are now waiting for details of the agreement, and confirmation that it will satisfy Xi and Trump. Traders are also anticipating the latest US inflation report, which may show that the trade war has driven up prices in the shops. Economists predict the US CPI index will have risen to 2.5%, from 2.3%. While in London, chancellor Rachel Reeves will deliver the government's spending review, outlining day-to-day departmental spending for the next three years. 12pm BST: US weekly mortgage applications data 12.30pm BST: Chancellor Rachel Reeves to deliver UK spending review 1.30pm BST: US inflation report for May