logo
Food charity moved on for Vivid Sydney says change will impact years of service at Martin Place

Food charity moved on for Vivid Sydney says change will impact years of service at Martin Place

A food charity for the homeless community and those in need says it will be forced to move from its years-long home due to the upcoming Vivid Sydney festival.
Alfresco Community Kitchen — which is based on Phillip Street near Martin Place in Sydney's CBD — was informed by the City of Sydney council via email on Monday that it wouldn't be able to serve at its usual location during the time of the festival.
The 2025 Vivid Sydney festival begins on Friday and is scheduled to operate until June 14.
It is the first time Vivid has included Martin Place in its programming since 2018, with a slate of events and lighting displays planned.
Carly Hall, an organiser with Alfresco Community Kitchen, said the email also included a map with a suggested alternative "blocks and blocks away".
The council later confirmed those locations included nearby Hyde Park, but Ms Hall said even a short move would be effectively impossible to communicate to those who rely on the soup kitchen with very little notice.
"With no way to get this information to our rough sleeping community, I don't know how they expect us to distribute this information that, 'Hey, as of tomorrow, we won't be serving where you usually get a meal. But hey, like blocks and blocks away there might be another option'," Ms Hall told 702 ABC Radio Sydney.
"While we could serve somewhere else, these are people who for years we've served at the same place at the same time, people without reliable communication.
Alfresco has been serving in Martin Place for more than four years.
Ms Hall said the group was planning a limited service to show up for those in need, but some of the city's suggested locations likely wouldn't be suitable as "thousands of people are going to be using them as a thoroughfare for Vivid".
"The community we service aren't going to want to be where tourists are," she added.
In a statement provided to the ABC, a City of Sydney spokesperson said that due to safety reasons, operators and vehicles not associated with Vivid would be turned away from Martin Place.
"It is a devastating reality, but declining the state government's request to host Vivid in Martin Place won't end the food security crisis," the spokesperson said.
Sydney Lord Mayor Clover Moore said the city approved the state government's request to use Martin Place in April.
"Rather than having known regular users of Martin Place show up and discover these barriers themselves, we tried to contact as many as possible," Cr Moore wrote on social media.
"For this charity, we suggested alternative nearby service delivery locations such as Hyde Park."
The lord mayor pointed to the City of Sydney's $1.5 million in annual spending on food relief and other support to address homelessness.
"The City works tirelessly to meet all its responsibilities — providing more food relief and homelessness support than any other council, and providing sites for community events like Vivid, which are also really important," Cr Moore wrote.
Acting CEO of Destination NSW, Karen Jones, told ABC Radio Sydney the agency has had approval for using Martin Place for Vivid since April, and that it was up to City of Sydney to engage with the community kitchens.
"We are absolutely open to continuing to work with the City of Sydney to come to a solution and to try and resolve the situation," Ms Jones told ABC Radio Sydney Breakfast.
"We recognise and we deeply respect the work of Alfresco Community Kitchen."
The NSW state government did not immediately reply to the ABC's request for comment on the matter.
Ms Hall said this was the first time her organisation — which budgets for between 150 and 200 meals per service — had been moved on due to Vivid and had usually operated as normal throughout the festivities.
The kitchen is on hand with dinner every Tuesday and every second Saturday.
"Everyone is just passing the buck," she said.
"It's just frustrating, deeply frustrating."
According to federal government data, there were 24,469 people in NSW who sought specialist homelessness services in July 2024, a monthly figure that has gradually crept upwards since 2017.
Food insecurity also remains a consistent issue in the state.
According to food charity Foodbank's data, 28 per cent of people in metropolitan NSW were considered food insecure in 2024.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Four rescued from Hoskyn Island after boat begins to sink
Four rescued from Hoskyn Island after boat begins to sink

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

Four rescued from Hoskyn Island after boat begins to sink

Four people have been rescued from a remote island on the southern Great Barrier Reef after their boat began to sink. The Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) said it detected a distress beacon from the recreational boat near Hoskyn Island about 4:30am on Sunday. The boat was about 55 kilometres north-east of 1770 in the Gladstone region. A spokesperson for Bundaberg's LifeFlight Rescue helicopter said three adults and a teenager had been out fishing on Saturday when they took shelter on the island because of poor weather. During the night, they discovered their boat was also taking in water. The group were flown to Lady Musgrave Island and then transferred back to the mainland by boat. The Queensland Ambulance Service said no-one was injured or required medical treatment. The AMSA said the event served as an important reminder of the importance of carrying distress beacons.

NSW Land and Environment Court rules on Battiato v Clifton tree dispute
NSW Land and Environment Court rules on Battiato v Clifton tree dispute

News.com.au

time6 hours ago

  • News.com.au

NSW Land and Environment Court rules on Battiato v Clifton tree dispute

A long-running tussle between neighbours over a pine tree and a crumbling retaining wall has finally ended, with a court ordering both parties to share costs for the fix-up. The brouhaha between Vince and Natalie Battiato of 20 Kanangra Ave and Faye Clifton of 22 Kanangra Ave in the coastal NSW town of Corlette escalated into a legal stoush because of the dilapidated wall that splits the two properties. The wall needed to be fixed and the neighbours could not agree on who should pay. The Battiatos contended that the roots of an old pine tree, which has since been removed, on Ms Clifton's property was the main contributor to the damage to the wall. But Ms Clifton shot back and argued the age of the wall was the central factor underpinning its dilapidation. In their application to the NSW Land and Environment Court, the Battiatos said Ms Clifton should remove all remaining trees on her property to facilitate the reconstruction of the wall and then pay for the fix-up. They also wanted her to bear all court costs. In her submission, Ms Clifton pushed for a 'just and fair outcome to a lengthy ongoing dispute', court documents show. She asked for costs to be shared between the parties for the reconstruction job. Acting Commissioner Peter Nichols AC, settling the dispute, visited the site and concluded age was the primary cause of the wall's dilapidation. But he added the tree had also likely caused some damage. 'The tree has been shown to have exacerbated damage to the section of the retaining wall, thus engaging the court's jurisdiction, however orders made for any compensation are a matter of discretion,' he said. 'Given the nature of the retaining wall, it appears that, in the main, the dilapidation was a function of the age and inappropriate design and construction materials of the retaining wall.' In his decision, handed down this week, Dr Nichols upheld the application from the Battiatos but only 'in part'. He ordered Ms Clifton to remove seven trees from her property, including tree stumps, trunks and roots 'with a diameter of greater than 100mm located within 200mm of the shared property boundary between 20 and 22 Kanangra Ave'. The trees are camellia, lemon and pine trees. But he ordered for the wall reconstruction costs to be split '50-50'. 'Within 365 days of the date of these orders the applicants (Battiatos) and respondent (Ms Clifton) are to arrange and pay for the design and construction of the replacement retaining wall, including obtaining all necessary approvals from Port Stephens Council … sharing the costs 50-50,' he said. The neighbours were ordered to swap quotes beforehand to find the cheapest option from 'suitably qualified and experienced building contractors'. Further, Dr Nichols ordered the parties to construct a new boundary fence on the top of the new retaining wall on the shared property boundary, splitting the costs 50-50. Legislation within the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours Act) from 2006 and the Dividing Fences Act from 1991 covered the dispute. Port Stephens Council sits north of Newcastle in NSW's Hunter Valley region.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store