
Jade Thirlwall's ‘f*** you JK Rowling' chant stems from cult-like trans belief… without women like JK she'd be nothing
POPSTAR Jade Thirlwall chanted: 'F*** you, misogyny. F*** you, JK Rowling' at the weekend.
While inciting blatant misogyny from the crowd by inviting them to pile on one woman, Jade seems unaware that there is a massive contradiction happening here.
4
The incident happened as the former Little Mix singer, now performing solo as JADE, was appearing at the LGBTQ+ music festival in London to mark the beginning of the holy month of Pride.
I find it absolutely shocking that a 32-year-old popstar would berate Rowling like this.
It is beyond baffling and unnerving to me that a woman would attack a feminist who is putting her neck out to help us all. These crowd-pleasing, posturing idiots are so misguided when they think of Rowling as the enemy.
I've been an active feminist for more than 40 years, campaigning against issues such as rape, domestic violence, the harms of prostitution and the murder of women.
I can tell you that Rowling has done more to support women who are victims of this horrendous abuse than anyone I can think of in all these decades.
Look at Rowling's track record.
When she bemoaned the fact that not one Rape Crisis service across the whole of Scotland advocated for women and girls only, welcoming men into their midst - even hiring a man as CEO in one instance - she put her money where her mouth was and set up Beira's Place in Edinburgh.
When a Leche League - the world's first breastfeeding charity, founded by mothers in 1956 - began to include men who claimed they could breastfeed babies, several trustees resigned and set up MoMa Breastfeeding, a women-only service to which Rowling donated a substantial sum of money.
As a lesbian, I am so grateful for her support when it comes to speaking out against the invasion of our precious spaces by perverted men claiming to be women.
Rowling's support for those of us encountering grotesque misogyny across the board has been invaluable in the fight.
Moment Jade Thirlwall is left speechless by savage The Assembly question
Jade has women like Rowling to thank for the fact she's on stage at all, because it is feminists such as Rowling who are beating down the paths for young women to be successful.
In fact, Rowling has contributed to the campaigns to keep women like Jade and her contemporaries safe, by speaking out against men's violence.
HORRIFIC IRONY
Women should be thanking Rowling… not inciting mass hate towards her from a stage.
There is a horrific irony that these young women are turning on their own and causing hatred to virtue signal about how lovely they are.
While Jade is making a pathetic attempt to please riled-up crowds, Rowling is offering to take three lucky raffle winners out to dinner, with all proceeds from the initiative going to Lumos, a charity that seeks to end poverty, family separation and a lack of accessible services for children with disabilities.
4
4
Encouraging a wound-up crowd to scream angry obscenities against another women – in particular one who has made such a positive difference to so many - is nothing short of Jade betraying her own sex.
Rowling's charitable work mainly focuses on supporting vulnerable children and women, in particular those who are most vulnerable to poverty, social deprivation or violence.
I would love to know what Jade has done for the good of humanity because it seems to me that she has no track record whatsoever in fighting for the rights of women or any other group of people prone to abuse.
Women should be thanking Rowling… not inciting mass hate towards her from a stage.
Julie Bindel
She, unsurprisingly, supports Stonewall though, and has donated a load of her old clothes to charity. But completely ignoring the world of good Rowling has done and continues to do is lazy and irresponsible.
The wilful misunderstanding - based on prejudice and a cult-like belief in transgender ideology - that Rowling is a hateful person harms all of us who are trying to protect women's rights.
It is the trans activists who spout hateful, violent rhetoric that has led to physical attacks on some women. Rowling is not 'transphobic' in the slightest.
Rather, she protects the rights of all women and girls by refusing to go along with the campaigns from extremists to allow rapists in women's prisons, and to allow sexual predators in female-only changing rooms.
ROWLING NOT ENEMY
With her privilege and public platform, Jade seems to think that she can throw away the rights that she enjoys as a woman but that she has not done nothing to contribute to.
Maybe Jade and her supporters should stop to think for a minute and realise that - without feminists - domestic violence wouldn't be a crime, rape in marriage would be legal and women wouldn't have the vote.
If they thought for a moment, these idiots would see that Rowling is not the enemy of women… but trans activists and their misguided 'allies' definitely are.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
Colin Campbell appeal 'straightforward', Court of Appeal told
The appeal of a former nurse who was convicted of murdering four elderly patients is a "straightforward" case, the Court of Appeal has Campbell, formerly known as Colin Norris, was found guilty in 2008 of killing four women by injecting them with insulin and was sentenced to life imprisonment. Doris Ludlam, 80, Bridget Bourke, 88, Irene Crookes, 79, and Ethel Hall, 86, were inpatients on orthopaedic wards where Campbell worked in Leeds in 2002 and developed unexplained the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which referred the case to the Court of Appeal four years ago, said prosecutors had relied on a "wholly circumstantial" case. Campbell, originally from Glasgow, was also found guilty of attempting to murder another inpatient, with his sentence carrying a minimum term of 30 the 13th day of the appeal hearing in London, judges heard closing submissions from Campbell's written submissions, Michael Mansfield KC said: "The appellant submits that this is a straightforward case in which this court must conclude that these convictions are unsafe."Campbell, who denied any wrongdoing and said he did nothing to cause hypoglycaemia, unsuccessfully appealed against his conviction in 2009 and applied to the CCRC in Curtis KC, representing the Crown Prosecution Service, told the court there were "certain matters to which we take exception" from the defence's closing submissions."There are a number of matters that I would seek to issue corrections on, things we firmly disagree with my learned friend on," he said. The appeal before Lady Justice Macur, Sir Stephen Irwin and Mr Justice Picken is due to conclude on Friday. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.


BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
Fresh plans for £40m Hull park-and-ride to be submitted
Revised plans for a £40m park-and-ride site north of Hull will be submitted "in the coming weeks", a developer has initial proposal for the scheme, at the Dunswell roundabout of the A1079 near Kingswood, was submitted to East Riding of Yorkshire Council (ERYC) by Ashcourt Group last it was withdrawn in March after concerns were raised about noise and light pollution, retail outlets and a bus Stathers, the head of external affairs at Ashcourt Group, said: "The team has taken on board concerns raised by residents and this scheme will lead to much reduced traffic congestion and pollution along Beverley Road into Hull." "We hope to have the revised plans ready for submission by mid-summer," he site, which is just outside the city boundary, is designated for a park-and-ride in ERYC's local plan. The initial proposal included space for 500 vehicles, a petrol station, car wash and drive-through residents lodged objections, saying they feared the development would "cause chaos" and be "unworkable". 'Ghastly' development In February, Hull City Council (HCC) wrote to ERYC to object to the inclusion of a bus depot, three drive-through restaurants and a petrol said that while it shared an "aspiration" for a park-and-ride, there were already restaurant facilities a separate letter of objection, three Hull city councillors, including the authority's leader Mike Ross, described the proposal as a "ghastly, oversized development".Ashcourt Group, a Hull-based construction company, said the fresh proposal would represent "one of the largest traffic management and infrastructure improvements to be undertaken in the region for decades" and would be "entirely funded" by private developer claimed it would provide "faster" transport links between Hull and Beverley and the two local hospitals, Hull Royal Infirmary and Castle Hill in Cottingham. 'Reduced congestion' The new proposal would still include food and retail spaces as Ashcourt said it believed there was "clear demand for such outlets in this area".Mr Stathers added: "Our proposal is very much about getting people out of cars and into energy efficient buses, reducing congestion and pollution."At the same time it will protect and enhance public transport services across many key areas of Hull and East Yorkshire."The BBC understands the updated proposal will be submitted to the council by the end of July. Listen to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.


Times
34 minutes ago
- Times
Keir Starmer attacks ‘staggering' SNP move to block £11m investment
Sir Keir Starmer has accused the SNP of choking off opportunities for young Scots by banning taxpayer support for munitions projects. The prime minister claimed it was 'staggering' that the nationalist government was 'blocking' an £11 million private investment from Rolls-Royce in the creation of a specialist welding centre on the basis that it could be used to support the building of Royal Navy submarines. John Swinney, the first minister, rejected accusations on Wednesday that he was indulging in 'student union' politics and insisted that the 'longstanding' position of the SNP — which is not to use public money to support the creation of weapons — would not change. It emerged at the weekend that a plan to create a state-of-the-art welding skills centre, part of a wider project aimed at reviving Scottish shipbuilding, faced being cancelled after Scottish Enterprise refused to provide a £2.5 million grant, branding the centre a 'munitions' project. The UK government said it would provide the funding instead, with Labour claiming the SNP's 'ill-informed dogma' was costing young people and the Scottish economy. At prime minister's questions, Starmer accused the SNP of 'blocking opportunities' for young people while also attacking cuts to college budgets in Scotland. An independent report last year found that real-terms funding for the sector had been cut by 17 per cent since 2021. 'At a time of global conflict, it is staggering that the SNP policy is to block an £11 million investment for a new national welding centre on the Clyde,' Starmer said. 'I was there earlier this week. I saw the huge potential for apprenticeships, for job opportunities and for young people. I support it, they block it. 'Despite the highest funding settlement in the history of devolution, they're cutting college budgets, they're blocking opportunities, they have no plan for Scotland's future.' SNP ministers have said their agencies have a longstanding policy that public money should not support 'the manufacture of munitions'. They have argued that the welding skills centre is ineligible for funding due to links with an attack submarine programme. However, the Scottish government-owned shipyard, Ferguson Marine, has taken on work supporting the construction of Royal Navy frigates. Meanwhile, Swinney has also faced criticism for turning down a briefing with the UK government about the defence review and instead going campaigning for the SNP in the Hamilton, Larkhall & Stonehouse by-election. 'We have a longstanding policy that we don't use public expenditure to support the manufacture of munitions, and that's been a policy position that has been well set out and well understood within parliament for many years,' Swinney said. 'As would be expected, it's been applied in this case in the proper fashion. We do not support the use of public expenditure to support the manufacture of munitions. It's a very clear and a distinctive position.' However, Stephen Kerr, a Scottish Tory MSP, claimed that the position could not be reconciled with the SNP 's claim to support the defence industry and causes such as providing more backing to Ukraine. 'This is not a serious policy,' Kerr said. 'It is posturing, bound up in the pacifistic ideology that requires ignoring the hard realities of an increasingly dangerous world.' Meanwhile, Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour leader, said Swinney's position on the issue was 'stupid and dangerous'. He told journalists: 'I think you should ask John Swinney, quite clearly, whether he wants to live in the real world or if he thinks he's a university student in the debating chamber. 'If he says there's no public money going towards munitions, are we going to Uber the missiles in? Are we going to Deliveroo the equipment if someone tries to attack us? 'It is completely and utterly incoherent, frankly stupid and dangerous, and it demonstrates why he's not fit to lead our country.'