Why We Made a Guide to Winning a Fight
Jun 16, 2025 6:00 AM Right now, everyone seems ready to throw down. More than ever, it's important to fight smart—and not give up until you land a decisive blow. Illustration: Shirley Chong
I don't think there's anything quite so satisfying as winning a fight—especially when you land that victory with a resounding and definitive punch to your opponent's gut.
In some instances, that's a literal victory. Just ask my third-grade playground nemesis; it's the one and only time I ever threw that kind of breathtaking slug, and yeah, she had it coming.
But much more often, that feeling comes during fights that transcend the physical. Especially right now, when it feels like there are more of them than ever. The American electorate wants to fight President Trump, or Congress, or one another; Tesla owners, and Tesla haters, want to fight Elon Musk; Elon Musk wants to fight the entire internet, including Trump himself. (Musk later apologized, which Trump said was 'nice.') On a more serious note, scores of people—from student activists to federal workers, from immigrants to the LGBTQ+ community—find themselves forced to fight deportation, government surveillance, and the drastic erosion of fundamental human rights. Just this past weekend millions of people took to the streets in hundreds of US cities to protest Trump's policies.
That latter battle is one for all of us to take on. It might be more possible to win than you think: Erica Chenoweth, from Harvard's Carr Center for Human Rights Policy, theorizes that modern-day nonviolent protests involving more than 3.5 percent of a given population have never failed to catalyze change. Physical protests can be effective, but remember that there are plenty of ways to deliver that metaphorical gut punch—to really, decisively, win a fight.
WIRED is here to help. In our latest package, we're exploring the myriad battles—both big and small, existential and elementary—playing out all around us, and how they can best be won. WIRED reporters are here to tell you the definitive story of the Tesla Takedown, and we're partnering with our colleagues at Them to walk you through the battle over the future of gender-affirming care. We're also chatting with the internet's most impressive shitposters to get their advice on out-trolling the trolls, and talking to a Hollywood stunt performer about the skills required to vanquish adversaries.
Finally, we've got all the guidance you could possibly need to fight the Big Fights in this moment, from locking down your digital security to protesting safely amid increasing—and increasingly dangerous—government surveillance.
So put on your big-person pants, shake off any lingering nerves, and remember: Whatever you're fighting for in this moment, don't stop until you land that victory blow. But please, not a physical one. WIRED doesn't condone violence, and I still feel kinda bad about that third grade thing.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
23 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Pentagon Pizza Index: The theory that surging pizza orders signal global crises
A different kind of pie chart is being used to predict global crises. A surge in takeout deliveries to the Pentagon has become a surprisingly accurate predictor of major geopolitical events, dubbed the 'Pentagon Pizza Index.' Tracking activity at local pizza joints in Arlington County, the X account Pentagon Pizza Report noted an uptick in Google Maps activity from four pizza places near the Pentagon on June 12. We, The Pizza, District Pizza Palace, Domino's, and Extreme Pizza all reportedly saw higher-than-usual order volumes around 7 p.m. ET. 'As of 6:59 p.m. ET nearly all pizza establishments nearby the Pentagon have experienced a HUGE surge in activity,' the X account posted. The timing? Just hours before news broke of Israel's major attack on Iran. The U.S. announced it was not involved in the attacks. 'We are not involved in strikes against Iran, and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement released by the White House on June 12. However, as the theory goes, the surge in traffic at local pizza joints close to government buildings may have signaled hungry military leadership hunkering down to monitor unfolding events. 'The kind of analytics we love,' read one comment on X. 'Google Maps research beats some spy agencies around the world,' another user reacted. The predictive power of pizza isn't a new theory. As Alex Selby-Boothroyd, The Economist 's head of data journalism, wrote on LinkedIn: 'The Pentagon Pizza Index has been a surprisingly reliable predictor of seismic global events—from coups to wars—since the 1980s.' During the Cold War, Soviet operatives reportedly monitored pizza delivery activity in Washington, believing a sudden uptick in late-night orders signaled military personnel working overtime. They even gave it a code name: 'Pizzint,' short for pizza intelligence. In January 1991, Frank Meeks, who then owned 43 Domino's outlets in the Washington area, told the Los Angeles Times: 'The news media doesn't always know when something big is going to happen because they're in bed, but [pizza] deliverers are out there at 2 in the morning.' He added that on the night of August 1, 1990, the CIA ordered a record number of pizzas in a single night—21 pies. A few hours later, Iraqi forces invaded Kuwait, marking the beginning of the Gulf War. As CNN's then-Pentagon correspondent Wolf Blitzer reportedly said in 1990: 'Bottom line for journalists: Always monitor the pizzas.' Of course, a correlation between pizza delivery and global crises is not a verified method of tracking world events. In a statement to Newsweek, the Pentagon dismissed the theory, noting they have plenty of pizza options inside the building, along with sushi, sandwiches, and donuts. They also disputed the timeline suggested by the Pentagon Pizza Report, saying it did 'not align with the events.'
Washington Post
23 minutes ago
- Washington Post
The ‘No Kings' protests were a glorious reminder of what America can be
Light drizzle didn't stop tens of thousands of Philadelphians from letting President Donald Trump know that the First Amendment is still alive. In a city notorious for unruly crowds at large sporting events, protesters were peaceful and law-abiding — as were the police. I saw a sea of American flags as well as signs protesting various Trump policies. Whether we were there to protest Trump's approach to immigration or Gaza, welfare for the rich, disregard for the Constitution or disdain for the underprivileged, we were united in the need for the First Amendment, which allows us to freely express our opinions, peacefully assemble and petition our government with our grievances.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump does not intend to sign joint G7 statement on Iran
President Donald Trump does not intend to sign a joint statement calling for de-escalation between Israel and Iran that had been drafted by G7 leaders in Canada, according to a person familiar with the matter, though officials preparing the document held out hope that he could eventually be convinced to add his name. The draft statement, which had been spearheaded by European officials at the summit, says Israel has a right to defend itself and that Iran cannot obtain a nuclear weapon. Trump's decision not to sign on to the statement set up an immediate divide with his counterparts as the summit was getting underway in the Canadian Rockies. Hours before the conference was set to convene, talks were ongoing among the G7 delegations about language in the draft statement. European officials, led by French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, were hoping to finalize a consensus among the leaders about the Middle East situation alongside the summit's host, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. But Trump, who has questioned the utility of multilateral organizations like the G7, intends for now to withhold his signature, preventing for now a show of resolve from the world's leading democracies. 'Under the strong leadership of President Trump, the United States is back to leading the effort to restore peace around the world. President Trump will continue to work towards ensuring Iran cannot obtain a nuclear weapon,' a White House official said in response to a question about Trump's plans when it came to the joint statement. A senior Canadian official said delegations representing the seven G7 leaders would continue to work on the language of the statement, and that European leaders in particular are still engaged in the hopes of reaching a consensus. 'This is not a done deal yet, this is something that will be discussed at the leader level. We expect that the bulk of that conversation will happen in the global security session this evening. It's too early to speculate on what will or will not come out of that conversation,' the senior Canadian official said. Trump told reporters Monday morning before the summit started that he believes Iran wishes to de-escalate its conflict with Israel as the skirmish between the two nations enters its fourth day. 'Yeah,' Trump told CNN when asked if he's seen any signals or messages from intermediaries that Iran wishes to de-escalate the conflict. 'They'd like to talk, but they should have done that before. I had 60 days, and they had 60 days, and on the 61st day, I said, 'We don't have a deal.' They have to make a deal, and it's painful for both parties, but I'd say Iran is not winning this war, and they should talk, and they should talk immediately, before it's too late,' he said as he met with Carney. Trump issued a two-month ultimatum this spring for Iran to strike a nuclear deal or face consequences. On Friday — day 61 — Israel launched unprecedented strikes on Iran, targeting its nuclear program and military leaders. The US president declined to say what, if anything, would prompt US military involvement in the conflict. 'I don't want to talk about that,' he said, remaining vague when pressed on what intelligence the US is providing Israel. Trump's counterparts at the G7 planned to press the US leader on his strategy for dealing with Israel and Iran, officials from multiple delegations said, as the spiraling Middle East conflict shadows the first day of the summit. It's not clear to European officials what makes Trump confident that talks can continue, given the scale and scope of Israel's attacks. Given US influence over Israel, Trump's fellow leaders want a clearer picture of how long the US intends to allow the conflict to continue, or whether Trump plans to apply pressure on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to de-escalate, the officials said. Already, a difference has emerged between Trump and Macron over a role for Russian President Vladimir Putin to play in mediating the conflict. After a phone call with Putin this weekend, Trump said Sunday he believed the Russian leader could act as a mediator. But Macron dismissed the idea during a visit to Greenland, saying Moscow's own violation of the UN Charter in Ukraine disqualified it from acting as a peace broker. The two men's differences over Putin were on full display Monday during Trump's first public appearance at the G7, where he criticized of the bloc for ejecting Russia eleven years ago. It was a combative opening to the president's outing in Canada, where he will meet with fellow leaders for the next two days on a wide range of subjects. 'Barack Obama and a person named Trudeau didn't want to have Russia in. And I would say that that was a mistake, because I think you wouldn't have a war right now if you had Russia in,' Trump said during his meeting with Carney. Russia was removed from the then-G8 after annexing Crimea in 2014. Justin Trudeau, whom Trump criticized repeatedly Monday for deciding to omit Russia, become prime minister a year later. 'They threw Russia out, which I claimed was a very big mistake, even though I wasn't in politics,' Trump said. He said not having Putin at the table 'makes life more complicated.' When later asked about Putin joining, he said, 'I'm not saying he should at this point, because too much water has gone over the dam.' CNN's DJ Judd and Paula Newton contributed to this story. This is story has been updated with additional developments.
