
Trump's three-word reaction to Musk's reduced DOGE role
Elon Musk has officially stepped down from his role in Donald Trump's administration bringing an end to one of politics' most unconventional partnerships. Musk, 53, joined the Trump administration four months ago to lead the newly created DOGE aimed at increasing governmental efficiency and productivity.
Backed by nearly $300 million in political spending to help re-elect Trump, Musk was granted sweeping authority to slash federal bureaucracy and reshape government operations. However, behind the scenes, their relationship was riddled with mistrust and miscommunication. 'Was it all bull[expletive]' Trump reportedly asked, expressing doubt over Musk's pledge to slash $1 trillion in government spending. At first, the relationship appeared strong. Trump regularly praised Musk, calling him '50 percent genius, 50 percent boy' - and at times, '90 percent genius, 10 percent boy,' the Wall Street Journal reported.
Musk was a frequent presence at the White House, as the two held long, informal dinners, with the Tesla CEO sometimes confusing Trump with his eccentric humor, according to White House officials. But as Musk began cutting foreign aid, trimming agencies and downsizing the federal workforce, tensions with Trump's inner circle escalated. Musk bypassed top aides, made unilateral decisions, and kept his plans secret - even from the president's chief of staff, Susie Wiles. In addition, Trump's advisers were often blindsided by DOGE's actions, learning about layoffs or data requests through news reports, according to the White House aides. Internal clashes only intensified, prompting Trump to ask Wiles to play a more 'hands-on' role in managing Musk.
The SpaceX founder also clashed with Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy over air traffic controller cuts and Secretary of State Marco Rubio protested after Musk slashed USAID without consultation. He also reportedly resisted White House vetting for DOGE staff and showed preference for advice from close allies like Stephen Miller, Trump's deputy chief of staff, and Katie Miller, his DOGE lieutenant and Stephen's wife. In the spring, Musk publicly attacked Republican Senator Todd Young, calling him a 'deep state puppet' just as Trump was lobbying him to support Tulsi Gabbard for director of national intelligence. Vice President JD Vance eventually had to intervene, urging Musk to delete the inflammatory post, which he did, but the damage had been done. 'White House officials picked up the pieces,' a Trump adviser said.
The relationship further frayed when Musk involved himself in a Wisconsin Supreme Court race. Despite warnings from Trump's team that his candidate, Brad Schimel, would lose, Musk insisted polling showed otherwise, and after Schimel's poor town hall and overwhelming loss, Trump distanced himself from the race. Behind the scenes, Musk was also pushing back against Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs, calling them dangerous for the global economy. He called business leaders to lobby against them and told advisers Trump was receiving bad advice. Though Trump stood firm on tariffs, Musk grew increasingly irritated - especially after learning Musk received a classified Pentagon briefing on China.
It was the most frustrated they'd seen him, two administration officials said, with Trump questioning whether it was a conflict of interest due to Musk's defense contracts. Meanwhile, Musk grew more absent from the White House. Initially present five to seven days a week, his visits dropped to three, then to only occasionally. At a cabinet meeting earlier this spring, Musk shocked officials by venting about how much damage his political role was causing to Tesla. Musk claimed the officials 'had no idea' how much damage was being done to his cars, a witness said. Attorney General Pam Bondi reportedly responded saying she would prosecute every criminal they could catch, the Wall Street Journal reported.
By May, Trump learned Musk's departure was imminent - but not the exact timing, which was later revealed in a social media post. Musk told aides he needed to 'get some heat off me and my companies,' amid a sharp decline in Tesla profits and setbacks at SpaceX. Despite the turmoil, Trump requested a final 'friendly farewell' meeting in the Oval Office on Friday, with the president claiming, 'Elon is not really leaving. He's going to be back and forth. DOGE is Done,' former Trump advisor Steve Bannon told the Daily Mail on the day of Musk's departure, tying up the Elon-run effort.
As Trump bid farewell to Musk in the Oval Office, the billionaire wore a shirt describing himself as the 'Dogefather,' indicating his desire to be remembered as the father of a political movement he hoped would continue. 'This is not the end of DOGE but really the beginning,' he said, promising that the DOGE team would only get stronger. The president agreed. 'Elon's really not leaving, he's going to be back and forth i think ... it's his baby,' Trump said. Today, DOGE employees have been sent to different departments, and are quietly working within the system.
Some of them view themselves as more missionaries than mercenaries, and even as Musk's public role fades, they expect the work to go on. The work of cutting government waste and dismantling the 'administrative state,' one of Bannon's biggest priorities, would continue in the Office of Management and Budget which is 'where DOGE is housed' to begin with, he said. OMB director, Russ Vought, who helped co-author Project 2025, remains engaged with the efforts, but ultimately the traditional hierarchy of the federal government has snapped back into place. Some of Trump's most visible cabinet members view the DOGE brand as a net positive, as they have worked to implement it into their departments.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Geeky Gadgets
22 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. S25 Edge: The ULTIMATE Speed Battle!
When comparing flagship smartphones, the iPhone 16 Pro Max and Galaxy S25 Edge emerge as two of the most advanced options available. Each device caters to distinct user preferences, offering unique strengths in design, performance, and usability. The Galaxy S25 Edge emphasizes speed and innovation, while the iPhone 16 Pro Max focuses on delivering a refined and consistent user experience. Below is a detailed breakdown of how these two devices stack up across key features in a new video from Nick Ackerman. Watch this video on YouTube. Design and Build The Galaxy S25 Edge stands out with its ultra-thin and lightweight design, redefining portability in the smartphone market. Despite its slim profile, it incorporates effective heat management, making sure the device remains comfortable to use even during extended sessions. This makes it an excellent choice for users who prioritize sleekness and mobility. In contrast, the iPhone 16 Pro Max offers a more substantial build, emphasizing durability and robustness. Its slightly bulkier design accommodates a larger battery, which translates to longer usage times. For users who value sturdiness and extended battery life, the iPhone's design is a clear winner. Both devices showcase premium craftsmanship, but their appeal depends on whether you prioritize portability or endurance. Performance Performance is a critical factor for any flagship device, and here the Galaxy S25 Edge takes the lead with its faster app launch speeds and superior multitasking capabilities. The device's snappy interface and responsiveness are particularly noticeable during demanding tasks, making it a favorite among power users. On the other hand, the iPhone 16 Pro Max offers a different kind of performance advantage. Its smooth animations and optimized app performance create a polished and seamless user experience. While the Galaxy S25 Edge excels in raw speed, the iPhone prioritizes fluidity and consistency, which many users find more intuitive for everyday use. Both devices deliver exceptional performance, but their strengths cater to different user needs. Display and Software The iPhone 16 Pro Max features a ProMotion display with adaptive refresh rates, offering a visually smooth experience during scrolling, video playback, and gaming. This technology enhances usability and provides a refined visual experience, making it ideal for users who value visual precision and fluidity. In comparison, the Galaxy S25 Edge delivers a faster and more responsive user interface, appealing to those who prioritize speed and efficiency. However, its rapid transitions and animations may feel overwhelming to users accustomed to a more measured pace. Both devices feature high-quality displays, but the choice between them depends on whether you prioritize visual refinement or interface responsiveness. Unlocking and Biometrics Biometric security is another area where these devices differ significantly. The iPhone 16 Pro Max relies on Face ID, a secure and seamlessly integrated system that works intuitively with its swipe-to-unlock functionality. This system is reliable and easy to use for most users. The Galaxy S25 Edge, however, offers greater versatility with both in-display fingerprint scanning and face unlock. These options provide faster access and cater to users who prefer having multiple unlocking methods. While both systems are effective, the Galaxy S25 Edge's variety may appeal to those who value flexibility and convenience. Gaming and Graphics For gaming enthusiasts, the Galaxy S25 Edge is a standout performer. Its multi-core processing power and advanced 3D graphics capabilities make it ideal for resource-intensive games. The device handles demanding titles with ease, delivering a smooth and immersive gaming experience. The iPhone 16 Pro Max, while slightly behind in multi-core performance, excels in single-core tasks and game launch speeds. Both devices maintain similar temperatures during extended gaming sessions, making sure comfort for users. Ultimately, the Galaxy S25 Edge is better suited for hardcore gamers, while the iPhone offers reliable performance for casual gaming. Camera Performance The iPhone 16 Pro Max excels in everyday photography, offering fast camera launch speeds and a responsive shutter. Its camera system is optimized for social media, making sure consistent results across platforms. This makes it a dependable choice for users who frequently capture spontaneous moments. The Galaxy S25 Edge, equipped with a 200MP main sensor, shines in capturing fine details and high-resolution images. However, its zoom capabilities fall short compared to Samsung's Ultra models. While both devices deliver impressive results, the iPhone's consistency and ease of use give it a slight edge for most users. Battery Life Battery life is a crucial consideration, and the iPhone 16 Pro Max outperforms the Galaxy S25 Edge in this area. Its larger battery capacity ensures longer usage times, making it a reliable choice for users with demanding schedules. The Galaxy S25 Edge, while capable of lasting a full day with moderate use, sacrifices battery capacity for its thin and lightweight design. This trade-off may appeal to users who prioritize portability, but those seeking endurance and reliability will find the iPhone more dependable. Future Implications The Galaxy S25 Edge's innovative design sets a new benchmark for smartphone portability. Its ultra-thin profile has sparked speculation about future trends, including the possibility of an 'iPhone Air' model. As manufacturers continue to push the boundaries of design and performance, devices like the Galaxy S25 Edge pave the way for thinner and more efficient smartphones. Meanwhile, the iPhone 16 Pro Max reinforces Apple's commitment to delivering a polished and consistent user experience, emphasizing durability, battery life, and ecosystem integration. These qualities ensure its relevance in a market increasingly focused on balancing innovation with practicality. Final Thoughts The iPhone 16 Pro Max and Galaxy S25 Edge represent two distinct approaches to smartphone design and functionality. The Galaxy S25 Edge impresses with its ultra-thin design, faster app launches, and superior gaming performance, making it an excellent choice for users who prioritize speed and portability. On the other hand, the iPhone 16 Pro Max delivers a refined and consistent experience, excelling in battery life, camera functionality, and ecosystem integration. Ultimately, the choice between these devices depends on your priorities. Whether you value innovative design or reliability and durability, both smartphones offer compelling features tailored to different user needs. Here are more detailed guides and articles that you may find helpful on iPhone 16 Pro Max. Source & Image Credit: Nick Ackerman Filed Under: Android News, Apple iPhone, Guides Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.


The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
AP PHOTOS: Cuba's energy crisis forces families to find ingenious solutions to get by
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.


NBC News
26 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump ratchets up steel tariffs to 50%
One of America's most storied industries is getting a massive boost from President Donald Trump's latest tariffs push — at the potential cost of a broader slowdown elsewhere in the U.S. economy. Trump signed an executive order increasing the already substantial 25% duties on steel imports he first set in March to 50%. He signaled last week that the tariff rate hike was coming. It went into effect at midnight Wednesday. 'We're going to bring it from 25% to 50% — the tariffs on steel into the United States of America,' Trump said at a rally in Pennsylvania, 'which will even further secure the steel industry in the United States.' The new 50% duties also affect aluminum products. The tariffs on steel, along with those on imported automobiles and auto parts, have been imposed under authorities not affected by recent court decisions that cast doubt on the president's powers to enact trade barriers. U.S. steel firms have hailed Trump's renewed push to raise the cost to American firms that rely on imports of steel. It's a notably favorable reaction to tariffs amid what has broadly been a backlash against them. "American-made steel is at the heart of President Trump's plan to revitalize domestic manufacturing and return our country to an economic powerhouse," the Steel Manufacturers Association said in a statement that applauded Trump's remarks about the new 50% tariffs. Investors have rewarded the steel firms accordingly, sending shares of U.S. steelmakers soaring across the board Monday as U.S. steel and aluminum prices jumped. Today, the steel manufacturing industry directly employs 86,000 U.S. workers. It's a fraction of the half million-strong workforce the industry counted in the decade after World War II, though employment levels have stabilized more recently. While trade globalization bears substantial responsibility for steel's decadeslong downturn, experts say advances in technology have played an equally significant role. Steel production increasingly revolves around so-called electric arc furnace technology, a more efficient means of production than the classic open blast furnace operations that prevailed for much of the 20th century. The same levels of output from steel's heydays can now be achieved with just a fraction of the workforce. As recently as the early 1980s, it took about 10 man-hours to produce a ton of steel. Today, the rate is as little as a single man-hour assuming multiple steel mills are working in tandem. "The way we make steel in the U.S. has changed a lot," said an expert on the local impact of industrial transitions, Ken Kolb, chair of the sociology department at Furman University in South Carolina. "There is simply no way to bring that scale of employment back if a fraction of that workforce is needed to essentially reach the same production levels," Kolb said. He estimated that perhaps 15,000 new direct jobs could be added assuming capacity levels increase. But the broader cost to industries dependent on steel inputs, like autos, construction and solar panels — which relies on tariffed aluminum components — would be likely to negate those gains. "Theoretically you're going to be able to hire some people, but in reality, the tariffs just raise the average price of steel," Kolb said. "And when the price of a commodity like that goes up, businesses just buy less and sideline investment." A study found that while Trump's 2018 steel tariffs created 1,000 new direct jobs, it cost downstream industries that rely on steel to make their products as many as 75,000 jobs because they became less competitive thanks to higher costs. While some limited capacity could come back online in the near term, the on-again, off-again nature of the tariffs limit any immediate job gains, said Josh Spoores, head of Steel Americas Analysis at the CRU Group consultancy. If the higher tariffs remain, there could be new investments, Spoores said in an email — but building new steel mills can take at least two years. Nor is it clear that American steelworkers themselves are entirely in favor of the tariffs. The United Steelworkers union signaled only tepid endorsement for the measure in a statement after its Canadian chapter rebuked Trump's announcement. 'While tariffs, used strategically, serve as a valuable tool in balancing the scales, it's essential that we also pursue wider reforms of our global trading system, working in collaboration with trusted allies like Canada to contain the bad actors and excess capacity that continue to undermine our industries,' the union said. The union has also shown signs of a split when it comes to Trump's proposed "partnership" between U.S. Steel and Japan's Nippon Steel, whose takeover of the U.S. firm he previously opposed. Trump now sees the deal "creating" as many as 70,000 jobs. 'There's a lot of money coming your way,' Trump told supporters at the Pennsylvania rally Friday. The United Steelworkers signaled lingering doubts about the Nippon arrangement in a statement Friday. 'We have not participated in the discussions involving U.S. Steel, Nippon Steel, and the Trump administration, nor were we consulted, so we cannot speculate about the meaning of the 'planned partnership' between USS and Nippon," it said, using an initialism to refer to the American firm. It continued: 'Whatever the deal structure, our primary concern remains with the impact that this merger of U.S. Steel into a foreign competitor will have on national security, our members and the communities where we live and work."