logo
Trump order on commercial fishing in Pacific challenged

Trump order on commercial fishing in Pacific challenged

The Advertiser24-05-2025

Environmentalists have filed a lawsuit against US President Donald Trump's executive order that they say strips core protections from the Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument and opens it to harmful commercial fishing.
On the same day of last month's proclamation allowing commercial fishing in the monument, Trump issued an order to boost the US commercial fishing industry by peeling back regulations and opening up harvesting in previously protected areas.
The monument was created by President George W. Bush in 2009 and consists of about 1.3 million square kilometres in the central Pacific Ocean. President Barack Obama expanded the monument in 2014.
A week after the April 17 proclamation, the US National Marine Fisheries Service sent a letter to fishing permit holders giving them a green light to fish commercially within the monument's boundaries, even though a long-standing fishing ban remains on the books, according to a lawsuit filed in a federal court in Honolulu.
The first longline fisher started fishing in the monument just three days after that letter, according to Earthjustice, which has been tracking vessel activity within the monument using Global Fishing Watch.
The Department of Justice declined to comment.
The lawsuit noted that commercial longline fishing, an industrial method involving baited hooks from lines 96km or longer, will snag turtles, marine mammals or seabirds that are attracted to the bait or swim through the curtain of hooks.
"We will not stand by as the Trump administration unleashes highly destructive commercial fishing on some of the planet's most pristine, biodiverse marine environments," David Henkin, an Earthjustice lawyer, said in a statement.
"Piling lawlessness on top of lawlessness, the National Marine Fisheries Service chose to carry out President Trump's illegal proclamation by issuing its own illegal directive, with no public input."
Designating the area in the Pacific Ocean to the south and west of the Hawaiian islands as a monument provided "needed protection to a wide variety of scientific and historical treasures in one of the most spectacular and unique ocean ecosystems on earth," the lawsuit said.
The lawsuit added that allowing commercial fishing in the monument expansion harms the "cultural, spiritual, religious, subsistence, educational, recreational, and aesthetic interests" of a group of Native Hawaiian plaintiffs who are connected genealogically to the Indigenous peoples of the Pacific.
Environmentalists have filed a lawsuit against US President Donald Trump's executive order that they say strips core protections from the Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument and opens it to harmful commercial fishing.
On the same day of last month's proclamation allowing commercial fishing in the monument, Trump issued an order to boost the US commercial fishing industry by peeling back regulations and opening up harvesting in previously protected areas.
The monument was created by President George W. Bush in 2009 and consists of about 1.3 million square kilometres in the central Pacific Ocean. President Barack Obama expanded the monument in 2014.
A week after the April 17 proclamation, the US National Marine Fisheries Service sent a letter to fishing permit holders giving them a green light to fish commercially within the monument's boundaries, even though a long-standing fishing ban remains on the books, according to a lawsuit filed in a federal court in Honolulu.
The first longline fisher started fishing in the monument just three days after that letter, according to Earthjustice, which has been tracking vessel activity within the monument using Global Fishing Watch.
The Department of Justice declined to comment.
The lawsuit noted that commercial longline fishing, an industrial method involving baited hooks from lines 96km or longer, will snag turtles, marine mammals or seabirds that are attracted to the bait or swim through the curtain of hooks.
"We will not stand by as the Trump administration unleashes highly destructive commercial fishing on some of the planet's most pristine, biodiverse marine environments," David Henkin, an Earthjustice lawyer, said in a statement.
"Piling lawlessness on top of lawlessness, the National Marine Fisheries Service chose to carry out President Trump's illegal proclamation by issuing its own illegal directive, with no public input."
Designating the area in the Pacific Ocean to the south and west of the Hawaiian islands as a monument provided "needed protection to a wide variety of scientific and historical treasures in one of the most spectacular and unique ocean ecosystems on earth," the lawsuit said.
The lawsuit added that allowing commercial fishing in the monument expansion harms the "cultural, spiritual, religious, subsistence, educational, recreational, and aesthetic interests" of a group of Native Hawaiian plaintiffs who are connected genealogically to the Indigenous peoples of the Pacific.
Environmentalists have filed a lawsuit against US President Donald Trump's executive order that they say strips core protections from the Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument and opens it to harmful commercial fishing.
On the same day of last month's proclamation allowing commercial fishing in the monument, Trump issued an order to boost the US commercial fishing industry by peeling back regulations and opening up harvesting in previously protected areas.
The monument was created by President George W. Bush in 2009 and consists of about 1.3 million square kilometres in the central Pacific Ocean. President Barack Obama expanded the monument in 2014.
A week after the April 17 proclamation, the US National Marine Fisheries Service sent a letter to fishing permit holders giving them a green light to fish commercially within the monument's boundaries, even though a long-standing fishing ban remains on the books, according to a lawsuit filed in a federal court in Honolulu.
The first longline fisher started fishing in the monument just three days after that letter, according to Earthjustice, which has been tracking vessel activity within the monument using Global Fishing Watch.
The Department of Justice declined to comment.
The lawsuit noted that commercial longline fishing, an industrial method involving baited hooks from lines 96km or longer, will snag turtles, marine mammals or seabirds that are attracted to the bait or swim through the curtain of hooks.
"We will not stand by as the Trump administration unleashes highly destructive commercial fishing on some of the planet's most pristine, biodiverse marine environments," David Henkin, an Earthjustice lawyer, said in a statement.
"Piling lawlessness on top of lawlessness, the National Marine Fisheries Service chose to carry out President Trump's illegal proclamation by issuing its own illegal directive, with no public input."
Designating the area in the Pacific Ocean to the south and west of the Hawaiian islands as a monument provided "needed protection to a wide variety of scientific and historical treasures in one of the most spectacular and unique ocean ecosystems on earth," the lawsuit said.
The lawsuit added that allowing commercial fishing in the monument expansion harms the "cultural, spiritual, religious, subsistence, educational, recreational, and aesthetic interests" of a group of Native Hawaiian plaintiffs who are connected genealogically to the Indigenous peoples of the Pacific.
Environmentalists have filed a lawsuit against US President Donald Trump's executive order that they say strips core protections from the Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument and opens it to harmful commercial fishing.
On the same day of last month's proclamation allowing commercial fishing in the monument, Trump issued an order to boost the US commercial fishing industry by peeling back regulations and opening up harvesting in previously protected areas.
The monument was created by President George W. Bush in 2009 and consists of about 1.3 million square kilometres in the central Pacific Ocean. President Barack Obama expanded the monument in 2014.
A week after the April 17 proclamation, the US National Marine Fisheries Service sent a letter to fishing permit holders giving them a green light to fish commercially within the monument's boundaries, even though a long-standing fishing ban remains on the books, according to a lawsuit filed in a federal court in Honolulu.
The first longline fisher started fishing in the monument just three days after that letter, according to Earthjustice, which has been tracking vessel activity within the monument using Global Fishing Watch.
The Department of Justice declined to comment.
The lawsuit noted that commercial longline fishing, an industrial method involving baited hooks from lines 96km or longer, will snag turtles, marine mammals or seabirds that are attracted to the bait or swim through the curtain of hooks.
"We will not stand by as the Trump administration unleashes highly destructive commercial fishing on some of the planet's most pristine, biodiverse marine environments," David Henkin, an Earthjustice lawyer, said in a statement.
"Piling lawlessness on top of lawlessness, the National Marine Fisheries Service chose to carry out President Trump's illegal proclamation by issuing its own illegal directive, with no public input."
Designating the area in the Pacific Ocean to the south and west of the Hawaiian islands as a monument provided "needed protection to a wide variety of scientific and historical treasures in one of the most spectacular and unique ocean ecosystems on earth," the lawsuit said.
The lawsuit added that allowing commercial fishing in the monument expansion harms the "cultural, spiritual, religious, subsistence, educational, recreational, and aesthetic interests" of a group of Native Hawaiian plaintiffs who are connected genealogically to the Indigenous peoples of the Pacific.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What are Donald Trump's alleged links to Jeffrey Epstein?
What are Donald Trump's alleged links to Jeffrey Epstein?

News.com.au

time36 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

What are Donald Trump's alleged links to Jeffrey Epstein?

The uneasy history between Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein is back in the spotlight after Elon Musk threw fuel on his feud with the US President by suggesting he is 'in the Epstein files'. Musk's bombshell claim was littered among a stream of erratic tweets attempting to discredit Trump, as the two former allies locked horns in one of the more embarrassing online skirmishes seen this year. '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk wrote. 'Have a nice day, DJT!' No evidence has been produced by Musk to support the allegation. There is no suggestion that Donald Trump was involved in Epstein's crimes. What is known, however, is that Trump and Epstein were photographed together on multiple occasions throughout the 1990s and early 2000s, and appeared to move in the same social circles during that time. One video shows Trump welcoming Epstein at a party with a throng football cheerleaders attending in 1992. Court documents also show Trump flew on Epstein's private jet several times, mostly between Florida and New York. A 2002 quote from Trump was unearthed during the Ghislaine Maxwell case, where the billionaire was heard describing Epstein as a 'terrific guy'. 'It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side,' Trump said at the time. Trump then distanced himself from Epstein, reportedly barring him from Mar-a-Lago in 2004 after Epstein allegedly attempted to recruit a staff member. The two men reportedly fell out over competing bids for real estate in Florida. Attorney-General Pam Bondi has said the FBI is reviewing tens of thousands of Epstein-related documents, with more expected to be made public soon. Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino echoed that on Fox News this week, saying additional files will be released after redactions. Trouble in paradise Musk's swipe comes amid growing hostility over Trump's proposed economic policies. The president accused Musk, who was very recently directing Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, of opposing his plans to cut EV subsidies and raise the federal debt ceiling. Musk responded by saying Trump's administration should 'go ahead, make my day' and cut SpaceX contracts. Musk has repeatedly mentioned the 'Epstein list' in recent months, a vague term often invoked online referring to sealed court documents related to Epstein's criminal activities. While some Epstein files have been released, most remain sealed to 'protect ongoing investigations' and victim privacy. The public record reflects no criminal accusations against Trump in connection to Epstein, and his past association with the financier is not unique among high-profile businessmen of the era. But Musk's sudden 180 on the US President has raised further questions. How did the world's richest man go from dancing around at campaigns, claiming civilisation would collapse if Trump lost the election, to accusing him of being linked to Epstein? Suspicions were multiplied when Musk arrived for a news conference at the Oval Office with a black eye and a black DOGE cap. The Tesla boss told the media it had occurred while playing rough with his youngest child. Trump later claimed Musk went 'crazy' when he learned an electric vehicle 'mandate' was being scrapped. 'Elon was 'wearing thin',' Trump said, declaring he had booted Musk from the White House. 'I asked him to leave, I took away his [electric vehicle] mandate that forced everyone to buy electric cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY! 'The easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's government subsidies and contracts. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' The Epstein files In February, a personal address book of Jeffrey Epstein's was released by Trump's Justice Department, which included a new list of celebrities and politicians whom the pedophile financier had in his phone. Among the famous names released by the Department of Justice: Rolling Stones frontman Mick Jagger, Michael Jackson, actor Alec Baldwin, Ethel Kennedy — the mother of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., supermodel Naomi Campbell and rocker Courtney Love. Thursday's unveiling was comprised of over 100 pages including a contact list that belonged to the convicted pedophile financier. The list is not 'a client list,' but includes names of people on Epstein's vast contact list. While the list of names were revealed, their addresses and contact information were redacted. The vast majority of names on the list — if not all of them — had been previously reported in the years of lawsuits and document leaks in the case. The US Attorney-General claimed the FBI has withheld 'thousands of pages' of critical documents relating to Epstein, demanding the bureau provide 'full and complete' access. In a fiery letter to FBI Director Kash Patel, Attorney-General Pam Bondi said she had only received 'approximately 200 pages of documents' which consisted of flight logs, contact lists and victim's names related to Epstein, despite requesting access to the 'full' files. 'I repeatedly questioned whether this was the full set of documents responsive to my request and was repeatedly assured by the FBI that we had received the full set of documents,' Ms Bondi wrote in the letter. 'Late yesterday, I learned from a source that the FBI Field Office in New York was in possession of thousands of pages of documents related to the investigation and indictment of Epstein.'

Australia should not ‘relinquish' biosecurity standards for US
Australia should not ‘relinquish' biosecurity standards for US

Sky News AU

time38 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

Australia should not ‘relinquish' biosecurity standards for US

Nationals Leader David Littleproud claims Australia does not 'fear competition' amid the trade talks on beef with US President Donald Trump. 'We don't fear the fact of us competing with the US beef that's already coming into Australian markets,' Mr Littleproud told Sky News Australia. 'What we do fear is a drop in biosecurity standards that would pose a biosecurity risk that could damage our herd, cost Australian farmers billions. 'We have the best biosecurity in the world … we shouldn't relinquish that to anybody.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store