
Inter Miami's pressing questions after a painful Concacaf Champions Cup ouster
In the days after Lionel Messi was first introduced as an Inter Miami player, and before he made his memorable debut against Cruz Azul, club owner Jorge Mas was asked what would constitute a success in the Messi Era of Miami and MLS.
'We're successful,' he said. 'We've succeeded. Expectations are something else, but we've succeeded. The fact that Lionel Messi is here, that Sergio Busquets is here, that others are going to come here, that we're opening new chapters for the sport in this country, we've succeeded.'
Advertisement
Mas was right, of course. That Messi signed in MLS was a massive win for the league, and Messi's presence playing for Inter Miami will never be measured solely by on-field results. The commercial impact has been beyond even the highest expectations, with Miami selling out stadiums across the league and setting attendance records in multiple markets. Miami's revenues ballooned to record levels. Messi's pink shirt was Adidas's top-selling jersey in any sport, MLS commissioner Don Garber said last year. The Argentine legend's presence has also influenced discussions at the board level about how MLS will move forward into its next phase of growth.
Ultimately, though, Messi's MLS legacy will be framed by one thing: how many trophies does he lift in that pink shirt he made so famous?
That's what made Wednesday night's 3-1 dismantling by the Vancouver Whitecaps in Fort Lauderdale so painful. The Whitecaps' win was the exclamation point on a 5-1 aggregate thrashing in the Concacaf Champions Cup semifinals. It was the second consecutive defeat in an elimination series at home for Miami, which was stunned last year by Atlanta United in the MLS Cup playoffs.
'You have to accept that they were better,' Inter Miami coach Javier Mascherano said. 'They were much better than us. It's for that that they are in the final and we aren't.'
Messi and Co. have now had a chance to win seven trophies in his two-plus years in MLS, forgiving the 2023 MLS Cup that was a longshot considering Miami's last-place standing when the World Cup winner arrived. They have won just two of those trophies: the 2023 Leagues Cup and 2024 Supporters' Shield. Respectively, there are two prizes that supersede the others: the MLS Cup and Concacaf Champions Cup. So far, Messi and Miami are 0-for-3 in those competitions.
Advertisement
It is easy after a loss to fall into the trap of hyperbole, that Miami should be in panic mode. Let's not forget that Miami has still lost just one game in MLS play this season.
Mascherano, who played more than 90 games for Liverpool, had north of 200 appearances for Barcelona and was capped 147 times by Argentina, has seen it all before and acknowledged the task ahead.
'When we started the season and went so many games without losing, we didn't go crazy or think we were something extraordinary,' Mascherano said. 'Quite the opposite. I've always said we have to be prepared for when the bad times come. And well, now we're in bad times and we have to live with this. It's very easy to live with the good times. The issue now is to get out of the bad times, and surely to get out of bad times we have to give it our all. We have to give it our all. We know we have to do more, that this isn't enough for us.'
This team, in all likelihood, will challenge for another Supporters' Shield and for MLS Cup. But they are also starting to look their age — which is unsurprising considering the history of MLS teams that have struggled to stay at their best after navigating through the gauntlet of Champions Cup and MLS games to start the season. For a team built around four stars at the tail end of their careers, the task to rebound from the brutal grind to start the season is even tougher, and Miami will have the added stressor of competing in the FIFA Club World Cup this summer.
The Vancouver series exposed some real issues that Inter Miami is going to have to figure out for the rest of 2025 – and if Messi re-signs in MLS, as expected, into 2026 and beyond.
It shouldn't be surprising that Miami looks, at times, like a team still trying to find itself.
In many ways, it is.
Advertisement
Miami had a turbulent offseason. Inter changed coaches. Tata Martino stepped away, and Mascherano was hired. The front office went through a significant makeover, too — more than once. Sporting director Chris Henderson went to Atlanta. Then Raul Sanllehi, president of football operations, moved out of a day-to-day sporting role in January. Longtime Messi ally Guillermo Hoyos was named sporting director, and, in April, Alberto Marrero was hired as chief soccer officer.
More than a dozen players from last year's roster are gone. Eight new players, including four who started against Vancouver, arrived. Miami is playing a different style than it did in 2024, opting for what often resembles a 4-2-3-1 in possession.
The makeover isn't finished yet.
At the close of the window, Miami traded Robert Taylor and waived Julian Gressel. That opened up two senior roster spots for the club to add pieces in the summer window. Miami had more than $3 million in allocation money when the league last published figures in March. It then signed Baltasar Rodríguez and Allen Obando on loan, which ate into that reserve, and also traded for international spots. But the Taylor trade to Austin FC brought in more money, and clearing Gressel's million-dollar cap number created space, too.
Miami is going to add pieces in the summer.
Where will it look to fortify the roster? Vancouver was able to slow Miami's attack in part by overloading central spaces and forcing Miami wide. Inter could try to target a left winger that brings pace and verticality to the attack. That might ease some of the attacking demand on Messi and Luis Suárez, who has now gone nine consecutive games — all starts — without a goal for Miami.
Center back has been another problem area. Maxi Falcón had a solid start to the MLS season, but struggled against Vancouver. With David Martínez and Toto Avilés on the bench, Miami has options. Would it add another?
Advertisement
Some of these problems could be helped by allowing Miami to continue to work into Mascherano's system and give the new faces time to continue to develop. Rodríguez, the 21-year-old attacking midfielder signed in March, has yet to play. Giving this team a bit more time will help some of these problems.
The bigger questions await in 2026.
As The Athletic reported last month, Inter Miami is nearing a contract extension for its primary superstar. Keeping Messi in town for another few years ensures that Messi will be there to open the club's new stadium next season.
It also opens up some questions about what that means for the roster.
Jordi Alba, Busquets and Suárez are all out of contract at the end of the season. Busquets and Alba take up two of Miami's three designated player spots. The question isn't just whether Miami brings all three former Barcelona stars back; it's also about at what cost?
All of these conversations are sensitive. These are four legends of the game. They have always been seen as a sort of package deal with Messi. But there is an argument to be made that Messi would get a boost from having a younger or in-prime player that could help take this Miami team to the next level. Imagine, for example, an Inter Miami team with Cucho Hernández starting up top.
So what does Miami do?
Alba, 36, has been very good for Miami. He was an MLS Best XI player last season, with four goals and 14 assists, and carried the load at times in 2024. Miami certainly gives something up in allowing Alba to venture forward as much as he does, but the former Spain captain is still productive. He converted to a DP deal in 2025 and it's a safe assumption that if he renews it'll be under similar terms, especially since he played the first year and a half in Miami on a $1.2 million base salary.
Advertisement
Busquets is a tougher call. The Spanish midfielder will turn 37 this summer, and in a league in which DPs are hopefully helping you score goals, Miami will have to consider whether it can afford to have Busquets occupy a DP slot. If he returned on a TAM deal, it'd be far more appropriate – and, crucially, it would allow Miami to go out and spend big on a player.
Suárez is another conundrum. That he's been able to produce so much despite his age and knee issues is remarkable. He had 20 goals and nine assists last season, but that production has dropped off this year. He has just one goal in eight league starts so far this season. As Messi's closest friend on the roster, this is a complicated decision — and ultimately it may be Suárez's call more than Miami's — but there's no doubt Miami should at least be considering whether it can add a younger, high-end striker to the team whether or not Suárez comes back.
Miami opening its stadium in 2026 with Messi in the lineup was a must. Adding another star designated player to the team would be the right step to keep the team moving forward.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

an hour ago
The Club World Cup has faced pushback in Europe but FIFA is banking on its big bet
The Club World Cup. A bold new era for the world's most popular sport — or a major inconvenience, shoe-horned into a soccer calendar that is already at saturation point? FIFA's newly expanded tournament kicks off June 14 in Miami against the backdrop of legal challenges in Europe, strike threats and repeated concerns over players' mental and physical welfare due to the increased number of games. There has been no shortage of pushback from Europe since the bumper new addition to soccer's landscape was announced in December 2023. Voices of dissent from the continent that will be sending the most teams to the tournament have continued virtually right up to its big launch. 'We want to protect football,' David Terrier, president of players' union FIFPRO Europe, said. 'It's a big problem and it's not just about the workload. The question is about the governance because the calendar is a consequence of the governance of football.' That sentiment is not shared universally. In many other parts of the world, there is a buzz of anticipation among fans about the opportunity of going up against the giants like Real Madrid in the biggest ever global tournament for clubs. The biggest sales of tickets outside of the United States have come from Brazil, Argentina, Mexico. The brainchild of FIFA president Gianni Infantino, soccer's world governing body is banking on its tournament rivaling the Champions League and Premier League in terms of status, wealth and popularity — describing it as its 'prime club competition.' Featuring 32 teams — expanded from seven — and staged in the U.S. through June and July, it will be played on a four-yearly basis. It means many top players face the prospect of offseason tournaments in three out of every four years going forward, with the Club World Cup sandwiched between the men's World Cup for national teams, the European Championship and Copa America. The lack of enthusiasm in Europe was striking when the new format was announced. 'I am not against new competitions, I am against the lack of time to recover year by year,' Manchester City manager Pep Guardiola said. Jürgen Klopp, the former Liverpool manager and now head of global soccer for Red Bull, called it "useless" as recently as January. 'It means you have no summer break,' he said. "Who wins the tournament, wow, is the poorest winner ever because you have to play through the whole summer.' A legal complaint by FIFPRO Europe and the association of European Leagues fed into a general sense of negativity from the continent. Javier Tebas, president of the Spanish league, called for the Club World Cup to be withdrawn. Last year there were doubts whether Real Madrid — the most famous franchise in soccer — would even accept its invitation to play after then-coach Carlo Ancelotti reportedly suggested the record 15-time European champion would boycott over appearance money. Madrid soon confirmed it would be involved after all. Despite the criticism, the tournament is backed by the European Club Association, which represents the majority of its top teams. And those participating are not taking it lightly. Europe will be represented by some of the biggest clubs like Madrid, Manchester City, Bayern Munich and Champions League winner Paris Saint-Germain. Superstars including Kylian Mbappé, Vinícius Júnior and Erling Haaland are expected to play. Madrid has signed Trent Alexander-Arnold early to ensure he is available. Also, midfielder Jude Bellingham will reportedly delay a shoulder operation in order to play. While City forward Phil Foden said he and his teammates were 'mentally drained' after a troubled season when the once-dominant Premier League club ended up trophyless, he did not doubt its determination to win the Club World Cup. 'Some clubs will take it more seriously than others, but I know City and the club we are. We'll definitely take it seriously,' he said. PSG coach Luis Enrique was also enthusiastic. 'I think it is an incredible competition. Maybe not now in its first edition, but it will become an incredibly important competition to win,' he said. The potential for the winner to take home $125 million from a total prize pot of $1 billion has also likely helped fuel interest from clubs participating. Europe's leagues and players' union say it was a lack of talks that put them on a collision course with FIFA over the tournament. Both of those bodies want to be consulted about new competitions being added to the calendar and that was the basis of their case with the European Commission, said Mathieu Moreuil, vice president of European Leagues. 'I mean we sent in letters, we tried to engage, there was no real consultations through any kind of committees or anything,' he said. Moreuil spoke at a briefing held in Munich ahead of the Champions League final last month, which The Associated Press attended. It was evidence of the intention to continue to apply pressure to FIFA even in the final weeks before the Club World Cup kicks off. 'FIFA is the one dealing with world football and is the governing body and they should take care of the game,' Moreuil said. FIFA didn't reply to requests for comment. Coaches and players in Latin America have not complained about having to play more matches. In Argentina there is huge expectation. According to FIFA, Boca Juniors was the first team to sell out tickets for its three group stage matches, likely helped by two games in Miami, where there is a large Argentine community. 'I'm going to the Club World Cup with the highest expectations," said new Boca head coach Miguel Ángel Russo. "I dream big.' Latin American teams have also been active in the transfer market, making marquee signings in preparation. Former Madrid captain Sergio Ramos joined Mexican team Monterrey. In Argentina, River Plate signed seven new players and Brazilian club Palmeiras paid 18 million euros ($20 million) for striker Paulinho. In the host nation, there were joyous scenes when LAFC secured the last place in the tournament after a playoff victory against Club America of Mexico last month. It will join Lionel Messi's Inter Miami and Seattle Sounders representing the U.S. In Japan thousands of fans unfurled a huge flag saying 'Grab the World Cup' ahead of Urawa Reds' last domestic game before heading to the U.S. For South Korea, represented by Ulsan HD, it is a case of national pride to take part. 'This is not just the journey of one club, but a message that the entire K-League sends to the world,' said local news outlet Asia Today. For Saudi Arabia, the Club World Cup is the chance to show the rapid growth of its Pro League following the oil-rich kingdom's drive to become a major player in soccer, which has included luring Cristiano Ronaldo and winning the right to host the 2034 World Cup. It will be represented by its most successful team, Al-Hilal, which failed in an attempt to sign Manchester United captain Bruno Fernandes in the weeks leading up to the tournament. ___


Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Three years away from the Olympics, L.A. is tripping over hurdles and trying to play catchup
Los Angeles is now a mere 12 months away from serving as primary host of the World Cup soccer championships, and three years away from taking the world stage as host of both the 2028 Summer Olympics and Paralympics. Athletes and tourists by the tens of thousands will pour into the region from around the world, and I'm reminded of the classic film 'Sunset Boulevard,' in which Gloria Swanson proclaimed, 'I'm ready for my close-up.' Will L.A. be ready for its close-up? That's a question I intend to explore on a semi-regular basis, and you're invited to worry and wonder along with me by sending your comments and questions to To let you know where I'm coming from, I'm a sports fan who watches the Olympics on television despite the politics, the doping scandals and the corporatization of the Games. But I'm also a professional skeptic, and my questions extend far beyond whether we're ready for our close-up. Here are just a few: Will the benefits of hosting outweigh the burdens? Will the average Southern Californian get anything out of the years-long buildup and staging of the Games? And, will basic services and infrastructure near Olympic venues get upgrades at the expense of long-overdue improvements in other areas? The answer to that question is a big 'yes,' says L.A. Councilwoman Monica Rodriguez, who represents the northeastern San Fernando Valley. 'What I've seen in [the latest] budget is that those areas that will be hosting some of the Olympic events will be prioritized,' she said, and that means her district is off the radar. It's worth noting that the city of Los Angeles is not running these Olympics (that's the job of LA28, a private nonprofit working in conjunction with the International Olympic Committee), nor is it hosting all the events. Olympic sites will be scattered well beyond Los Angeles proper, with volleyball in Anaheim, for instance, cricket in Pomona, cycling in Carson and swimming in Long Beach. Softball and canoe slalom competitions will be held in Oklahoma City. But as lead host and a partner in the staging of mega-events that will draw an international spotlight, the reputation of the city of Los Angeles is on the line. One financial advantage the 2028 Games will enjoy over previous Olympics is that there's no need to erect any massive, ridiculously expensive new stadiums or arenas. There'll be soccer at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena, track and field at the L.A. Coliseum and baseball at Dodger Stadium, for instance. All of which will keep the overall cost of the Games down. But playing the part of primary Olympic host carries as many risks as opportunities. 'The Games have a history of damaging the cities and societies that host them,' according to an analysis last year in the Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, which cited 'broken budgets that burden the public purse … the militarization of public spaces … and the expulsion of residents through sweeps, gentrifications and evictions.' Even without all that, L.A. has a raft of problems on its hands, and the close-up at the moment is not a pretty portrait. Tens of thousands of people are homeless, and the agency overseeing homelessness is in turmoil amid damning financial audits, so unless there's a quick turnaround, the city will be draped in blue tarps for all the world to see. Meanwhile, planned transportation improvements are behind schedule, skyrocketing liability claim settlements are expected to cost $300 million this year, and on top of all that, it suddenly dawned on local leaders several weeks ago that the city was broke. 'Our budget situation is critical,' Mayor Karen Bass wrote in an April letter to the City Council, outlining a nearly $1-billion deficit and proposing numerous program cuts and layoffs. The City Council restored some of those trims, but the outlook is still grim, with several hundred workers losing their jobs. Bass and other local leaders maintain that playing host to mega-events will help restock the treasury. But the opposite could be true, and if the $7-billion Games don't break even, the already-strapped city will get slapped with a $270-million bailout tab. For all the hand-wringing at City Hall, it's not as if the current budget deficit should have come as a surprise. Revenue is down, the response to homelessness devours a big chunk of the budget (without transformational progress to show for the investment), and the bills keep coming due on the City Hall tradition of awarding public employee pay raises it can't afford. That's why there's a 10-year wait to get a ruptured sidewalk fixed (although the city is much quicker to pay millions in trip-and-fall cases), and there's an estimated $2 billion in deferred maintenance at recreation and parks department facilities. At TorchedLA, journalist Alissa Walker reports that in an annual ranking of park systems in the largest 100 cities, L.A. has dropped to 90th, which she fairly called 'a bad look for a city set to host the largest sporting events in the world.' Speaking of bad looks, moving thousands of athletes and tourists around the city will be key to the success of the Games, but some of the so-called '28 by 28' transportation improvements slated for completion by the start of the Olympics have been dereailed or scaled back. And my colleague Colleen Shalby reported last month that Metro's projected budget deficit over the next five years is massive: 'Critical parts of Metro's Olympics plans are yet to be nailed down,' she wrote. 'The agency has yet to confirm $2 billion in funds to lease nearly 3,000 buses, which are integral to Los Angeles' transit-first goal for the Games.' Michael Schneider, founder of the nonprofit Streets for All, said L.A.'s budget crisis 'is coming at the worst possible time.' Not that the delivery of basic infrastructure needs should be tied to major sporting events, but he had hoped the Olympics would trigger a substantial investment in 'bus rapid transit, a network of bike lanes, sidewalks that aren't broken, curb ramps. Just the nuts and bolts of infrastructure.' Jules Boykoff, a Pacific University professor and former professional soccer player who has studied the social and economic impacts of several recent Olympics, is not wowed by L.A.'s record so far. 'I thought Los Angeles was going to be in a lot better shape,' Boykoff said. 'I've been taken aback by the problems that exist and how little has been done.' The real goal isn't just to host the Olympics, Boykoff said, but to do so in a way that delivers long-lasting improvements. 'Any smart city' uses the Games 'to get gains for everybody in the city. Athens in 2004 got a subway system,' he said, Rio de Janeiro in 2016 got a transit link, and last year's host, Paris, got a system of bike lanes. L.A. had gold-medal aspirations, and the city has made some transit improvements. It's also got a wealth of signature natural wonders to show off, from the mountains to the sea, just as the Paris Games featured the Eiffel Tower and the magical evening skyline. But three big hurdles now stand in the way of making it to the podium: The budget limitations (which could get worse between now and 2028), the diversion of resources to the Palisades wildfire recovery, and the uncertainty of desperately needed federal financial support from President Trump, who would probably not put Los Angeles on his list of favorite cities. Races are sometimes won by runners making a move from the back of the pack, and L.A. could still find its stride, show some pride, and avoid embarrassing itself. That's what I'm rooting for. But just one year away from the World Cup and three from the Olympics, the clock is ticking, and it's almost too late to be playing catchup.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Two alarming stats after Italy's 3-0 humbling by Norway
Italy were dealt a 3-0 blow by Norway at the beginning of their 2026 World Cup qualification campaign on Friday night, which has already brought a genuine risk of missing out on direct qualification to the final tournament. First-half strikes from Alexander Sorloth, Antonio Nusa and Erling Haaland dealt an injury-hit Azzurri side a 3-0 humbling to kick off their World Cup qualification campaign. Advertisement As Italy have played fewer matches than anyone else in Group I of the UEFA World Cup qualifying groups, there is already a nine-point deficit between the Azzurri and the top of the group table. Two alarming stats after Norway 3-0 Italy epa11984179 Head coach Luciano Spalletti looks on during the UEFA Nations League quarterfinal, 2nd leg match between Germany and Italy in Dortmund, Germany, 23 March 2025. EPA-EFE/FRIEDEMANN VOGEL This is now the first time in history that Italy have lost two consecutive World Cup qualifying matches. The latest Italy World Cup qualifier before Friday night was the infamous 1-0 loss to North Macedonia in the play-off stages of the 2022 World Cup qualifiers, which prevented Roberto Mancini's side from featuring in the final tournament. In fact, the Nazionale have now not won in four World Cup qualifying matches, with the 3-0 loss to Norway, the 1-0 loss to North Macedonia, a 0-0 draw with Northern Ireland in 2021 and a 1-1 draw with Switzerland a few days before. Advertisement Alarmingly for the national team, the 3-0 loss against Norway was also the first time that Italy have failed to score in three consecutive World Cup qualifiers, including the 1-0 loss to North Macedonia and the 0-0 draw with Northern Ireland. CT Luciano Spalletti and his players will look to make amends when they host Moldova at the Mapei Stadium in their second 2026 World Cup qualifying match on Monday night.