logo
Anti-racism and anti-immigration protests take place in Dublin city centre

Anti-racism and anti-immigration protests take place in Dublin city centre

Dublin Live5 hours ago

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
An anti-racism rally and an anti-immigration demonstration were held in Dublin city on Sunday.
O'Connell Bridge was closed for a time on Sunday afternoon as the Gardai erected extensive barriers to separate the two crowds. The United Against Racism rally began at the Central Plaza on Dame Street, marching through the city to O'Connell Bridge at around 2pm.
Several protesters carried signs saying: 'Blame the Government, not migrants'; and: 'Dublin stands against racism'. They also chanted: 'Say it loud, say it clear, refugees are welcome here.' The anti-immigration protest marched down O'Connell Street and turned left at O'Connell bridge before continuing along the quays.
Participants from both sides shouted and gestured towards each other from across the empty space between the barriers created by gardai. The anti-immigration group, which was the larger of the two, was thick with large tricolour flags. It chanted 'ole ole' and: 'Whose streets? Our streets'.
Several people were seen wearing 'Make Ireland Great Again' green caps and holding US or 'Trump' flags, and some signs critical of RTE. At one point, the famous rebel song 'Oro 'Se do bheatha 'bhaile' was played by the anti-racism rally over a speaker, and prompted some participants in the anti-immigration group to sing along and applaud at the end.
There was an extensive Garda presence at the location where the two protest groups were due to cross paths. The Garda Mounted Support Unit, the Public Order Unit, and Garda members from outside the Dublin Metropolitan Region were in attendance.
One Garda member was heard telling a member of the public he could not give directions as he was brought in from a region outside Dublin to police the protest. One mother said she and her eight-year-old attended the anti-racism protest as there was an anti-immigration demonstration being held close to her daughter's school.
She said the group are camped beside the primary school every day over a nearby International Protection Accommodation Service (IPAS) centre, which has been there since 2022. 'We want to just come down and show our support for all of the people who go to her school who are migrants, or who have migrant parents,' the woman said, who asked that she not be named.
'We want to pass the message over to the other side that this is unacceptable for Ireland today, especially for the youth to have to put up with this type of environment. It's been extremely upsetting for the children and the families.'
Councillor Conor Reddy said that communities across Ireland had been divided over the last year and a half and what happened in Ballymena in recent weeks was 'only a few steps away' in Dublin. He said anti-immigration marches would 'further divide our city' and that it was 'about time we put it up to them'.
'We're here to say that we are stronger when we stand together, that hate divides us, hate plays into the hands of Government. We've seen how far hate can take us – when you look at what happened in Ballymena in the north last week, that's only a few steps away here I fear, especially in my community of Ballymun and Finglas where we have seen houses attacked and unfortunately burned before people have gone into them, so we have to draw a line in the sand.'
He said the march was acknowledging that there are issues with housing and inequality, but shifting the blame to the Government rather than migrants. 'Migrants, asylum seekers people that own IPAS centres are also multi-property landlords, so the enemy is the same and it's about pointing that out.'
Join our Dublin Live breaking news service on WhatsApp. Click this link to receive your daily dose of Dublin Live content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice .
For all the latest news from Dublin and surrounding areas visit our homepage.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nuclear weapons have been in the Middle East for decades – not in Iran, but in Israel
Nuclear weapons have been in the Middle East for decades – not in Iran, but in Israel

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

Nuclear weapons have been in the Middle East for decades – not in Iran, but in Israel

Donald Trump 's decision to go to war against Iran will not stop the spread of nuclear weapons. On the contrary, it has taught every dictator a simple lesson: get yourself a H-bomb fast or you will be bombed whenever we feel like it. Trump once threatened to unleash 'fire and fury' on North Korea . He didn't do it because North Korea has 50 nuclear warheads. But the Iranian regime is fair game, not because it was probably developing its own nuclear weapons , but because it had not actually done so. This is the grotesque irony of this war – if the mullahs had been more reckless, they would be safe. Ostensibly, the American and Israeli war on Iran has a laudable aim: to keep nuclear weapons out of the combustible Middle East. Fine – until we remember that nuclear weapons have been in the Middle East for decades – specifically in Israel. Israel's nuclear doomsday plan is called the Samson Option , after the biblical hero who pulled down the temple in Gaza, killing himself but also all the Philistines. With Trump in harness, it is pulling the temple of international order down on all our heads. READ MORE Israel's possession of about 90 nuclear warheads ('A-bombs and H-bombs, low yield and high yield, nuclear artillery shells and nuclear mines,' writes Ari Shavit in My Promised Land) is almost the definition of cognitive dissonance. For the Samson threat to be effective, everybody has to know it exists. Yet Israel does not acknowledge that existence and punishes those who do so. In 1986, Mordechai Vanunu , who worked at Israel's nuclear weapons facility at Dimona, revealed details of the programme to the Sunday Times. He was kidnapped in Italy by Mossad agents, drugged and flown back to Israel. There, he was tried in secret and sentenced to 18 years in prison, much of which he served in solitary confinement. The point of Vanunu's punishment was to sustain at all costs what has been called Israel's policy of 'implausible deniability'. This cognitive conjuring trick has worked. As Shavit puts it in his essential book about Israel in his lifetime: 'the international community accepted and adopted Israel's policy of opacity regarding [the] existence' of Dimona. It did so at least in part because the Samson Option was developed with active assistance from France while the United States (from the Eisenhower presidency onwards) turned an appropriately blind eye. Thus the presence of a major nuclear arsenal in the most inflammable part of the world has been an unknown known. The fear of nuclear weapons in the Middle East is focused on a country where they do not exist (Iran). It cannot be placed in the country where they do exist. Israel successfully created a reality distortion field in which the possible (Iran might get nuclear weapons) obscures the actual (Israel already has them). Even when, in November 2023, Amihai Eliyahu , a minister in the Israeli government, suggested in a radio interview that Israel could consider dropping an atomic bomb on Gaza , the EU and the US stuck their fingers in their ears and pretended not to hear. This great cloud of deliberate unknowing shrouds an obvious truth – the inevitability that, since Israel has been allowed to become a nuclear power, its regional rivals will eventually do the same. Many senior figures in Israel opposed the creation of the Samson Option because they feared, in Shavit's phrase, that it would 'open the gates of a future hell'. [ Nuclear threat is more real than at any time since second World War Opens in new window ] Writing in 2013, Shavit predicted: 'Sooner or later, the Israeli monopoly will be broken. First one hostile state will go nuclear, then a second hostile state, then a third. In the first half of the 21st century, the Middle East is bound to be nuclearised. The world's first multi-rival nuclear arena might emerge in the world's most unstable region.' When Shavit put this to one of the main architects of Israel's nuclear programme, the unnamed 'engineer' did not demur. 'He can definitely foresee a Middle East glowing in radioactive green ... As far as the engineer is concerned, there is only one answer: a pre-emptive strike.' Nuke them before they nuke us. This is the nihilistic logic set in train when the West gave the green light to a nuclear-armed Israel. In choosing to ignore this reality, the democratic world implicitly accepted that Israel exists in a twilight zone where the normal rules do not apply. It allowed Isreal to become a black hole of accountability. The problem with black holes is that they suck in everything that approaches them. Once you exempt Israel from the principle of nuclear non-proliferation, you also give it licence to ignore every other norm of behaviour. As we saw last week, Iran hitting a hospital in Israel with a rocket is an outrage (and yes it really is) but Israel launching 700 attacks on hospitals and healthcare facilities in Gaza is a regrettable necessity. A double standard is worse than no standard at all. It makes those who practice it look like liars, not just to the outside world but to their own citizens. When a war crime is merely an act of violence against civilians committed by people we don't like, all moral pronouncements become hollow. The US called Vladimir Putin's attacks on 'heat, water, electricity' in Ukraine 'barbaric'. But that word loses all meaning when it cannot be uttered in relation to Gaza. What's pulled down in this destruction of principles is any sense that democratic politicians believe what they say. As citizens watch their leaders switch their outrage on and off and collude in the atrocities they have so recently condemned, they become ever more deeply cynical. And cynicism corrodes democracy. The invasion of Iraq in 2003 wasn't just disastrous for the people of that country. It poisoned the wells of public trust on which democracy depends. The attack on Iran combined with the continuing slaughter in Gaza will be equally toxic. More voters will exercise their own Samson Option – pull the whole damn thing down on all our heads.

Israel reports waves of Iranian missiles, soon after Trump announced ceasefire
Israel reports waves of Iranian missiles, soon after Trump announced ceasefire

RTÉ News​

timean hour ago

  • RTÉ News​

Israel reports waves of Iranian missiles, soon after Trump announced ceasefire

Israel's military said Iran launched waves of missiles, with emergency services reporting three people killed, hours after US President Donald Trump announced a complete ceasefire between Israel and Iran to end a 12-day war. Witnesses said they heard explosions near Tel Aviv and Beersheba in southern Israel. Israel's military said six waves of missiles were launched by Iran and Israel's national ambulance service said three people were killed in Beersheba, the first reported deaths in Israel since Trump announced the ceasefire late last night. A senior White House official said Mr Trump had brokered a ceasefire deal in a call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel had agreed so long as Iran did not launch further attacks. "On the assumption that everything works as it should, which it will, I would like to congratulate both Countries, Israel and Iran, on having the Stamina, Courage, and Intelligence to end, what should be called, 'THE 12 DAY WAR'," Trump wrote on his Truth Social site. An Iranian official earlier confirmed that Tehran had agreed to a ceasefire, but the country's foreign minister said there would be no cessation of hostilities unless Israel stopped its attacks. Abbas Araqchi said overnight that if Israel stopped its "illegal aggression" against the Iranian people no later than 4am Tehran time (1.30am Irish time), Iran had no intention of continuing its response afterwards. There have been no reported Israeli attacks on Iran since that time. "The final decision on the cessation of our military operations will be made later," Mr Araqchi added in a post on X. Mr Trump appeared to suggest that Israel and Iran would have some time to complete any missions that are underway, at which point the ceasefire would begin in a staged process. Iran's semi-official SNN news agency reported today that Tehran fired its last round of missiles before the ceasefire came into effect. Israel, joined by the United States on the weekend, has carried out attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities, after alleging Tehran was getting close to obtaining a nuclear weapon. Iran denies ever having a nuclear weapons program but Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has said that if it wanted to, world leaders "wouldn't be able to stop us". Israel, which is not a party to the international Non-Proliferation Treaty, is the only country in the Middle East believed to have nuclear weapons. Israel does not deny or confirm that. Qatar's Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman AL Thani secured Tehran's agreement during a call with Iranian officials, an official briefed on the negotiations told Reuters today. US Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US special envoy Steve Witkoff were in direct and indirect contact with the Iranians, a White House official said. Neither Iran's UN mission nor the Israeli embassy in Washington responded to separate requests for comment from Reuters. Hours earlier, three Israeli officials had signaled Israel was looking to wrap up its campaign in Iran soon and had passed the message on to the United States. Mr Netanyahu had told government ministers whose discussions ended early this morning not to speak publicly, Israel's Channel12 television reported. Markets reacted favourably to the news. S&P 500 futures rose 0.4% late last night, suggesting traders expect the U.S. stock market to open with gains today. US crude futures fell in early Asian trading hours to their lowest level in more than a week after Mr Trump said a ceasefire had been agreed, relieving worries of supply disruption in the region. End of fighting? There did not appear to be calm yet in the region. The Israeli military issued two evacuation warnings in less than two hours to residents of areas in the Iranian capital Tehran, one late last night and one early this morning. Israeli Army radio reported early today that alarms were activated in the southern Golan Heights area due to fears of hostile aircraft intrusion. Earlier yesterday, Mr Trump said he would encourage Israel to proceed towards peace after dismissing Iran's attack on an American air base that caused no injuries and thanking Tehran for the early notice of the strikes. He said Iran fired 14 missiles at the US air base, calling it "a very weak response, which we expected, and have very effectively countered". Iran's handling of the attack recalled earlier clashes with the United States and Israel, with Tehran seeking a balance between saving face with a military response but without provoking a cycle of escalation it can't afford. Tehran appears to have achieved that goal. Iran's attack came after US bombers dropped 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs on Iranian underground nuclear facilities at the weekend, joining Israel's air war. Much of Tehran's population of 10 million has fled after days of bombing. The Trump administration maintains that its aim was solely to destroy Iran's nuclear program, not to open a wider war. "Iran was very close to having a nuclear weapon," Vice-President JD Vance said in an interview on Fox News' "Special Report with Bret Baier". "Now Iran is incapable of building a nuclear weapon with the equipment they have because we destroyed it," Mr Vance said. Mr Trump has cited intelligence reports that Iran was close to building a nuclear weapon, without elaborating. However, US intelligence agencies said earlier this year they assessed that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon and a source with access to US intelligence reports told Reuters last week that that assessment had not changed. But in a social media post on Sunday, Mr Trump spoke of toppling the hardline clerical rulers who have been Washington's principal foes in the Middle East since Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution. Israel, however, had made clear that its strikes on Evin prison - a notorious jail for housing political prisoners - and other targets in Tehran were intended to hit the Iranian ruling apparatus broadly, and its ability to sustain power. Iran's attack came after US bombers dropped 30,000-pound bunker-busters on Iranian underground nuclear facilities at the weekend, joining Israel's air war against Iran in a conflict that has entered its 12th day. "We did not assault anyone, and we will never accept being assaulted by anyone," Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said in a statement. "We will not submit to anyone's aggression - this is the logic of the Iranian nation." Iran gave advance notice to the US via diplomatic channels hours ahead of the attack, as well as to Qatari authorities. Mr Trump seized on that as a positive sign. "I want to thank Iran for giving us early notice, which made it possible for no lives to be lost, and nobody to be injured," he wrote on his Truth Social media site. "Perhaps Iran can now proceed to Peace and Harmony in the Region, and I will enthusiastically encourage Israel to do the same." He said Iran fired 14 missiles at the air base, calling it "a very weak response, which we expected, and have very effectively countered." "I am pleased to report that NO Americans were harmed and hardly any damage was done," Mr Trump wrote. "Most importantly, they've gotten it all out of their 'system,' and there will, hopefully, be no further HATE," he added. Iran's handling of the attack recalled earlier clashes with the United States and Israel, with Tehran seeking a balance between saving face with a military response but without provoking a cycle of escalation it can't afford. The country's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said Iran was ready to respond again in case of further action by the United States, according to a statement posted by the ministry's account on Telegram. The attack strained Iran's relationship with its Arab neighbors: Qatar condemned it, as did Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Iraq. "There are deep ties between the two states (Iran and Qatar) and the two nations, but the attack undoubtedly calls for a genuine meeting and a clear stance," Qatari foreign ministry spokesperson Majed Al Ansari said at a press conference. Meanwhile, Israel said it has carried out its most extensive wave of attacks on Tehran ever. Targets included a Tehran prison where Iran's leadership holds political opponents, in a renewed demonstration of its willingness to strike beyond its previously stated military and nuclear targets and attack key pillars of Iran's ruling system. Despite Iran's threats to challenge oil shipments from the Gulf, oil prices fell 7% in volatile trading LCOc1, suggesting traders doubted the Islamic Republic would follow through on any action that would disrupt global supplies. Qatar, situated just across the Gulf from Iran, reopened its airspace after a brief suspension, its civil aviation authority said early on Tuesday. Iran's foreign minister met Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow as Tehran sought backing from one of its last major power friends for its next steps. Striking regime targets Israel made clear that its strikes on Evin prison and other targets in Tehran were intended to hit the Iranian ruling apparatus broadly, and its ability to sustain power. Iran's IRIB state broadcaster released video showing rescue workers combing the flattened wreckage of a building at the prison, carrying a wounded man on a stretcher. The Mizan news outlet of Iran's judiciary said urgent action was being taken to protect the health and safety of inmates there. Evin has long been Iran's primary prison for political detainees and people accused of espionage, as well as the site of executions that remain strong memories for the opposition. Several high-profile foreign prisoners are also held there. Israel's military said it had also struck Revolutionary Guard command centres responsible for internal security in the Tehran area. The military was "currently striking, with unprecedented force, regime targets and governmental repression bodies in the heart of Tehran," Defence Minister Israel Katz said in a statement. Much of Tehran's population of 10 million has fled after 10 days of bombing.

'If World War III breaks out neutrality won't save us - here's why'
'If World War III breaks out neutrality won't save us - here's why'

Irish Daily Mirror

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Daily Mirror

'If World War III breaks out neutrality won't save us - here's why'

I grew up during the cold war as it was known between the United States and Russia and there was always a fear that World War 3 could break out at any time. But do you know what, we didn't lie in bed worrying about it because it was something none of us could control and if there was to be a nuclear war, we naively hoped Ireland as a neutral country would be spared from total annihilation and destruction. As a people we had a view that if we mind our own business, no one will interfere in our business. if there were things wrong in the world we kept our mouths shut and stayed out of it rather than upsetting any of the two superpowers. Things then all changed with the fall of the Berlin Wall and this in turn led to the breakup of the old Soviet Union as we knew it. New democracies from the old communist east emerged, Poland, Hungry, the Czech Republic, Romania, Bulgaria, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Ukraine and of course old east Germany was reunited with the west of the country. The new look Europe looked a far more peaceful place and our good friends in Moscow had their own troubles trying to keep a bankrupt Russia together. We all breathed a sigh of relief that the threat of a nuclear holocaust had passed for now. But fast forward to this year and thanks to the Russian leader Vladimir Putin, along with his buddy in the White House, Donald Trump, the world is now a far more dangerous place. The Moscow dictator wants to reunite the old Soviet Bloc which is why he started the war in Ukraine in the first place. He also has his eyes set on the Baltic states and could try to invade them in the next couple of years with devastating consequences for Europe. Trump in turn hates Europe and more specifically the EU - he sees Europe united as a big trading block as a threat to the prosperity of America. He would prefer if countries did a Brexit like Britain, leave the EU, and just do their own thing. Trump's decision to bomb Iran over the weekend was no big surprise. The last thing the west and specifically the US, Israel and Europe want is for the Mad Mullahs of Iran to have their own nuclear weapon. This is not a normal regime. It is a country run by religious extremists who will use their 1 million strong army against their own people to stay in power. They had no problem executing almost 1,000 of them last year. Any critics of the regime and severely punished and their secret police have eyes and ears in every little corner of the country. They are threatening all sorts of revenge against the US and Israel but the harsh truth is they haven't got the firepower to do it. The Iranians have lost control of their own skies so every military base and every piece of military equipment they have is now a sitting duck. They can be picked up piece by piece. Their threat to stop oil tankers using the straits of Hormuz wouldn't last too long if the Americans sent a naval battle group to the area, to protect international shipping. I hate war and prefer diplomacy all day every day. I have seen far too many young people die in conflict zones over the years. I am no fan of Trump but he had little or no choice but to bomb the Iranians. He was damned if he did and damned if he didn't. The world has no idea what evidence there was that Iran had a nuke so but tell you what I wouldn't trust the Tehran regime with their finger on the nuke button and I'd say Trump felt the same. I am an eternal optimist and genuinely don't believe this incident will cause world war 3. Russia says it will give Iran a nuclear weapon to defend itself, but don't believe a word of it. The last thing Putin will do is upset Trump because the President has basically given him free reign to grab as much territory in Ukraine before serious peace talks eventually get under way. Putin is also running out of cash to finance his military machine and the Russian economy is now under serious pressure. Remember it was the Americans who claimed Iraq had chemical weapons after 9/11 and it later turned out to be nonsense. They financed a war with Iraq which led to the removal of Saddam and his execution. Trump won't seek regime change in Iran because it would drag America into a long protracted and costly war that he and the Republicans don't want. He wants his legacy to be as a peacemaker not a warmonger. Sending young men into battle on foreign shores would go against the grain for him and there would be no support in the US for it. What does all this mean for Ireland? The Government rightly kept its head down and didn't condemn the Americans for the Iran bombing .They know where their bread is buttered. It called for dialogue between all sides to resolve their dispute. Most of our EU partners don't care much for our neutrality. They will want to see us paying big pots of money into a European defence fund in the years ahead so the EU can defend us. At the moment we haven't the military numbers or weaponry to defend ourselves and are the laughing stock of the world. We are literally a sitting duck waiting to be invaded. If World War 3 ever does break out trust me neutrality won't save us. The Russians have already said they see us as part of Britain.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store