NST Leader: Time for Myanmar to change
WESTERN analysts are no fan of Asean. Because, to quote The Economist, it has "the irritating habit of talking around the big issues". Hard to disagree.
But Malaysia's call on Asean to speak "firmly and collectively" in defence of international law, citing the Gaza and Myanmar crises as tests of the bloc's moral responsibility will surely win some fans.
Speaking at the Asean Foreign Ministers' Meeting in Kuala Lumpur on Sunday, Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan said the bloc must not remain on the sidelines in the face of global injustices. Blame the silence on Asean's consensus-based decision-making and its principle of non-interference.
To issue a statement on any issue, it would require all the 10 countries to agree, a near impossibility.
On most issues, it has been a tug of war between one group and another. One wonders where the Asean spirit fled to. At the most, if consensus is what drives its decision, then the world has to get used to "the irritating habit of talking around the big issues".
This is of no help to anyone, most of all to Asean. This must change if the bloc wants to defend the oppressed, a call that Malaysia has made to Asean. We needn't go far to find the oppressed.
They are within Asean in Myanmar. For more than four years the bloc has been trying to get the military junta, which overthrew an elected government in February 2021, to stop the atrocities there through the five-point consensus (5PC).
But the military leaders have shown no interest in implementing it. There is a reason why the 5PC is badged consensus; military regime leader General Min Aung Hlaing himself signed the document.
Frustrated by the recalcitrance of the military junta and Asean's inability to stop the atrocities in a member country, Malaysia is emerging as a vocal advocate for change, including a reconsideration of its principle of non-interference.
If the military regime continues to ignore the 5PC, suspension of membership may be next. Malaysia is right.
Asean cannot remain on the sidelines when atrocities are being committed against its people. More than four years is long enough to show that whatever Asean is doing now is not effective. The bloc can't keep doing the same thing and expect different results.
Already more than 10,000 people have been killed — local news portals and Western media, The Economist included, call the killings massacres. Not to mention the millions of Rohingya who have fled to Bangladesh, putting great strain on the country's limited resources.
Malaysia, Indonesia and others are also forced to house the Rohingya refugees. These are war crimes, yet some Asean members continue to be silent. If Asean's past is our guide, Malaysia's call for change in diplomacy may face some hurdles. Myanmar itself isn't the problem; currently it has no voting rights.
The challenge will come from a few countries that are aligned with Myanmar. As consensus is still the ruling principle, it will require the agreement of all nine members.
These few will certainly challenge the proposal for change. But they must remember that they are helping Min Aung Hlaing damage Asean's reputation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Kuala Lumpur to host fourth CEAPAD on July 11
KUALA LUMPUR: The fourth Ministerial Meeting of the Conference on Cooperation among East Asian Countries for Palestinian Development (CEAPAD IV) will be held in Kuala Lumpur on July 11. The meeting will be jointly chaired by Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan and his counterparts from Japan and Palestine, Wisma Putra said on Thursday (June 5). Earlier, Malaysia, Japan and Palestine had co-chaired the eighth Working-level Online Meeting of CEAPAD. The meeting was held for the second time this year with discussions focused on current and future assistance needs for Palestine and preparations for the 4th CEAPAD, the ministry said on its official Facebook page. The meeting was also participated by Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, South Korea, the World Bank, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) and the Islamic Development Bank. Separately, the Japanese Foreign Ministry, in a statement, said participants to the meeting have concurred to working towards the success of the upcoming ministerial meeting. The Palestinian side, meanwhile, updated the participants on the current situation in Gaza and the West Bank, and outlined future assistance needs, it added. The virtual meeting was co-chaired by the director-general of the Middle Eastern and African Affairs Bureau at Japan's Foreign Ministry, Ando Toshihide, Palestine's Acting Planning and International Cooperation Minister, Dr Samah Hamad, and and undersecretary of the International Cooperation and Development Division at Malaysia's Foreign Ministry, Devrin Jeck. CEAPAD is a regional platform initiated by Japan in 2013 to support Palestinian state-building efforts by leveraging the resources, knowledge, and economic development experiences of East Asian nations. In a joint news conference in Putrajaya early this year, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba have reaffirmed commitment to CEAPAD and to support Palestinian development efforts. - Bernama
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
Malaysia brings ASEAN voice to OECD meeting in Paris
KUALA LUMPUR: ASEAN, which is chaired by Malaysia this year, has expressed full support for all efforts to strengthen open markets and uphold a rules-based multilateral trading system as the foundation for sustainable and inclusive global growth. The Permanent Representative of Malaysia to the World Trade Organisation (WTO), Ambassador Syahril Syazli Ghazali said the ASEAN chairmanship's theme 'Inclusivity and Sustainability' reflects Malaysia's priority in promoting a fair, sustainable and inclusive trade. 'In addressing the emerging global headwinds and uncertainties, ASEAN Geoeconomics Task Force (AGTF) was established to monitor, assess and recommend policy responses to strengthen ASEAN – as a single market,' he said in a statement to Bernama today. Syahril Syazli represented Malaysia at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Ministerial Council Meeting (MCM) held from June 3 to 4 in Paris. Malaysia is also spearheading various initiatives to build a digitally resilient ASEAN, in particular, driving the ASEAN Digital Economy Framework Agreement (DEFA) negotiations, towards substantial conclusion by the end of this year. 'DEFA is a cornerstone in facilitating and promoting the 'inclusivity' of ASEAN, and ensuring the region will continue to enjoy digital trade benefits,' he said. On empowering micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) as well as women, Syahril Syazli said Malaysia is fostering digital skills for women entrepreneurs via national programmes such as EmpowerHER Digital and Women Exporters Development Programme, aimed to integrate more women-led businesses into the international value chain. 'The landmark initiative to establish ASEAN's first Women's Economic Empowerment Centre in Kuala Lumpur, announced last month, would further enhance the role of women in economic development as well as promote inclusive growth in the region,' he added.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Exclusive-Ukraine hits out at Europe's payout from frozen Russian cash
KYIV/BRUSSELS (Reuters) -Ukraine's government has criticised a decision to take billions of euros of Russian wealth frozen in Europe and hand it to Western investors, warning that it weakened Europe's stand against Moscow. The criticism follows a move last month by Belgium's Euroclear to take 3 billion euros ($3.4 billion) of Russian investor cash held at the clearing firm to pay Westerners who lost out when Moscow seized their money held in Russia. Now Ukraine has warned that it sends a wrong signal and threatens to weaken Europe's hand when dealing with Russia, while it debates using the entire $300 billion of Russian wealth stranded in Europe to rebuild and defend the battered country. "If private investors are compensated before the victims of war, it won't be justice," said Iryna Mudra, a senior official in Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy's office, in Kyiv's first public comments on the move. "It creates a perception of inconsistency, of Europe wavering in its resolve," Mudra, a deputy head of Ukraine's presidential administration, told Reuters. "International law requires that the aggressor is to make full reparation to the victim and not to investors who ... entered a high-risk jurisdiction," said Mudra, who is in charge of legal affairs in Zelenskiy's administration. The criticism comes at a critical time for the Western alliance backing Kyiv, with U.S. President Donald Trump's administration distancing itself from Europe and casting doubt over its commitment to Ukraine's defence and Russian sanctions. Mudra, one of a small circle of officials that set policy, also stressed the importance of maintaining control of the frozen Russian assets, which chiefly belong to its central bank with the majority held at Euroclear. The central bank assets were frozen at the outset of war in the single most powerful sanction directed at Russia over its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, a penalty that is deeply resented in Moscow. Euroclear in March gained clearance from Belgium, its principal legal authority, to make the payout, people familiar with the matter have told Reuters, after the European Union changed its sanctions regime last year to make this possible. A spokesperson for the Belgian government said: "This is not a Belgian decision but the application of a European regulation decided unanimously by the member states." Euroclear has emphasised that it only implements sanctions and does not take decisions about lifting them. 'MIND BOGGLING' Three Russian sources recently told Reuters that Russian President Vladimir Putin's conditions for ending the war include the resolution of the frozen assets issue. Ukraine, meanwhile, is campaigning fiercely against any return of the money to Moscow. Euroclear alone held 195 billion euros of cash in March - mainly Russian central bank funds, with some belonging to Russian investors. "If it is returned to Russia, it will be converted into tanks, missiles, drones, training of new troops," said Ukraine's Mudra. "The world ... must demonstrate that unlawful war brings irreversible financial consequences." Some see the frozen Russian wealth as a lifeline for Kyiv. In the past, the West has engineered loans and payments to Ukraine from the interest on the stranded Russian stockpile, which Putin denounced as theft. Ukrainian officials fear the Euroclear payout, even though it does not affect the central bank money, could undermine their efforts to secure an agreement on using the wider pool of Russian assets to help their country. Mykola Yurlov, an official at Ukraine's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said the payout set a bad precedent, while Kira Rudik, a Ukrainian parliamentarian, was also critical. "Western companies were operating in Russia at their own risk. Why are these companies basically asking their societies to compensate for this risk?" Rudik told Reuters. "We need this money to rebuild and defend Ukraine." Last month's move also drew criticism abroad. "It is mind boggling that the priority is to reimburse corporate interests rather than spend the money defending Ukraine," said Jacob Kirkegaard, a sanctions expert with the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a Washington-based think tank. While the payout to investors left frozen Russian central bank reserves untouched, it made a dent in the stockpile of Russian wealth that gives the EU leverage over Moscow. More importantly for critics, it sets a worrying precedent. European Union leaders are expected to renew sanctions, including a freeze of Russian assets, at a summit meeting in June, although they could yet face an attempt by Hungary to derail those efforts. (Reporting by John O'Donnell and Tom BalmforthEditing by Tomasz Janowski)
