China never supplied weapons to parties in the Ukraine war, foreign ministry says
BEIJING, June 26 (Reuters) - China's foreign ministry on Thursday denied that China supplied weapons to parties in the Ukraine war, and accused "relevant NATO personnel" of slandering China's "normal military build-up".
Guo Jiakun, a spokesperson for the foreign ministry, made the remarks in a regular press briefing in response to NATO chief Mark Rutte saying there was a "massive build-up" of the military in China, and that China was supporting the war effort in Ukraine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
Nato was a victory for Starmer on the global stage, but now he's at war with his own MPs
Sir Keir Starmer seemed chipper as he boarded the plane home from the Nato summit on Wednesday evening. He cheerily thanked hacks in the travelling press delegation for what he said had been a great two-day trip to The Hague. And looking at Nato alone, it had been a success. Across the board, allies signed up to a historic increase in defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP. After briefly wavering on his commitment to Article 5, even Donald Trump fell in line. And following a public love-in with Nato secretary general Mark Rutte – who unnervingly, dubbed him the 'daddy' between the two warring nations of Iran and Israel – the US president conceded that the alliance was no longer a 'rip off', saying he is with is his European friends 'all the way'. Meanwhile, Starmer was able to pitch Britain as a leader on the world stage by cosying up to Mr Trump and purchasing 12 new F-35A fighter jets, massively ramping up Britain's nuclear capabilities. But what was left unsaid when the PM briefly greeted the media sharing the plane with him was that he was flying back into the most significant rebellion of his premiership – a revolt which threatens to shake the foundations of the historic majority he won just 11 months ago. Speaking at a press conference about Britain's contribution to defence spending at the Nato summit just hours earlier, the prime minister was forced to deny suggestions that he might be forced out of office before the next election. 'Many people predicted before the election that we 'couldn't read the room' we 'hadn't got the politics right' we 'wouldn't win an election after 2019' because we lost so badly. "We got a landslide victory. So I'm comfortable with reading the room and delivering the change the country needs', Sir Keir insisted. But at home, his MPs are much less convinced. More than 120 Labour MPs have signed an amendment which would kill off the government's flagship £5bn welfare reforms entirely. And there is a growing feeling that the prime minister has failed to listen to them, after he used part of his Nato presser to dismiss the rebellion as 'noises off'. 'No 10 sees MPs as irritants and fodder', one Labour MP with her name on the amendment said. 'We're all working hard and this is how they treat us. It goes back to the point about how arrogant and out of touch they are.' The prime minister's comments at the Nato press conference displayed a real lack of empathy for his own MPs, and ironically, a distinct failure to read the room. It would be hard to argue the prime minister is a wholly unempathetic person. An in-depth profile of the prime minister in the New Statesman published earlier this month showed how deeply he feels the weight of sacrifices made by individuals putting their lives on the line to serve their country. But in his first year in office, it has become increasingly clear that the prime minister is much more comfortable navigating foreign diplomacy than he is with dealing with angry backbenchers. It is in this area that Sir Keir seems entirely unable to empathise. He is known for being pragmatic rather than ideological, and appears to be bored by political manoeuvring. At times, this can provide a refreshing break from the Westminster bubble. But, taken too far, it can be the opposite. Starmer seems to have lost sight of the fact that in some scenarios, political manoeuvring is more than just self-serving posturing. Sometimes, it's a fight for hundreds of thousands of disabled people who are scared of losing vital financial support. The prime minister is now frantically meeting with leading MPs involved in the amendment to try to secure their backing by offering concessions. But the fact that it was allowed to get this far in the first place has angered those who would naturally be inclined to back the prime minister. Many are now threatening to dig their heels in until the bill is dead in the water. As Starmer returns from what was a strong showing at Nato, he must now display some of the empathy and political nous that he so effectively shows on the global stage. If he is unable to do so, he may well lose the domestic battle – and it could be catastrophic for his authority.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Nato has just surrendered Ukraine to Putin
This week's Nato summit in the Hague was marred by a tragic irony. Donald Trump achieved a major diplomatic victory as his calls for increased European defence spending converted into reality. The final summit declaration text announced Nato's commitment to spending 5 per cent of its budget on defence and articulated its ironclad support for the Article 5 collective defence clause. While the US president's big win should have enhanced Europe's sense of security against the Russian threat, the Nato summit left the alliance's eastern flank with a feeling of grave unease. Trump's inflammatory comments on the ambiguity of Article 5 left the Baltic States questioning whether Nato would confront Russia's intensifying array of hybrid threats. The sense of betrayal in Ukraine was even more palpable. The Nato final summit declaration's refusal to condemn Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine and Volodymyr Zelensky's marginal presence encapsulated the alliance's growing Ukraine fatigue. While Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary-general, repeated the age-old trope about Ukraine's irreversible path towards alliance membership, his words felt hollower than ever before. The Nato summit's dismissal of Ukraine's concerns is emblematic of an alarming broader trend. After more than three years of attritional war with Russia, Ukraine finds itself lacking the manpower and weaponry to triumph. During their inflammatory Oval Office meeting with Zelensky, Trump warned that Ukraine was 'running low on soldiers' and JD Vance, his vice-president, railed against forced conscription on the Ukrainian streets. The Ukrainian president responded to these taunts by reversing his long-standing opposition to mobilising Ukrainians aged 18-24. The up-tick in voluntary new recruits has not solved the problem. Russia's incremental military triumphs around Pokrovsk were enabled by a shortage of Ukrainian defenders and morale in the Ukrainian army's ranks is dipping due to frictions between the rank-and-file and senior command over tactics. Combat injuries are afflicting Ukraine's most experienced servicemen and leaving their rookie replacements vulnerable to Russian human wave attacks. As Trump continues to signal his aversion to open-ended military assistance to Ukraine, war materiel supplies are poised to dry up further. As Russia's drone and missile barrages against Kyiv intensify, Ukraine is prioritising Patriot air defence systems in its US procurements and is side-lining its past pleas for more sophisticated offensive weapons. The prospects of the US transferring Tomahawk cruise missiles or aircraft that could fully neutralise Russia's Su-35 advanced stealth fighter jets are remote. For now, Ukraine can rely on the largesse of its European allies to compensate for some of these shortfalls. Germany has received permissions from the US to transfer 125 long-range artillery rockets and 100 Patriot air defence missiles to Ukraine. Vladimir Putin's threats against Germany over the Taurus long-range missiles suggests that Friedrich Merz, its chancellor, might finally be breaking with his predecessor Olaf Scholz's die-hard restraint. The Netherlands recently transferred the last of its 24 pledged F-16 jets to Ukraine and Norway is mulling a doubling of F-16 deliveries to Ukraine's air force. European countries are also playing a critical role in strengthening Ukraine's domestic arms industry. At the Nato summit, Britain announced plans to fund joint drone production initiatives with Ukraine and Germany built on its recent pledge to invest €5 billion in Ukraine's long-range missile production capacity. These promises are music to Zelensky's ears but are not a panacea for Ukraine's equipment woes. Ukraine's domestic arms industry cannot develop fast enough to neutralise North Korea's military assistance to Russia and Europe's depleted militaries need to supply Ukraine by ordering new weapons from the US. As Russia launches a multi-pronged offensive against Donetsk, Kharkiv and Sumy, Ukraine is unable to meet its urgent war materiel needs. Despite these negative headwinds, Ukraine's unbreakable patriotism and tactical ingenuity can slow Russia's advance. Ukrainian Armed Forces Commander Oleksandry Syrskyi's declaration that Ukraine has stopped Russia's offensive in Sumy and the Operation Spiderweb attack on Russian strategic bombers encapsulate these invaluable traits. Russia's unwillingness to de-escalate the war despite staggering casualties and frustratingly slow gains suggests that Ukraine cannot rely on resolve alone. This realisation is turning Ukrainians who idolised Western economic and democratic institutions into cynics, and damaging Ukraine's long-term prospects of integrating into the Trans-Atlantic security orbit. While Trump and Rutte hailed defence spending increases that should increase Nato's long-term resilience, the Nato joint declaration's marginalisation of Ukraine undoes many of the benefits of the system. Long-term security is impossible if we surrender to Russia in Ukraine.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Prestwick Airport releases statement on US war planes row
The Herald reports that the government-owned airport said it was 'providing aviation services to military customers from around the world including Nato partners'. It comes after Constitution Secretary Angus Robertson insisted the base was not used in recent American bombing raids on Iran. READ MORE: Patrick Harvie and Angus Robertson face-off over Israel divestment We told how Yousaf said he hoped the Scottish Government would take advice on its 'legal obligations' including US planes refuelling at Prestwick. He called on First Minister John Swinney to distance himself from Israel's genocide in Gaza and 'illegal' strikes on Iran. "Scotland, including through the use of our publicly owned assets such as Prestwick, cannot be complicit,' the former first minister said. 'The Scottish Government should be doing everything within its power to distance itself from Israel's illegal military actions, whether it's the assets we own, the limited foreign interventions we can make…Whatever we can do, we should be doing because this is the moral question of our time." US military aircraft have stopped at Prestwick 39 times since the start of June. And now, the airport has released a statement in response to the row. (Image: PA) 'Glasgow Prestwick Airport operates on a commercial basis and at arms-length from the Scottish Government," a spokeswoman said. "For almost 80 years the airport has been providing aviation services to military customers from around the world including Nato partners. 'We do not comment on operational matters relating to individual military customers. 'All aircraft landing at any aerodrome in the UK (including Glasgow Prestwick Airport) require to have Civil Aviation Authority permission to transit UK airspace or land in the UK.' READ MORE: YouGov poll predicts result in every Scottish seat – see the full map Earlier this week, Robertson was asked by Scottish Labour backbencher Carole Mochan whether the Scottish Government would rule out allowing the US and Israel access to Prestwick Airport while they carried out strikes on Iran. Robertson said that he had 'not seen any information that would support any conclusion about involvement of Scottish facilities being used directly in terms of military attacks on Iran'. He added that previous strikes did not involve the airport and American jets were refuelled 'in the air' before bombing Iran, returning to the US without stopping at Prestwick.
