‘Redundant agency': Child welfare groups doubt Hope Florida's foster care claims
Hope Florida helped more than 21,000 families referred to it by child protective investigators, according to the Florida Department of Children and Families.
During a recent legislative hearing, the program's executive director credited it with helping to reduce the number of Florida children in foster care by 7,000.
But others who are familiar with what the program does — and doesn't do — suggest such claims are exaggerated or false.
St. Petersburg resident Julie Broward said she reached out to Hope Florida after her home was flooded during Hurricane Milton. Broward cares for three grandchildren who had been in foster care and has Stage 4 ovarian cancer. Her brush with Hope Florida was all too brief.
'I never got help,' she said.
Current and former leaders of foster care agencies interviewed by the Tampa Bay Times said they doubt the claims made by Hope Florida. They say that the program founded by Florida first lady Casey DeSantis duplicates what their agencies were already doing and that it has taken resources from existing programs.
'There is already a system to accomplish everything Hope Florida was supposed to accomplish,' said Gerry Glynn, former CEO of Embrace Families, the nonprofit that ran foster care operations in Orange, Osceola and Seminole counties for two decades. 'They were holding the hands and being a moral support. Is that worth the millions of dollars they spent on it?'
Three current chief executives confirmed what Glynn had to say but spoke on the condition of anonymity, citing their agencies' reliance on state funding. Glynn and the other chief executives disputed Hope Florida's claim of helping turn around families at risk of having their children removed. Many times, they said, Hope Florida referred needy families to state agencies and services, a role foster care agencies already perform.
After Glynn's former nonprofit announced that it was stepping down as a lead agency, Embrace Families was criticized by the Florida Department of Children and Families for financial mismanagement and placing children in unlicensed settings, reports show.
Glynn said Hope Florida's hotline would be of little help to parents dealing with issues such as substance addiction, mental health disorders and domestic violence that often lead to the removal of their children.
There was also concern that families battling those problems need more than someone showing up with a meal. That was referencing Casey DeSantis' comment at a recent news conference that churches showing up with a tray of lasagna for a struggling single mother can ease poverty.
The doubts about Hope Florida's merits come as lawmakers have also asked questions about its effectiveness and how much it costs. The scrutiny came after the organization's charity arm received $10 million from a $67 million Medicaid settlement that was previously undisclosed to the state Legislature.
When asked for comment, a Department of Children and Families spokesperson declined over email when a Times reporter would not share direct quotes ahead of publication of this story nor name the four officials who were interviewed.
'Hope Florida does not provide services, it connects people with others who provide services — like CarePortal,' said the spokesperson, referencing a platform launched 10 years ago.
Florida had a free crisis helpline long before Hope Florida. The Florida 211 Network, comprised of 11 organizations, was officially adopted by the state in the early 2000s, said executive director Tori Greer. It provides callers with access to more than 32,000 programs and services.
The 211 network fielded more than a million requests for help last year. About 348,000 were requests for housing resources, 87,000 for food assistance, and more than 211,000 for mental health and substance abuse support, Greer said.
Hope Florida was created as a pilot program in 2019 before operating statewide in 2021. It operates within the Florida Department of Children and Families, whose secretary reports to Gov. Ron DeSantis.
Hope Florida doesn't have an official budget but the department reassigned 150 state employees to become navigators who answer calls made to the program's help line.
That adds up to about $6 million in salaries even before benefits are calculated, said state Rep. Allison Tant, D-Tallahassee, during an April 15 Florida House hearing on healthcare.
She asked why the department had created those positions while state lawmakers are considering a Florida budget that will cut jobs in other state departments.
'I'm frankly astonished we have this whole system which we've now got at least one agency with $6 million in hirings that have happened,' she said.
The secretary of the Department of Children and Families, Taylor Hatch, responded that the positions were funded within her agency's existing budget and amounted to less than 2% of its workforce.
The reassignment of workers to Hope Florida coincided with the department struggling to deal with an influx of calls for help as it recertified the eligibility of about 5 million Medicaid recipients.
Residents calling the department's Medicaid call center during 2023 had average wait times of 32 minutes. Nearly four out of 10 callers gave up waiting. Slow response times were cited in a lawsuit brought by health advocacy groups on behalf of residents who lost health coverage. Florida also received a warning from the federal government that the Medicaid call center wasn't providing timely assistance to those renewing or applying for the benefit.
Concerns about whether the Medicaid call center is adequately staffed persist. A recent report by Unidos, a Latino advocacy nonprofit, found that Spanish speakers waited an average of 54 minutes, with some waiting more than two hours.
Hope Florida navigators take calls from families in need and log details into an online system called CarePortal, which allows church groups and nonprofits to see requests for help.
But foster care agencies already were using that system. If a family needs help buying a bed for a child, foster care workers typically reach out to local faith groups or nonprofits and use CarePortal to find the closest help by ZIP code. If help isn't forthcoming, the agency will spend from its own budget to fill the need.
The performance of foster care agencies and child protective investigators is documented and posted online, but the state has not released any details about Hope Florida's performance and how much the program costs.
The group has published magazine-style reports on its website and social media pages listing success stories but those provide only the first name of the person helped. The accompanying photographs are stock images obtained online.
Not included in the promotional materials is Acacia Davidson, 50. She offered a less flattering take of her experience.
Davidson said she repeatedly called Hope Florida after her apartment flooded during Hurricane Milton. The help to pay for accommodations she received from the Federal Emergency Management Agency expired and she, her husband and daughter have been living in a motel room since.
Davidson, who has osteoarthritis, said the navigators she spoke with were unable to help her find a subsidized apartment.
'They're very ill-informed on resources they're talking about,' she said. 'I've been the one emailing and calling until I could get some kind of result.'
The claim that Hope Florida deserved credit for a drop in the number of children in foster care was made by former Executive Director Erik Dellenback during the April Florida House hearing.
More than 23,000 Florida children were wards of the state when Dellenback was named as Governor's Liaison for Faith in August 2019. He was appointed as executive director of Hope Florida in January but resigned effective May 1 amid the fallout over the use of the Medicaid settlement.
As of March, the number of children in foster care had fallen to just over 15,200.
'I would encourage you to look at where foster care is today,' Dellenback told lawmakers during the hearing, adding that the reduced numbers are because Hope Florida had made it possible for faith and community partners to 'care for families, strengthen families and help that child stay in that biological home.'
Foster agency officials said it's unlikely that Hope Florida's help line contributed to the drop and cite other factors.
Local agencies have spent years developing and implementing evidence-based interventions to go into homes and have eyes on families at risk of having their children removed. Case managers work for weeks or months to get parents to follow plans that include substance-abuse counseling, therapy and anger management classes.
The 2018 Families First Prevention and Services Act made more federal funding available for services that help families before children are removed. The drop in the number of children in care in Florida is mirrored nationally, with federal data showing a 13% decline between 2019 and 2022.
'I would be skeptical that Hope Florida could take that credit when nationally the numbers have come down,' Glynn said. 'Hope Florida clearly does not have a national footprint.'
Other changes specific to Florida's child welfare system likely also helped.
In 2023, Florida ended a more than two-decade experiment that saw child protective investigators employed and supervised by sheriff's offices in seven counties, including Hillsborough, Pinellas and Pasco.
Some of those counties had among the highest removal rates of children, a 2021 Times report found.
Foster care agencies contracted by the state receive funding from the Department of Children and Families but also fundraise to boost their revenue and the services they can offer. The arrival of Hope Florida has created another competitor for those limited donor dollars, Glynn said.
'I didn't understand why we were creating this redundant agency that will vie for the same resources,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca sues Utah Attorney General over discount medication law
SALT LAKE CITY () — The pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca has filed a federal lawsuit against Utah Attorney General Derek Brown and Utah Insurance Commissioner Jon Pike over a recent law that is intended to allow more pharmacies to have access to drug discount programs. In a lawsuit filed May 23, AstraZeneca alleges that Utah SB 69 is unconstitutional. The law was introduced and passed in the 2025 General Assembly, and it went into effect on May 7. The law prohibits drug manufacturers from restricting pharmacies from working with 340B entities, which help pharmacies and patients access medications at a discounted price. Senator Lee responds to the Trump-Musk feud The 340B Drug Pricing Program is a that 'enables covered entities to stretch scarce federal resources as far as possible, reaching more eligible patients and providing more comprehensive services,' according to the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) website. It means that drug manufacturers participating in Medicaid agree to provide 'outpatient drugs to covered entities at significantly reduced prices.' All organizations need to be registered and enrolled in the 340B program in order to purchase discounted medications. The law that established the 340B Program, Section 340B(a)(4) of the Public Health Service Act, specified certain types of for the program, such as medical centers that serve rural and other underserved communities and clinics that specialize in particular diseases like HIV/AIDS. SB 69 expands the scope, requiring drug manufacturers to provide the discounts to third-party pharmacies that are contracting with 340B entities, and this is what AstraZeneca is claiming is unconstitutional in its lawsuit. Utah House Republicans elect new leadership members The lawsuit states that because price controls 'disincentivize innovation and destabilize markets,' Congress chose to specifically limit the types of organizations that are eligible in Section 340B. The suit notes that for-profit pharmacies like Walgreens or CVS were not included as eligible, and there have already been several federal court cases ruling that block efforts to require drug manufacturers to provide discounts to contracted pharmacies. AstraZeneca claims in its suit that SB 69 'requires pharmaceutical manufacturers to offer 340B-discounted pricing for sales at an unlimited number of contract pharmacies,' expanding 340B discounts to 'an entirely new category of transactions not covered by Section 340B itself.' The suit alleges that SB 69 directly conflicts with federal law requirements, and therefore, it cannot be enforced against Astrazeneca or other drug manufacturers. AstraZeneca is asking the court to declare SB 69 unconstitutional and to order that Utah AG Derek Brown and Insurance Commissioner Jon Pike not enforce the law against AstraZeneca. Musk floats 'The American Party' after Trump tiff Myths VS Facts: What health officials want you to know about the MMR vaccine Good4Utah Road Tour: Willard Bay State Park Lori Vallow Daybell back in court, charged with conspiracy to murder ex nephew-in-law Man charged with assault for allegedly attacking and strangling neighbor Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Activists protest possible Medicaid cuts outside KS Rep. Derek Schmidt's Topeka office
TOPEKA (KSNT) — Kansans are speaking out against lawmakers who are voting to cut Medicaid. The GOP-led One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed the US House by a razor thin margin. 215 House members voted to pass it, while 214 voted against it. Local Kansas activists are calling out Rep. Derek Schmidt, a Republican who voted to pass the bill. A group of protesters gathered outside of Schmidt's office in Topeka Thursday afternoon and expressed concerns about cuts to Medicaid. 'Today is life or death,' protester Dillon Warren said. 'We voted someone in there that we shouldn't have. He doesn't support us.' The Congressional Budget Office estimates that if the bill passes, at least 7 million people will lose Medicaid coverage. For that reason, many Kansas voters are making their voices heard. Chiefs and Royals stadium bill deadline approaching as Kansas and Missouri fight for the teams 'We need Medicaid for medical equipment,' protester Rick Macias said. 'These chairs are $200,000 if not more. So, it's very important that Medicaid sticks around.' 27 News reached out to Schmidt, who was unavailable for comment. A spokesperson for the congressman provided 27 News with a written statement. 'Congressman Schmidt is a strong supporter of Medicaid for people the program is designed to help: those who are disabled, in nursing homes, pregnant, raising small children, or otherwise in need. Unfortunately, some states have abused the program by providing benefits to illegal aliens, millions of healthy young adults who choose not to work, or people who are not eligible to receive taxpayer-funded benefits from the program. That is the main reason why Medicaid spending has exploded by more than 50 percent since just 2019: an unsustainable rate of growth that puts benefits for Americans who need them most at risk. By addressing this abuse of the program, Congressman Schmidt is protecting both the traditional Medicaid recipients who rely on benefits and the taxpayers who pay the bills.' Spokesman for Rep. Derek Schmidt For more Capitol Bureau news, click here. Keep up with the latest breaking news in northeast Kansas by downloading our mobile app and by signing up for our news email alerts. Sign up for our Storm Track Weather app by clicking here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
46 State Medical Associations Urge Senate to Reject Medicaid Cuts in H.R. 1
The House Budget Reconciliation bill will cause at least 7.8 million Medicaid enrollees to lose their health care coverage. SACRAMENTO, Calif., June 6, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Just days ahead of an expected Senate vote on H.R. 1, 46 state medical associations, as part of Physicians for Medicaid have sent a letter to the United States Senate urging them to reject the dangerous cuts to Medicaid proposed in H.R. 1 that will cause millions of patients to lose coverage and even more to lose access to care - children, pregnant women, seniors, veterans, the disabled and working families. Statewide hospital associations have also weighed in, as proposed cuts impact all providers, including physicians and hospitals. The bill, which includes $200 billion in cuts to the existing and longstanding provider taxes, would have a catastrophic effect on state budgets and the country's entire health care delivery system and would impact 49 state Medicaid programs. Provider taxes have been authorized under federal law, approved by both Republican and Democratic administrations, and affirmed by state legislatures in 49 states for decades. They are a legitimate financing mechanism used by states in partnership with the federal government to fund essential health services and have kept rural hospitals, maternity wards, nursing homes, and physician practices open. The bill also imposes damaging changes to federal student loan programs making it harder for students to pursue medical careers at a time of critical physician shortages. We urge the Senate to pursue more balanced solutions that expand the physician workforce and preserve Medicaid for our patients. "If these provider tax cuts are enacted, it will create significant gaps in State budgets, forcing states to raise taxes, or reduce benefits, coverage, and provider payments. These reductions will lead to even more crowding of emergency departments and as the uncompensated care burdens grow from patients losing coverage, many rural hospitals, nursing homes, and community physician practices will be forced to close to all patients," the letter says. There are three main provisions in H.R. 1 (as passed by the House of Representatives on May 22, 2025) that will drastically limit or eliminate existing provider taxes nationwide. These provisions below apply to all provider taxes, including hospitals, nursing homes, managed care organizations, and other provider categories. Moratorium on New or Increased Provider Taxes (SEC. 44132) – Under the provisions of H.R. 1, none of these taxes could be increased after the passage and enactment of the law nor can any new taxes be adopted by the state Legislatures (there are 19 categories of provider taxes). This provision would freeze taxes and not keep pace with increasing health care costs over time. It is also not equitable between states. Revising Payments for Certain State Directed Payments (SEC. 44133) – Once a provider tax is established, state Medicaid programs can fund supplemental or enhanced payments to providers using a variety of rate methodologies. Under H.R. 1, any future directed payments would be limited to the Medicare payment rate. Medicare physician payment rates are already 33% behind the costs to provide health care. These rates will not keep pace for public hospitals and physician specialists that care for the sickest patients nationwide. Requirements Regarding Waiver of Uniform Tax Requirement for Medicaid Provider Tax (SEC. 44134) – The language in H.R. 1 requires provider taxes in multiple states to uniformly tax hospitals, nursing homes, and managed care organizations within each category of provider tax. The uniformity requirement will be extremely difficult for most states to meet and therefore, it eliminates multiple provider taxes in many states. The HHS Secretary has discretion to allow for a transition period, which is not something upon which states can rely. "These provisions will destabilize state health systems, reduce access to care, and worsen physician shortages. Instead, we encourage you to protect Medicaid – a proven, cost-effective safety net that serves 80 million vulnerable Americans," the letter concluded. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE California Medical Association; Physicians for Medicaid Sign in to access your portfolio