House passes bill to save Oregon Health Plan if Congress kills Medicaid funding
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) – As the future of federally funded programs like Medicaid , Oregon lawmakers are working to preserve healthcare coverage for its residents.
On Thursday, the Oregon House of Representatives passed HB 2010, a bipartisan bill that would ensure ongoing funding for the state's Medicaid program known commonly as the .
Oregon State Police trooper shoots, kills person at Army Aviation Support Facility at Salem Airport
The state program is currently funded by a combination of state resources that are matched by federal dollars. But as , HB 2010 would cushion OHP in case federal officials double down on the decision.
House Speaker Julie Fahey said one out of every three Oregonians rely on OHP for their health coverage.
'HB 2010 will help ensure that those Oregonians continue to have access to care and that our hospitals and providers have the resources they need to serve all Oregonians,' Fahey said. 'Regardless of whether Congress cuts Medicaid funding this year, passing HB 2010 is the surest way to position us to accomplish those goals.'
According to state records, OHP covers 1.4 million Oregonians — including 57% of the state's children. The program also protects healthcare coverage for people of color, who make up 42% of its demographic.
'That means thousands of parents, regardless of their income, have access to vital services like regular check-ups, ultrasounds, screenings for complications, nutritional counseling, and maternity services at many of our community hospitals,' Rep. Andrea Valderrama said.
'Dangerous trend': Tillamook students are misusing Benadryl to get high, district says
The bill passed the Oregon House with a 40-15 vote, allowing it to advance to the Senate. If approved there, it will head to Gov. Tina Kotek's desk for her to sign.
By making it through the Oregon legislature, HB 2010 would ensure program coverage by extending the state's insurance and hospital assessments through 2032.
'While Congress debates cuts to Medicaid, Oregon is standing strong to protect OHP,' Rep. Lesly Muñoz said. 'Our state has led the way in making Medicaid work efficiently, ensuring healthcare access for 1.4 million people. Oregon won't back down when it comes to healthcare.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Asks Congress To Rescind Funding For Public Broadcasting, Foreign Aid
President Donald Trump asked Congress on Tuesday to rescind more than $9 billion in funding it already approved for public broadcasters, foreign aid and global health efforts, taking aim at those initiatives as 'wasteful' and 'woke.' The requested cuts are part of a process known as rescission, in which the president can ask Congress to remove funding commitments from the budget. 'They have 45 days to codify these massive cuts to woke, wasteful, and weaponized spending via a simple majority vote,' the White House Office of Management and Budget said in a statement. The single biggest cut Trump is requesting is a $1.1 billion funding commitment to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds NPR and PBS. Leaders of both news outlets said the rescission would strip Americans of vital sources of information while cutting very little in costs. 'This rescission would have a negligible impact on reducing the deficit and provide little-to-no savings for taxpayers, yet it would harm all Americans, shutting off access to local news, national reporting, music and regional culture, and emergency alerting,' NPR's CEO Katherine Maher said in a lengthy statement. NPR is responsible for receiving and distributing 'Presidential-level emergency alerts' within minutes, she noted. 'Rescission would irreparably harm communities across America who count on public media for 24/7 news, music, cultural and educational programming, and emergency alerting services,' she said, noting that private media companies have not been willing to take on those commitments. Paula Kerger, the president and CEO of PBS, raised similar concerns, saying the impacts will especially be felt at 'smaller and rural stations that rely on federal funding for a larger portion of their budgets.' The proposed funding removals would write into law some of the cuts initiated by Elon Musk when he was running the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, which he stepped down from last week. Other requested cuts include millions to the President's Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief, orPEPFAR, a Bush-era program credited with saving 25 million lives. Rep. Susan Collins (R-Maine) told reporters she wouldn't support any reductions to PEPFAR, calling it 'possibly the most successful public health program that has ever been used in Africa and other parts of the world.' Skepticism from more Republicans could spell trouble for the rescission package given the GOP's slim majority in the Senate. But Trump's staff is already preparing to ask for more cuts. 'If they pass this, we'll send up many more,' White House budget director Russ Vought said on Fox News, referring to rescission packages.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Medicaid cuts in ‘big beautiful bill' become flashpoint for GOP
Republicans are increasingly on the defensive over the party's handling of Medicaid cuts in the party's 'big, beautiful bill,' underscoring how the issue has become an early flashpoint ahead of next year's midterms. A number of Republicans have been pressed about cuts to Medicaid in heated town halls and conferences, most recently Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), whose sarcastic response went viral and has been mocked among Democrats. The moment underscored the challenge the party faces as it seeks to message on President Trump's agenda while also responding to growing criticism from Democrats over changes to the health care program, which could lead to millions of people losing coverage. 'As Republicans are bringing this bill home, they've got to focus their message around that waste, fraud and abuse, and they need to make sure that the policy is focused around that waste, fraud and abuse as well,' said Brian Reisinger, a former Wisconsin Republican strategist and rural policy expert who's authored 'Land Rich, Cash Poor.' House Republicans last month passed their sprawling package filled with several of Trump's top priorities, including extending the 2017 tax cuts and an immigration crackdown — overcoming their first major hurdle as they look to clear a Fourth of July holiday deadline to pass the bill in the Senate and get it signed into law. One of Democrats' clearest criticisms over the bill is the impact Medicaid changes could have on Americans. Millions are estimated to be uninsured and vulnerable to losing Medicaid coverage under the bill, though it remains unclear exactly how many will be impacted. Democrats and aligned groups like the Senate Democrats' campaign arm and Protect Our Care have attacked Republicans in ads over the issue. And the issue has come up in some public events that Republicans have participated in, most recently Ernst's town hall. The Iowa Republican drew the ire of Democrats when she quipped that 'we all are going to die' after an audience member shouted that people will die amid a discussion over the proposed Medicaid changes. In that same town hall, Ernst noted that 'Medicaid is extremely important here in the state of Iowa' and that 'those that meet the eligibility requirements for Medicaid, we will protect.' Speaking to reporters on Monday, Ernst defended her remarks, saying she was 'very passionate' and that 'you need to listen to the entire conversation.' But the fallout from the incident has been swift: a well-known Iowa Democrat, J.D. Scholten, jumped into the race following the controversy, and election handicapper Sabato's Crystal Ball shifted the race slightly toward Democrats as a result. Republicans have sought to counter the Democratic attacks, stressing the need for members of their party to frame the changes as part of an effort to make sure only those who really need Medicaid will have access to it. 'Narrative: Republicans are defending Medicaid for EVERY American who NEEDS and DESERVES it the most. That means seniors, low-income families, pregnant women, and disabled Americans, not fraudsters, able-bodied adults who refuse to work, or illegal immigrants,' reads messaging guidance from the House Republicans' campaign arm. 'FACT: Medicaid spending is going up year over year to support those in need.' Most immigrants without legal status can't qualify for Medicaid at the federal level, but some blue states have extended health care coverage to them. Republicans' legislation would lower the federal matching rate for states that make health care coverage available to immigrants without legal status. Other Republicans simply argue the party is tackling waste, fraud and abuse. 'The Democrats are just flat out lying about it. We're not doing Medicaid reform,' Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.), an ally of President Trump, told reporters on Monday. 'We're kicking off the waste and the fraud off of it, people that should never be on it.' The Senate Republicans' campaign arm has also played up other aspects of the bill — such as tax cuts and border security — suggesting Democrats running for Senate who voted against it are also voting against the interests of their constituents. One Republican operative who requested anonymity to speak candidly acknowledged while the GOP was not 'entirely on offense on the Medicaid issue,' they noted that the party was at least 'muddying the waters and neutralizing it' by leaning into work requirements and illegal immigration. Yet not all Republicans are on the same page. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) has opposed some of the Medicaid changes included in the bill, expressing concern over how parts of the legislation could impact rural hospitals. 'I'm concerned about the provider [tax]. I mean, that's not a direct benefit cut, but if it closes rural hospitals, I mean that's … people can't get coverage,' Hawley told reporters, referring to a provision of the bill that would help states fund Medicaid. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who's up for reelection next year, also said last month she was not going to support the bill 'if there are deep cuts in Medicaid that would endanger health care for low-income families, for disabled children, for other vulnerable populations, and for our rural hospitals,' according to Maine Public. Reisinger, the former Wisconsin Republican strategist, said the GOP's messaging needs to focus on the waste, fraud and abuse that resonates with rural communities. 'Right now, voters are hearing … deeply conflicting information from Republicans [and] Democrats, and here's the thing: Republicans need to remember that in rural areas, there are a lot of their voters who at one time voted for a blue-collar Democrat and could do so again,' he said. 'We don't know if that'll be in the near term, in the midterms,' he added. 'We don't know if that'll be long term, but if they're passing legislation that is not living up to the declarations around waste, fraud and abuse, and they're actually passing legislation that has a deeply negative economic impact on rural America, that's going to have an impact.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ernst risks political blowback with ‘we all are going to die' remarks
Sen. Joni Ernst's (R-Iowa) recent controversial remarks on Medicaid are threatening to become a political liability for the incumbent as she faces reelection next year. Ernst drew the ire of Democrats when she responded to concerns about potential Medicaid cuts by saying 'we all are going to die.' Despite the swift backlash, Ernst doubled down on the remarks in a sarcastic video posted Saturday on social media in which she appeared to be recording from a cemetery. While the second-term senator has been a formidable candidate and will benefit from the conservative lean of her state, some Republicans acknowledge the comments could follow her into the midterms. 'It is very, very early, but there is no question that that comment from Sen. Ernst will be on Iowa airwaves for the better part of the next 15 months,' said one Iowa Republican strategist. The election handicapper Sabato's Crystal Ball on Tuesday shifted Ernst's race slightly toward Democrats — from safe to likely Republican — citing her recent comments and a new challenge from Democratic state Rep. JD Scholten, who said the senator's remarks spurred him to jump in. Another GOP strategist acknowledged the risk posed by Ernst's comments but added the political climate next year is going to ultimately have a greater impact on the race. 'It probably wasn't helpful, and the cleanup wasn't helpful,' the strategist said. 'But the race, presuming it's these two candidates on the ballot, isn't going to be decided by Sen. Ernst's comments in 2025. It's going to be more influenced on where the country's at.' Ernst had pushed back against constituents who shouted at the Butler, Iowa, town hall event that cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) would cause people to die. 'Well, we all are going to die,' the senator responded, as she defended a House-passed budget reconciliation package that proposes cuts to Medicaid and SNAP funding. The exchange drew sharp backlash from Democrats. The party's Senate campaign arm called Ernst's remarks 'stunningly callous,' and Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Ken Martin accused her, President Trump and the GOP of being 'hellbent on putting their own constituents at risk.' Scholten jumped into the race Monday following the backlash to her remarks. 'I wasn't planning on doing this right now, but I just can't sit on the sidelines after Joni's recent town hall justifying gutting Medicaid because 'we're all going to die,'' he said in his video launch. He enters the race alongside Democrat Nathan Sage, who said Ernst 'has stepped in it.' State Sen. Zach Wahls, another potential candidate, said 'we desperately need a new voice for Iowa in the US Senate.' Ernst also faces three long shot primary challengers on the right. Democrats argue that the comments will play poorly with much of Iowa's aging and rural population, which depend on programs like Medicaid. But Ernst doubled down on the comments in her sarcastic apology video, saying, 'I made an incorrect assumption that everyone in the auditorium understood that, yes, we are all going to perish from this Earth.' Even some conservatives took issue with her response. 'I wouldn't have posted the follow-up video,' said CNN commentator Scott Jennings. 'In fact, the answer she gave in the town hall, the first 98 percent of it was correct. She was talking about taking illegal immigrants off of Medicaid.' 'I wouldn't have posted the follow-up video myself, but I think the Republicans can actually win this debate,' he added. Last week's events would not be the first time a political candidate in the state has faced backlash for off-the-cuff remarks caught on camera. In fact, when Ernst first ran for Senate in 2014, her opponent, former Rep. Bruce Braley (D-Iowa), faced backlash when he was caught on camera at a fundraiser referring to Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) as 'a farmer from Iowa who never went to law school.' 'Those things can be harmful,' said the unnamed GOP strategist. 'It won't decide the race, but on the periphery and on the edges, sure, it could have a long-term impact.' Still, Republicans are largely brushing off the criticism, arguing Ernst's comments were taken out of context. 'Anyone who knows Joni — especially the folks who heard her answer tough questions for over an hour — knows Dems and the mainstream media are purposefully replacing her core message because it helps their fearmongering,' said Iowa Republican Party Chair Jeff Kaufmann. 'But the fact is, without Sen. Ernst taking a strong stand to protect the integrity of programs like Medicaid, Iowans would be worse off.' Democrats, on the other hand, are leaning into the senator's comments because 'there's been nothing for them to really lean into' before this point, argued Iowa Republican consultant Luke Martz. 'This isn't going to win the election for them. It's just giving them something to talk about.' Tim Hagle, a political science professor at the University of Iowa, also acknowledged Ernst doubling down was 'probably not a good idea' but forecasted voters will forget about the incident on the long road to the 2026 midterms. 'Ernst's comments give Scholten some opportunity to jump into the race, get some headlines. … I don't think it's a big enough deal that it's going to have legs, so to speak,' Hagle said. But Iowa State University political science professor Dave Peterson predicted that, while Republicans will try to ignore the incident and 'hope it goes away,' Democrats are likely to make sure it dogs her. 'This just seems like something that might not go away, something that might sort of linger with her,' Peterson said. Of course, Ernst — who has not yet formally launched a reelection bid — would enter 2026 as the favorite, despite the backlash and her new challengers. It's been more than a decade since a Democrat represented Iowa in the upper chamber. Ernst won reelection by roughly 7 points back in 2020, and Trump won the state by 13 points in November. 'Joni Ernst is Iowa's winner in Washington,' GOP strategist Michael Zona told The Hill in an email. But the latest controversy, adding to scrutiny that mounted on Ernst earlier this year over her support for Trump's Cabinet picks, could give Democrats leverage to make inroads in the midterms, Peterson said. 'It's Ernst's race to lose, and the last week has made that a little more likely,' he said. The Iowa Republican strategist said the attention drawn onto Iowa this week 'opens up the door to resources being put in,' and groups on both sides of the aisle will have to make calculations. However, Democrats argue the state already presented an opportunity for them prior to Ernst's comments, pointing to recent special election victories they say signal a shift in the political environment. In January, Iowa Democrats flipped the state's 35th Senate District, which Trump won by 21 points in November. In March, Democrats overperformed in the special election for the 100th House District. 'It's still a high bar for Democrats trying to win statewide,' said Iowa Democratic strategist Jeff Link, but 'video clips like this have a way of just hanging around.' If Ernst runs next year, 'we're going to see this clip a ton, and that's not good for her,' he said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
