NC Republicans renew their support for Medicaid work requirements, while Democrats say ‘no'
Legislators were divided Tuesday over a move intended to smooth the way for North Carolina to require people who gained health insurance though Medicaid expansion to work.
Republicans on the House Health Committee voted in favor of House Bill 491, which its sponsor, Rep. Donny Lambeth (R-Forsyth) described as a signal to Washington decisionmakers that state legislators support work requirements. Nearly all Democrats on the committee voted no. Rep. Carla Cunningham (D-Mecklenburg) abstained.
Rep. Garland Pierce (D-Scotland) said after the committee meeting the bill wasn't 'fully vetted.'
Rep. Becky Carney (D-Mecklenburg) said the bill 'wasn't ready for prime time,' though Lambeth 'did what he thought was right.'
North Carolina's 2023 Medicaid expansion law already includes a provision requiring the state Department of Health and Human Services to pursue work requirements if it seems federal administrators will allow them. The federal government sets baseline requirements for Medicaid coverage and pays most of the bill. States must ask permission before changing their Medicaid programs.
Under President Donald Trump's first administration, state requests to impose Medicaid work requirements were approved. Courts overturned some of those approvals and President Joe Biden's administration later rescinded others.
Congressional budget-cutters are now considering work requirements as a way to save money in the Medicaid program. Along with work requirements and other cuts, Congressional Republicans are also considering a reduction in the 90% in funding support the federal government currently provides to states for people covered under Medicaid expansion.
North Carolina's Medicaid expansion law includes a trigger that would end Medicaid expansion, which would withdraw health insurance from more than 600,000 people, if the federal government's support falls below 90%. None of the money for people insured under Medicaid expansion comes from state coffers.
Lambeth's bill requires the state Department of Health and Human Services to tell the legislature how much money is needed to implement a work requirement and says it would be imposed regardless of another state law on income thresholds and eligibility categories.
'It basically reiterates what the current expansion bill already says, signaling to the folks in Washington we'd be supportive of that if we got to that point,' Lambeth told the committee.
'I'm hoping by signaling we're okay with a work requirement, they will get off the idea of changing our funding formula. If the funding formula is changed, even a small tenth of a percent, one percent, it is a major impact to North Carolina, and we hope we don't have to go down that path.' Lambeth has stated previously that a reduction in federal support would be 'a disaster.'
Rep. Sarah Crawford (D-Wake) co-sponsored a bill that would get rid of the trigger. Under that bill, Medicaid expansion in North Carolina would be spared if the federal government's financial support falls below 90%.
Crawford voted against the work requirement bill.
'There is no evidence that work requirements actually increase work participation,' Crawford said after the committee meeting. Most adults who use Medicaid as their insurance and are able to work already do. 'About eight percent of people on Medicaid who are able to work are not working, so it's a relatively small number of people. Those individuals typically have a number of barriers to employment that include a whole host of things — where they live, their health, access to transportation. All that we've seen in the past, when other states have tried to implement work requirements, it actually leads to be people being left without coverage.'
Arkansas imposed a Medicaid work requirement for less than a year in 2018 before a judge ended it. About 18,000 people lost their health insurance, according to a study, and the work requirement did not lead to increased employment. Arkansans were not able to report their work hours due to lack of internet access, didn't know about the requirement, or didn't think it applied to them, a 2019 study said.
Stateline reported Tuesday that between 4.6 million and 5.2 million adults ages 19 to 55 could lose their health care coverage under an emerging congressional Republican plan to impose Medicaid work requirements nationwide.
Lambeth said after the meeting that the work requirement would cover people who gained insurance under Medicaid expansion. In that case, people with disabilities who are insured under special Medicaid programs would be exempt.
Lambeth worked for years to extend Medicaid coverage to more adults, and for a long time he was one of the few Republicans in the legislature openly supporting it. He sponsored bills that were precursors to the 2023 Medicaid expansion law that included work requirements.
Including the requirement for at least 90% federal funding in the 2023 expansion law was one of the conditions for winning greater Republican support, he said.
'The only way we got that bill approved was to have triggers in there,' Lambeth said. The 90% trigger and work requirements were necessary to 'cobble together enough Republican votes.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
26 minutes ago
- New York Post
Congress to grill Kathy Hochul on NY sanctuary laws — and local GOP offers spicy advice over what questions they should ask
ALBANY – State Republican lawmakers offered advice to their congressional counterparts ahead of Gov. Kathy Hochul testimony on Thursday over sanctuary policies – outlining a list of questions to fling at the Democrat. The GOP legislators sent a letter to House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer ahead of Hochul's trip to Washington, DC where she'll be grilled by a congressional panel on the Empire State's sanctuary laws. 'Governor Hochul's sanctuary state policies have played a direct role in the ongoing migrant crisis throughout our state, despite bipartisan concern including repeated warnings from New York City Mayor Eric Adams,' Assemblyman Michael Tannousis (R-Staten Island) wrote in the letter, cosigned by various other New York GOP lawmakers. Advertisement 'We believe that Governor Hochul must be held accountable for her failure to reverse the state's sanctuary policies and recklessness with taxpayer dollars,' Tannousis continued. Gov. Kathy Hochul is set to testify on capitol hill Thursday on New York's sanctuary city laws and its handling of the influx of migrants. Hochul is voluntarily appearing before the House committee on Capitol Hill and will testify alongside Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker. The hearing is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. Advertisement In their letter, the Republican state lawmakers ask the House Republicans to ask Hochul to outline: Why New York continued to accept migrants during the height of the crisis The vetting process for migrants and concerns about public safety A shady $432 million no-bid contract awarded to DocGo to help mitigate the crisis Her justification for roughly $4 billion the state has spent dealing with migrants Why some municipalities weren't reimbursed with costs associated with the migrants Tannousis said he wants the House Oversight committee to follow through after Hochul's testimony to deliver 'accountability.' The governor has tried to navigate a vague middle ground when it comes to the state's sanctuary policy, which is still based on a 2017 executive order issued by then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo who is now running for mayor of New York City. Advertisement Assemblyman Michael Tannousis and other Albany Republicans wrote a letter to the House panel suggesting areas where they should hammer Hochul. Michael McWeeney Hochul had promised specifics and clarity over her guidance on how New York would work with federal immigration authorities. Instead, her office only provided a list of four broad categories of situations that would trigger state law enforcement to work with the feds, such as if ICE has a judicial warrant or when relevant to investigating another crime committed in New York. Hochul had previously said she was 'happy to go down' to DC for the hearing. 'I'll tell them our policy in the state of New York is not to use state resources, our state police, to enforce the civil infractions,' Hochul said earlier this year.


Washington Post
30 minutes ago
- Washington Post
DNC votes to redo vice chair elections, dealing a blow to David Hogg
The Democratic National Committee has voted to hold new elections for two leadership positions, dealing a blow to DNC Vice Chair David Hogg that could lead to his removal after months of internal turmoil. In a 294-99 vote that concluded Wednesday, DNC members agreed to move forward with redoing the contest earlier this year that elected Hogg and another Democrat, Malcolm Kenyatta, as vice chairs. The DNC will now vote from Thursday through Saturday — and then Sunday through Tuesday — to fill the two slots, which both men can seek again.


New York Post
31 minutes ago
- New York Post
Democrats are in the polling dumps — fighting America on this key demand
The Democratic Party has never been more unpopular — yet no Democrat seems to understand why. Some say they're not fighting President Donald Trump hard enough. Others say they aren't messaging their agenda well enough. In reality, they're fighting too hard for an agenda that Americans reject, with a central demand of welfare for all. Thirty-two years after President Bill Clinton promised to 'end welfare as we know it,' no idea unifies the Democratic Party more than the belief that welfare should be never-ending. This vision of government dependency spurred their most notable policies of recent years, and explains their intransigent opposition to Republican reforms. While some Democrats show an increasing willingness to compromise on other leftist priorities, such as biological men in women's sports, the party brooks no dissent on welfare — even though Americans want to fix the system's many failures. Consider the ongoing federal budget battle. House Republicans have put together a reconciliation bill that would slow the rate of Medicaid growth — from a projected 59.6% increase to 40% — over the next decade. Democrats oppose even that, including GOP attempts to end waste, fraud and abuse. Yet the latest federal data show that 22% of Medicaid payments and 12% of food-stamp payments went to ineligible recipients. More than 70% of likely voters want to protect taxpayers from fraud and abuse, polls show, yet Democrats essentially deny there's a problem that needs to be solved. In fact, when the Trump administration proposed a rule in March to end $11 billion in improper ObamaCare subsidies — aiming solely to curtail fraud — Democrats immediately opposed it. Democrats are just as adamant when it comes to work requirements for welfare recipients. My organization, the Foundation for Government Accountability, recently found that six in 10 able-bodied adults on Medicaid don't work at all, hoovering up resources that would benefit the truly vulnerable. When voters in purple Wisconsin were asked two years ago if welfare recipients should work as a condition of receiving benefits, nearly 80% said yes — but national Democrats now say no. They also reject Republican attempts to block Medicaid payments for illegal immigrants, which would save billions of dollars over the next decade. More than 70% of voters don't want illegal immigrants to receive government benefits, yet Democrats bizarrely disagree. But it's not just Congress; Democrats are striking the same strange tune in state capitols. Over the past 10 years, virtually all Republican-led states have taken steps to purge waste, fraud and abuse from welfare programs. By contrast, Democrat-run states have expanded illegal immigrants' access to Medicaid and pushed able-bodied adults onto welfare programs. In recent months, Democratic governors in Kansas and Arizona have vetoed Republican bills that would ban food-stamp purchases of soda and junk food — a reform that could lower state and federal Medicaid spending and encourage healthier choices. Democrats have a long history of supporting restrictions on consumers' options, but as soon as welfare enters the picture, they oppose it. Apparently limiting freedom is fine by them, but limiting federal welfare is unthinkable. The left's unwillingness to support even modest welfare reforms reflects the reality that government dependency is the biggest thing Democrats now offer Americans — even beyond limitless immigration and the Green New Deal. The Affordable Care Act, the central achievement of Barack Obama's presidency, dramatically expanded Medicaid while creating a new welfare system for the individual health-insurance market. Joe Biden enacted a work-destroying child tax credit and sought perpetual expansions of Medicaid and food stamps under the guise of pandemic relief. A slew of Biden regulations made it easier for people to abuse the taxpayer's generosity, from Medicaid to food stamps to free school lunches for rich kids. Democrats' end goal is clear: Get every American on the dole. Yet insisting that government dependency is always the answer means Democrats can't publicly admit that seemingly infinite welfare has any shortcomings. In fact, the left's agenda of welfare-for-all is profoundly harmful, and voters know it. Democrats have built a welfare system that taxpayers can't afford while pushing millions of people out of the workforce — a dual assault on the economic growth. They've left fewer resources for disabled children and the elderly by prioritizing able-bodied adults and illegal immigrants. And they're corrupting the foundational American belief that welfare is temporary assistance whose recipients should work to get back on their feet. No wonder Democrats are so unpopular: They're fleecing taxpayers, crippling the economy, hurting the truly needy and giving handouts to those who don't deserve them — none of which has Americans' support. The first Democrat who wakes up on welfare will be the hero their party desperately needs. Hayden Dublois is data and analytics director at the Foundation for Government Accountability.