Why More Workers Are Putting in Extra Hours After the Workday - Your Money Briefing
Thanks to a growing number of meetings, messages, and actual work, more employees are finding it difficult to log off after regular work hours . Wall Street Journal reporter Ray A. Smith joins host Ariana Aspuru to discuss how to get your time back.
Full Transcript
This transcript was prepared by a transcription service. This version may not be in its final form and may be updated.
Ariana Aspuru: Here's Your Money Briefing for Wednesday, June 25th. I'm Arianna Aspuru for The Wall Street Journal. A recent study from Microsoft showed that the average worker gets 117 emails and 153 chats per day. The ping after ping, combined with back-to-back meetings and a cooling job market, means that more of your workday is bleeding into the evening.
Ray A. Smith: They're almost doing three jobs instead of one. They're doing a lot of jobs beyond what's in their job description. And it's a lot because of layoffs, but also it's driven by this idea that companies are really trying to be more efficient.
Ariana Aspuru: We'll hear from Wall Street Journal reporter Ray A. Smith about why some workers are burning that midnight oil and how you can reclaim some of your personal time. That's after the break. The classic nine-to-five is now looking like the nine-to-long-after-five or even later for some workers. Wall Street Journal reporter Ray A. Smith joins me to talk about it. Ray, what's causing this now?
Ray A. Smith: There are a couple of reasons. One is just because companies have been slowing their hiring of new employees. And so that leaves a lot more work for current or existing employees to do. That just gives them an increased workload. And so they're having to catch up off hours, whether it's evenings or weekends. Another reason is their days are typically stacked with back-to-back meetings. So they barely have time to do the actual work that they're supposed to be doing. And so they almost have no choice but to get that work done at night or early in the morning or on weekends. And then a third reason is we're all expected, in this global world, where companies are international and workers are in different time zones, we're all expected to be on all the time.
Ariana Aspuru: And we've seen a shrinking white-collar job market for the past few years. And we've seen lots of companies conducting layoffs, and that has to add on to that pressure to perform. How has that impacted what's on workers' actual plates during their workday?
Ray A. Smith: What it's meant for employees and their workday and their workloads is just that they have more on their plates. They're almost doing three jobs instead of one. They're doing a lot of jobs beyond what's in their job descriptions, and they're not getting a promotion or an increase in pay for that. They're just being tasked with more and more. It's just an increasing workday and increasing workload. And it's a lot because of layoffs, but also it's driven by this idea that companies are really trying to be more efficient. They're saying, "We don't need as many employees to get this work done, and we're not going to hire any more employees." So the employees that are left there are just tasked with doing a lot more work. And companies really feel, at this point in time, when the white-collar job market, as you alluded to, is softer, that they have the power to ask more of their employees. Because what are the employees going to do? They're not going to be able to just up and quit.
Ariana Aspuru: How does this leave employees feeling at the end of the day, whether it's at 5:00, 8:00, or sometimes 10:00 PM?
Ray A. Smith: Employees have mixed feelings about this. On one hand, a lot of us thought we'd be able to, after COVID, have more work-life balance. And we heard a lot of employers talk about more work-life balance. And now employees are feeling a little betrayed, like that wasn't true. And so, there's this feeling that "What happened to all this talk about work-life balance? Now I'm back to feeling burned out." We saw mentions of burnout rise 32% year-over-year during the first quarter. That's to their highest levels in almost a decade. And that's from a Glassdoor report. So, it's just employees feeling really burned out and resentful and also feeling like this is unsustainable.
Ariana Aspuru: How does the level that you're at in the company impact the amount of time that you're working outside of that nine-to-five, like an entry-level versus a senior-level employee?
Ray A. Smith: The manager sets the tone. And so, if a manager is on all the time, whether it's through osmosis or just a feeling that if your boss is on, you should be on too, there's this expectation that you're going to follow your boss's lead or your manager's lead.
Ariana Aspuru: And I want to turn to what actions workers feel like they can do. I'm wondering, in your reporting, did you hear from people who were telling their managers about their off-hours work, and what are the possible risks or implications in doing that?
Ray A. Smith: In some cases, some workers that I talked to told me that they have tried to talk to their bosses or their managers about what is unreasonable or to set expectations or even to set boundaries. But they acknowledged that they were concerned that when they brought that up, it sounded like they couldn't handle the workload and they were afraid of them being perceived as not being up to the task. Other employees told me they've tried, in some cases, on their digital calendars to make it clear when they are busy. So they'll block time on their calendars so that they can't be invited to meetings or interrupted for meetings. That's one strategy that some people are using to try to at least limit the amount of meetings they get called into so they can focus on work.
Ariana Aspuru: There's a line in your story that really struck out to me, Ray. A senior vice president who works remotely in the Seattle area said, it just needs to be the exception and not the rule for me when talking about working outside of hours. What other tips or techniques did you hear from people about how to streamline your work so that working outside of hours is the exception?
Ray A. Smith: You make a choice to say, "Okay, I'm going to spend an hour or two just going over emails. I may not even respond to them, but I'm just going to look at them just to see what I missed. And I can either schedule send a response or just deal with it in the morning." That's another hack, giving yourself a limit, saying, "I'm only going to do this for a half an hour," or, "I'm only going to do this for 45 minutes and that's it."
Ariana Aspuru: That's WSJ reporter Ray A. Smith. And that's it for Your Money Briefing. I'm Ariana Aspuru for The Wall Street Journal. We had production help from Coleman Standifer. This episode was produced by me, with supervising producer Melony Roy. Thanks for listening.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
25 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
RV Camping This Summer? This Power Station With Solar Panels Is at a Record Low Price
If you're heading out for camping this summer, having a reliable power station is already a smart move. But pairing your power station with a solar panel for true off-grid independence is even better—and right now, the Jackery Solar Generator 300 with a 100W panel is available at a record low price on Amazon, down by 40%. At just $298, this bundle is a steal compared to its original $499 price tag, which makes it one of the best (early Prime Day) deals you'll find for a portable solar power setup. This setup isn't just for summer adventures, either: When storms are closing in and winter looms with a threat of power loss, this power station will keep your essentials charged. See at Amazon At just 7.1 pounds, it's light enough to carry in a backpack but contains a whopping 293Wh lithium-ion battery that can supply up to 300W of clean energy. The device features two pure AC outlets so you can safely power sensitive electronics without risking voltage spikes and interference. If you desire a power station with flexibility, this model is able to charge a maximum of six devices simultaneously. The output diversity is incredible: two AC outlets, a 60W PD USB-C port (input/output compatible), a fast charge 3.0 USB-A port, and a DC car port. Recharging the Jackery Solar Generator 300 is simple: With the wall socket and the 60W PD USB-C port combined, you can top up 80% of the battery in two hours. If you're not stationary, you can use the included car charger cable or simply plug in the 100W panel for clean, green energy. The solar panel will connect with the power station seamlessly, thanks to the onboard MPPT controller. This deal is one of the best you'll find on a trusted brand like Jackery, and with the current discount, it's hard to imagine a better time to invest in this. See at Amazon
Forbes
27 minutes ago
- Forbes
Three Ideas To Boost Economic Growth And Reduce Government Deficits
NEW YORK - NEW YORK - JUNE 1: A man walks near the National Debt Clock in Midtown Manhattan on June ... More 1, 2023 in New York City. (Photo by Eduardo Munoz Alvarez/VIEWpress) The federal budget is a mess, with federal debt held by the public at $29 trillion and counting. States cannot print money and borrow the way the federal government can, but some of them still have deficit problems. Maine, California, Colorado, and New York are just a few of the states facing large deficits over the next few years. Fortunately, there are policy reforms both the federal government and state governments can implement to boost economic growth and reduce deficits. In a recent National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) paper, economists Douglas Elmendorf, Zachary Liscow, and R. Glenn Hubbard examine several policies with the potential to increase economic growth and reduce deficits. The general idea is that increasing total factor productivity (TFP)—the primary driver of economic growth—increases incomes and thus tax revenue. If this can be done in a way that does not involve too much government spending (or revenue losses) then the higher tax revenue would lower the deficit. Using estimates from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the authors calculate that increasing TFP by 0.5 percentage points each year for the next decade would reduce the federal budget deficit by 1.2% of GDP and make debt held by the public around 12% of GDP lower than it otherwise would be. The authors discuss seven policies in their paper, but I am going to focus on the three that seem to have the most potential. And while the paper focuses on the policies' impacts on federal deficits, the same growth effects would also impact state budgets. The first policy idea is making it easier to build housing. Economists know land-use regulations that restrict the supply of housing—including minimum lot sizes, parking requirements, and prohibitions on apartments, duplexes, and other forms of multi-family housing—make housing more expensive. As the authors explain, reducing the cost of housing construction would lead to more housing being built, which has downstream impacts on the demand for appliances, furniture, carpet, decks, and all the other things that make a house a home. The increase in housing construction and the production of complementary products would directly increase GDP all else equal. In addition to this direct effect, more housing in the most productive cities would make it easier for workers to move to take higher paying jobs. A few studies estimate that this mobility effect would increase U.S. GDP by roughly 8%. New residents also have a significant impact on state budgets. A recent report from the National Taxpayers Union Foundation shows that adding new residents can increase a state's revenue by billions of dollars. For all these reasons, it is a good idea for policymakers to reform regulations so we can build more housing in the places people want to live. State and local governments control most of the regulations that restrict the supply of housing. Over the last several years, many states have implemented reforms to make it easier to build, including Montana, Florida, California, and Arizona. This year, Texas passed several laws that will make housing more affordable in the Lone Star state. Other states should adopt and build on these reforms. A second and related idea discussed by Elmendorf, Liscow, and Hubbard is permitting reform for construction projects. In recent years, long permitting times have gotten more attention, and for good reason. Federal laws like the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) can delay projects for years. A recent report from the Council on Environmental Quality, which oversees agency implementation of NEPA, found that 61% of environmental impact statements still take more than two years to review despite a law specifying a two-year deadline. Clearly, we need more changes at the federal level. States have permitting problems, too. Earlier this year, wildfires destroyed thousands of homes in Los Angeles County. California governor Gavin Newsome promised to fast-track permitting so families could rebuild and get on with their lives. Five months later, only 33 building permits have been issued and not one house has been rebuilt. This is unacceptable for a country as wealthy as the United States. Long permitting times increase project costs since money is tied up in resources—land, equipment, and buildings—that are not generating returns. As the authors note, shortening permitting times would accelerate projects already underway as well as increase the number and size of future projects by increasing the return on investment. And since reforming regulations and processes typically does not require a lot of government spending, the growth we create by shortening permitting times is likely to help bring down government deficits. A third idea to boost economic growth and help reduce government deficits is immigration reform. Allowing more foreign workers with advanced degrees in science, engineering, and math to live and work in America would increase U.S. innovation and productivity. The NBER study calculates that a one-time increase of 200,000 additional high-skill immigrants would reduce debt held by the public as a percent of GDP by 2% after thirty years. Adding more high-skilled immigrants every year instead of just a one-time increase would have a larger effect. In addition to increasing innovation and productivity, immigrants have a direct effect on government deficits. High-skill immigrants, like high-skill natives, have a positive effect on government budgets on average since they pay more in taxes than they consume in government services such as welfare benefits or Social Security. One study estimates that over a decade we could reduce federal deficits by $25 billion per 100,000 additional people who come to America to work. Another recent report from the Committee to Unleash Prosperity (CTUP) also makes the case for more immigration to increase growth. The basic formula for economic growth is to add workers and make workers more productive. The U.S. fertility rate is falling, and without a sudden rebound the best way to add workers will be through immigration. From 2013 to 2023 about half of the growth in the U.S. civilian labor force was due to immigrants, as shown in the figure below (red bar). Without immigration, U.S. labor force growth would slow and eventually turn negative. Labor force growth Immigrants also tend to be incredibly entrepreneurial. According to the CTUP report, nearly half of all Fortune 500 companies were founded by foreign-born or second-generation Americans. These immigrants and their children create jobs for native-born workers in addition to the valuable new goods and services their companies create for consumers. Federal policymakers should reform our immigration system so more high-skill immigrants can create and grow their companies in America. Government budgets throughout the United States are a mess. From cities such as Chicago to the Halls of Congress, policymakers struggle to keep spending in line with revenue. Economic growth cannot solve all these budget problems, but it can help. Policy changes that make it easier to build housing, reduce permitting times, and increase immigration would boost output, incomes, and tax revenue. If we could get government spending under control, too, we would have a real shot at fixing our debt problem.
Forbes
32 minutes ago
- Forbes
AI In E-Commerce: Are Brands And Customers Aligned?
Rytis Lauris is the cofounder and CEO of Omnisend, a marketing automation platform built for e-commerce. I don't think there is a single industry AI hasn't touched, and e-commerce is certainly no exception. Chatbots, product recommendations, segment creation and churn prediction have been well underway for some time, but these tools are only the beginning. It seems like every day we read stories of another brand implementing new and improved AI on their site. However, while brands see the value and promise in using AI to revolutionize the customer experience, do consumers want it, and if so, for what purposes? What Online Shoppers Want From AI While times will surely change, currently, many consumers want AI to improve their shopping experiences, not transform them. A consumer survey from my company learned that the AI-powered features shoppers found most useful were improved product recommendations and faster product discovery. Nearly half also said they want to see improvements in customer service. However, product recommendations, whether on-site or in marketing emails, aren't always relevant, much to the dismay of shoppers. This is an opportunity for brands to use AI to give shoppers what they want. The more relevant the recommendations, the easier it is to find a product, leading to a better chance of capturing a sale. For example, take Muse by Wayfair, where users can type a description of what they're looking for (e.g., "modern chic dining room with hints of lime") and find design inspiration. Upon clicking on the 'muse' they like, shoppers can click on the Wayfair products pictured in the image. The challenge for brands with customer service is that many chatbots, though improving, are clunky and often frustrating. This needs to change. For more complex inquiries, there needs to be a seamless escalation procedure that directs to human representatives without losing the chat history or background from the customer. If chatbots or other AI customer service tools can't provide a more intuitive level of support, it creates friction and becomes a detriment to the business. This can't happen. Agentic AI, where autonomous decisions are made, is a rapidly advancing area for e-commerce brands. Maybe the most newsworthy example is Amazon's Buy For Me feature, which allows users to discover products through the Amazon site that are not sold on Amazon and then complete the purchase directly with the off-site retailer on their behalf. Amazon isn't alone in using agentic AI to drive purchases. Visa and Mastercard got into the fray with tools that can make purchases on people's behalf. Admittedly, we are at the early stages of this type of use case for agentic AI, and it's going to be interesting to see where it leads. But right now, most consumers aren't quite ready. In my view, the current behavior for most shoppers is to verify all details, from size and color to shipping information, before clicking 'complete purchase.' Trusting AI to select the right size, color and other variables feels like a large behavioral and trust issue that needs to be overcome. Agentic AI holds a lot of promise for e-commerce brands on the customer-facing and operational sides of the business. It can be used to make product recommendations, sift through product reviews, solve customer service inquiries and track and find lower prices. Operationally, it can be used to track and forecast inventory, analyze data, personalize marketing campaigns and detect fraud. What Brands Can Do Now Consumers' hesitation to use AI for more than basic improvements to their shopping experience isn't irrational. The online purchase process is mostly the same as it was 20 years ago: search, click, browse, add to cart and check out. Expecting consumers to abandon this instinctive behavior overnight is an impossible ask, especially when it comes to making purchases for them. Trust in AI needs to be established and built through use and consistency. But like ecommerce's early days, it's going to be an evolution—one step at a time. If AI applications are consistently useful for shoppers, they'll trust and adopt them. If they're not, they won't. Brands can look to AI to help in various ways, but what they can't lose sight of is that, within this, shopping is often enjoyable for people. Leaving this to programmatic tools removes the thrill of the hunt to find the perfect item. Striking this balance will be a challenge. As such, e-commerce brands should adopt AI thoughtfully and use it to put consumers first. While experimenting with new tools is fine, the goal should be to give shoppers better experiences, whether it's support, product discovery or personalization. If brands can't execute the fundamentals and instead create friction, asking them to change their instinctive shopping behaviors will be a pipe dream. The two 'simplest' ways brands can begin building consumers' trust in AI is through chatbots and product search. Chatbots have come a long way in the past several years, moving from a tool that provides help article links to one that can accurately provide answers and triage customer concerns. By refining customer service chatbots to handle customer queries accurately, consumers can realize their value and trust them further. This trust in one tool gives them a reason to trust the next one. On-site search is another area where brands can use AI to support the customer experience. As search moves from keyword matching to an intuitive prediction model, shoppers' ability to discover additional products and have an expanded, non-linear shopping experience improves. A non-linear shopping experience creates a more enjoyable one, similar to the surprise-and-delight experience of in-store shopping. If AI-powered search results stay relevant and helpful, shoppers are more likely to see AI as a helpful asset vs. an annoyance. The Takeaway Is AI in e-commerce going anywhere? Absolutely not. Will it transform the way online shopping is done? Probably. Are consumers clamoring for radical changes instead of everyday improvements? Not yet. It's OK to dream big, and I'm excited for what's to come, but don't lose sight of what got you here: your customers. Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
