logo
Minister denies Sinn Féin's claim anti-terrorism Bill contains a ‘Kneecap' clause

Minister denies Sinn Féin's claim anti-terrorism Bill contains a ‘Kneecap' clause

Irish Times6 hours ago

Minister for Justice
Jim O'Callaghan
has rejected Opposition claims that
Kneecap
band member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh could be prosecuted under antiterrorism legislation being introduced in the Dáil.
Sinn Féin justice spokesman
Matt Carthy
described provisions of the Criminal Justice (Terrorism Offences) (Amendment) Bill as the 'Kneecap clause' in the
wake of the prosecution
in England of the Belfast band member whose stage name is 'Mo Chara'.
He was charged under UK antiterrorism legislation with showing support for a proscribed organisation. It is alleged he draped himself in a
Hizbullah
flag at a London gig last November and shouted 'up
Hamas
, up Hizbullah', referring to the Palestinian and Lebanese militant groups respectively. He is contesting the charge.
The proposed new Irish legislation broadens the category of terrorist offences to bring it in line with a 2017 EU directive, to include travelling or facilitating travel for the purposes of terrorism and receiving or providing training for terrorism.
READ MORE
The Bill also revises the definition of provoking terrorism, stating that the glorification of a terrorist activity, including by praise or celebration, 'may be considered publicly provoking the commission of a terrorist offence'.
Mr Carthy, who called this the 'Kneecap clause', said it is 'deeply problematic' because 'there is a real fear that this inclusion could lead to charges against political activism and legitimate freedom of expression, similar to the manner in which Mo Chara from Kneecap is currently facing terrorism charges in the UK'.
This sort of antiterrorism legislation 'undercuts civil liberties, free speech and the rule of law, with little or no effect on actual terrorist activity', he said.
'It is exactly the type of language that has been used, in the North in particular, to attempt to curtail the rights of families to remember loved ones killed in the conflict in the six counties. It has equally been used in arguments against commemorating the 1916 Rising or wearing an Easter lily,' he said.
But Mr O'Callaghan said 'what Kneecap is being prosecuted for in the UK would not happen here'.
[
Fans rally behind Kneecap after London court appearance: 'If you're supporting Ireland, you're supporting Kneecap'
Opens in new window
]
'Under this legislation, people would be entitled to say they support Hamas, although it has been involved in reprehensible behaviour,' he said.
Describing the UK legislation as 'alarmingly wide' and a provision 'that would not be enacted by this House', he said that under the UK law it is an offence if a person in a public place 'wears, carries or displays an article in such a way or in such circumstances as to arouse reasonable suspicion that he is a member or supporter of a proscribed organisation'.
Sinn Féin's Mark Ward said people singing republican songs about Irish heroes could be prosecuted under the legislation.
However, the Minister said the deputy could sing whatever songs he wants. 'People can sing songs about the Boys of Barr na Sráide and the Men Behind the Wire. In loyalist parts of Belfast, they can sing whatever they want.'
He said TDs' 'concern that this will have a restrictive impact on protest or freedom of expression is not accurate'.
'The only time your message is going to come within the criminal law and face criminal sanction is if it is being done with the intention of inciting someone else to commit criminal terrorist activity.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Letters to the Editor, June 27th: On contactless travel payment, Tusla and security guards and brave women
Letters to the Editor, June 27th: On contactless travel payment, Tusla and security guards and brave women

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

Letters to the Editor, June 27th: On contactless travel payment, Tusla and security guards and brave women

Sir, – I have family in Dublin and visit regularly. I've always been surprised that the transport system does not accept contactless payment. I then read that it will take five years, yes that is correct five years to introduce a system that London introduced in a two- year period over a decade ago. (' Dublin transport contactless payments delayed until 2029, ' June 26th). I live in Oxford and here we have had contactless for seven years. It took 18 months to introduce. I also have family in Belfast. They have contactless payment for public transport – it took less than two years to introduce. READ MORE Why is Dublin so incompetent? London has much higher levels of complexity and scale. Belfast does not have the resources as we are continually told by those comparing the much richer South. Yet they seem to be able to manage the project in a timely fashion. What is going on? Is this another children's hospital fiasco with the potential for rising costs and no proper programme management? Why has Dublin not used Flowbird as in Belfast or other suppliers who can deliver a timely system? And why does the Government not have a joined up strategy to have contactless payment across all major urban centres in Ireland and thus get scale economies and cost savings? This is just another indicator of Ireland's inability to develop infrastructure at scale and speed which the citizens deserve. – Yours, etc, DR MARC THOMPSON, Oxford, England. Sir, – I am currently in Corfu where having used their public buses, you can pay by bus pass, cash and contactless payments on the bus. The Government are doing their darnest to get people out of cars and yet they are not making it easy for customers to choose alternative methods of transport, which is the key in getting them to use them. Greece, a country with far fewer resources than Ireland, can manage what we can't for another four years. It is mind boggling. – Yours, etc, NIAMH BYRNE, Fairview, Dublin 3. Sir, – The National Transport Authority (NTA) says it will take three-plus years to deliver contactless payments. If this was Ryanair it would be introduced tomorrow, crash, bang, wallop, and no shopping bags. – Yours, etc, KEN BUGGY, Ballyduff Co Waterford Ireland and the Middle East Sir, – With regards to the recent debate in Ireland about the Middle East, Dr Ed Abrahamson (Letters, June 26th) accuses Tánaiste Simon Harris of at times resorting to 'ugly' rhetoric. Are the Tánaiste's statements as ugly as the aerial bombardment, forced starvation and the inexplicable shootings of Palestinians queuing for food supplies in areas which have been designated by Israel? Dr Abrahamson expressed his concern that Ireland's pro-Palestinian stand in relation to the conflict in Gaza may have a more long-term, negative impact on the Irish economy. He pointed to the threat that hospital patients could be deprived of Israel's latest medical advances. If such outcomes were to come about, it would be most unfortunate but surely nothing as calamitous as the hellish experience the Palestinians are being subjected to – day in, day out in Gaza. As regards his closing remarks, where he questioned Ireland's retention of its reputation as a country that extends a warm welcome to all visitors regardless of their background, Dr Abrahamson can be assured that this country will go down in history as having campaigned for the most basic right of Palestinians to survive. Not just that, but to live freely, without apartheid, and prosper in their own homeland. Such hopes may seem a long way off right now, but Ireland must remain steadfast in its support of humanity. – Yours, etc, MICHAEL CULLEN, Sandycove, Co Dublin. Sir,– In response to Dr Ed Abrahamson, I suggest that he carefully consider what has been said by the Government in relation to Gaza. The Government has never expressed support for Hamas. In fact, quite the contrary. Rather, they are expressing grave concern about some of the behaviour of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) in relation to the people of Gaza and the appalling way these people are being treated. I am wondering if an ally has to agree and approve of everything an allied State does? So many countries are reluctant to challenge Israel regarding the treatment of Palestinian children, women and men because they are allies of Israel. I find that astounding. Surely a 'friend' can question and challenge what an ally is doing? In fact, I would suggest that this is part of what a true friend does. What Israel is doing in Gaza is unconscionable. Killing people who are simply gathering to get food is beyond belief. It is clear that Israel is using food as a weapon of war and it appears to be their goal to starve the people of Gaza. Surely, as a friend and an ally we can challenge this and I hope that many more allies will join us in challenging what Israel is doing. – Yours, etc, PAULA MOLLOY, Baldoyle, Dublin 13. Security guards and children Sir, – I refer to your story: ('Security guards will be hired to restrain children in State care during violent episodes', June 26th). That Tusla, the agency responsible for child welfare and protection, has decided to hire security services in child residential centres, makes for depressing reading. Undoubtedly, the decision was taken with due regard to professional advice, staff consultation and adherence to proper governance. It is nonetheless, an enormous admission of failure, not just for Tusla, but for the whole of government and the whole of society that physical restraint is to become a key tool in the management and care of vulnerable children. Since the early 1990s, Irish society has been witness to a purgative opening up of past, previously unacknowledged abuses of children. The revelations continue, underlining that Ireland's reputation as an idyllic, consensus-driven society were seriously misplaced. With new legislation, new resources and the establishment of Tusla, we were invited to believe that this has all changed, that a new, enlightened, secular approach has emerged. Surely, there is someone, or some entity – government department or government agency – who can intervene and order a pause? There must be a better way for protecting children and for protecting those who work with them than to rely on security measures. – Yours, etc, BARRY CULLEN, Rialto, Dublin 8. Grist to meat labelling Sir, – Louisa Moss (Letters, June 26th) suggests that the 'dead animal industry' needs to improve labelling. I would say that the shoe, whether made of vegan 'leather' or not, is on the other foot. We already have a word for 'connective tissue extracted from the dead body of a slaughtered cow' – it's 'beef'. Do we have a word to cover the range of ingredients that 'veggie burgers' and other meat substitutes are made from? Depending on the brand you can have rehydrated textured soya, wheat protein, fungus, wheat flour, sodium alginate (yum,yum) and many other weird and wonderful substances. Many of these products require industrial processing and combining with a wide variety of flavourings to make the appear and taste palatable, and many of them are nothing that an average person would consider a vegetable – who is fooling who? It's not the 'dead animal industry' that are using euphemisms, I don't think you will find anyone who will be surprised to find that beef is dead cow and pork is dead pig. – Yours, etc, CIAN CROSSEN, Dun Laoghaire, Dublin. Domestic violence and pets Sir, – Missing from Mary Carolan's article on the latest report from Women's Aid Ireland is any reference to the use of pets as a tactic of abuse ('Highest number of domestic violence disclosures in 50 years is 'just tip of iceberg', says Women's Aid,' June 25th). The link between animal abuse and domestic violence is well known as abusers will use violence against beloved family pets as a tactic to manipulate and psychologically torment their victims. Domestic violence victims who own pets are particularly vulnerable as no refuge accommodation in Ireland will accept pets. This means that those who are fleeing abuse must often choose either to leave their pet behind with an abuser or to stay with the animal in the abusive home. The DSPCA has launched an initiative to foster the pets of domestic violence victims who are seeking refuge. It's a start but more needs to be done across Ireland to help both domestic violence victims and their pets. – Yours, etc, GRETTA DATTAN, Merrion Road, Dublin. A brave woman Sir, – What a powerful and deeply moving piece by Natasha O'Brien (' I will never be the person who ignores someone else's suffering, ' June 26th). With grace and unflinching honesty, she conveyed the emotional aftermath of her assault and the harrowing experience of the subsequent trial. Her words should be essential reading for anyone who has ever felt bullied, silenced, or afraid. Natasha's courage is not only inspiring – it is a beacon of strength and dignity in the face of injustice. – Yours, etc, GEOFF SCARGILL, Bray, Co Wicklow. Martin O'Neill and Brentford Sir, – Martin O Neill should ditch his grudges and move on from Keith Andrews adverse punditry comments during his time as manager of the Irish soccer team ('O'Neill chief among the doubters as Andrews closes in on Brentford job,' June 25th). Giving Keith a positive affirmation by wishing his fellow Irishman the absolute best in his challenging new job would have been more fitting over his less than magnanimous 'good luck to him' and subsequent comment on his 'much better career than he had.' – Yours, etc, KEVIN McLOUGHLIN, Ballina, Co Mayo. Donegal and anger at the GAA Sir, – Darragh O' Se said it very succinctly: 'Donegal have every right to be angry at six day turnaround. It's riduculous.' He also stated that Donegal are 100 per cent right to be annoyed. The most important point he makes is that the players are the very last to be considered when venues and match dates are decided. The priority for the GAA seems to be cash and TV rights. When these decisions are made by the GAA hierarchy they then present various reasons as to how they arrived at these decisions. In relation to the Donegal v Mayo game, one of the reasons was that some Mayo supporters had just as long to travel to Roscommon as Donegal. No marks for geography there. The reason/excuse for the arrangements for the upcoming quarter finals was that Galway had to travel the previous week. Galway finished third in their group and according to the rules they had to play away last weekend. Donegal finished second in their group and so earned a home draw. Is Donegal being punished because they did better in their group? To add insult to injury, the Donegal/ Monaghan game is not being shown on TV but behind the paywall the pay wall' on GAA plus Now they have to pay for the privilege of watching the game. More cash for the GAA. These decisions and flimsy excuses for them, do not reflect well on the decision makers in the GAA. – Yours, etc, PATRICK BONNER, Dungloe, Co Donegal. Health warnings on alcohol Sir, – The introduction of health warnings on alcohol is now likely to be delayed following further intervention from Tánaiste, Simon Harris suggesting the need to pause the legislation for a variety of reasons, most particularly the situation in relation to trade and tariffs. What he did not mention is that Europe is already home to the world's heaviest drinkers with 80 lives lost due to alcohol every passing hour – 800,000 deaths a year. He did not mention that warning labels will specifically address cancer risks and harm to the unborn. The toxicity of alcohol in pregnancy is not surprising, given its ready transfer across the placenta. Of 58,443 births in Ireland in 2021, the best estimate is that 526 babies were born with foetal alcohol syndrome (the worst form) and a further 2,715 babies were born with foetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Ireland has the third highest rate of foetal alcohol spectrum disorder in the world – no mention of this while deciding to delay the introduction of a health warning on alcohol in Ireland. People with foetal alcohol spectrum disorder experience challenges in their daily living and need support with motor skills, physical health, learning, memory, attention, communication, emotional regulation and social skills. In terms of cancer risk, drinking any type of alcohol increases your risk of seven different types of cancer and the evidence shows there is no safe level of drinking. Yet, Cabinet Ministers, Tánaiste Simon Harris and Minister for Finance, Paschal Donohoe, have added their voices to the political melee, suggesting the introduction of alcohol labelling be delayed to safeguard economic interests. What is it going to be? Boomier business or better health? Don't consumers have a right to see potential health harms from alcohol clearly spelt out on the label? – Yours, etc, DR CATHERINE CONLON, Former director of human health and nutrition, safefood, Cork. Goodbye, Joe Duffy Sir, –From one Joe to another may I sincerely thank Joe Duffy for a being such a strong voice for the people of Ireland for the past 27 years. He always showed great empathy in dealing with the many sensitive issues raised by his listeners throughout the years. He has done the State some service and they know it. – Yours, etc, JOSEPH TUMMON, Circular road, Galway.

An ugly incident at Seapoint
An ugly incident at Seapoint

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

An ugly incident at Seapoint

Sir- In Letters (June 21st) Eileen Bannan remarked on the number of dogs roaming freely at Seapoint in Dublin. Unfortunately, confronting dog owners who choose to ignore the notices can be a risk in itself. My 81-year-old mum who is a daily sea swimmer in Sandycove made the grave mistake of pointing out the sign which clearly states :'Bathing Area – NO dogs allowed all year round. Outside Bathing Area – 10.00 am to 7.00 pm – dogs must be on a leash all year round,' to a man who had two large dogs roaming freely on the small beach. To her horror he approached her, responded that she was the only dog on the beach who should be on a lead and proceeded to put a heavy chain lead around her neck. READ MORE Would he have done this to a dog warden, if there was one to be seen? –Yours, etc, INGRID O'SULLIVAN, Dun Laoghaire, Co Dublin.

Glastonbury founder says people who don't agree with festival's politics 'can go somewhere else'
Glastonbury founder says people who don't agree with festival's politics 'can go somewhere else'

The Journal

time5 hours ago

  • The Journal

Glastonbury founder says people who don't agree with festival's politics 'can go somewhere else'

THE FOUNDER OF Glastonbury has told those who disagree with the politics of performers at the festival to 'go somewhere else'. His comments come after the music festival faced backlash for keeping Kneecap in the lineup, after one member was charged under the British Terrorism Act. Critics included UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Mo Chara, whose real name is Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, allegedly displayed a flag in support of Hezbollah at a London show last year. Starmer said, in light of this, the Belfast rap trio should not be allowed to perform at Glastonbury this year. Ó hAnnaidh was last week released on unconditional bail to appear before a judge again in August. His defence team signalled that they will be contesting the charges , and the band has said the accusations are politically-motivated. Advertisement When asked by Glastonbury Free Press , the festival's newspaper, whether the event still stood for something, founder Michael Eavis said: 'Oh heaven's above, yes, of course it does. And I think the people that come here are into all those things. People that don't agree with the politics of the event can go somewhere else. Kneecap are to perform on West Holts stage this Saturday at 4pm. The music festival is broadcast by the BBC each year. UK Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch said it should not air Kneecap's performance . The BBC said in a statement to the UK's Independent newspaper: 'Whilst the BBC doesn't ban artists, our plans will ensure that our programming will meet our editorial guidelines. Decisions about our output will be made in the lead up to the festival.' Kneecap today released a short film called See it. Say it. Censored. A collaboration involving a number of artists, the film builds on reports from Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and UN agencies, explaining what is happening in Gaza. It includes testimony from Palestinians and doctors who have seen the impact of Israel's siege first-hand. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store