Fury as hotel firm housing asylum seekers in ‘all-inclusive resorts' paid £700M a year of YOUR money
A HOTEL firm housing asylum seekers raked in £700million a year in taxpayers' cash.
Stay Belvedere Hotels Ltd, which runs 51 UK sites, has been a big winner from the boats crisis. Crossings stand at 9,638 already this year.
7
7
Labour has pledged to close the hotels and 'save billions'.
Providing rooms for asylum seekers costs £5.5million a day, with 38,000 people housed in around 210 sites.
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'The taxpayer is picking up the bill for Labour's loss of control of our borders.
"So far 2025 has been the worst year ever for migrants crossing the Channel, who invariably end up in taxpayer-funded hotels or flats.
'They should be in Rwanda but Labour cancelled that scheme before it started.'
'Loss of control'
A Labour source hit back: 'Tories let the accommodation system spiral out of control, with 400 hotels costing £8million a day at its peak.
'We have made changes to save the taxpayer billions and are committed to exiting asylum hotels altogether.'
One of Stay Belvedere's asylum seeker hotels has been likened to an all-inclusive resort for offering entertainers, fitness classes, guitar lessons and fresh meals.
The Ibis Budget in Bishop's Stortford, Herts, is one of around 210 hotels housing 38,000 asylum seekers at a cost of £5.5million a day.
The mostly-male population can choose from a timetable of activities including singing and cookery classes. English lessons are provided along with a support service for immigration cases.
Windows smashed at migrant hotel as UK braces for another night of violence
A twice-daily free bus ferries them to town where they spend their £8-a-head weekly allowance — also funded by taxpayers.
Children are entertained by the visiting Buffy Playbus, a charitable organisation funded by donations.
A whistleblower told The Sun: 'It is a very well-run hotel with loads on offer. It's basically at the same level as the four-star all-inclusive I went to on holiday last year.
'They get three fresh meals a day included. Fresh fruit is available around the clock.
'I don't begrudge the kids getting the help and the residents are generally polite. But it does make you wonder will they ever want to leave?
"They all have phones and I imagine they send pictures to their mates saying, 'Come over here!' '
Stay Belvedere Hotels, which runs the Ibis, recently had its Government contract ended for 51 UK hotels they operate, because their behaviour 'fell short of expectations'.
These migrants shouldn't be getting cooking lessons in hotels — they should have been sent to Rwanda.
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philip
Their deal — part of a £2billion contract for accommodation — will now end in September 2026.
Asked about the daily running of the Ibis Budget and the activity timetable, a spokesperson would say only: 'SBHL has provided a consistent bus service, which has been well-received by guests.'
The Home Office says there are fewer asylum hotels open than when Labour came to power in July — when 213 were in use.
More are set to be closed, but 206 are still expected to be in operation by the end of next month.
Ending their use was a key election pledge from Labour, a task they said would be 'saving the taxpayer billions'.
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp last night said it was 'another Labour promise that has turned out to be a lie'.
He added: 'These migrants shouldn't be getting cooking lessons in hotels — they should have been sent to Rwanda.'
Demand for the migrant-housing hotels is unlikely to be stemmed any time soon, with 2025 crossings on track to break records.
7
7
Some 9,638 have crossed in small boats this year — 45 per cent more than this time last year.
Home Office data released last month revealed that about 10,000 people who arrived in the UK with a visa, such as for study or work, were now being provided with taxpayer-funded asylum digs.
The figure raised concerns that migrants who could financially support themselves — a fact they would have had to declare to get a visa — are still being given free stays.
To access asylum support, claimants have to tick a box saying they would otherwise be destitute. People are unable to work while asylum claims are being processed.
The Home Office said they will start reviewing the finances of residents staying in hotels from May.
Labour has blamed the Tory government for allowing a backlog of unprocessed claims to build up.
The latest data shows that at the end of the year, 41,987 people were waiting for a decision on their asylum applications.
Mr Philp highlighted that 8,000 more immigrants were in hotels since the election.
It's an insult to the taxpayer to discover that all the extra taxes Starmer has imposed are being squandered on accommodating illegal immigrants
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philip
He added: 'It's an insult to the taxpayer to discover that all the extra taxes Starmer has imposed are being squandered on accommodating illegal immigrants in hotels with nice activities. Starmer is a weak PM letting Britain down.'
A Labour source hit back: 'The Tories let the asylum system spiral out of control, with 400 hotels costing £8million a day at its peak.
'We have already made changes to save the taxpayer billions on the asylum system and are committed to exiting asylum hotels altogether.'
The 70-room Ibis, close to Stansted, is believed to have last been open to the public in 2021.
A villager in nearby Birchanger said they were baffled by the arrival of the asylum seekers.
They said: 'It's a quaint location and they're plonked in the middle of the countryside. We see them walking around and getting on the bus. They keep to themselves.'
A mile down the road, the £140-a-night Great Hallingbury Manor has reopened to the public after we revealed how in November 2022 it had been closed to house 50 male asylum seekers.
Latest accounts for Stay Belvedere Hotels show that in the year to September 2022 the company had a turnover of £704.6million, making a pre-tax profit of £62.6million.
The majority of SBHL's business is believed to be their Government contracts for asylum hotels.
'Begun to restore order'
The 2022 accounts say the business was reliant on a single agency agreement. It is run by Safwan Adam, 37, a Lib Dem donor, and Bassam Gilini, 37, a property tycoon.
SBHL was removed as a government contractor last month but is still operating for now.
Minister for Border Security and Asylum Angela Eagle said then: 'Since July, we have improved contract management and added more oversight on our suppliers of asylum accommodation.
'We have made the decision to remove Stay Belvedere Hotels from the supply chain and will not hesitate to take further action to ensure Home Office contracts deliver.'
SBHL did not respond to requests about their earnings.
The Home Office said last night: 'In autumn 2023, there were more than 400 asylum hotels in use at a cost of almost £9million a day.
In the months before the election, the asylum backlog soared again as decision-making collapsed, placing the entire asylum system under unprecedented strain.
'That was the situation the Government inherited but we have begun to restore order, with a rapid increase in asylum decision-making and the removal of over 24,000 people with no right to remain.
'The Home Office does not fund activities for those in asylum hotels.
'These may be provided by voluntary organisations.
'This hotel is currently being transitioned to a new provider.'
'DEPORT' VOW
By Noa Hoffman
NIGEL Farage yesterday pledged to create a Minister of Deportations — and slammed multiculturalism as a failed experiment in modern Britain.
The Reform UK leader demanded a Home Office unit dedicated to the removal of illegal migrants, and a minister put in charge to make someone accountable.
Speaking in Dover ahead of local elections, Mr Farage, right, said: 'What I'm calling for isn't actually anything particularly radical. It's actually just common sense.'
He also warned of sectarian strife caused by both illegal and legal migrants refusing to integrate, pointing to four MPs elected on a pro-Gaza ticket.
He added: 'Encouraging difference was a mistake. we should encourage a sense of togetherness.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Immigration warning over 'less than welcoming' statements
The tone of Sir Keir's remarks on May 12 was, as observed by Mr Sheerin and many others, surely something of a surprise. And it was unexpected even with an awareness - having covered this key issue closely over months and years - of Labour's developing and lamentable stance on immigration. The Prime Minister declared: 'Nations depend on rules – fair rules. Sometimes they're written down, often they're not, but either way, they give shape to our values. They guide us towards our rights, of course, but also our responsibilities, the obligations we owe to one another. Now, in a diverse nation like ours, and I celebrate that, these rules become even more important. Without them, we risk becoming an island of strangers, not a nation that walks forward together.' The 'island of strangers' was a striking turn of phrase. Sir Keir went on: 'So when you have an immigration system that seems almost designed to permit abuse, that encourages some businesses to bring in lower-paid workers rather than invest in our young people, or simply one that is sold by politicians to the British people on an entirely false premise, then you're not championing growth, you're not championing justice, or however else people defend the status quo. You're actually contributing to the forces that are slowly pulling our country apart.' Maybe with the benefit of hindsight the Prime Minister's remarks, even though they could have been uttered just as easily by the Tory Brexiters, should not have been quite so much of a shock as they were. After all, Labour has embraced the key elements of the Conservatives' hard Brexit: loss of free movement of people between the UK and European Economic Area nations and the ending of the frictionless trade from which the country previously benefited enormously when it was part of the single market. Nevertheless, Sir Keir's tone was surely surprisingly dismal, even given all of this. Not only did we have the reference to 'an island of strangers' but also this declaration: 'This strategy will finally take back control of our borders and close the book on a squalid chapter for our politics, our economy, and our country.' What seemed clear from Sir Keir's utterings was that populism most certainly did not end with the exit of Boris Johnson or Rishi Sunak from the prime minister post. Sir Keir's tone contrasted so starkly with Mr Sheerin's reasoned appraisal of the Prime Minister's remarks and Labour's plans on immigration. We had this from Sir Keir: 'We do have to ask why parts of our economy seem almost addicted to importing cheap labour rather than investing in the skills of people who are here and want a good job in their community. Sectors like engineering, where visas have rocketed while apprenticeships have plummeted.' You would imagine Mr Sheerin, as a veteran of the engineering sector, knows a lot more about the specifics than Sir Keir. And it is worth observing the Scottish Engineering chief executive is passionate about people in Scotland and elsewhere in the UK being trained as engineers. He would love to see the skills shortages which are posing such a challenge to member companies of Scottish Engineering and others in the sector solved. Mr Sheerin is not a politician - just someone with deep knowledge of the Scottish engineering sector. So what did the Scottish Engineering chief have to say in his quarterly report published on Friday? Read more He declared that he found the UK Government's 'latest pronouncements on immigration disappointing', highlighting the detrimental impact on companies of 'statements that feel less than welcoming'. Mr Sheerin hammered home his view that raising minimum qualification levels from Higher equivalents to degree level would 'leave out the skilled trades and crafts roles where we are already in shortest supply: welders, fabricators, electricians, pipefitters, CNC (computer numerical control) machinists to name a few'. That is surely a crucial point. And it is worth emphasising Mr Sheerin's observation that people skilled in these roles are 'already in shortest supply'. Mr Sheerin also noted: 'The shortening of the graduate visa scheme reducing the right to work from two years to 18 months after graduating will not only hit our education sector but also reduce the attractiveness of the scheme for companies who will have a shorter timeline to decide whether to invest in the process to extend the visa of the employee.' This is another good point. And the Scottish Engineering chief executive declared: 'Whilst I recognise that this [immigration] is a contentious political issue across the UK for a whole range of reasons, in engineering and manufacturing in Scotland the reality is that immigration is a vital source of skills and experience that cannot be replaced overnight. These skills levels take years to build - and we should be building them - but closing off the supply before putting in place the actions to do that is another example of an action that will challenge the stated ambition of growing our economy.' The time horizon with regard to building skills levels is important. It might not chime with that of politicians such as Sir Keir, who seems at pains to bang the drum on immigration as Nigel Farage's Reform UK makes a big noise on this front. However, it is a simple factual point that engineering skills do take years to build. Mr Sheerin declared that a frustration for him in Labour's immigration pronouncements was that 'whereas there is considerable detail on how we plan to restrict and close this supply of skills, on the laudable stated aim that we will replace the loss with trained or upskilled UK-born workers, the detail is missing on how that will be achieved'. He added: 'And there is no detail that recognises that engineering skills take between four and six years to get to a starting level of competency. It does not seem an unreasonable request for the get-well plan to carry at least the same level of detail as the take-it-away plan.' This seems like an absolutely fair summation of the problems with Labour's populist immigration proposals. If you were asked to choose whether you think it is Sir Keir or Mr Sheerin who is on the money in relation to immigration policy and its effect on engineering and the broader economy, it would surely be the easiest of questions to answer, any day of the week.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Jim Sillars: John Swinney should resign as SNP leader
Polling suggested the SNP would win the crunch by-election but instead Labour took the seat pushing the SNP into second while Reform was placed third. The result prompted calls on Friday by SNP veteran Alex Neil for Mr Swinney's resignation as leader before the Scottish Parliament elections in 2026, when the SNP will have been in power for 19 years. Speaking to The Herald Mr Sillars echoed Mr Neil's views that Mr Swinney should quit though added he did not think a change of leadership would be sufficient to put the SNP on the front foot in time for the election next May saying better delivery on public services and a review of policy priorities was needed. "Look at yesterday's result," he said. READ MORE: SNP veteran calls for Swinney to quit after Labour shock by-election victory Sarwar: Swinney ran a 'disgraceful' campaign and is running down the clock as FM Rows with press, claims of racism and misinformation - a by-election that turned ugly "The SNP went down to 29%. If that was repeated in 2026 the SNP will have a disaster on their hands, they would get nowhere near the seats they need to get and therefore not be in government. "It is very difficult to see how they can reverse their position. They are also being judged by voters on the basis of their performance in government. "They have spent more time in Holyrood arguing about the identity of women than they have about the 85,000 children living in abject poverty. Former SNP deputy leader Jim Sillars (Image: PA) "It is not just a leadership replacement they would have to rethink their whole policy priorities. They have lost the people." He noted the difference in support for independence and for the SNP. "When you get polling showing that support for independence is around 50% but the so-called party of independence is getting 29% of the vote in a critical by-election then there is a real problem," he added. "I never thought John Swinney would make a good leader. I think he should go on the basis that he is a failure, though it doesn't mean that him going would really change things substantially." Along with Mr Neil, Mr Sillars is a longstanding critic of Mr Swinney and former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon. Both were supportive of the late former First Minister Alex Salmond when he fell out with Ms Sturgeon. Turning to the First Minister's message that the by-election was a straight contest between the SNP and Reform, Mr Sillars said: "He punted Reform instead of dealing with the real opposition which was Labour. Scottish Labour's victory rally in Hamilton on Friday (Image: Colin Mearns) "It showed a man with a lack of judgment and someone who could not read the street." Former SNP health secretary Mr Neil was the first senior party figure to call for a change of leadership following the SNP by-election defeat. In a post on X on Friday Alex Neil, who held Cabinet roles in the administrations of both Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon, said it was time for a new leadership. READ MORE: Keir Starmer: John Swinney hasn't raised independence referendum with me Swinney defends claims Labour 'out of it' in by-election Not a shot that's been fired across SNP's bows, it's a cruise missile "Poor by election result for the SNP despite having the best candidate," wrote the former Cabinet minister on X. "It shows that the opinion polls appear wide of the mark. Most importantly it shows the current SNP leadership needs to be replaced urgently." Mr Sarwar and his party celebrated in the early hours of Friday morning after Labour's Davy Russell was elected as the new MSP for Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse, winning the seat from the SNP. With the votes showing a swing of more than 7% from the SNP to Labour, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said on Friday the result showed people have "voted for change". The by-election had been held following the death earlier this year of Scottish Government minister Christina McKelvie. When the votes were counted, Mr Russell polled 8,559, SNP candidate Katy Loudon took 7,957 votes, while Reform's Ross Lambie secured 7,088. And although Mr Russell was elected with fewer votes than Labour secured in the seat in the 2021 Scottish Parliament election, the SNP's support fell from just over 46% of all ballots then to 29.35% in the by-election. Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice insisting they were "delighted" with coming third - despite speculation prior to the count that they could come in second or may even pull off a surprise victory. Speaking at a media event in Hamilton on Friday morning, Mr Sarwar accused the SNP leader of running a "disgraceful" campaign" and insisted the by-election could "help lead the way" to him becoming Scotland's next First Minister. Mr Swinney said the SNP was "clearly disappointed" with the result. The First Minister and party leader said Labour had "won by an absolute landslide" in Rutherglen and Hamilton West - noting the SNP "came much closer" this time round. But he added: "The people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse have made clear that we still have work to do. "Over the next few days, we will take time to consider the result fully." The SNP was approached to seek comment on the interventions from Mr Sillars and Mr Neil. Since coming into office in Spring last year Mr Swinney has attempted to refresh the SNP's policy agenda with a renewed focus on addressing child poverty and improving public services, in particular tackling waits for NHS treatment. He has attempted to steer away from the public debate on gender politics which dominated the end of Ms Sturgeon's time in office.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
British man orders pint in Benidorm but is totally floored by price
A British man recently visited Benidorm and ordered a pint at a well-known bar. He was floored when he was told the price of the tipple, and what it would set him back A British man ordered a pint in Benidorm but was left totally floored by the price. The man, who appears to be no stranger to Spain, was taken aback when he was told how much a drink would set him back at the popular holiday hotspot. Known as the Benidorm Fanatic to his TikTok followers, he told people he headed to Uncle Ron's bar, which is said to be "famous" for its pints, notable for how cheap they're sold for. As he ventured to the venue, he was left astoudned at the price list, as he seriously got a lot for his money. In the clip, he said: "I tell you what, I believe it's actually a very, very nice pint as well, so it comes to the equivalent of about 84p in British money. Let's go and try it out, shall we? Let's give it a try." After he made his way to the bar, he added: "So there you go, I'll give you a euro, a €1 pint, and I'll take that. Let's try this €1 pint. Look at that - a nice, clean, cold pint. It's got a nice, good head on it - let's try it. "That is actually one of the best pints I've had in one of the popular bars. That is actually one of the best pints I've had in Benidorm to be honest with you. €1, I'll drink them all day." Since he shared the video, many people have viewed it, and they were quick to comment too. They shared their thoughts, and some posted their own Benidorm stories. One said: "Wow." Another shared: "I was there last week." A third replied: "Lovely pint. Had many." Meanwhile, a fourth also commented: "Bargain." If you've never heard of Uncle Ron's before, it's a popular spot for British tourists in Benidorm. As well as being known for its cheap drinks, it also serves food too. According to TripAdvisor, the venue serves breakfast, lunch and dinner, and also has 3.8/5 rating on average, according to the review platform. Many people say it's worth a visit if you're looking for a reasonable meal and a few drinks while on holiday. In the review section, one person wrote: "Had a fantastic breakfast at Ron's today. Lovely English produce. Great service. Brilliant staff. "A massive group came in, but they were serviced promptly. Don't know how they manage with so few staff." Another said: "Last day we visited for some lunch before heading to airport. Left full, which is always a good thing. In all my times of going here, never left unhappy at the service nor the food - always really good." A third replied: "We went many times during our two-week holiday. The staff are friendly and extremely hard working day and night. "Cheapest drinks you will find in town and food to suit everyone (daily deal only 6 euros). It's not a stylish 5* restaurant but then you wouldn't expect it. "For drinks just go to the bar like a normal bar. Always busy Sunday and Friday, so expect to book if you want a Sunday lunch. Would we go again? Certainly would!"
