Gretchen Engel of the Center for Death Penalty Litigation on the role of race in our justice system
Gretchen Engel (Courtesy photo)
Two of the most hotly debated topics in law and policy — racial justice and the death penalty — have been on trial in a high-profile criminal case in Johnston County over the last year. In the case, a man named Hasson Bacote challenged the death sentence he received in a murder trial based on his contention that race, and racism played a role in the sentence he received — something that was prohibited at one point in our state under a law known as the Racial Justice Act.
Last week, in what is being widely hailed as a landmark decision, a superior court judge issued a lengthy and detailed ruling in which held that race had in fact played big and wrongful role in Bacote's sentence. So, what exactly did the judge find and what does it mean for our state going forward? Recently NC Newsline sat down with one of the lawyers who represented Bacote — Center for Death Penalty Litigation executive director Gretchen Engel — to find out.
Click here to listen to the full interview with Gretchen Engel.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Stein signs six bills, including changes to state's investment fund
North Carolina State Treasurer Brad Briner (left) and Gov. Josh Stein at a bill signing ceremony at the governor's mansion in Raleigh on June 13, 2025. (Photo: Galen Bacharier/NC Newsline) Gov. Josh Stein signed a bundle of bills into law Friday, including one that overhauls how the state's investments are managed. Under House Bill 506, a five-person board of appointees would oversee North Carolina's $127 billion pension fund. It is currently the sole responsibility of the treasurer. The new law comes after Brad Briner, the new Republican treasurer, said he wanted to see the fund deliver better returns for state retirees. 'While I trust that Treasurer Briner would do an excellent job if he kept this authority to himself, he and I share a belief that this process will be stronger when more voices are involved,' Stein said Friday at a bill signing ceremony in the governor's mansion. Briner's predecessor, former Republican Treasurer Dale Folwell, was often criticized for keeping an unusually large portion of the state pension funds sitting in cash. Briner pledged to move North Carolina away from that sole-fiduciary governance model. Briner, who also spoke Friday, said the state had 'fallen short on the investment side,' which was 'coming at a cost to our retirees.' 'This legislation allows us to face that problem,' he said. Four of the five members of the new board will be appointees. Two will be appointed by the heads of the House and Senate, both Republicans. Stein and Briner will both appoint one member each, subject to the legislature's approval. Those members will serve staggered six-year terms; they must have expert knowledge and a decade of relevant experience. Stein also signed several other bills into law Friday: House Bill 50, which changes how state law enforcement officers' separation allowance is paid out. House Bill 231, which makes it easier for social workers to transfer their licenses to North Carolina. House Bill 477, which makes changes to the Death Benefits Plan in state retirement plans. Senate Bill 248, which makes birth certificates for adopted persons similar to those not adopted. Senate Bill 477, which makes changes to the Department of Natural Resources, including about public access to confidential information on rare species and sensitive habitats. Stein has yet to issue a veto, but that could change soon. Several controversial Republican-led bills sit on the Democrat's desk, including multiple proposals to crack down on immigration enforcement, and a bill allowing permit-less carry of handguns. The governor has ten days to either sign or veto a bill before it automatically becomes law. If Stein does issue vetoes, the path for a GOP override could be challenging — Republicans are one vote short of a veto-proof majority in the House.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Secrecy of immigration control actions is frighteningly un-American
Immigration officials, their backs turned to hide their identities, pose with an Australian citizen who faces possible deportation back to his home country. A list of 'sanctuary' jurisdictions accused of failing to cooperate with immigration arrests, including the state of Colorado, was taken down after protests about its accuracy. (Photo by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) As long as the United States is going to maintain immigration laws, it's a given that unauthorized people will be subject to arrest and deportation. This fact is not terribly controversial. That said, there should be enormous controversy over the way federal officials are now carrying out this work. Simply put: we don't have secret police in the United States. Or at least we shouldn't. Unfortunately, it's hard to describe Trump administration immigration enforcement actions in any other way. Time and again in recent months – here in North Carolina and around the nation — masked individuals in unmarked vehicles have swooped in and spirited people away to undisclosed locations. And whatever the alleged status or crime of these arrested people – this is just plain wrong and un-American. The bottom line: It's a fundamental premise of the U.S. Constitution that no person in our country can be deprived of liberty without due process. When government starts evading this guarantee – even for non-citizens — it places all of our freedoms in grave jeopardy. For NC Newsline, I'm Rob Schofield.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
New and damning school voucher data confirm worst fears
Ever since North Carolina legislators established the so-called 'Opportunity Scholarships' school voucher program, sponsors and proponents have pitched it as a means of helping low-income students escape struggling public schools. Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, a new report from the Department of Public Instruction shows that this was all baloney. The DPI researchers found that just sixty-seven hundred of the state's eighty-thousand-plus vouchers in the current school year went to students who had attended a North Carolina public school in the prior year. And while the data for kindergartners were not yet available, it's clear that as much as ninety percent or more of new vouchers in 24-25 were for students who have never attended a public school. In other words, the vast majority of voucher money is going to parents – most of them well-off – who never had any intention of sending their kids to public schools. The bottom line: School vouchers in our state have nothing to do with quote 'opportunity' and everything to do with undermining and privatizing public education. Other explanations are simply false. For NC Newsline, I'm Rob Schofield.
