UK not selectively applying international law, Labour minister insists
Ian Murray, speaking to media in East Lothian on Monday, repeatedly refused to say whether the US air strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, which took place over the weekend, breached international law.
The top Labour MP insisted that the Government did not issue judgments on 'the legality of another country's actions'.
Pushed on why the UK Government had done exactly that without reservation after Russia invaded Ukraine, Murray said it was because the law breaches in that case had been 'clear'.
READ MORE: John Swinney 'concerned' about UK involvement in Middle East conflict
Asked initially if the US strikes on Iran were legal under international law, Murray said: 'Well, it's up to the US to determine the legality, because they're the ones that took the action and therefore they determine the legality of that.'
Asked if it was right to say that the US determines the legality of their own actions under international law, he said: 'They determine the legality of the legal advice that they have in terms of what they did in Iran, and that's the right thing for them to do.
'It's not for us to determine the legality of another country's actions.'
Reports have said that Attorney General Richard Hermer, the UK Government's top legal adviser and a friend of Prime Minister Keir Starmer, has warned that direct UK involvement in the war between Israel and Iran may be illegal.
Asked if such reports were correct, Murray said: 'We don't talk about legal advice that we're given, particularly in these circumstances, but we don't also comment on another country's legal advice.
'If the US have taken action, they've had to determine their own legal advice.'
Attorney General Richard Hermer is Ian Murray's colleague in the UK CabinetAsked then why the UK and Labour – who were then in opposition – had shown no such restraint when describing Russia's invasion of Ukraine as illegal, Murray said: 'Well, it was quite clear that their actions were illegal, wasn't it? Because they invaded another country.
'The US action in Iran is there for all to see, and the basis and the reasoning they've done it for – but it's not up for us to determine their legal advice, and we don't comment on our own legal advice, in terms of whether it be this issue or any other.'
Asked if that amounted to 'different strokes for different folks', Murray said: 'No, it's the way in which governments operate.'
Also speaking on Monday, Foreign Secretary David Lammy also refused to say if the US attacks on Iran were illegal or not under international law.
However, he added: 'I don't say it's not legitimate.'
READ MORE: Scottish Secretary ditches 'lifelong' opposition to nuclear weapons
Chancellor Rachel Reeves was asked about the legality of the strikes as she visited the West Midlands, and said: 'It is up to the US to make that case. We were not involved in these actions and, of course, we would never comment on the legal advice that the Government receives.'
Overnight, US president Donald Trump called the future of the Iranian regime into question, posting on his TruthSocial platform: 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???'
It appeared to be a different approach to that of his defence secretary Pete Hegseth, who had said on Sunday that 'this mission was not and has not been about regime change'.
Iran is reportedly considering shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, through which some 20% of the world's oil is shipped, in response to the US attacks on its territory.
The UK Government has urged Iran to return to the negotiating table, at which it was due to sit before Israel launched unilateral attacks on June 13.
Iran has said it will not enter talks while Israel is bombing its territory.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
24 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Welfare reforms will lead to ‘appalling poverty'
Labour MP Andy McDonald asked for further evidence on how many people will lose out on Personal Independence Payments (Pip) as a result of the welfare reform Bill. In the Commons, Labour's Richard Burgon also claimed anyone supporting the reforms is voting to take away benefits from disabled people who need help 'to cut up their food, wash themselves and go to the toilet'. Work and pensions minister Sir Stephen Timms said the reforms will 'open up opportunities for people who have been denied opportunities for far, far too long'. It comes after Labour's Vicky Foxcroft resigned as a Government whip over the proposed cuts last week. The Government has previously said the reforms could save up to £5 billion a year. The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill will be debated on July 1, when it receives its second reading in the Commons. Speaking on Monday, Mr Burgon, Leeds East MP, said: 'Isn't the simple and sad truth that any MP who votes for this upcoming welfare Bill is voting to take Pip from disabled people who need assistance to cut up their food, wash themselves and go to the toilet?' Sir Stephen replied: 'No. What people will be voting for is reforms to open up opportunities for people who have been denied opportunities for far, far too long. We're putting that right.' Mr McDonald, MP for Middlesbrough and Thornaby East, said: 'Ministers have highlighted the scale of Pip recipients expected to lose payments make up one in 10 of the total Pip caseload, suggesting the impact of the cuts will be limited, but that's still 370,000 current recipients expected to lose on average, £4,500. 'But these numbers rest on a set of assumptions that the OBR has described as highly uncertain. DWP data shows there are 1.3 million people currently receiving Pip daily living payments who would not meet the new criteria. 'So before MPs are asked to vote on imposing such appalling poverty, will the DWP or the OBR provide further evidence underpinning these claims?' Sir Stephen replied: 'Well, the OBR has published its assessment. (Mr McDonald) is absolutely right, their assessment is that one in 10 of those who are receiving Pip in November next year will have lost it by 2029/30.' He added: 'Following that, we will be able to introduce the biggest investment there has ever been in employment support for people out of work on health and disability grounds, because we don't want any longer to track people on low income for years and years and years, we want people to be able to enter work and fulfil their ambitions, and that's what the investment will allow.' Pip is a benefit aimed at helping with extra living costs if someone has a long-term physical or mental health condition or disability and difficulty doing certain everyday tasks or getting around because of their condition. Data for Pip claimants begins in January 2019, when the number stood at 2.05 million. An impact assessment published alongside the Bill confirmed previously published estimates that changes to Pip entitlement rules could see about 800,000 people lose out, with an average loss of £4,500 per year. Shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately said the reforms will get 'a grand total of zero people into work, according to their own impact assessments'. Liberal Democrat MP Helen Maguire said cuts to Pip could make it harder for people to live independently, thus negating the point of the benefit. The Epsom and Ewell MP said one of her constituents feels that Pip is treated as a 'pity payment rather than a benefit designed to offset the extra costs of disability'. She added: 'Does the minister agree that cutting Pip payments simply pushes more disabled people further from living independently and also from employment?' Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said reforms were needed to preserve the system in the long term. She said: 'I do not recognise the attitude that she described there. Quite frankly we feel precisely the opposite. 'This is a vital benefit that makes a crucial contribution towards the extra costs of living with a disability. 'That is why we want to reform it, to protect it for generations to come because we do not think it's sustainable to have a doubling of the number of people on Pip over this decade from two to more than 4.3 million.' Elsewhere in work and pensions questions, Ms Kendall said the child poverty task force will look at 'all the levers that we need' to tackle the issue, when pressed on the Government's plans for the two-child benefit cap. Tracy Gilbert, Labour MP for Edinburgh North and Leith, said: 'I absolutely agree… with a number of charities that removing the cap alone is not a silver bullet to tackle child poverty, but it will make a difference. 'Can (Ms Kendall) confirm if the tackling child poverty task force is considering the removal of a two-child cap?' Ms Kendall replied: 'I can absolutely confirm that the child poverty strategy will be looking at all the levers that we need to tackle this really important issue, including in terms of social security. 'She is impatient for change for her constituents, as am I. We have already put in place a fair repayment rate for universal credit, we are increasing the standard allowance for the first time in universal credit, for the first time in its history, and rolling out free school meals. 'But I will, of course, take her representations forward and make sure they're heard by the task force.'
Rhyl Journal
24 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Lammy urges Reform's newest MP to ‘get some help' over ‘conspiracy theories'
Sarah Pochin had asked the Foreign Secretary whether the US felt unable to use the UK-US airbase on Diego Garcia, following the Government's deal with Mauritius over the Chagos Islands. Responding during a statement on the Middle East, Mr Lammy said the MP for Runcorn and Helsby should 'get off social media'. The UK-operated base in the Chagos Islands was not used in the US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, Foreign Office minister Stephen Doughty has said. He added that the US did not ask to use it, as he answered questions from the Foreign Affairs Committee on Monday. Speaking in the Commons, Ms Pochin said: 'Is he (Mr Lammy) able to explain to the House whether the United States felt unable to use the Diego Garcia base and have to refuel, in a highly dangerous operation three times because of that, because of your deal that you did with the with the Mauritians, that would then tell the Chinese, that would then tell the Iranians?' Mr Lammy replied: 'The honourable lady has got (to) get off social media, has got to get some help… because she is swallowing conspiracy theories that should not be repeated in this House.' The deal over the Chagos Islands follows a 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice which says the islands should be handed over to Mauritius. As well as establishing a £40 million fund for Chagossians, the UK has agreed to pay Mauritius at least £120 million a year for 99 years in order to lease back the Diego Garcia base – a total cost of at least £13 billion in cash terms. During the statement on Monday, Mr Lammy was pressed by MPs on the UK's position following the US military action. Conservative MP Lincoln Jopp (Spelthorne) said: 'Does His Majesty's Government support or oppose US military action against Iran at the weekend?' Mr Lammy replied: 'His Majesty's Government will continue to work with our closest ally, as I was last week in Washington DC.' Liberal Democrat MP Mike Martin (Tunbridge Wells) said: 'What is UK Government policy on whether regime change should be pursued in Iran?' Mr Lammy replied: 'It is not our belief that it's for us to change the regime of any country, that it must be for the people themselves.' SNP MP Brendan O'Hara (Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber) said: 'We've been here for an hour, and still the Foreign Secretary appears incapable of saying whether he supports or condemns America's actions, or whether he regards them as being legal or not. 'And nowhere in this statement does the role of international law even merit a mention. So will the Foreign Secretary take this opportunity now to tell us whether he believes that America's unilateral action was compliant with international law?' Mr Lammy replied: 'I've got to tell (Mr O'Hara), I qualified and was called to the bar in 1995, I haven't practised for the last 25 years. 'It is not for me to comment on the United States' legal validity. I would refer him to article 51 and article two of the UN Charter, and he can seek his own advice.'
STV News
34 minutes ago
- STV News
British nationals evacuated from Israel as Iran conflict continues
The RAF has evacuated 63 British nationals from Israel as Tel Aviv and Tehran continue to exchange fire, the Foreign Secretary has told MPs. David Lammy told the Commons that an RAF A400 had taken the group of British nationals to Cyprus on Monday, from where they will be taken to the UK, adding that more flights will follow. He also confirmed that one British national in Israel had been injured during Iranian missile attacks and had been offered consular support. Downing Street said 'around 1,000' people had requested a seat on an evacuation flight – a quarter of the 4,000 who had registered their presence in Israel or Palestine with the Foreign Office. In his statement to the Commons, Lammy repeated his plea to Iran to return to the negotiating table following America's strikes on its nuclear programme. He said: 'My message for Tehran was clear, take the off ramp, dial this thing down, and negotiate with the United States seriously and immediately. 'The alternative is an even more destructive and far-reaching conflict, which could have unpredictable consequences.' He had previously urged Tehran to engage in negotiations, saying US President Donald Trump's apparent decision last week to delay US military action offered a two-week window for a diplomatic solution. On Monday, he said: 'We can and we must find a negotiated solution. The window has narrowed, but the risks of further escalation are so great and the costs so considerable for Britain and all in the region, that this is the Government's priority.' Lammy's statement came after an air raid by American B-2 stealth bombers and a salvo of submarine-launched missiles hit Iran's nuclear facilities on Saturday night. The Foreign Secretary told MPs it was not yet clear how far the attack had set back Iran's nuclear ambitions, but said the need for a diplomatic solution remained. He added: 'Strikes cannot destroy the knowledge Iran has acquired over several decades, nor any regime ambition to deploy that knowledge to build a nuclear weapon.' Lammy also told MPs that the Government has withdrawn staff from its embassy in Iran, telling the Commons it is operating 'remotely'. The Foreign Secretary also continued to face questions on the legality of the US strikes, but said it 'must rightly be a matter for the US government in relation to their action' and added: 'This was not our action. We have been clear that we were not involved.' Earlier, Downing Street had said that preventing Tehran from obtaining a nuclear bomb was a 'good thing' for the UK, but declined to comment on whether the US strikes complied with international law. It came as Qatar shut its air space temporarily on Monday to ensure the safety of citizens, residents and visitors. Dr Majed Al Ansari, spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said in a post on X: 'The competent Qatari authorities announce the temporary suspension of air traffic in the country's airspace, in order to ensure the safety of citizens, residents, and visitors.' The Foreign Office advised British nationals in Qatar to 'shelter in place' after a US security alert. The UAE has also closed its air space, according to flight-tracking website Flightradar24. Meanwhile, Israeli jets hit targets in Tehran on Monday including the security headquarters of the Revolutionary Guard Corps and Evin Prison, the regime's main site for detaining political prisoners and human rights activists. In turn, Iran carried out its own strikes against cities in Israel, and sparked fears of a wider regional conflict as it accused the US of crossing 'a very big red line'. Meanwhile, oil prices reached their highest level for nearly six months over fears a regional conflict could restrict supply, especially if Iran decided to blockade the Strait of Hormuz. The jump in prices prompted Trump to post on his Truth Social platform: 'EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I'M WATCHING! YOU'RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON'T DO IT!' Lammy told MPs the Government was 'closely monitoring' the energy markets and urged Iran to keep the Strait of Hormuz open, saying a blockade would be 'a monumental act of economic self-harm' and make reaching a diplomatic solution even harder. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
