logo
Business leaders say they're tired of being villainized, used as ‘an ATM' by lawmakers

Business leaders say they're tired of being villainized, used as ‘an ATM' by lawmakers

Yahoo13-03-2025

Business leaders in Annapolis said a proposed tax on services makes the state less business-friendly. (Photo by Bryan P. Sears/Maryland Matters.)
Business owners gathered in Annapolis on Wednesday said they are tired of being villainized by the same lawmakers who view them as a source of easy money.
For the second consecutive year, business owners arrived at the state capitol to oppose a proposal to impose a sales tax on services. The late-filed, pared down proposal would raise as much at $940 million next year — and $1.4 billion by fiscal 2030 — by imposing a 2.5% sales tax on services provided by a specific set of businesses to other businesses.
They aired their grievances over the course of a day that began with a late-morning news conference followed by hours of testimony before House and Senate committees where more than 400 businesses signed up in opposition.
'One of the most frustrating aspects of this debate is hearing legislators refer to businesses as bad actors, or stating that they're not paying their fair share,' said Kimberly Prescott, founder and president of Columbia-based Prescott HR, at the morning event.
'Let me be clear: The businesses that I work with are not bad actors,' she said. 'They're hard-working employers that do the right thing for their employees and their communities. This kind of rhetoric discourages business owners from staying in Maryland, let alone expanding here.'
Prescott and others said businesses are at a breaking point.
In recent years, they've weathered a pandemic. The state has increased the minimum wage and imposed mandates for paid leave and other programs. Many of those mandates require professional services to ensure compliance — the same services targeted by the proposed tax, said Rebekah Olson, CEO of the Maryland Association of Certified Public Accountants.
'This bill is a tax on compliance itself,' Olson said. 'Hiring a CPA to ensure you're meeting your tax obligation? Now taxed. Paying for payroll services to ensure your employees are paid appropriately and on time? Taxed. Bringing in a consultant and new software to actually implement this very bill? Now taxed.'
Mary D. Kane, president and CEO of the Maryland Chamber of Commerce, said the bill is yet another hurdle thrown up by lawmakers.
'Instead of creating opportunities for businesses to recover and grow, the state is continually using them as their ATM machine,' Kane said. 'This is our moment because we've been taxed enough.'
A Department of Legislative Services analysis released Tuesday said that House Bill 1554, sponsored by Del. David Moon (D-Montgomery), and the identical Senate Bill 1045, sponsored by Sen. Shelly Hettleman (D-Baltimore County), highlighted 12 services that would be hit by the new tax, raising $940 million in fiscal 2026. Tech services and consulting account for 66% of the total in the first year, the analysis said.
Both the House and Senate hearings Wednesday featured moments of tension and drama.
Moon said the bill is one option to address the state's ballooning budget deficits: The state faces a projected $3 billion gap for fiscal 2026, which doubles to more than $6 billion in fiscal 2030. And those estimates came before President Donald Trump's administration began its sustained, rapid-fire series of cuts of federal spending and employment.
Maryland stands to lose more than any other state as a result of Trump administration cuts, Moody's Ratings reported this week. Senate President Bill Ferguson (D-Baltimore City) said those cuts could spark a 'Maryland recession.'
Lawmakers have less than four weeks to craft a state spending plan, even as they brace for more federal budget and a potential shutdown.
'This sucks, right?' said Del. Joe Vogel (D-Montgomery), a member of the House Ways and Means Committee. 'We're here in this position not because of what we're doing but rather because of the consequences of an administration in D.C.'
The crowd objected, with many speaking over Vogel, saying 'No' and preventing him from finishing the sentence.
House Ways and Means Committee Chair Vanessa Atterbeary (D-Howard) gaveled the session back to order, calling for attendees to restrain themselves or be removed.
Moon, while testifying on his bill, turned at one point to speak to an audience filled with business owners, many of whom clearly favored a budget solution involving cuts.
'To the folks that were just groaning: I feel that groaning I totally get it,' Moon said. Atterbeary asked him to not address the crowd, but Moon continued, saying that lawmakers are also making 'billions in cuts.'
'I promise you we are doing billions in cuts. I promise it. They're slowing the Blueprint [education reform plan]. There's billions in cuts. More are coming. We have to make a decision with what to do with what's left,' he said.
'The unemployment rolls are doubling by the moment. It's going to be folks — employees and contractors — coming through the system. We know that for a fact. The $280 – $350 million [revenue reduction] that was announced by the Board or Revenue Estimates was a floor. It's a floor. It was not factoring in whatsoever any private sector cuts,' Moon said. 'Big cuts are coming to Maryland, rest assured.'
In the Senate Budget and Taxation Committee, Vice Chair Jim Rosapepe (D-Prince George's and Anne Arundel) sparked a tense exchange with the owner of a small IT business when, after hearing from a panel of opponents, he asked for suggestions to balance the budget.
'If we don't do this [service tax], we need to come up with about $1 billion in cuts beyond what the governor has proposed or other revenue,' Rosapepe said. 'So, I'd appreciate to know what billion-dollar revenue source would you suggest we substitute for or what billion dollars of cuts you'd suggest.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Darren Clark, owner of Clark Computer Services, said the sales tax proposal would 'stifle' small businesses.
'You're doing a transaction versus thinking long term,' Clark said.
'With all due respect, we are thinking long term,' Rosapepe replied.
Rosapepe later said he would not ask again, but left the question open for opponents to answer.
'I'm asking all the witnesses if they don't want this … I personally would like specific suggestions of alternative revenue sources or cuts,' Rosapepe said.
'I think if you were sitting in my business with 40 employees you might have to start letting go, you'd think a lot differently,' Clark said. 'But you're sitting up on your perch and you're thinking this is easy. Most of us are operating on thin margins already. You're going to make it worse.'
It was at that point, Senate Budget and Taxation Chair Sen. Guy Guzzone (D-Howard) ended the exchange.
'We're going to move on,' Guzzone said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mayor Bass taps AECOM to assist with Palisades rebuilding
Mayor Bass taps AECOM to assist with Palisades rebuilding

Los Angeles Times

time38 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Mayor Bass taps AECOM to assist with Palisades rebuilding

Nearly five months after a firestorm laid waste to a wide swath of Pacific Palisades, Mayor Karen Bass announced Friday that the global infrastructure firm AECOM will help develop a master plan for rebuilding the area, as well as a plan for reconstructing utilities and other infrastructure. The firm will work alongside both the city and Hagerty Consulting, which Bass tapped as a recovery contractor in early February, according to the mayor's office. Hagerty, an Illinois-based disaster recovery firm, has a yearlong contract with the city for up to $10 million but has faced persistent questions about the specifics of its work. The mayor's office did not immediately answer when asked Friday whether Hagerty's role was being scaled back. In late January, the mayor, along with four council members and other city officials, heard presentations from Hagerty, AECOM and a third firm also seeking to be the city's disaster recovery contractor. After Bass selected Hagerty in February, she said the city was still in discussions with AECOM about a separate contract. 'An unprecedented natural disaster requires an unprecedented, all-hands-on-deck response — all levels of government, philanthropy, the private sector and educational institutions coming together to support the community and rebuild as quickly and safely as possible,' Bass said in a written statement Friday. 'AECOM's expertise in long-term infrastructure planning and design will only further expedite our work to get families home.' The mayor's office also did not immediately respond when asked whether the city now has a contract with AECOM, or what the specifics of that contract, including the compensation, are. Steve Soboroff, a longtime local developer and Bass' former chief recovery officer, publicly criticized Bass' decision to choose Hagerty over AECOM as the city's initial disaster recovery contractor. In an interview in mid-April as he was leaving his post, Soboroff raised questions about Hagerty's role and said he thought AECOM should have been hired instead. Along with developing a comprehensive rebuilding master plan and supporting the Palisades' infrastructure reconstruction, AECOM will help coordinate broader public and private rebuilding efforts. The company will work on a 'logistics plan for materials management in coordination with local builders and suppliers' as well as a master traffic plan as more homeowners leap into the rebuilding process, according to a news release. AECOM is also the 'official venue infrastructure partner' for the 2028 Olympic Games, according to a March news release from LA28.

Detained Columbia graduate describes ‘visceral' harm of missing son's birth
Detained Columbia graduate describes ‘visceral' harm of missing son's birth

The Hill

time39 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Detained Columbia graduate describes ‘visceral' harm of missing son's birth

Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia graduate detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) over his campus activism, said he has suffered 'visceral' harm after missing the birth of his son while in federal custody. 'The most immediate and visceral harms I have experienced directly relate to the birth of my son, Deen. Instead of holding my wife's hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone,' Khalil, a green card holder, wrote in court documents filed Thursday. 'I listened to her pain, trying to comfort her while 70 other men slept around me,' he added. The Trump administration said it plans to revoke Khalil's legal status and urged him to self deport, according to reports from the Associated Press. Khalil was denied permission to go to the birth of his first child last month. Secretary of State Marco Rubio initiated removal efforts for Khalil in March citing a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act over the government's allegation that he participated in pro-Hamas rhetoric at campus protests amid the ongoing Israel-Hamas war. 'To not be able to see them, hold them, speak with them freely, enjoy everything I imagined our first days as a family would be like, is devastating. Worst still is knowing that they must face all the fear and notoriety of this case without me,' Khalil wrote in this week's court documents. 'The Rubio Determination is casting a shadow of suspicion across our entire family. I could never have imagined this would happen, and it is horrifying to experience this as a husband and father,' he added. Khalil, in the court filings, denied accusations that he supports Hamas but questioned the Israeli government's strikes on 'innocent Palestinians.' Democrats and advocacy organizations have urged officials to immediately release Khalil, alleging that his constitutional right to free speech has been ignored. 'This arrest is unprecedented, illegal, and un-American. The federal government is claiming the authority to deport people with deep ties to the U.S. and revoke their green cards for advocating positions that the government opposes. To be clear: The First Amendment protects everyone in the U.S. The government's actions are obviously intended to intimidate and chill speech on one side of a public debate,' Ben Wizner, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project said in a statement. The State Department did not immediately respond to The Hill's request for comment.

Exclusive-US mulls giving millions to controversial Gaza aid foundation, sources say
Exclusive-US mulls giving millions to controversial Gaza aid foundation, sources say

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Exclusive-US mulls giving millions to controversial Gaza aid foundation, sources say

By Jonathan Landay WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The State Department is weighing giving $500 million to the new foundation providing aid to war-shattered Gaza, according to two knowledgeable sources and two former U.S. officials, a move that would involve the U.S. more deeply in a controversial aid effort that has been beset by violence and chaos. The sources and former U.S. officials, all of whom requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said that money for Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) would come from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which is being folded into the U.S. State Department. The plan has met resistance from some U.S. officials concerned with the deadly shootings of Palestinians near aid distribution sites and the competence of the GHF, the two sources said. The GHF, which has been fiercely criticized by humanitarian organizations, including the United Nations, for an alleged lack of neutrality, began distributing aid last week amid warnings that most of Gaza's 2.3 million population is at risk of famine after an 11-week Israeli aid blockade, which was lifted on May 19 when limited deliveries were allowed to resume. The foundation has seen senior personnel quit and had to pause handouts twice this week after crowds overwhelmed its distribution hubs. The State Department and GHF did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Reuters has been unable to establish who is currently funding the GHF operations, which began in Gaza last week. The GHF uses private U.S. security and logistics companies to transport aid into Gaza for distribution at so-called secure distribution sites. On Thursday, Reuters reported that a Chicago-based private equity firm, McNally Capital, has an "economic interest" in the for-profit U.S. contractor overseeing the logistics and security of GHF's aid distribution hubs in the enclave. While U.S. President Donald Trump's administration and Israel say they don't finance the GHF operation, both have been pressing the United Nations and international aid groups to work with it. The U.S. and Israel argue that aid distributed by a long-established U.N. aid network was diverted to Hamas. Hamas has denied that. USAID has been all but dismantled. Some 80 percent of its programs have been canceled and its staff face termination as part of President Donald Trump's drive to align U.S. foreign policy with his "America First" agenda. One source with knowledge of the matter and one former senior official said the proposal to give the $500 million to GHF has been championed by acting deputy USAID Administrator Ken Jackson, who has helped oversee the agency's dismemberment. The source said that Israel requested the funds to underwrite GHF's operations for 180 days. The Israeli government did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The two sources said that some U.S. officials have concerns with the plan because of the overcrowding that has affected the aid distribution hubs run by GHF's contractor, and violence nearby. Those officials also want well-established non-governmental organizations experienced in running aid operations in Gaza and elsewhere to be involved in the operation if the State Department approves the funds for GHF, a position that Israel likely will oppose, the sources said. Gaza hospital officials have said more than 80 people had been shot dead and hundreds wounded near GHF's distribution points between June 1-3. Since launching its operation, the GHF has opened three hubs, but over the past two days, only two of them have been functioning. Witnesses blamed Israeli soldiers for the killings. The Israeli military said it fired warning shots on two days, while on Tuesday it said soldiers had fired at Palestinian "suspects" advancing towards their positions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store