logo
Americans do not see Supreme Court as politically neutral, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

Americans do not see Supreme Court as politically neutral, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds

Straits Times9 hours ago

The two-day poll, which closed on June 12, was based on responses from 1,136 US adults. PHOTO: REUTERS
WASHINGTON - Americans are divided on major issues that the US Supreme Court is due to rule on in the coming weeks, but most agree on one thing - neither Republicans nor Democrats see the nation's top judicial body as politically neutral, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll.
Just 20 per cent of respondents to the poll agreed that the Supreme Court is politically neutral while 58 per cent disagreed and the rest either said they did not know or did not respond.
Among people who described themselves as Democrats, only 10 per cent agreed it was politically neutral and 74 per cent disagreed, while among Republicans 29 per cent agreed and 54 per cent disagreed.
The two-day poll, which closed on June 12 , was based on responses from 1,136 US adults. It had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
The court has issued major rulings in recent years including in cases rolling back abortion rights, expanding gun rights, recognising presidential immunity from prosecution for official acts, rejecting race-conscious collegiate admissions and curbing the power of federal agencies.
Its 6-3 conservative majority includes three justices appointed by Republican President Donald Trump in his first term in office.
In the Reuters/Ipsos poll, 44 per cent of respondents expressed a favourable view of the court, including 67 per cent of Republicans and 26 per cent of Democrats.
The Supreme Court's popularity has declined since its June 2022 decision to overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that had legalised abortion nationwide.
Some 57 per cent of respondents in a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted at the end of 2021 expressed a favourable opinion of the court. By the end of June 2022, that figure had fallen to 43 per cent.
The justices are expected to issue rulings in major cases in the coming weeks as they near the end of their current term that began in October.
Among the cases are one on the legality of Tennessee's Republican-backed law banning gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors and one involving Mr Trump's executive order restricting automatic birthright citizenship, part of his hardline approach to immigration.
Some 53 per cent of respondents in the Reuters/Ipsos poll said they supported 'laws that prevent transgender children under the age of 18 from getting medical treatment related to gender identity and gender transitioning'. Another 28 per cent opposed such laws and the rest were unsure or did not answer the question.
Among Republicans, support for such laws was at 57 per cent and opposition at 28 per cent, while among Democrats support was at 23 per cent and opposition at 54 per cent.
The Tennessee law prohibits medical treatments such as puberty blockers and hormones for transgender minors. During Dec 4, 2024, arguments in the case, the court's conservative justices signaled their willingness to uphold the law. The eventual ruling could affect other state laws targeting transgender people.
After Mr Trump signed his birthright citizenship directive in January, 22 states as well as immigrant rights advocates and pregnant immigrants sued, arguing that it was a violation of citizenship language in the US Constitution's 14th Amendment.
In the Reuters/Ipsos poll, only 24 per cent of all respondents supported ending birthright citizenship and 52 per cent opposed it.
Among Democrats, 5 per cent supported ending it, with 84 per cent opposed. Among Republicans, 43 per cent supported ending it, with 24 per cent opposed. The rest said they were unsure or did not respond to the question.
The court also by the end of June is expected to issue a ruling on the legality of a Texas law that requires people to verify the age online before accessing pornographic websites.
The Reuters/Ipsos poll found strong support for such laws. Among all respondents, 70 per cent were in support and 14 per cent opposed. Among Democrats, 65 per cent supported and 18 per cent opposed, while among Republicans 80 per cent supported and 7 per cent opposed.
During Jan 15 arguments in the case, the justices seemed to agree that states can try to keep adult material from minors but also voiced concern over burdens imposed on adults to view constitutionally protected material. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

G7 leaders meet in Canada hoping to avoid Trump clash
G7 leaders meet in Canada hoping to avoid Trump clash

CNA

time2 hours ago

  • CNA

G7 leaders meet in Canada hoping to avoid Trump clash

BANFF, Alberta: Group of Seven leaders gather in the Canadian Rockies starting on Sunday (Jun 15) amid growing splits with the United States over foreign policy and trade, with host Canada striving to avoid clashes with President Donald Trump. While Prime Minister Mark Carney says his priorities are strengthening peace and security, building critical mineral supply chains and creating jobs, issues such as US tariffs and the conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine are expected to feature heavily. Israel and Iran launched fresh attacks on each other overnight into Sunday, killing scores hours before the leaders of the world's industrialized democracies meet. "This issue will be very high on the agenda of the G7 summit," German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said. He said his goals are for Iran to not develop or possess nuclear weapons, ensuring Israel's right to defend itself, avoiding escalation of conflict and creating room for diplomacy. The summit takes place in the mountain resort of Kananaskis, some 90 km west of Calgary. The last time Canada played host, in 2018, Trump left the summit before denouncing then Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as "very dishonest and weak" and instructing the US delegation to withdraw its approval of the final communique. "This will be a successful meeting if Donald Trump doesn't have an eruption that disrupts the entire gathering. Anything above and beyond that is gravy," said University of Ottawa international affairs professor Roland Paris, who was foreign policy adviser to Trudeau. Trump has often mused about annexing Canada and arrives at a time when Carney is threatening reprisals if Washington does not lift tariffs on steel and aluminum. "The best-case scenario ... is that there's no real blow-ups coming out of the back end," said Josh Lipsky, the chair of international economics at the Atlantic Council think tank and a former White House and State Department official. Carney's office declined to comment on how the Israeli strikes would affect the summit. Diplomats said Canada has ditched the idea of a traditional comprehensive joint communique and would issue chair summaries instead, in hopes of containing a disaster and maintaining engagement with the US. A senior Canadian official told reporters Ottawa wanted to focus on actions the seven members, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States, could take together. Canadian Senator Peter Boehm, a veteran former diplomat who acted as Trudeau's personal representative to the 2018 summit, said he had been told the summit would last longer than usual to give time for bilateral meetings with the US president. Expected guests for parts of the Sunday to Tuesday event include leaders from Ukraine, Mexico, India, Australia, South Africa, South Korea and Brazil, who all have reasons to want to talk to Trump. "Many will want to talk to President Trump about their own particular interests and concerns," Boehm said by phone. A senior US official said on Friday working discussions would cover trade and the global economy, critical minerals, migrant and drug smuggling, wildfires, international security, artificial intelligence and energy security. "The president is eager to pursue his goals in all of these areas including making America's trade relationships fair and reciprocal," the official said. The visit of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to the Oval Office in February descended into acrimony and has served as a warning for other world leaders about the delicate dance they face in negotiating with Trump. But diplomats say the frustration of dealing with the Trump administration has made some keener to assert themselves. 'THE BIG TEST' Canada has long been one of Ukraine's most vocal supporters. Trump came to power promising to end the war with Russia within 24 hours but diplomatic efforts to end the conflict have stalled. One Ukrainian official involved in preparations for the summit said hope had faded for a strong statement in support of Ukraine. Instead, success for Kyiv would merely constitute an amicable meeting between Trump and Zelenskyy. A European official said the G7 summit and the NATO summit in The Hague later in June provided an opportunity to underscore to Trump the need to press ahead with a sanctions bill put together by US senators alongside a new European package to pressure Russia into a ceasefire and broader talks. Trump's first international summit will offer some early clues on whether Trump is interested in working with allies to solve common problems, said Max Bergmann, a director at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Netanyahu says regime change in Iran could be result of Israel's attacks
Netanyahu says regime change in Iran could be result of Israel's attacks

Straits Times

time3 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Netanyahu says regime change in Iran could be result of Israel's attacks

FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu waves following a meeting in the White House, in Washington, U.S., April 7, 2025. REUTERS/Kevin Mohatt//File Photo Netanyahu says regime change in Iran could be result of Israel's attacks WASHINGTON - Regime change in Iran could be a result of Israel's military attacks on the country, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Fox News on Sunday, saying Israel would do whatever is necessary to remove the "existential threat" posed by Tehran. Israel launched "Operation Rising Lion" with a surprise attack on Friday morning that wiped out the top echelon of Iran's military command and damaged its nuclear sites, and says the campaign will continue to escalate in coming days. Iran has vowed to "open the gates of hell" in retaliation. Israel's military has said the current goal of the campaign is not a change in regime, but the dismantling of Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programs. Asked by Fox's Bret Baier on his "Special Report" program if regime change was part of Israel's military effort, Netanyahu said: "Could certainly be the result because the Iran regime is very weak." "We're geared to do whatever is necessary to achieve our dual aim, to remove ... two existential threats - the nuclear threat and the ballistic missile threat," Netanyahu said in one of his first interviews since Israel's attacks began. "We did act - to save ourselves, but also, I think, to not only protect ourselves, but protect the world from this incendiary regime. We can't have the world's most dangerous regime have the world's most dangerous weapons," he said. Israel has said its operation could last weeks, and Netanyahu has openly urged the Iranian people to rise up against their Islamic clerical rulers. Israel and Iran launched fresh attacks on each other overnight into Sunday, killing scores and raising fears of a wider conflict, as U.S. President Donald Trump said it could be ended easily while warning Tehran not to strike any U.S. targets. Asked about a Reuters report that Trump vetoed an Israeli plan to kill Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Netanyahu said: "I'm not going to get into that." But he said he had informed Trump ahead of Friday's military action. American pilots are shooting down Iranian drones headed toward Israel, he said. With worries growing of a regional conflagration, Trump has lauded Israel's offensive while denying Iranian allegations that the U.S. has taken part in it. He warned Tehran not to widen its retaliation to include U.S. targets or else face the "full strength and might" of the U.S. armed forces. Trump has repeatedly said Iran could end the war by agreeing to tough restrictions on its nuclear program, which Iran says is for peaceful purposes but Western countries say could be used to make a bomb. The latest round of nuclear negotiations between Iran and the United States, due to be held on Sunday, was scrapped after Tehran said it would not negotiate while under Israeli attack. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Trump vetoed Israeli plan to kill Iran's supreme leader, US officials say
Trump vetoed Israeli plan to kill Iran's supreme leader, US officials say

Straits Times

time3 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Trump vetoed Israeli plan to kill Iran's supreme leader, US officials say

FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks as he attends a military parade to commemorate the U.S. Army's 250th Birthday, on the day of his 79th birthday, in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 14, 2025. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo FILE PHOTO: Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei looks on, in a televised message following the Israeli strikes in Tehran, Iran, June 13, 2025. Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/WANA (West Asia News Agency)/Handout via REUTERS/File Photo WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump vetoed an Israeli plan in recent days to kill Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, two U.S. officials told Reuters on Sunday. "Have the Iranians killed an American yet? No. Until they do we're not even talking about going after the political leadership," said one of the sources, a senior U.S. administration official. The officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said top U.S. officials have been in constant communications with Israeli officials in the days since Israel launched a massive attack on Iran in a bid to halt its nuclear program. They said the Israelis reported that they had an opportunity to kill the top Iranian leader, but Trump waved them off of the plan. The officials would not say whether Trump himself delivered the message. But Trump has been in frequent communications with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. When asked about Reuters report, Netanyahu, in an interview on Sunday with Fox News Channel's "Special Report With Bret Baier," said: "There's so many false reports of conversations that never happened, and I'm not going to get into that." "But I can tell you, I think that we do what we need to do, we'll do what we need to do. And I think the United States knows what is good for the United States," Netanyahu said. Trump has been holding out hope for a resumption of U.S.-Iranian negotiations over Tehran's nuclear program. Talks that had been scheduled for Sunday in Oman were canceled as a result of the strikes. Trump told Reuters on Friday that "we knew everything" about the Israeli strikes. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store