
Our Milky Way May Not Collide With Andromeda After All, Scientists Say
Andromeda Galaxy : https://esahubble.org/images/heic1112e/ Milky Way Galaxy : ... More https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_2132.html Stars : https://esahubble.org/images/heic0910t/
When will the Milky Way collide with the Andromeda Galaxy? It's a common question because, for many years, astronomers have theorized that the two largest spiral galaxies in our cosmic neighborhood — our Milky Way and Andromeda (also called M31) will one day collide. An answer is normally offered: about four billion years.
Now, this decade-long belief is being challenged by new research that suggests the Milky Way and Andromeda may not be on a collision course after all. The study, published today in Nature Astronomy, reveals a 50% probability that the two galaxies will avoid crashing into each other within the next 10 billion years.
Andromeda is 2.5 million light years from the Milky Way. Cmosmically speaking, that's very close. It's home to at least a trillion stars. The Milky Way, meanwhile, hosts about 100-400 billion stars (it's hard to say because we're in it, so our telescopes can't see all of it).
The knowledge that Andromeda is moving toward the Milky Way is core to our understanding of an expanding universe. Having four years previously figured out that Andromeda — a fuzzy blob to the naked eye in dark skies — was an "island universe" (in other words, a galaxy), American astronomer Edwin Hubble calculated in 1929 that galaxies were moving away from the Milky Way, All of them, that is, except one — Andromeda. The universe was expanding, as Albert Einstein had predicted. However, Andromeda and the Milky Way are headed towards each other at 250,000 miles per hour.
Three future scenarios for Milky Way & Andromeda encounter. Top left: Galaxies bypass at 1 million ... More light-year separation. Top right: At 500,000 light-years, dark matter provides friction that brings galaxies to a close encounter. Bottom: A 100,000 light-year separation leads to a collision.
Andromeda will dominate Earth's night sky in about four billion light-years, goes the received wisdom. It will collide with the Milky Way in about five billion years, forming a new, larger galaxy — 'Milkomeda.'
New research debunks this. Based on gravitational models that consider the influence of other celestial bodies in the Local Group of galaxies — specifically a number of dwarf galaxies orbiting the Milky Way — researchers at the University of Helsinki in Finland calculate that the Milky Way's path through the cosmos has a high chance of missing Andromeda altogether. The research uses the latest data from the European Space Agency's Gaia mission and NASA's Hubble Space Telescope, along with revised mass estimates of surrounding galaxies.
The Milky Way is not alone. It exists with over 50 other galaxies called the Local Group, which also includes Andromeda. In orbit around the Milky Way are a number of dwarf galaxies, including the Small and Large Magellanic Clouds and the Triangulum galaxy (M33) — the latter half the size of our Milky Way and the third-largest galaxy in our local group of galaxies, according to NASA.
Those small galaxies affect the Milky Way's path through space, according to the researchers, whose new data on the mass of those galaxies produces a new result. In particular, the gravitational pull of the LMC, whose mass was not considered in previous analyses, may explain it. As an aside, this paper also states that the LMC may merge with the Milky Way within the next two billion years.
The Andromeda Galaxy. (Photo by: Alan Dyer /VW PICS/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)
Given that the movement of Andromeda is the basis for our understanding of the entire universe, there's been a lot of research into its movements. In 2019, researchers reported that Andromeda had already consumed several smaller galaxies within the last few billion years. In 2023, another paper argued that the Milky Way and Andromeda are, in effect, already interacting since ancient stars in the Milky Way's halo are about halfway to Andromeda and that a halo of gas around both galaxies is already entwined.
Whether or not Andromeda collides with the Milky Way or not in four billion years is, for Earthlings, somewhat academic. By that time, the sun will have used up its hydrogen fuel and be expanding into a red giant star, boiling away Earth's oceans as it does so and possibly even consuming the entire planet.
Wishing you clear skies and wide eyes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Threat to Kill SpaceX Presents One Hidden Safety Concern
Because of a political fallout, tech mogul and SpaceX owner Elon Musk has now attracted the verbal ire of President Trump. While sparring over social media, the President suggested that he could and would cancel Musk's government contracts relative to SpaceX. Briefly, this led Musk to claim that SpaceX would "decommission" the crucial Dragon spacecraft, but later reversed his position, saying, "Ok, we won't decommission Dragon." This is the very same type of vessel which recently led to the rescue of astronauts Butch Wilmore and Sunni Williams who were stranded on the International Space Station for much longer than originally planned. And it's the fate of the International Space Station that is actually the number one reason why an utterly defunded SpaceX might be a very dangerous thing. In 2024, NASA awarded SpaceX a contract valued at $843 million. The purpose? To deorbit the International Space Station by the end of the decade. Basically, the ISS is not designed to stay in orbit forever, and before it is replaced by something more permanent, it will have to be safely moved to a low Earth orbit. This means that SpaceX is currently tasked by the U.S. government to build the United States Deorbit Vehicle (USDV). "Selecting a U.S. Deorbit Vehicle for the International Space Station will help NASA and its international partners ensure a safe and responsible transition in low Earth orbit at the end of station operations," Ken Bowersox said in a NASA statement last a hypothetical world in which Trump decides to rescind all government contracts for SpaceX, that would presumably include killing the all-important job of SpaceX building the USDV. And if SpaceX doesn't build the USDV, who will help mitigate the very real fallout of a large space station? Again, hypothetically, there are other organizations that have spacecraft, but as the stranding of Wilmore and Williams recently demonstrated, SpaceX has proven to be the most reliable way for the U.S. to get people in and out of space. In fact, the whole reason that Wilmore and Williams were stranded was because the Boeing Starliner — a rival aerospace venture to SpaceX — was unable to complete a return trip because of safety concerns. Concurrent with all of this, Blue Origin's New Glenn craft isn't even close to being ready. Notably, Blue Origin's other craft, the New Shepard, isn't designed to go far enough into space to be useful to the ISS. One might wonder if SpaceX really needs the money. And it's possible the company doesn't. As Musk pointed out on June 3, the entirety of what NASA pays to SpaceX ($1.1 billion) is dwarfed by SpaceX's current revenue ($15.5 billion). Basically, SpaceX's Starlink services are making plenty of money for the company, so if Trump rescinded even just that contract valued at roughly $800 million, it wouldn't come close to putting SpaceX out of business. Legally, Trump might be able to try and sever ties between SpaceX and the U.S. government, specifically, NASA. But practically speaking, this seems very unlikely long-term. Right now, SpaceX is the best bet for creating a safe deorbit for the ISS. And, if any more astronauts get stranded — from any country — it seems like Musk's Dragons are still the most reliable space Threat to Kill SpaceX Presents One Hidden Safety Concern first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 6, 2025


Forbes
28 minutes ago
- Forbes
The U.S. Government Is Stuck With SpaceX. But Trump Can Still Hurt It.
Donald Trump and Elon Musk arrive for a test launch of SpaceX's Starship rocket on November 19, 2024, in Brownsville, Texas. In the barrage of attacks that President Donald Trump and Elon Musk fired at each other Thursday, one stood out: Trump's threat to cancel federal contracts with companies owned by the world's richest man. The primary target: SpaceX, which has received at least $21 billion in government contracts, with about $13 billion still outstanding. Musk probably doesn't have much to fear. Legally, the Trump administration would likely enmire itself in lengthy legal disputes if it appeared to cancel contracts out of spite. Moreover, as the world's No. 1 launch provider and maker of low-Earth orbit satellites, SpaceX may have made itself indispensable. 'The [U.S. government] is simply too locked in to cut them off over a social media meltdown,' said Kimberly Siversen Burke, director of government affairs at the consultancy Quilty Space. Nonetheless, there are some types of contracts that could be vulnerable for cancellation, and ways the government could lessen its dependence on SpaceX going forward. The 134 rockets SpaceX launched last year accounted for 83% of all satellites put into orbit worldwide. With its reliable, partially reusable Falcon 9, the company has come to dominate U.S. national security launches. Its chief competitor, United Launch Alliance, a joint venture of Boeing and Lockheed Martin, has struggled to keep up, with multiyear delays in developing its new Vulcan rocket. The U.S. government may have more options to carry its military satellites to space going forward. Vulcan is now operational and Blue Origin, the space company founded by Musk's billionaire rival Jeff Bezos, pulled off a successful first launch of its New Glenn rocket in January. In the latest round of contracts awarded by Space Force, SpaceX won 28 launches from 2027 through 2032, a little more than half, with ULA getting 19 and Blue Origin seven. But ULA and Blue Origin have their hands full scaling up, said Todd Harrison, a defense and space analyst with the American Enterprise Institute. 'There's no replacing SpaceX. You just do not have the capacity in our other launch options.' SpaceX has also become a major supplier of national security satellites. The National Reconnaissance Office is depending on SpaceX to build out a multibillion-dollar network of hundreds of spy satellites in low-Earth orbit based on the company's Starshield platform. For delivering cargo and astronauts to the International Space Station, NASA has also had to rely on SpaceX, as Boeing has struggled to fix defects in its Starliner spacecraft. But there are some relatively small-dollar SpaceX contracts that could be vulnerable, said Burke. The government could lower its exposure to SpaceX by looking for early phase development programs that don't have a contractor locked in yet. For example, SpaceX has won roughly $140 million in contracts on an Air Force program to test whether commercial satellite services can be integrated into tactical military communications, Burke said. Another way Trump could hurt Musk, as well as Ukraine, would be to cancel or reduce a $537 million contract to provide Starlink satellite communications services to the Ukrainian military. But rather than targeting existing contracts, where the administration could make a greater impact is by steering new business to others and reorienting its plans. The Commerce Department could backtrack on a revamp announced in March to a $42 billion program to expand rural broadband access that was expected to make Starlink eligible to compete for grants. Till now the program has only included telecom companies laying fiber-optic cables. Trump could also pull back from the support he promised in his inaugural address for Musk's ultimate ambition: to reach Mars. 'Where Trump can single handedly harm SpaceX in a significant way is redirecting the mission goals for NASA,' Harrison said. Given how mercurial Musk has proven to be, perhaps diversifying away from SpaceX isn't a bad idea. Burke worries, however, that the bad blood will undo years of work to convince the Pentagon and other national security agencies that they can rely on any commercial companies. 'Elon's antics are threatening to rewind the tape,' she said. MORE FROM FORBES


Associated Press
30 minutes ago
- Associated Press
101 dogs living in packed, filthy conditions removed from North Carolina home
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — Dozens of dogs found living in packed, filthy conditions were removed from a North Carolina home. Animal control officers responding to a complaint in Raleigh County discovered 101 dogs crammed in stacked cages or roaming in confined quarters at the home on Wednesday, the Wake County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals said on Facebook. Many of the dogs were small breeds. Among those rescued were several puppies and older dogs. The homeowner agreed to relinquish the dogs, along with 21 chickens, news outlets reported. The dogs were taken in by eight different shelters and were undergoing medical assessments, the SPCA chapter said. Many dogs had matted fur as well as skin and dental issues. It wasn't known whether the homeowner faces charges. A telephone call to the Raleigh police department wasn't immediately returned Friday. On Friday, the chapter said that several dogs under its care were 'getting the spa day of their lives — and their first taste of fresh air, possibly ever. We're seeing a lot of smiles from these guys. 'This is the biggest moment in these dogs' lives, and we are feeling so grateful to be a part of their healing.'