logo
Blasted — Indigenous bills advancing through Montana legislature

Blasted — Indigenous bills advancing through Montana legislature

Yahoo25-02-2025

Kaiden Forman-Webster ICT + MTFP
Two bills that are priorities for the Legislature's American Indian Caucus are back in play after strategic moves by Sen. Jonathan Windy Boy, a Democrat from Box Elder, last Friday afternoon.
At the end of the Senate's floor session, Windy Boy motioned that the Montana Indian Child Welfare and Indian Education for All bills be pulled from the committees where they had previously been voted down and revived by the full chamber.
In Friday's Senate floor session, Windy Boy blasted both bills. For Montana Indian Child Welfare he stated 'It had 26 proponents and zero opponents, and it is a good bill'.
Sen. Dennis Lenz, a Republican from Billings and Chair of Senate Health, Welfare, and Human Safety committee that tabled the bill objected to the motion stating that the issue of MICWA is complex.
The Senate voted 29-21 in favor of the motion, the bill will now be heard for second reading by the Senate.
A blast motion simply allows a bill sponsor to pull a bill from its respective committee after it has been heard and is either voted down, tabled, or the committee chair refuses to take executive action on the bill. The blast requires a simple majority vote by the Senate.
As for the second bill, Windy Boy motioned for it to also be pulled from committee stating 'It had 15 proponents and one opponent, and I did have an amendment that would address that at one point and when the opponent spoke up they said they would support the bill afterwards.'
Sen. John Fuller, a Republican from Kalispell and Chair of the Education and Cultural Resources committee objected to the motion on the grounds that it would be a violation of procedural rulings.
It was another victory for Windy Boy with the Senate voting 26-24, advancing the bill to be heard for second reading along with the other.
It was a successful day for Windy Boy and his bills.
'It feels good,' said Windy Boy, 'It's good for the kiddos.'
Windy Boy joked 'I'll have to buy [Sen. Mike] Yakawich a Happy Meal for supporting both.'
On Monday, Feb 24, both bills were heard on the Senate floor for second reading.
The Montana Indian Child Welfare Act bill involved a very lengthy conversation.
Windy Boy reflected on a personal story of the death of his daughter and the ensuing crisis of finding a home for the seven children left behind after her passing.
Windy Boy and his wife took in all seven grandchildren and relayed what would have happened to the kids if he did not take them in. Explaining that if he did not step up and raise his grandchildren they may have been lost to the foster care system, opening the children up to being separated from one another and the possible severance from their culture.
Windy Boy stated that the cultural compacts within the MICWA bill will be able to address these issues.
Sen. Daniel Emrich, a Republican from Great Falls, encouraged a no vote on the bill on the grounds that the requirement in section one of the bill requires a cultural compact between the guardian and respective tribe of the Indigenous child as a 'serious constitutional concern'.
Windy Boy's answer to this was to refer to the Montana state Constitution article 10 section one subsection 2. 'The state constitution recognizes the unique cultural heritage of the tribes in Montana' said Windy Boy.
The bill was voted on by the Senate body and passed second reading 31-19 and will now be heard for third reading before going to the House.
Indian Education for All was heard for second reading immediately after and involved much less debate.
Windy Boy emphasized the accountability required by the bill, appealing to people's want to ensure government funding is used transparently. Simply put it is an accountability piece of legislation.
'So this basically is an accountability bill to make sure that if you get $1 and that dollar is supposed to be geared towards educating the students at the local school district, it's just to see 'show me what you're doing,'' Windy Boy said.
No one spoke out against the bill with it passing second reading 31-19 and will also be heard for third reading before advancing to the House.
After multiple bills being held up in committees related to Native issues, Montana American Indian Caucus Members look to use the blast motion for their bills to the senate floor, a rare situation, but members believe it is the best way to accomplish their agenda of strengthening Native issues
At a Wednesday meeting of Montana's American Indian Caucus, several members raised concerns about their bills being held up in committees and or being tabled or voted down. With Republicans holding a strong majority in both the Senate and the House, it is an uphill battle to get legislation through, prompting some new strategies by the caucus – who are mostly Democratic lawmakers.
During last Wednesday's meeting, caucus members concluded enough is enough.
Sen. Jonathan Windy Boy, a Democrat from Box Elder said he would have the votes to blast his bill in the Senate, citing the current dysfunction of the chamber.
Windy Boy's Montana Indian Child Welfare Act was tabled by a committee on Feb. 14, though he said other child welfare bills have advanced from the same committee.
The Indian Education for All bill, also from Windy Boy, made several changes to the program that Windy Boy argued created more accountability regarding the reporting of funding. His bill was tabled Jan. 30.
Following Windy Boy, Sen. Susan Webber, Blackfeet and a Democrat from Browning, also spoke to her Senate Bill 180, which aims to include the child's heritage in divorce proceedings. It was voted down Feb. 14, but Webber said she plans to blast it Feb. 25.
Sen. Shane Morigeau, D-Missoula and Salish and Kootenai, also threw his hat in the ring regarding his bill to recognize Indigenous Peoples Day in Montana and is 'On the Jonathan Windy Boy wagon' on blasting his bill as well. Morigeau is confident his bill 'Will not get rid of Columbus Day but will let people celebrate what they want.' Similar legislation has died in previous sessions.
The aforementioned dysfunction of the senate stems from what is known as the nine moderate Republicans. These nine have continually been a thorn in the side for the Republican majority.
When asked if this factors into Moderates being more open to working on key issues for Montana with Democrats, Windy Boy said 'I don't like to read too much into issues like that, but if it happens, no doubt that's probably what those Moderates are thinking.'
Multiple bills this session that have made it to the senate floor have been opposed by the more Conservative Republicans, yet the Moderates have sided with the Democrats on certain matters such as keeping Medicaid Expansion.
When asked about situations where individuals work across the aisle to support a bill they may not fully support in exchange for support on their own bill, Webber acknowledged 'That is a part of it and there is some of that going on.'
She added that for her bill in particular, she's been able to gain support by talking to and explaining it to others.
Morigeau addressed this strategy from a different lens, looking back on last session and explaining a bill to 'establish autism facilities grant program' that was voted down in committee. He then turned to a Republican and asked if they would carry the bill for him.
They did, and the bill was signed into law.
For Windy Boy, engaging with Moderates has been a productive experience bringing forth appreciation that they are open to listening to what he wants to accomplish, which he attributes to these Republicans being a reflection of their voter base that cares for Montana priorities.
Being open to learning from different perspectives from across Montana is an important skill needed to successfully transverse issues, something Windy Boy is well attuned to due to his many years at the Capitol.
'The way I see it is that they're more open minded on looking at that bigger picture, so they understand what the issue is about from our version, our angle,' Windy Boy said.
Currently, caucus members believe the issue of bills being held up in committees creates large setbacks for these lawmakers and that using the ability to blast bills will more than likely continue.
"I think so as of right now, because it is the only way we can really get our bills through,'Webber said.
Windy Boy has been a strong advocate for Indigenous issues for the entire 23 years that he has served the legislature and enjoys stepping up to the plate to cross the aisle and find common ground with Republicans.
Looking at it as an opportunity to address stereotypes inflicted on both sides. Even after he was told that doing so was a lost cause to which he ignored.
'I am the kind of guy that I just walk right up and start talking to them,' Windy Boy said.
He went on to say that people can often be mislabeled.
What I found out are people that are labeled as racist, people that are labeled as discriminatory, all of that,' Windy Boy said. 'My take from it is, they're uneducated, they don't understand me. But at the end of the day, after I turned around and educated them from my approach of what I'm talking about, they have kind of one of those 'Aha moments,' and so those ones there, who have been labeled as racist and discriminatory have become some of my strongest proponents.'
For Windy Boy's bills, they must now pass through the Senate and the House with the possibility that other Montana American Indian Caucus members may use the same strategy of blasting their bills through committee hold ups.
This story is co-published by Montana Free Press and ICT, a news partnership that covers the Montana American Indian Caucus during the state's 2025 legislative session

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans advance measure to ban noncitizens from voting in local DC elections
Republicans advance measure to ban noncitizens from voting in local DC elections

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republicans advance measure to ban noncitizens from voting in local DC elections

WASHINGTON — The House advanced a bill to ban noncitizens from voting in local elections in Washington, D.C., marking the latest step from Republicans to crack down on city policies they view as too liberal. Lawmakers voted 268-148 largely along party lines to advance the measure, sending the bill over to the Republican-led Senate for consideration. The bill managed to garner some bipartisan support after 56 Democrats voted in favor. However, the legislation's future is uncertain as it would require seven Democrats to buck party leadership and support the proposal. 'The right to vote is a defining privilege of American citizenship,' House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., said in a speech on the House floor. 'Diluting that right by extending it to noncitizens — whether here legally or illegally — undermines the voice of D.C. residents.' The bill would overturn the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act, a bill passed by the D.C. Council in 2022 that permits undocumented residents living in Washington to vote in local elections. City lawmakers have defended the measure by pointing to a 'long history of the U.S. allowing noncitizens to vote in local (or) state' elections. Lawmakers also note many of the undocumented residents pay local taxes, support businesses, and attend district schools — arguing that should qualify them to have a say in local elections. However, Republicans have argued that allowing noncitizens to vote in local elections sets a dangerous precedent that could negatively harm local governments. 'Some may wrongly dismiss these as local elections. The reality is local elections are a vital part of our democratic process and have a significant impact on communities,' Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, who led the bill in the House, said in a speech. 'Local elections determine matters such as taxation, the criminal code, and the election of city council members who create essential ordinances, including those that dictate voting rights.' Additionally, Republicans have criticized the law as a way to dilute 'the voice of American citizens.' 'It's also important to acknowledge that many local elections are decided by razor-thin margins underscoring their significance and importance of active participation,' Pfluger said. GOP lawmakers also cited opposition from D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, who withheld her signature from the ordinance but allowed it to take effect. 'Why would my colleagues on the other side of the aisle want foreigners to vote in local elections in Washington, D.C.? What's the purpose?' Pfluger said. 'Free and fair elections are prerequisites for the healthy republic our founding fathers envisioned, with the District of Columbia as the epicenter.' House Republicans passed a bill in 2023 seeking to repeal the D.C. law allowing noncitizens to vote. The bill was spearheaded by Republicans but 52 Democrats ultimately joined all Republicans in approving the bill despite efforts from Democratic leadership to quash the proposal. However, the legislation was never considered in the Senate, which was controlled by Democrats at the time. Despite not being a state, Washington is permitted to operate as an independent city government under the D.C. Home Rule Act. However, local laws are still subject to congressional approval before they can take effect, occasionally setting up showdowns between Congress and local lawmakers. The vote on Tuesday is the first of three bills being considered this week by the House to rein in some of D.C.'s local ordinances. Other proposals being considered would rescind D.C. Council policies allowing city employees to not comply with requests from the Department of Homeland Security or Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Rep. Mikie Sherrill wins Democratic nomination for NJ governor
Rep. Mikie Sherrill wins Democratic nomination for NJ governor

Politico

time15 minutes ago

  • Politico

Rep. Mikie Sherrill wins Democratic nomination for NJ governor

Democrats chose Rep. Mikie Sherrill as their nominee for governor of New Jersey, as the party attempts to defy odds by holding onto the governorship for a third term in a row. The Associated Press called the race just under an hour after polls closed. The four-term member of Congress prevailed in the crowded Democratic primary field on Tuesday to succeed term-limited Gov. Phil Murphy. She'll face Republican Jack Ciattarelli, setting up a high-stakes battle of two party establishment favorites. Both sides acknowledge that November's election will be competitive. Although the electorate does favor Democrats, it's been decades since Democrats have won the governorship three terms in a row in the Garden State. But in recent history, the candidate of the party opposite of the one that controls the White House typically wins the race for governor. Still, Republicans are emboldened by President Donald Trump's closer-than-expected loss in New Jersey last November, as well as the gains they've made to cut into Democrats' voter registration advantage. And Republicans argue it helps that they have a candidate with high name ID: Ciattarelli ran for governor two times prior and narrowly lost to Murphy in 2021.

Takeaways from New Jersey's primaries: GOP nominee's win is also a victory for Trump
Takeaways from New Jersey's primaries: GOP nominee's win is also a victory for Trump

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Takeaways from New Jersey's primaries: GOP nominee's win is also a victory for Trump

NORTH BERGEN, N.J. (AP) — New Jersey primary voters have chosen their GOP nominee — and President Donald Trump notched a win in his endorsement belt — in one of two high-stakes governor's races being held this year. While officials from both parties say November's general election will hinge on local, pocketbook issues, the outcome will also be closely watched as a harbinger of how both parties might fare in next year's midterm elections, and as a test of both Democratic enthusiasm and how the GOP fares without Trump on the ballot. Here are takeaways from Tuesday's primary results: Trump notches a decisive win 2025's off-year elections have been rough for Republicans and Trump. The president went all in on Wisconsin's state Supreme Court race this spring, backing conservative Brad Schimel, even as polls showed Schimel lagging his Democratic-backed rival. Schimel went on to lose by a whopping 10 points, even after billionaire Elon Musk and groups he backed poured $21 million into the race. This time, Trump's chosen candidate, Republican front-runner Jack Ciattarelli, easily won the nomination. "Jack Ciattarelli is a WINNER, and has my Complete and Total Endorsement – HE WILL NOT LET YOU DOWN," Trump wrote in a social media post announcing his endorsement last month. 'MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, ELECT JACK CIATTARELLI!' After losing in 2021 to term-limited Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy by the slimmest of margins, Ciattarelli is hoping his third try for the office will be the charm. The endorsement was a blow, in particular, to Ciattarelli rival Bill Spadea, a conservative radio host who ran by vowing to enthusiastically back the president's agenda. Ciattarelli, he complained in one ad, 'did more than disagree with the president. He disrespected him. Me? I've been a supporter of President Trump since he came down the escalator.' He said voters should feel free to flout Trump's advice: 'I've disagreed with him in the past. It's ok for you to disagree with him now." Trump alluded to the name dropping during a tele-rally he held on Ciattarelli's behalf. 'Other people are going around saying I endorsed them. That's not true," he said. Another primary all about Trump Candidates on both sides of the aisle vowed to tackle pocketbook issues, from high property taxes to grocery prices, to housing and health care costs. But Trump loomed large. On the GOP side, most of the candidates professed their allegiances to the president. Ciattarelli said in ads that he would work with Trump and end New Jersey's status as a sanctuary state 'on Day One.' (Currently, the state's attorney general has directed local law enforcement not to assist federal agents in civil immigration matters.) He also pledged to direct his attorney general to end lawsuits filed against the Trump administration, including one challenging Trump's effort to end birthright citizenship. Democrats featured him heavily, too. In one ad, Democratic Rep. Mikie Sherrill — who won the Democratic primary for New Jersey governor on Tuesday — featured an armada of pickup trucks waving giant Trump flags and warned that, 'Trump's coming for New Jersey with Trump-endorsed Republican Jack Ciattarelli." 'We've gotta stop them,' it said. In another, she tells viewers, 'I know the world feels like it is on fire right now," and vows to "stand up to Trump and Musk with all I've got.' Past insults forgotten Back in 2015, Ciattarelli labeled then-candidate Trump a 'charlatan' who was unfit for the office of the presidency and an embarrassment to the nation. 'Instead of providing the kind of leadership that appeals to the better angels of our nature in calling us to meaningful and just action, Mr. Trump preys upon our worst instincts and fears,' he wrote. When Ciattarelli ran in 2021, he distanced himself from Trump, without the outward insults. Trump nonetheless complained about the treatment on Spadea's radio show last year, saying Ciattarelli 'made some very big mistakes' and would have won had he sought Trump's support. But like Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and so many others, past insults gave way to alliance. Trump offered his enthusiastic backing in a tele-rally, and in his endorsement, said that, 'after getting to know and understand MAGA,' Ciattarelli 'has gone ALL IN, and is now 100% (PLUS!).' A changing state November's presidential election offered warning signs for Democrats in the state. While Trump lost to Democrat Kamala Harris, he did so by only 6 points — a significantly smaller margin than in 2020, when President Joe Biden won by 16 points. 'New Jersey's ready to pop out of that blue horror show,' Trump said in the tele-rally held for Ciattarelli last week. Trump also made stunning gains in several longtime Democratic strongholds, including New Jersey's heavily Latino Passaic County. He carried the city of Passaic and significantly increased his support in Paterson, which is majority Latino and also has a large Muslim community. Indeed, 43% of Latino voters in the state supported Trump, up from 28% in 2020, according to AP VoteCast. November's election will serve as a crucial test for Democrats and whether they can regain Latino support — both in the state and nationally. Strategists, unions, organizers and politicians so far were pivoting away from immigration and focusing on pocketbook concerns in their appeals. 'At the end of the day, if you're worried about paying your bills and being safe at night, everything else is secondary,' Rep. Josh Gottheimer, one of the Democratic candidates, told the AP. 'I think that is front and center in the Latino community.' One exception was Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, who was arrested while trying to join an oversight tour of a 1,000-bed immigrant detention center. A trespass charge was later dropped, but he sued interim U.S. Attorney Alina Habba over the dropped prosecution. In one of his final campaign ads in Spanish, he used footage from the arrest to cast himself as a reluctant warrior, with text saying he is 'El Único,' Spanish for 'the only one,' who confronts Trump.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store