logo
Will Native tribes secure Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument?

Will Native tribes secure Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument?

On March 25, representatives of six Southwestern tribes announced the formation of the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Inter-Tribal Coalition. They are following the model of the Bears Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition, the moral force behind the 2016 establishment of Utah's Bears Ears National Monument.
This elevation of Indigenous voices in land management signals a cultural shift in America — and it's a transformation worth celebrating in this dark time.
These Native people — including the Hopi Tribe, the Navajo Nation, the Kaibab Band of Paiute Indians, the Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah, the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe and the Zuni Tribe — all have ancestral connections to this vast southern Utah monument designated by President Clinton in 1996. Indigenous groups have unique and authoritative standing to advocate for the conservation of these aboriginal lands and to work with federal agencies as co-stewards, preserving sensitive monument resources.
The Grand Staircase Coalition is launching just in time to defend this particular landscape from any attempts by the Trump administration to modify the monument's boundaries or reduce its protections. On Feb. 3, Trump's secretary of the Interior, Doug Burgum, issued orders 'unleashing American energy' and mandating a 'review' of public lands where energy development is forbidden, such as Bears Ears and Grand Staircase.
'Tribes carry an invaluable treasure of traditional knowledge about these lands, meticulously passed down through generations,' Anthony Sanchez Jr., head councilman of the Zuni Tribe, said in a statement announcing the coalition's formation. 'Indigenous perspectives illuminate the intricate interconnectedness of ecosystems…. The rich tapestry of oral histories, cultural narratives, and ceremonial traditions provides essential context, often uncovering insights that written records overlook.'
When I worked on book projects in Native America in the 1980s and 1990s, I listened to dozens of such narratives. I interviewed and photographed several hundred Native people in the 50 reservations in the Southwest and encountered stunning generosity and enduring traditions everywhere. I did my best to honor these gifts, to channel the warmth and strength of 'the People' (as so many cultural groups call themselves in their own languages) in my work as messenger, bringing Native stories to general readers.
As a white man, I couldn't do those books today, and this shift is both appropriate and thrilling. Native people now speak for themselves, and they insist on the right to do so. Young members of tribal communities are fierce about claiming their voices — in writing, in art, in film, in public policy. FX's streaming series 'Reservation Dogs,' whose writers and directors, and most of its actors and crew, were Indigenous, broke ground for authenticity on television. Tribal members have served as secretary of the Interior (Deb Haaland, from New Mexico's Laguna Pueblo) and director of the National Park Service (Chuck Sams, Cayuse and Walla Walla). The Biden administration appointed more than 80 Native people to federal positions.
President Biden also established national monuments in Arizona, Nevada and California that protect Indigenous sacred lands, responding to longstanding tribal initiatives. He issued a formal apology for the federal government's forced assimilation practices and established Carlisle Federal Indian Boarding School National Monument in Pennsylvania, acknowledging the painful legacy of the Indian boarding school era and the resilience of Indigenous communities and tribal nations.
In those long-ago years of my fieldwork, Peterson Zah, then president of the Navajo Nation, told me, 'Indian life is a roller coaster. When we are at the very top of the roller coaster, we have to do things to allow the survival of the Indian people. That's the only time you can accomplish things, when people are willing to listen.' Lakota historian Vine Deloria Jr. noted that the United States gets interested in Native people in cycles. About every 20 years, there's a brief flurry of attention, and then Indigenous issues disappear again from the national agenda.
In 1990, what grabbed headlines was the film 'Dances With Wolves.' At the 1991 Academy Awards, Doris Leader Charge translated acceptance speeches into the Lakota language. In the weeks that followed, Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii), longtime chair of the Senate Select Committee on Indian Affairs, found prominent senators knocking on his door daily, requesting a seat on his usually neglected committee. For the first time ever, he had a designated committee room and a full slate of members. Inouye joked with Zah that the new converts were the 'Dances With Wolves' senators.
With increasing co-stewardship and co-management of their ancestral lands, today's Native people are breaking the on-again, off-again cycle of attention. 'Native American' and 'Indigenous people' may be on the list of words scrubbed from government documents and websites, but Trump's lack of respect for tribal sovereignty and disinterest in Indian Country will be a passing blip in the 'rediscovery of America,' as Native historian Ned Blackhawk calls our new regard for Indigenous history.
Native peoples who continue to interact with the Grand Staircase-Escalante landscape traditionally and ceremonially can trace their deepest roots in the region back at least 13,000 years. 'We are the living descendants of the ancestors that left their footprints and writings across Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument,' says Autumn Gillard, cultural resources manager with the Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah.
Indigenous people have persisted, miraculously, despite America's efforts to erase them. No matter the volatility of changing political winds, we must continue to honor Native voices, listen to traditional ecological knowledge and insist on respect for our Native neighbors. Empowering and engaging with the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Inter-Tribal Coalition is one way to live up to that responsibility.
Stephen Trimble served on the board of Grand Staircase Escalante Partners. His books include 'The People: Indians of the American Southwest' and 'Talking With the Clay: the Art of Pueblo Pottery in the 21st Century.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pope Leo criticizes political nationalism and prays for reconciliation and dialogue

time6 minutes ago

Pope Leo criticizes political nationalism and prays for reconciliation and dialogue

VATICAN CITY -- VATICAN CITY (AP) — Pope Leo XIV criticized the surge of nationalist political movements in the world as he prayed Sunday for reconciliation and dialogue — a message in line with his pledges to make the Catholic Church a symbol of peace. The pope celebrated Sunday Mass in St. Peter's Square in front of tens of thousands faithful, and asked the Holy Spirit to 'break down barriers and tear down the walls of indifference and hatred.' 'Where there is love, there is no room for prejudice, for 'security' zones separating us from our neighbors, for the exclusionary mindset that, tragically, we now see emerging also in political nationalisms,' the first American pontiff said. He did not name any specific country or politician. Leo also recalled the words of late Pope Francis, who — on the feast of Pentecost in May 2023 — observed that in our world 'we are all connected, yet find ourselves disconnected from one another, anaesthetized by indifference and overwhelmed by solitude.' The pope also condemned wars, which 'are plaguing our world,' and asked the Holy Spirit for 'the gift of peace.' 'First of all, peace in our hearts, for only a peaceful heart can spread peace in the family, society and international relations,' Leo said, then prayed for reconciliation and dialogue wherever there is war in the world. Soon after becoming pope, Leo pledged to work for unity and peace. His first message, 'Peace be with you all,' set the importance of peace as a pillar of his papacy.

Live Updates: National Guards to Deploy to L.A. as More Protests Are Planned
Live Updates: National Guards to Deploy to L.A. as More Protests Are Planned

New York Times

time12 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Live Updates: National Guards to Deploy to L.A. as More Protests Are Planned

President Trump took extraordinary action on Saturday by calling up 2,000 National Guard troops to quell immigration protests in California, making rare use of federal powers and bypassing the authority of the state's governor, Gavin Newsom. It is the first time since 1965 that a president has activated a state's National Guard force without a request from that state's governor, according to Elizabeth Goitein, senior director of the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, an independent law and policy organization. The last time was when President Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to Alabama to protect civil rights demonstrators in 1965, she said. Mr. Newsom, a Democrat, immediately rebuked the president's action. 'That move is purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions,' Mr. Newsom said, adding that 'this is the wrong mission and will erode public trust.' Governors almost always control the deployment of National Guard troops in their states. But the directive signed by Mr. Trump cites '10 U.S.C. 12406,' referring to a specific provision within Title 10 of the U.S. Code on Armed Services. Part of that provision allows the federal deployment of National Guard forces if 'there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' It also states that the president may call into federal service 'members and units of the National Guard of any State in such numbers as he considers necessary to repel the invasion, suppress the rebellion, or execute those laws.' Mr. Trump's directive said, 'To the extent that protests or acts of violence directly inhibit the execution of the laws, they constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said in a statement on Saturday night that Mr. Trump was deploying the National Guard in response to 'violent mobs' that she said had attacked federal law enforcement and immigration agents. The 2,000 troops would 'address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester,' she said. Although some demonstrations have been unruly, local authorities in Los Angeles County did not indicate during the day that they needed federal assistance. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said in a post on X late on Saturday that the Pentagon was 'mobilizing the National Guard IMMEDIATELY.' But he did not say when or where the troops would assemble, or identify their units. Mr. Trump's directive authorized the secretary of defense to 'employ any other members of the regular Armed Forces as necessary to augment and support the protection of Federal functions and property in any number determined appropriate in his discretion.' In Mr. Hegseth's post on X, he said that active duty Marines were 'on high alert' at Camp Pendleton, about 100 miles south of Los Angeles, and could also be mobilized. Protests have occurred on Friday and Saturday in California to oppose federal immigration raids on workplaces. The latest is unfolding at a Home Depot in Paramount, Calif., about 20 miles south of downtown Los Angeles. California Democrats have braced for months for the possibility that President Trump would seek to deploy U.S. troops on American soil in this way, particularly in Democratic-run jurisdictions. Privately, they have acknowledged that such a move, absent the state's agreement, would have profound implications. Mr. Trump suggested deploying U.S. forces in the same manner during his first term to suppress outbreaks of violence during the nationwide protests over the police murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis. He opted against doing so at the time, but he has repeatedly raised the idea of using troops to secure border states. In 2020, in the final days of Mr. Trump's first presidential term, military helicopters were used to rout peaceful protesters demonstrating against police violence near the White House. 'For the federal government to take over the California National Guard, without the request of the governor, to put down protests is truly chilling,' said Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of the law school at the University of California, Berkeley. 'It is using the military domestically to stop dissent.' The National Guard was last federalized in 1992, Ms. Goitein said, when President George H.W. Bush sent troops to Los Angeles to control riots after police officers were acquitted in the beating of Rodney King. That deployment was requested by the California's governor at the time, Pete Wilson. Mr. Trump and his aides have often lamented that not enough was done by Minnesota's governor to quell protests that followed the death of Mr. Floyd in 2020. During a campaign rally in 2023, Trump made clear he was not going to hold back in a second term. 'You're supposed to not be involved in that, you just have to be asked by the governor or the mayor to come in — the next time, I'm not waiting,' Mr. Trump said. Jonathan Swan , Maggie Haberman and Carol Rosenberg contributed reporting.

California lawmaker pans Trump's push to federalize National Guard in California
California lawmaker pans Trump's push to federalize National Guard in California

Politico

time13 minutes ago

  • Politico

California lawmaker pans Trump's push to federalize National Guard in California

California Rep. Nanette Barragán slammed President Donald Trump on Sunday for his move to send 2,000 National Guard troops to quell protests over immigration in her Los Angeles House district. 'There is no need for the National Guard,' Barragán told CNN's Dana Bash on 'State of the Union.' 'They have the manpower that they need. So this is really just an escalation of the president coming into California. We haven't asked for the help. We don't need the help. This is him escalating it, causing tensions to rise. It's only gonna make things worse in a situation where people are already angry over immigration enforcement.' Protests over the Trump administration's brash deportation agenda and regional immigration raids erupted over the weekend, culminating in a confrontation between demonstrators and federal agents in the city of Paramount, California, less than 20 miles from downtown Los Angeles. Authorities used tear gas and flash-bang grenades to break up the protesters. Trump's move to federalize the California National Guard on Saturday came despite forceful opposition from Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and California Gov. Gavin Newsom, his longtime rival. 'The federal government is taking over the California National Guard and deploying 2,000 soldiers in Los Angeles — not because there is a shortage of law enforcement, but because they want a spectacle,' Newsom wrote on X. Early on Sunday morning, a social media post from Trump congratulating the National Guard for calming the unrest was contradicted by Bass, who clarified that the troops had not yet been deployed to Los Angeles. Barragán, who represents Paramount in Congress, agreed that Trump's call to the National Guard wouldn't make the city safer. 'People were there to protest, they're there to protest the mass deportations that are happening,' she told Bash. 'And so it was peaceful. And of course, you escalate the situation. Now you're talking about bringing in the National Guard to militarize the situation. It's going to get worse. It's unnecessary.' The threat of escalation is likely to persist. 'We've been told to get ready for 30 days of enforcement, 30 days of ICE enforcement,' Barragán said. 'So, 2,000 troops to be there for that enforcement. It's a concern.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store