Best cities in New York for hockey fans: See the top picks
While the Buffalo Sabres have struggled to make it to the playoffs in over a decade, Buffalo was named one of the best cities for hockey fans in a recently released study by WalletHub.
The study compared over 75 U.S. cities across two divisional categories — the National Hockey League and Division 1 Men's NCAA hockey — based on 20-plus key metrics that make up a good hockey city, including average ticket prices, stadium capacity and performance level of each city's teams.
Advertisement
"Hockey is one of the most underappreciated sports in America, but its popularity is steadily growing, bringing in record-breaking revenue and attendance," WalletHub analyst Chip Lupo said. "The best cities for hockey provide good opportunities to watch high-performing NHL teams in person, and sometimes NCAA teams as well."
Here's what to know.
Why Buffalo is one of the best hockey cities
Buffalo's downtown is a hub for all things hockey as it's centered around the KeyBank Center, LECOM Harborcenter and its outdoor skating availability in the winter. The Queen City is also home to a multitude of hockey teams and rinks scattered throughout the area.
Advertisement
WalletHub focused on the Buffalo Sabres and the men's Canisius University Golden Griffins team in their study, but other college-level Buffalo-area teams include the Buffalo State Bengals and University at Buffalo Ice Bulls, both men's and women's.
According to the study, Buffalo has the second-lowest average ticket price for an NHL game, is tied for 4th lowest when it comes to the minimum season ticket price for NCAA games and has the 3rd highest NHL stadium capacity.
Which other NY cities made the list
New York City : Ranked No. 4, home to the New York Rangers, New York Islanders and the Long Island University Sharks
Lewiston: Ranked No. 26, home to the Niagara University Purple Eagles
Hamilton: Ranked No. 28, home to the Colgate University Raiders
West Point: Ranked No. 31, home to the Army Black Knights
Potsdam: Ranked No. 38, home to the Clarkson Golden Knights
Ithaca: Ranked No. 42, home to the Cornell Big Red
Rochester: Ranked No. 46, home to the Rochester Institute of Technology Tigers
Canton: Ranked No. 50, home to the St. Lawrence University Saints
Schenectady: Ranked No. 55, home to the Union College Garnet Chargers
Troy: Ranked No. 65, home to the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Engineers
Do you think it is rated high enough?: Buffalo one of best cities for football fans in U.S.
WalletHub's top 10 cities for hockey fans
Every city in WalletHub's top 10 is represented by at least one NHL team. Here's which cities are the best for hockey fans, according to the report:
Advertisement
Boston, Massachusetts
Detroit, Michigan
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
New York, New York
Newark, New Jersey
Denver, Colorado
Sunrise, Florida
Tampa, Florida
Buffalo, New York
St. Louis, Missouri
See the list: These NY cities named some of the best baseball cities in the country
How WalletHub measured hockey fan-friendliness
WalletHub compared 76 U.S. cities based on 21 key metrics grouped into NHL and Division 1 Men's NCAA hockey categories. Here's which elements went into the rankings.
The NHL category took a look at these factors:
Number of teams
Performance level of teams
Number of Stanley Cup wins
Number of NHL Division Championship wins
Number of Hall of Fame head coaches
Franchise value
Average ticket price for a game
Fan engagement
Number of coaches in the past 10 seasons (2015/2016-2024/2025)
Stadium capacity
Attendance
Popularity index
The NCAA category included these elements:
Number of D1 teams
Performance level of D1 teams
Number of D1 championship wins
Number of D1 conference regular season championship wins
Number of Hall of Fame head coaches
Minimum season-ticket price for a D1 game
College hockey fan engagement
Number of coaches in the past 10 seasons
College hockey stadium capacity
Data used to create the ranking was collected as of April 30, 2025 and the information was sourced from several entities, such as ESPN, U.S. College Hockey Online, the U.S. Hockey Hall of Fame and each team's website.
Advertisement
Emily Barnes on consumer-related issues for the USA TODAY Network's New York Connect Team, focusing on scam and recall-related topics. Follow her on X and Instagram @byemilybarnes. Get in touch at ebarnes@gannett.com.
This article originally appeared on Rochester Democrat and Chronicle: Best cities in New York for hockey fans: See the top picks
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
19 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Faruqi & Faruqi Reminds NET Power Investors of the Pending Class Action Lawsuit with a Lead Plaintiff Deadline of June 17, 2025
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Securities Litigation Partner James (Josh) Wilson Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In NET Power To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options If you purchased or acquired securities in NET Power between June 9, 2023 and March 7, 2025 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310). [You may also click here for additional information] New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - June 7, 2025) - Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against NET Power Inc. ('Net Power' or the 'Company') (NYSE: NPWR) and reminds investors of the June 17, 2025 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company. [ This image cannot be displayed. Please visit the source: ] Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Georgia. The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors since its founding in 1995. See As detailed below, the complaint alleges that the Company and its executives violated federal securities laws by making false and/or misleading statements and/or failing to disclose that: (1) Net Power was unlikely to complete Project Permian on schedule, and the project was likely to be significantly more expensive than Defendants had represented, because of, inter alia, supply chain issues and numerous site- and region-specific challenges; (2) accordingly, Defendants' projections regarding the time and capital needed to complete Project Permian were unrealistic; (3) the increased time and capital needed to complete Project Permian were likely to have a significant negative impact on the Company's business and financial results; and (4) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. On November 14, 2023, during pre-market hours, Net Power issued a press release announcing its third quarter 2023 results and providing a business update. Therein, the Company disclosed that "[d]ue to . . . tightness in the global supply chain, we are incorporating a 12-month cushion into our expected schedule for Project Permian' with Defendants 'now expecting to achieve initial power generation sometime between the second half of 2027 and first half of 2028.' This represented a significant delay from Defendants' initial schedule to have the plant operational by 2026. On this news, Net Power's stock price fell $2.47 per share, or 18.54%, to close at $10.85 per share on November 14, 2023. On March 10, 2025, during pre-market hours, Net Power issued a press release announcing its fourth quarter and full year 2024 results and providing a business update. Therein, Net Power disclosed that it 'now estimates Project Permian's total installed cost to be between $1.7 billion and $2.0 billion"-significantly higher than its last estimate of $1.1 billion-"which is inclusive of non-recurring first-of-a-kind, Project Permian site-specific and owner costs[,]' advising that 'there are a number of site- and region-specific challenges which impact cost.' The Company further advised that Project Permian 'would come online no earlier than 2029[,]' representing a significant delay from its prior timeline of sometime between the second half of 2027 and first half of 2028. In addition, Net Power reported that it ended 2024 'with $533 million in cash, cash equivalents, and investments, down from $580 million last quarter, primarily due to $13 million in operating cash outflows and $29 million in capital expenditures for La Porte upgrades and SN1 development.' On this news, Net Power's stock price fell $2.18 per share, or 31.46%, to close at $4.75 per share on March 10, 2025. Then, on April 15, 2025, Net Power issued a press release announcing that its President and Chief Operating Officer ('COO') and Chief Financial Officer would depart the Company on May 1, 2025, and that the Company had appointed a new COO, effective immediately. On this news, Net Power's stock price fell $0.13 per share, or 5.75%, to close at $2.13 per share on April 16, 2025. The court-appointed lead plaintiff is the investor with the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class who is adequate and typical of class members who directs and oversees the litigation on behalf of the putative class. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision to serve as a lead plaintiff or not. Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP also encourages anyone with information regarding NET Powers' conduct to contact the firm, including whistleblowers, former employees, shareholders and others. To learn more about the NET Power class action, go to or call Faruqi & Faruqi partner Josh Wilson directly at 877-247-4292 or 212-983-9330 (Ext. 1310). Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, on X, or on Facebook. Attorney Advertising. The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP ( ). Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. We welcome the opportunity to discuss your particular case. All communications will be treated in a confidential manner. To view the source version of this press release, please visit
Washington Post
21 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Southern hockey surge: NHL teams thrive in non-traditional markets, from Texas to Florida
Popeye Jones was an NBA rookie with the Mavericks the same season that Dallas debuted its new NHL team, and he decided to go to a Stars game after meeting future Hall of Fame player Mike Modano. 'I couldn't figure out hockey. They were jumping over and off the ice … I'm like, 'what's going on with this sport?'' Jones said. 'The puck flew up, I remember it hit somebody in the nose, blood was all over the ice and they kept playing.'
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge turns back challenge to MBTA housing law; Holden among plaintiffs
Superior Court ruling dismissing MBTA Communities unfunded mandate challenge by Michael Elfland on Scribd A Superior Court judge on Friday tossed a lawsuit brought by nine municipalities challenging the MBTA Communities Act, ruling that the controversial zoning-reform law is not an unfunded mandate. Plymouth Superior Court Justice Mark Gildea granted the Healey administration's motion to dismiss the latest challenges to the 2021 law, which supporters see as a key tool to spur development of much-needed housing in more than 170 eastern Massachusetts cities and towns. Marshfield, Middleton, Hanson, Holden, Hamilton, Duxbury, Wenham, Weston and Wrentham had each filed legal complaints against the law in recent months, contending that it should not be enforceable after the Division of Local Mandates in Auditor Diana DiZoglio's office deemed the measure an unfunded mandate. More: Holden seeks short-term halt to MBTA housing law Plaintiffs said allowing multifamily housing by right in at least one reasonably sized zone as the law requires could force them to absorb significant new infrastructure costs with no state assistance. But Gildea concluded the possible costs are "indirect," which means the law is not an unfunded mandate, and that grant programs are available to help shoulder some of the burden. "Even if [the law] was an unfunded mandate, the Municipalities have failed to allege sufficient facts concerning any anticipated amounts associated with future infrastructure costs beyond a speculative level," Gildea wrote in a 40-page decision. Some of the plaintiffs laid out their own issues with the law as well, such as Middleton arguing that it should not be classified as an MBTA community and therefore should not be subject to the mandatory zoning reforms. Jason Talerman, an attorney for some of the towns, said in an email that plaintiffs are "disappointed with the result and find the decision to be contrary to applicable law." Most of the 177 communities subject to the law have approved new zoning reforms, putting them in compliance, according to the Healey administration. In January, the Supreme Judicial Court upheld the MBTA Communities Act as a constitutional law the attorney general can enforce with legal action. The high court required the Healey administration to redo the regulation-setting process. This article originally appeared on Telegram & Gazette: Judge turns back challenge to MBTA housing law
