Germany's Merz says Western allies no longer impose range limits on Ukrainian weapons
Chancellor Friedrich Merz said on Monday, May 26, that Germany, along with Ukraine's other key Western backers, had lifted range restrictions on weapons they send to Kyiv to fight against Russia. Merz, who took office early this month, also vowed that "we will do everything in our power to continue supporting Ukraine, including militarily," in close coordination with other supporters.
"There are no longer any range restrictions on weapons delivered to Ukraine – neither by the British nor by the French nor by us nor by the Americans," he said. "This means that Ukraine can now defend itself, for example, by attacking military positions in Russia... With very few exceptions, it didn't do that until recently. It can now do that."
The previous German government of center-left chancellor Olaf Scholz strongly backed Kyiv but shied away from sending it long-range Taurus missiles, worried that this might escalate tensions with the nuclear power. Merz has in the past said he favors delivery of Taurus, which could strike targets deep inside Russia.
His government has since stressed it would no longer detail what arms it is sending to Ukraine, preferring a stance of strategic ambiguity. Speaking in a lengthy interview with public broadcaster WDR, Merz did not say whether Germany would now send Taurus missiles to Kyiv.
The recently appointed chancellor took the opportunity to slam Russian President Vladimir Putin's reluctance to engage in talks to end the fighting in Ukraine. The Kremlin chief has responded to diplomatic efforts to bring the conflict to a close by prosecuting the war "harder than before," Merz told WDR. "Putin obviously sees offers of talks as a sign of weakness," Merz said.
Since US President Donald Trump returned to the White House this year, he has sought to push the two sides in the conflict toward direct talks at the highest level. Trump last week suggested the Vatican as a possible host for a meeting, with the Italian government saying the leader of the Catholic Church was ready to organise talks.
But Moscow has cast doubt on the potential for the Holy See as a host. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said it would be "inelegant" for the Catholic Church to mediate discussions between two principally Orthodox Christian countries.
Merz said that Ukraine's Western backers had sought to use all the diplomatic options available to them to initiate talks. "After the last three weeks, no one can seriously accuse us of not having exhausted all available diplomatic means," Merz said. Short of "raising the white flag," Ukraine's supporters had "done everything" they could.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
9 hours ago
- LeMonde
Ukraine renews demand to see Russia's peace terms
Ukraine said Thursday, May 29, it was ready to hold more talks with Russia in Istanbul next week but again demanded that Moscow supply a document setting out its conditions for peace. And as the United Nations said that hopes for peace in the three-year-old war were "barely" alive, the United States again warned that it could withdraw from mediation efforts and impose sanctions on Russia. Ukraine spoke out after Russia said Thursday it was still waiting for its rival to commit to new talks in Istanbul on Monday. "Ukraine is ready to attend the next meeting, but we want to engage in a constructive discussion. This means it is important to receive Russia's draft," President Volodymyr Zelensky's chief of staff, Andriy Yermak, said in a statement in response. It was not immediately clear whether the statement was setting an official condition for attending the talks. While diplomatic efforts to end the war have gained pace in recent months, Russia has maintained an intense bombardment of Ukraine and rebuffed calls for an immediate ceasefire. Moscow has offered to hold a second round of direct talks in Istanbul on June 2, when it said it would present a "memorandum" outlining its conditions for a long-term peace settlement. Ukraine has repeatedly said the meeting would not yield results unless it saw a copy of the memorandum in advance. Calling for a response from Ukraine, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Thursday that Kyiv's demand to hand over its "memorandum" was "non-constructive." Ukraine said it had already submitted its own vision of a peace settlement to Russia and demanded Moscow do the same. Zelensky said Russia was "doing everything they can to make the meetings empty. And this is another reason why there must be sufficient sanctions, sufficient pressure on Russia." Moscow's refusal to send the document "suggests that it is likely filled with unrealistic ultimatums," said Ukrainian foreign ministry spokesperson Georgiy Tykhy. US 'will have to consider stepping back' Russian foreign ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharov told state television the Kremlin planned to send the same negotiating team as for the earlier talks. That was led by Vladimir Medinsky, a Kremlin aide. After the May 16 talks, Ukraine accused Russia of outlining unrealistic demands, including calls to cede territory Kyiv still controls. The Russian offensive, launched in February 2022, has resulted in tens of thousands of deaths and the destruction of large parts of eastern and southern Ukraine. Russian forces have moved forward on the battlefield while pushing peace demands that include Ukraine abandoning its NATO ambitions and giving up around a fifth of its land. The Russian army said Thursday it had captured three villages in Ukraine's Donetsk and Kharkiv regions in its latest advance. US President Donald Trump has sought a peace deal but has expressed growing frustration at Russia's stance. He said Wednesday he would determine within "about two weeks" whether Putin was serious about ending the fighting. At a UN Security Council meeting Thursday, US diplomat John Kelley reaffirmed that Washington could pull back from peace efforts. "If Russia makes the wrong decision to continue this catastrophic war, the United States will have to consider stepping back from our negotiation efforts to end this conflict," Kelley told the meeting, which included Russian and Ukrainian envoys. "Additional sanctions" on Russia were possible, he added. "The hope that the parties will be able to sit down and negotiate is still alive, but just barely," UN under-secretary-general for political affairs Rosemary DiCarlo told the meeting. Local authorities in Ukraine said Thursday that Russia had fired 90 drones overnight. At least seven people were killed in drone, missile and artillery strikes across five frontline Ukrainian regions, officials said. Russia said it had repelled 48 Ukrainian drones overnight, including three near Moscow. Zelensky earlier this week said Russia was "amassing" more than 50,000 troops on the front line around Sumy, where Moscow's army has captured a number of settlements as it seeks to establish what Putin has called a "buffer zone" inside Ukrainian territory.
Fashion Network
12 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Trump officials downplay court ruling that blocked sweeping tariffs
Meanwhile, a second U.S. court issued a preliminary ruling against the tariffs on Thursday, temporarily blocking them from going into effect in a case brought by educational toy maker Learning Resources. U.S. District Court Judge Rudy Contreras issued a narrower decision that did not block the tariffs completely, but he stopped the tariffs from being levied on the toy company and ruled that its challenge could remain in his Washington, D.C. federal court. The administration immediately asked an appeals court to stay Wednesday's trade court ruling and allow the tariff regime to remain in place. Trump has put tariffs at the center of his effort to extract concessions from U.S. trading partners, including traditional allies such as the European Union. White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett expressed confidence that the ruling would ultimately be reversed in an interview with Fox Business Network on Thursday. He also said it would not get in the way of signing new trade deals. "If there are little hiccups here or there because of decisions that activist judges make, then it shouldn't just concern you at all, and it's certainly not going to affect the negotiations," Hassett said. Indeed, at least two sets of scheduled trade talks appeared unaffected by the ruling. Japan's trade negotiator is scheduled to meet with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in Washington on Friday for a fourth round of talks, while India still plans to send a trade team to Washington next week for talks, an India trade official told Reuters. White House trade adviser Peter Navarro, a staunch proponent of higher tariffs, told Bloomberg TV that the Trump administration could rely on other laws to implement import taxes if the court's decision remains in place. Trump had invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a law intended to address threats during national emergencies, to impose tariffs on almost every U.S. trading partner, raising fears of a global recession. The president temporarily suspended many of the tariffs until early July after markets swooned in response. The court found that the emergency powers law does not grant Trump the unilateral power to order such sweeping tariffs. Some sector-specific tariffs, such as those Trump has imposed on steel, aluminum and automobiles, were imposed under separate authorities on national security grounds and were unaffected by the ruling. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney welcomed the decision, saying it was "consistent with Canada's longstanding position" that Trump's tariffs were unlawful. Other U.S. trading partners offered careful responses. The British government said the ruling was a domestic matter for the U.S. administration and noted it was "only the first stage of legal proceedings." Both Germany and the European Commission said they could not comment on the decision. Several analysts said it was preliminary to conclude this closes the door entirely on Trump's sweeping tariffs, with legal paths other than IEEPA likely at his disposal. "We suspect the administration will lean on other legal authorities to maintain tariff levels around current levels," Bernard Yaros, lead U.S. economist at Oxford Economics, wrote in a note to clients on Thursday. Some businesses and industry groups expressed exasperation amid continued uncertainty about how the tariff saga will play out. The ruling is "just another chapter in this difficult journey toward a clear, consistent and strategic trade policy," said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain for the National Retail Federation trade group. After prompting an initial surge in stocks in Asia, the ruling stimulated more muted reactions in Europe, where indexes were largely flat, and in the U.S., where gains were modest. The S&P 500 was up about 0.4%, having given back more than half of its initial rise at the opening bell. An early rally in the dollar also fizzled and the greenback was about 0.5% lower against a basket of major trading partner currencies. Bond yields also declined. Following a market revolt after his major tariff announcement on April 2, Trump paused most import duties for 90 days and said he would hammer out bilateral deals with trade partners. But apart from a pact with Britain this month, agreements remain elusive, and the court's suspension of the tariffs may dissuade countries like Japan from rushing into deals, analysts said. "Assuming that an appeal does not succeed in the next few days, the main win is time to prepare, and also a cap on the breadth of tariffs – which can't exceed 15% for the time being," George Lagarias, chief economist at Forvis Mazars international advisers, said. Trump's trade war has shaken makers of everything from luxury handbags and sneakers to household appliances and cars as the price of raw materials has risen, supply chains have been disrupted and company strategies redrafted. Drinks company Diageo, opens new tab and automakers General Motors, opens new tab and Ford are among those that have abandoned forecasts for the year ahead. Non-U.S. companies including Honda, opens new tab, Campari, and pharmaceutical companies Roche, and Novartis have said they are considering moving operations or expanding their U.S. presence to mitigate the impact of tariffs.
Fashion Network
12 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Trump officials downplay court ruling that blocked sweeping tariffs
Meanwhile, a second U.S. court issued a preliminary ruling against the tariffs on Thursday, temporarily blocking them from going into effect in a case brought by educational toy maker Learning Resources. U.S. District Court Judge Rudy Contreras issued a narrower decision that did not block the tariffs completely, but he stopped the tariffs from being levied on the toy company and ruled that its challenge could remain in his Washington, D.C. federal court. The administration immediately asked an appeals court to stay Wednesday's trade court ruling and allow the tariff regime to remain in place. Trump has put tariffs at the center of his effort to extract concessions from U.S. trading partners, including traditional allies such as the European Union. White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett expressed confidence that the ruling would ultimately be reversed in an interview with Fox Business Network on Thursday. He also said it would not get in the way of signing new trade deals. "If there are little hiccups here or there because of decisions that activist judges make, then it shouldn't just concern you at all, and it's certainly not going to affect the negotiations," Hassett said. Indeed, at least two sets of scheduled trade talks appeared unaffected by the ruling. Japan's trade negotiator is scheduled to meet with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in Washington on Friday for a fourth round of talks, while India still plans to send a trade team to Washington next week for talks, an India trade official told Reuters. White House trade adviser Peter Navarro, a staunch proponent of higher tariffs, told Bloomberg TV that the Trump administration could rely on other laws to implement import taxes if the court's decision remains in place. Trump had invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a law intended to address threats during national emergencies, to impose tariffs on almost every U.S. trading partner, raising fears of a global recession. The president temporarily suspended many of the tariffs until early July after markets swooned in response. The court found that the emergency powers law does not grant Trump the unilateral power to order such sweeping tariffs. Some sector-specific tariffs, such as those Trump has imposed on steel, aluminum and automobiles, were imposed under separate authorities on national security grounds and were unaffected by the ruling. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney welcomed the decision, saying it was "consistent with Canada's longstanding position" that Trump's tariffs were unlawful. Other U.S. trading partners offered careful responses. The British government said the ruling was a domestic matter for the U.S. administration and noted it was "only the first stage of legal proceedings." Both Germany and the European Commission said they could not comment on the decision. Several analysts said it was preliminary to conclude this closes the door entirely on Trump's sweeping tariffs, with legal paths other than IEEPA likely at his disposal. "We suspect the administration will lean on other legal authorities to maintain tariff levels around current levels," Bernard Yaros, lead U.S. economist at Oxford Economics, wrote in a note to clients on Thursday. Some businesses and industry groups expressed exasperation amid continued uncertainty about how the tariff saga will play out. The ruling is "just another chapter in this difficult journey toward a clear, consistent and strategic trade policy," said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain for the National Retail Federation trade group. After prompting an initial surge in stocks in Asia, the ruling stimulated more muted reactions in Europe, where indexes were largely flat, and in the U.S., where gains were modest. The S&P 500 was up about 0.4%, having given back more than half of its initial rise at the opening bell. An early rally in the dollar also fizzled and the greenback was about 0.5% lower against a basket of major trading partner currencies. Bond yields also declined. Following a market revolt after his major tariff announcement on April 2, Trump paused most import duties for 90 days and said he would hammer out bilateral deals with trade partners. But apart from a pact with Britain this month, agreements remain elusive, and the court's suspension of the tariffs may dissuade countries like Japan from rushing into deals, analysts said. "Assuming that an appeal does not succeed in the next few days, the main win is time to prepare, and also a cap on the breadth of tariffs – which can't exceed 15% for the time being," George Lagarias, chief economist at Forvis Mazars international advisers, said. Trump's trade war has shaken makers of everything from luxury handbags and sneakers to household appliances and cars as the price of raw materials has risen, supply chains have been disrupted and company strategies redrafted. Drinks company Diageo, opens new tab and automakers General Motors, opens new tab and Ford are among those that have abandoned forecasts for the year ahead. Non-U.S. companies including Honda, opens new tab, Campari, and pharmaceutical companies Roche, and Novartis have said they are considering moving operations or expanding their U.S. presence to mitigate the impact of tariffs.
