Money alone will not fix our failing police
Police chiefs have told the Government that if they are to meet pledges to cut crime they need more money and more officers. Their appeal comes ahead of the Chancellor's spending review due to be published next month and with law and order expected to take a financial hit since it is not a 'protected' area.
Sir Mark Rowley, commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, praised Labour's 'sensible ambition' to halve knife crime and violence against women and girls, as well as boost neighbourhood policing. But this required cash, not least because the population had risen so much (though no one seemed prepared to join the dots with large scale immigration as the cause). The problem the police have when making such demands is that the public no longer feels they make the right choices with the resources they have.
Burglaries are rarely, if ever, investigated; mobile phone thefts are ignored; shoplifters strip stores with impunity; and officers are only occasionally seen walking the beat, almost always in pairs.
Police chiefs maintain that they direct scarce resources where they are most needed and yet this is impossible to square with stories of half a dozen officers being sent to arrest someone for sending an injudicious tweet to a school website. Stories like these make it hard to take seriously the argument that police numbers are too low.
Policing is as much about choices as money. More bobbies on the beat has been a recurring policy ambition for decades yet never seems to happen. Labour has promised to recruit 2,500 police neighbourhood officers and nearly 400 PCSOs over the next 12 months, as part of the target to hit 13,000 by 2029. The police say this is not enough.
But it might be if they deploy their officers more effectively and make different decisions about what is important to the public. The Government must play its part by finally stripping away much of the red tape that often keeps officers stuck in police stations inputting data and removing self-defeating targets.
The release of career criminals back into the community because there are too few prison places also needs to stop, even if it means temporary overcrowding while new jails are built. Police chiefs say they also want structural reform which invariably means fewer but bigger forces. If they go down that road they will become even more remote from the public they serve than they are already.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Musk Formally Ends His Time Working In Government - The Source with Kaitlan Collins - Podcast on CNN Audio
Musk Formally Ends His Time Working In Government The Source with Kaitlan Collins 48 mins With his businesses battered, his reputation bruised, and his face sporting a black eye, Elon Musk got a heroes send off inside the Oval Office.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Painfully soft and inane questions for Musk's White House swan song
It was billed by the president as a press conference.. But that was accurate only to the extent that there were a few select reporters asking questions in the Oval Office. They were part of the 'pool', a chosen group of journalists on a rota to cover the president's movements each day. The rota used to be drawn up by the White House Correspondents Association on a rotating basis. The administration has changed that. They now compile the pool. And today, as it happens, the media seemed particularly compliant. The questions were soft. Painfully so. Read more: There was one on whether the president had any marital advice for his French counterpart - who appeared to be shoved by his wife the other day. Another was about whether Mr Musk thought it was harder to colonise to Mars or reform government. There were one or two about the pressing issues of the day, like Gaza, but nothing that could be described as probing or doing what we are supposed to be there to do - hold power to account. And Musk, under Trump, has without question wielded immense power over the past few months; unprecedented for an unelected official. He upended the workings of federal government, slashing thousands of jobs. He forced the closure of whole departments like USAID, changing America's global footprint. He did it all with a sense of enjoyment. The literal chainsaw to bureaucracy was memorable. There is little debate in America about the need to cut government bureaucracy or cut the debt. America, more than any country I have lived in, is a place full of bloat and waste. Yet it was Mr Musk's methods which caused so much unease among his many critics. They argued that where a scalpel was definitely needed, Musk instead deployed a sledgehammer. At times, his flamboyant style was a neat distraction from the substance of Trump's sweeping policy changes. But none of that was interrogated in this 'press conference'. Instead, the inane questions went on. Trump was asked if he would pardon Sean 'Diddy' Combs should he be convicted - he didn't say 'no', but there was no follow up to examine why. He was asked if he wished he'd become a judge given that they are blocking so much of his legislation. He laughed. There was a moment when irony appeared to have died altogether. In the same breath as trumpeting his success in cutting government waste - when he has, in fact, achieved a fraction of the $2 trillion savings he promised - Musk congratulated Trump for deploying so much gold around the Oval Office. The presidential office has had an extensive, gaudy gold makeover costing undisclosed sums. One reporter did ask about Musk's alleged drug use. But by attributing the story to the New York Times - who have made the allegations - Musk had an easy out. "Why believe that fake news," he essentially said. Surely the obvious question was "Mr Musk, when was the last time you took ketamine or ecstasy?" It never came. Read more: We did get the answer to one burning question, trivial though it was, given what's going on in the world. But it took 41 minutes for any of the reporters to ask it: Why was Elon Musk sporting a shiner on his right eye? His 4-year-old son, X, whacked him, he said. Maybe young X has some sympathy for the thousands of federal workers - ordinary Americans - who Musk fired at his president's pleasure.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Consumer Sentiment Snaps 4-Month Decline After US-China Trade Deal, Survey Shows
Consumer sentiment stabilized in May after declining over the past four months as a US-China prelimi Sign in to access your portfolio
