DeAPlaneta Teams With China's Alpha Group To Relaunch Animated Polar Bear Character ‘Bernard'
Barcelona-based DeAPlaneta Entertainment and Chinese licensing and merchandising company Alpha Group, which is also a producer of children and family content, have signed an agreement to jointly relaunch animated series Bernard globally.
The dialogue-free, animated TV series about a bumbling polar bear called Bernard, was first launched out of Spain in 2006 and went on to win fans at home and internationally, with the character known as Backkom in Asia.
More from Deadline
Andy Serkis' Animated Film 'Animal Farm' Sets Sales With Goodfellas Animation - Cannes Market
Annecy Unveils 2025 Line-Up With Matt Groening Honor; First Looks For 'Animal Farm'; Netflix's 'Stranger Things'; DreamWorks' 'Bad Guys 2'; Sony's 'Goat' & Disney's 'Zootopia 2'
Shout! Studios Takes North America For Animated Feature 'Into The Wonderwoods' By 'Persepolis' and 'Zombillenium' Directors
DeAPlaneta Entertainment announced the partnership ahead of the Annecy International Animation Film Festival next week where the company will be out in force at the MIFA market.
The company acquired the Bernard IP in 2023 when it bought the catalogue of Madrid-based children's content company BRB International, in a deal including broadcast rights and operating licences for a number of popular animated shows.
Prior to the deal, Alpha Group had acquired Chinese rights to the Bernard IP and produced three feature films devoted to the polar bear and his entourage: Backkom Bear: Agent 008 (2017), Agent Backkom: Kings Bear (2021), and Backkom Bear: Mars Mission (2024).
Under the agreement with the Alpha Group, DeAPlaneta Entertainment, the owner of all Bernard-related content previously produced by BRB International in Western markets, will distribute both new seasons and future productions created around the Bernard brand outside of Asia.
The agreement also includes the global distribution in Western countries by DeAPlaneta Entertainment of the new animated feature film Bernard: Mars Mission, which enjoyed a successful theatrical release in China.Alpha Group is one of China's top family and children's content companies, with other credits including Petronix Defenders, Super Wings, Katuri and Quantum Heroes: Dinoster.Bernard is currently broadcast in more than 180 countries through linear channels such as Disney Channel, Cartoon Network, Televisa, BBC, Televisión Española, KIKA, M6/Gulli, Nickelodeon, and Canal Panda, as well as VOD platforms such as Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Rakuten, and Hulu.It has also gained digital traction with a dedicated Bernard YouTube channel, which as a subscriber base of 6.7 million; a total of 2.648 billion views, and monthly viewership of two million.The Bernard IP has also generated licensing partnerships with Universal, Ravensburger, Famosa, Panini, Clementoni, Warner Bros., and Comansi, among others.
'Bernard has achieved unparalleled global brand maturity. Both DeAPlaneta Entertainment and Alpha Group are pleased to offer new content to the fans of this unforgettable character,' said Carlos Biern, Content and Media Sales Director of DeAPlaneta Kids & Family.
Best of Deadline
Sean 'Diddy' Combs Sex-Trafficking Trial Updates: Cassie Ventura's Testimony, $10M Hotel Settlement, Drugs, Violence, & The Feds
'Poker Face' Season 2 Guest Stars: From Katie Holmes To Simon Hellberg
2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Tonys, Emmys, Oscars & More
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's business empire was built on government help. How badly could Donald Trump hurt him?
Even for Elon Musk, this is — to use the precise technical term — bonkers. Barely one week after leaving the Trump administration with every semblance of amity, the world's richest person is going scorched earth against the leader of the world's richest nation. Insults and threats. Calls for impeachment. Sinister references to Jeffrey Epstein. Somehow, Kanye West is also involved. It's like the messiest online influencer drama you've ever seen, except the parties are two of the most powerful people on Earth. But when it comes down to brass tacks, what exactly does Musk stand to lose in this titanic celebrity divorce? If Trump were to follow through on all his threats, and use every available weapon against Musk's business empire, how badly could it hurt him? The short answer is: pretty badly. In fact, with some admittedly quick and dirty math, we can put a price tag on some of it. Elon Musk's estimated $388bn fortune — already $26.6bn smaller than it was before this frank exchange of thermonuclear warheads — depends on the success of two companies which are both intertwined with the U.S. political system. One is Tesla, which makes electric vehicles; the other is SpaceX, which builds rockets, spacecraft, and satellites. X, formerly Twitter, can be left aside for now; having bought the social network 2022 for $44bn, Musk is still struggling to recoup his investment and has almost certainly lost money overall. Let's start with Space Exploration Technologies Corp., aka SpaceX. Not many people can afford to rent a rocket, so a lot of its business comes from government contracts, and U.S. government contracts most of all. As of writing, according to federal data, the Texas-based company has been paid or promised just under $21bn by Uncle Sam since 2008. The total potential value of all SpaceX's existing contracts, however, is much higher: $89.2bn. If Trump cancelled every contract tomorrow, that would mean a theoretical maximum of $68bn in lost potential income. For context, that's more than four times SpaceX's entire forecasted revenue for 2025, and nearly 15 times its revenue from 2022. Of course, there's no way to know if those maximum payments would ever actually have been made. So we could also get a rough sense of what SpaceX stands to lose by looking at the actual cash it received from federal coffers every year. In 2022 that was $2.8bn; in 2023, $3.1bn; and in 2024, $3.8bn. On the plus side for Musk, the U.S. government is so dependent on SpaceX that some critics have called it a monopoly in the making. SpaceX ferries our astronauts to and from the International Space Station, is heavily involved in Nasa's moon landing program, and manages an increasing share of government satellite communications as well. Still, that does not guarantee safety. Would you really, in all soberness, bet against Donald Trump doing something that hurts the country merely to punish his personal enemies? In fact, as Talking Points Memo editor-in-chief Josh Marshall argues, SpaceX's critical role might actually put it in greater danger, because it leaves the feds with few options except "expropriation or nationalization". Like SpaceX, Tesla has benefited greatly from taxpayer money, mostly in the form of emission trading payments from non-electric carmakers and tax credits or consumers buying electric vehicles. An analysis by The Washington Post put Tesla's total income from emission credits since 2007 at $11.4bn as of this February. Its gain from tax credits, which allow more people to buy its cars at higher prices, has been estimated at $3.4bn. Those emission credit schemes are run by U.S. states, not by the federal government. Nevertheless, Trump and the Republican Party have tried to undermine such schemes by contesting states' ability to set their own emissions rules. The wider impact is difficult to calculate. In contrast to SpaceX, Tesla sells to ordinary people, who tend to have their own opinions independent of government. In reputational terms, splitting noisily with Trump could reverse some of its recent sales losses; on the other hand, it might just make Tesla hated on both sides of politics. The biggest risk may be regulatory. At the time of Trump's second inauguration, Tesla was being investigated by numerous federal agencies including the Justice Department, the National Labor Relations Board, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration — which by itself had six pending probes. During his time at DOGE, Democrats feared Musk could use his power to influence or cancel these cases. But Trump's unabashed willingness to wield state power to punish those who displease him while rewarding loyalists cuts both ways. Live by the chainsaw, die by the chainsaw. How much that costs Tesla would depend on how far Trump is willing to go, and on the outcome of any ensuing court battle. But when U.S. stock exchanges closed on Thursday its share price had crashed by nearly 12 percent, wiping $122bn off its market value. So far we've only addressed Elon Musk's finances. Yet there are other, more personal ways that Trump could hurt him if the former reality TV star truly isn't here to make friends. For example, Trump's old advisor Stephen Bannon — who has previously branded Musk a "parasitic illegal immigrant" — urged the administration to investigate Musk's immigration history, and potentially deport him. Unlike some of the feverish allegations that emanate from the extended Trump-o-sphere, this one actually has some substance. An investigation by The Washington Post last year alleged that Musk had worked illegally in the U.S. while launching his Silicon Valley career in the mid-90s. Musk has denied this, and in any case he has been a U.S. citizen since 2002. Still, legal experts have said his citizenship could technically be revoked if he were proven to have lied to immigration authorities. And while those laws have only rarely been enforced in the past 25 years, some Trump aides and allies have said they want that to change. Nor is that anywhere close to the only alleged skeleton in Musk's closet. What is his relationship with ecstasy, Adderall, ketamine, or magic mushrooms? Has he ever been in regular contact with Vladimir Putin? Did his colleagues at DOGE rigorously follow information security laws when extracting sensitive data from federal systems? What happened to all that data after it was obtained? At least we can probably can rule out plain old assassination by government special forces. Although, to be fair, that is literally something that Trump and his lawyers have argued should be protected by presidential immunity. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Hamilton Spectator
33 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Michaels completes acquisition of Joann's intellectual property and fan-favorite labels
NEW YORK (AP) — Craft labels from the now-shuttered fabrics seller Joann are making their way to a new home: Michaels. The Michaels Companies announced on Thursday that it had completed its purchase of Joann's intellectual property and private label brands — in an acquisition that arrives as the Texas-based arts and crafting chain works to expand its own fabric, sewing and yarn offerings. 'We're honored to have the opportunity to welcome JOANN customers into our creative community and are committed to delivering the selection, value, and inspiration they are looking for at Michaels,' Michaels CEO David Boone said in a statement. The deal, he added, allows the company to better 'respond to rising demand' among both new and existing customers. Financial terms of the acquisition were not disclosed. The Associated Press reached out to Michaels for further information on Friday. With roots dating back to a single Ohio storefront in 1943 , Joann had grown into a destination for generations of sewers, quilters, knitters and lovers of other crafts for more than 80 years. But more recently, operational challenges continued to pile up — with the retailer pointing to sluggish consumer demand, inventory shortages and rising competition. Joann announced it would be going out of business back in February, just one month after filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for the second time within a year. At the time, the company said financial services company GA Group, together with Joann's term lenders, had been selected as the winning bidder to 'acquire substantially all of Joann's assets' and conduct going-out-of-business sales at all store locations. Michaels on Thursday said that its purchase of Joann's IP and private brands included the acquisition of 'Big Twist' yarns, which had become a staple in Joann stores over the years. Those 'Big Twist' labels are now being developed as part of Michaels' portfolio — and will be available in-stores and online later this year, the company said. In the meantime, Michaels has also dedicated a landing page to welcome former Joann customers online. And as part of its overall expansion into fabrics, Michaels said on Thursday that its adding more than 600 new products from new and existing brands — including quilting supplies and fabrics, specialty threads, sewing machines and more. Michaels, founded in 1973, currently operates 1,300 stores across 49 U.S. states and Canada. Its parent company also owns Artistree, a framing merchandise manufacturer.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk's Political Exit Results In More Volatility for Tesla Stock — Experts Answer Whether You Should Buy the Dip
Elon Musk has taken a step back from politics, and some investors are excited about the tech billionaire's renewed focus on Tesla. Musk's entrepreneurial successes and ability to think ahead are one of the main reasons that Tesla stock commands a high premium. Learn More: Read Next: Some people see Musk's exit from politics as a good thing for the stock, while others still don't view it as a buying opportunity. The recent spat between Musk and Trump has created even more uncertainty for the stock, but fear can create opportunities. Several experts shared their thoughts about the electric vehicle (EV) maker. Elon Musk's involvement in the Department of Government Efficiency has stirred up controversy. Liberals make up a large percentage of EV buyers, and many people in this group adamantly turned against the tech billionaire. Robert P. Johnson, PhD, certified financial advisor (CFA), CAIA, professor of finance at Creighton University's Heider College of Business, views Musk's DOGE departure as good for business, but he has to clear a few hurdles. 'More attractive, but there are a couple of problems. First, Musk himself has seemingly always divided his time between several endeavors — Space X, X (formerly Twitter), Neuralink, etc. Second, his DOGE involvement also negatively impacted Tesla in the sense that he alienated a large part of his current and potential owner base by aligning himself with Trump,' Johnson explained. Find Out: While liberals have been turned off by Musk, he also risks losing conservatives due to a recent string of X posts. 'Now, his criticism of the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' may alienate potential buyers of Teslas who are supporters of Trump. In other words, Musk has seemingly alienated people on both sides of the political aisle,' Johnson added. 'Wading into politics is a losing proposition for the CEO of a publicly traded company, particularly one with as high a visibility as Musk.' Musk committing more of his time to Tesla isn't only a tailwind for its EVs. Tesla has been working on several projects, such as robotaxis and humanoid robots, that have the potential to deliver massive gains for patient investors. Alex Black, chief marketing officer at EpicVIN, encourages investors to consider all of Tesla's underlying businesses before making a decision. 'This is not an auto company — it's energy, software, AI, all in one. High potential, high volatility. Monitor margins, delivery numbers, and how they're competing against Chinese competition. And remember: Hype drives this stock more than rationale at times,' Black said. He also suggested considering where you are with your finances before making an investment. Your age plays a big role in the types of assets you should consider. 'Are you young and have time to take the ups and downs? Future tech in the form of EVs, AI and autonomy may be worth it,' according to Black. 'But if you're close to retirement, playing it safe with solid, proven companies is the better bet. Diversify a bit if possible.' Another problem for Tesla is the rising competition. BYD is a leading EV maker that is gobbling up market share in China, Europe and Mexico. Competition can present several problems for the valuation. John Ellmore, editor and spokesperson for Electric Car Guide, shares what investors should monitor. 'Investors need to look past the brand and dig into the numbers. Tesla's margins are tightening, sales are flatlining in key markets and the competition is delivering cheaper EVs at scale,' he pointed out. 'I think the market is catching up, so I would urge caution for would-be investors.' Musk's return to Tesla can minimize concerns about competition. The tech billionaire may have additional time to focus on Tesla and regain lost ground. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates How Far $750K Plus Social Security Goes in Retirement in Every US Region This article originally appeared on Musk's Political Exit Results In More Volatility for Tesla Stock — Experts Answer Whether You Should Buy the Dip Erreur lors de la récupération des données Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données