After magnets, China now plants agriculture barrier for India
Live Events
Local Production Unviable
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
New Delhi: China has halted shipments of specialty fertilisers used to increase the yields of fruits, vegetables and other remunerative crops to India for the last two months, according to top executives of several large importers. China, a global supplier of agricultural inputs, continues to export them to other nations.India imports about 80% of its supplies of these chemicals from China. "China has been restricting suppliers of specialty fertilisers to India for the last four to five years. However, this time it is a complete halt," said Rajib Chakraborty, president, Soluble Fertilizer Industry Association (SFIA).Shipments from factories are subject to inspections by the Chinese government.It's not been inspecting shipments meant for India, using various procedures to block exports without imposing an express ban, said people with knowledge of the matter.China has been restricting the export of key raw materials such as rare earth magnets in apparent retaliation for tariffs and other curbs.India mandates government approval for investment by countries that have a border with it, specifically aimed at its northern neighbour.That's against the backdrop of an escalation in tensions between the two over the past five years, including border skirmishes and China's support for Pakistan.Specialty fertilisers are non-subsidised soil nutrients. These include water-soluble fertilisers (WSFs) and liquid fertilisers for foliar and fertigation, controlled release fertilisers (CRFs), slow-release fertilisers (SRFs), micronutrient fertilisers, fortified fertilisers, customised fertilisers, nano fertilisers, bio-stimulants, organic and other value-added and innovative fertilisers.India typically imports 150,000-160,000 tonnes of specialty fertilisers in the June-December period, according to some industry estimates.In India, the market for micronutrient fertilisers is expected to cross $1 billion by 2029 at a CAGR of 9.2%, according to the Fertilizer Association of India (FAI).Indian biostimulants are expected to grow to $734 million by 2029, a CAGR of 15.6% while the organic fertiliser market is predicted to increase to $1.13 billion by 2032, a CAGR of 7%, according to the FAI.These fertilisers enhance crop yields, improve soil health, and optimise nutrient use efficiency, often reducing environmental impact compared to traditional fertilisers.All top fertiliser companies such as Deepak Fertilizers , Paradeep Fertilizers and Nagarjuna Fertilizer Company operate in this segment.India does not have the technology to produce specialty fertilisers as volumes until now have been low, making it unviable for companies to set up manufacturing facilities locally.'However, specialty fertilisers are now replacing primary fertilisers, thereby increasing their consumption volume,' Chakraborty said, adding that a large number of companies are now interested in setting up manufacturing units.In the meantime, India can also explore other options for importing these fertilisers.'While alternative destinations such as Jordan and Europe can be explored, the challenge is to land these chemicals in time,' said a senior official of a multinational fertiliser company.While urea, diammonium phosphate (DAP) and muriate of potash (MOP) are considered commodity fertilisers with broader applications, specialty fertilizers offer targeted nutrient delivery and formulation for specific needs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
17 minutes ago
- India.com
Rajasthan Royals Owner Manoj Badale Accuses Raj Kundra Of Blackmail In High-Stakes UK Court Battle
In a dramatic legal twist, Manoj Badale, the majority stakeholder of IPL franchise Rajasthan Royals, has accused his former co-owner Raj Kundra of blackmail. The allegation surfaced during an intense hearing at London's High Court, where Badale and his firm, Emerging Media Ventures, are suing Kundra for allegedly breaching a confidential 2019 settlement agreement. The case digs deep into the past ownership dynamics of the Royals, a team that clinched the inaugural Indian Premier League title in 2008 but has since been no stranger to controversy. The spotlight is once again on Raj Kundra, whose turbulent association with the franchise has come back to haunt both him and the Royals' hierarchy. At the heart of the dispute lies Kundra's former 11.7% stake in Rajasthan Royals—a stake he was forced to relinquish after being implicated in the 2015 IPL betting scandal. The scandal rocked Indian cricket and led to the suspension of Rajasthan Royals for two seasons. Now, nearly a decade later, Kundra claims he was 'cheated out of the true value' of his stake. In an email sent to Badale last month, Kundra alleged fraud, claiming he was 'misled and defrauded' regarding the actual worth of his equity. The message included a veiled threat: he had filed complaints with Indian authorities and was prepared to escalate the matter to the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). Blackmail Allegations and Legal Ripples Badale's legal team, led by barrister Adam Speker, described Kundra's actions as a 'blackmail attempt.' Court filings revealed that Kundra contacted disgraced IPL founder Lalit Modi with statements suggesting Badale would 'pay dearly' for allegedly undercutting his stake's value. These revelations, Badale argued, directly violated the terms of their 2019 settlement agreement. In response, Badale's firm secured a UK court injunction on May 30, barring Kundra from making any disparaging remarks or further breaching the agreement. This legal shield remains active until a full trial determines the case's outcome. Kundra's lawyer, William McCormick, pushed back against the blackmail charge. While agreeing to uphold the injunction, he clarified that his client's acceptance does 'not amount to an admission' of any wrongdoing. IPL Franchise in Crisis On and Off the Field While legal fireworks erupt off the field, the Rajasthan Royals franchise faces internal turmoil on the pitch as well. After an underwhelming IPL season, rumours suggest the franchise may part ways with captain Sanju Samson, their long-serving leader. Reports link the Kerala wicketkeeper-batter to Chennai Super Kings, sparking speculation that Riyan Parag could be groomed for captaincy. If true, these changes could mark a new era for the Royals—but one shadowed by off-field disputes and ownership controversies. What This Means for the IPL Landscape This high-profile legal battle has significant implications beyond just the Royals. With the IPL's brand value exceeding $12 billion, any controversy involving team ownership and internal rifts casts a shadow on the league's credibility. The BCCI, though not directly involved yet, may be forced to respond should Kundra escalate his claims. The courtroom clash also serves as a reminder of the fragile alliances behind India's most lucrative cricket property, where billion-dollar stakes, public image, and personal reputations collide.
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump gets 'golden share' power in US Steel buyout. US agencies will get it under future presidents
HARRISBURG: President Donald Trump will control the so called "golden share" that's part of the national security agreement under which he allowed Japan based Nippon steel to buy out iconic American steelmaker US Steel, according to disclosures with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. The provision gives the president the power to appoint a board member and have a say in company decisions that affect domestic steel production and competition with overseas producers. Under the provision, Trump, or someone he designates controls that decision making power while he is president. However, control over those powers reverts to the treasury department and the commerce department when anyone else is president, according to the filings. The White House responded in a statement that the share is "not granted to Trump specifically, but to whoever the president is" when asked why Trump will directly control the decision making and why it goes to the treasury and commerce departments under future presidents. Still, the wording of the provision is specific to Trump. It lists what decisions cannot be made "without, ... at any time when Donald J. Trump is serving as President of the United States of America, the written consent of Donald J. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Trump or President Trump's Designee" or "at any other time, the written consent of the CMAs", a contractual term for the treasury and commerce departments. Nippon steel's nearly USD 15 billion buyout of Pittsburgh-based US Steel became final last week, making US Steel a wholly owned subsidiary. Trump has sought to characterise the acquisition as a "partnership" between the two companies after he at first vowed to block the deal - as former president Joe Biden did on his way out of the White House, before changing his mind after he became president. The national security agreement became effective June 13 and is between Nippon Steel, as well as its American subsidiary, and the federal government, represented by the departments of Commerce and Treasury, according to the disclosures. The complete national security agreement hasn't been published publicly, although aspects of it have been outlined in statements and securities filings made by the companies, US steel said on Wednesday. The pursuit by Nippon Steel dragged on for a year and-a-half, weighed down by national security concerns, opposition by the United Steelworkers and presidential politics in the premier battleground state of Pennsylvania, where US Steel is headquartered. The combined company will become the world's fourth-largest steel-maker in an industry dominated by Chinese companies, and bring what analysts say is Nippon Steel's top-notch technology to US steel's antiquated steel-making processes, plus a commitment to invest USD 11 billion to upgrade US Steel facilities. The potential that the deal could be permanently blocked forced Nippon Steel to sweeten the deal. That included upping its capital commitments in US Steel facilities and adding the golden share provision, giving Trump the right to appoint an independent director and veto power on specific matters. Those matters include reductions in Nippon Steel's capital commitments in the national security agreement; changing US steel's name and headquarters; closing or idling US steel's plants; transferring production or jobs outside of the US; buying competing businesses in the US; and certain decisions on trade, labour and sourcing outside the US.
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Mobikwik shares slide 6% as Net1 Applied Technologies likely sells 9% stake sale via block deal
Live Events One Mobikwik Systems shares price target (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel Shares of One Mobikwik Systems slid 6.2% to their day's low of Rs 230.65 on the BSE on Thursday after 69.76 lakh shares or 8.98% of the company's equity reportedly changed hands via a block deal According to CNBC-TV18 reports, Net1 Applied Technologies Netherlands BV, a subsidiary of South Africa's Net1 UEPS Technologies, is the likely seller in the suggest that the deal is valued at approximately Rs 161.20 crore and took place at a price of Rs 231 per the official parties to the transaction and other details are not yet had invested $40 million (approximately Rs 268 crore) in Mobikwik in 2016 as part of a strategic partnership aimed at integrating its virtual card technology with the Indian digital payments planned stake sale comes as Mobikwik undertakes a series of strategic moves. In March 2025, the company entered the stockbroking space by launching Mobikwik Securities Broking Private made a strong debut on the stock exchanges earlier this year, listing at a 58% premium to its IPO price of Rs 279. However, the stock has since declined over 60% from its post-listing high of Rs month, the company reported its March quarter results — its second earnings report since net loss widened significantly to Rs 56 crore in Q4, compared to a net loss of just Rs 67 lakh in the same quarter last year. Revenue rose 2.6% year-on-year, while Payments GMV surged 2.3 times compared to the year-ago period. However, EBITDA stood at a negative Rs 45.8 crore due to lower contribution to Trendlyne, the average target price for Mobikwik shares is Rs 500, implying an upside potential of around 104%. One analyst currently has a 'Strong Buy' rating on the a technical perspective, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) stands at 40.5, indicating the stock is in neutral territory. The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) is at -4.4, below both the signal and center lines — a sign of bearish momentum.: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)
