Zelenskyy calls for more pressure on Russia after deadly Kyiv missile strike
Ukrainian Emergency Service work on the site of Russia's Tuesday deadly missile attack that ruined a multi-storey residential building in Kyiv, Ukraine, Wednesday, June 18, 2025. (AP Photo/Efrem Lukatsky)
KYIV, Ukraine — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Thursday said a Russian missile strike on a nine-story Kyiv apartment building was a sign that more pressure must be applied on Moscow to agree to a ceasefire, as Moscow intensifies attacks in the three-year war.
The drone and missile attack on Kyiv early on Tuesday, the deadliest assault on the capital this year, killed 28 people across the city and injured 142 more, Kyiv Military Administration head Tymur Tkachenko said on Thursday.
Zelenskyy, along with the head of the presidential office Andrii Yermak and Interior Minister Ihor Klymenko, visited the site of the apartment building in Kyiv's Solomianskyi district Thursday morning, laying flowers and paying tribute to the 23 people who died there after a direct hit by a missile collapsed the structure.
'This attack is a reminder to the world that Russia rejects a ceasefire and chooses killing,' Zelenskyy wrote on Telegram, and thanked Ukraine's partners who he said are ready to pressure Russia to 'feel the real cost of the war.'
Tuesday's attack on Kyiv was part of a sweeping barrage as Russia once again sought to overwhelm Ukrainian air defenses. Russia fired more than 440 drones and 32 missiles in what Zelenskyy called one of the biggest bombardments of the war, now in its fourth year.
As Russia proceeds with a summer offensive on parts of the roughly 1,000-kilometre (620-mile) front line, U.S.-led peace efforts have failed to gain traction. Russian President Vladimir Putin has effectively rejected an offer from U.S. President Donald Trump for an immediate 30-day ceasefire, making it conditional on a halt on Ukraine's mobilization effort and a freeze on Western arms supplies.
Meanwhile, Middle East tensions and U.S. trade tariffs have drawn world attention away from Ukraine's pleas for more diplomatic and economic pressure to be placed on Moscow.
Russia in recent weeks has intensified long-range attacks that have struck urban residential areas. Yet on Wednesday, Putin denied that his military had struck such targets, saying that attacks were 'against military industries, not residential quarters.'
Speaking to senior news leaders of international news agencies in St. Petersburg, Putin said he was open to talks with Zelenskyy, but repeated his claim that the Ukrainian leader had lost his legitimacy after his term expired last year — allegations rejected by Kyiv and its allies.
'We are ready for substantive talks on the principles of a settlement,' Putin said, noting that a previous round of talks in Istanbul had led to an exchange of prisoners and the bodies of fallen soldiers.
Putin on Wednesday praised Trump's push for peace in Ukraine. But Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha wrote on X on Thursday that it was his country that had 'unconditionally accepted' the U.S. proposal for a ceasefire, and said that Russian claims of willingness to end the war were 'manipulations.'
'It has been exactly 100 days since Ukraine unconditionally accepted the U.S. peace proposal to completely cease fire, put an end to the killing, and move forward with a genuine peace process ... 100 days of Russia escalating terror against Ukraine rather than ending it,' Sybiha wrote.
'Ukraine remains committed to peace. Unfortunately, Russia continues to choose war, disregarding U.S. efforts to end the killing,' he added.
Overnight on Wednesday, Russia fired a barrage of 104 Shahed and decoy drones across Ukraine, according to the country's air force. Of those, 88 were intercepted, jammed, or lost from radars mid-flight.
There were no immediate reports of casualties or damage caused by the attack.
___
Justin Spike And Illia Novikov, The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
5 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Putin says all of Ukraine is ‘ours' as he eyes capture of Sumy
Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Friday that in his view the whole of Ukraine was 'ours' and cautioned that advancing Russian forces could take the Ukrainian city of Sumy as part of a bid to carve out a buffer zone along the border. Ukraine's foreign minister denounced the statements as evidence of Russian 'disdain' for U.S. peace efforts and said Moscow was bent on seizing more territory and killing more Ukrainians. Russia currently controls about a fifth of Ukraine, including Crimea, more than 99 per cent of the Luhansk region, over 70 per cent of the Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions, and fragments of the Kharkiv, Sumy and Dnipropetrovsk regions. Asked about fresh Russian advances, Putin told the St Petersburg International Economic Forum that he considered Russians and Ukrainians to be one people and 'in that sense the whole of Ukraine is ours.' Kyiv and its Western allies say Moscow's claims to four Ukrainian regions and Crimea are illegal, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has repeatedly rejected the notion that Russians and Ukrainians are one people. He has also said that Putin's terms for peace are akin to capitulation. Putin, who ordered troops into Ukraine in 2022 after eight years of fighting in eastern Ukraine, said on Friday he was not questioning Ukraine's independence or its people's striving for sovereignty, but he underscored that when Ukraine declared independence as the Soviet Union fell in 1991 it had also declared its neutrality. Putin said Moscow wanted Ukraine to accept the reality on the ground if there was to be a chance of peace – Russia's shorthand for the reality of Russia's control over a chunk of Ukrainian territory bigger than the U.S. state of Virginia. 'We have a saying, or a parable,' Putin said. 'Where the foot of a Russian soldier steps, that is ours.' Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha, writing in English on the X social media platform, said: 'Putin's cynical statements demonstrate complete disdain for U.S. peace efforts.' 'While the United States and the rest of the world have called for an immediate end to the killing, Russia's top war criminal discusses plans to seize more Ukrainian territory and kill more Ukrainians.' Wherever a Russian soldier sets foot, 'he brings along only death, destruction, and devastation,' Sybiha said. Zelensky, in his nightly video address, said Russia had shown 'openly and utterly cynically that they 'don't feel like' agreeing to a ceasefire. Russia wants to continue the war.' Zelensky said commanders had discussed action in Ukraine's northern Sumy region and that Russia had 'various plans and intentions, completely mad as always. We are holding them back and eliminating these killers, defending our Sumy region.' Putin said Russian forces were carving out a buffer zone in the Sumy region in order to protect Russian territory. 'Next is the city of Sumy, the regional centre. We don't have the task of taking it, but in principle I don't rule it out,' he said.
CTV News
6 hours ago
- CTV News
‘We're here for him': Ukrainian Canadian Congress meets with President Zelenskyy
President of the Alberta Provincial Council of the Ukrainian Canadian Congress Orysia Boychuk speaks with Alberta Primetime host Michael Higgins about their recent meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. This interview has been edited for clarity and length. Michael Higgins: You were part of a separate meeting with President Zelenskyy Tuesday. Was that just a quick meet and greet? What did the opportunity accomplish? Orysia Boychuk: We're very grateful to have had this extraordinary opportunity to meet with him. It was a very quick meeting. It was initially scheduled to be a little bit longer, up to an hour. Unfortunately we had 15 minutes. But so grateful to have had that opportunity. It was a very emotional, very humbling experience to meet the president after and following the G7 meeting in Kananaskis. It was an honour to be there and represent our community. There were 16 representatives across Canada that had the opportunity to gather and meet with him. We were initially meeting downtown Calgary, and then in the end, it was at the airport where we had some time to talk to him and thank him for his courageous and extraordinary leadership, defending democracy, civil society and national identity that was key for us to really appreciate him and show him that we were still supporting him. We're here for him, wanted him to know. We can only imagine how difficult and how stressful the circumstances are for him. MH: On that very point about both the stress you mentioned emotions a moment ago, we understand that as President Zelenskyy was flying to Alberta, news was being relayed to him about another massive Russian attack. Many dead, many more injured. How did you get a sense for how heavily that was weighing on his mind at the time? OB: It was huge for him. It was huge for us. It was it was a bittersweet meeting. We were gathering and unfortunately, as the day unfolded, there were bombings in Kyiv. Fifteen casualties from the bombing. There were over 100 people that were injured and they were ordinary civilians in downtown Kyiv that were impacted, so it definitely was bittersweet. Canada was unrolling its additional supports, the G7 was coming to an end, and unfortunately there was that layer of attack, of Russian brutality, in continuous invasion on Ukraine. So it was very hard for all of us. MH: I want to ask what you're able to contribute to that conversation. From an Alberta perspective, how familiar is the President with our province as being a home to not only Ukrainians displaced by the war but so many who are of Ukrainian descent. OB: He's very familiar with us. When he was in parliament about a year ago, he did address Alberta, he addressed Edmonton, that Edmonton had established the first Holodomor, the genocide famine monument at City Hall, and he said that he would be back to Edmonton one day to visit. So he's very familiar. He knows that we are here. He knows that there's a large community and that there's a lot of work being done. He thanked us for our ongoing work and our support for the displaced Ukrainians and all the work Canada is doing, Alberta is doing, and all the support in Edmonton and Calgary. He was very grateful and very supportive of us, and it was a mutual exchange of reinvigorating that hope for each other, that we continue to support Ukraine, and that we're here. He was acknowledging and supporting us and the work that we were doing. So it was revitalizing, given the circumstances and the complexities of the day. MH: I want to quickly ask as well about that huge welcome billboard for President Zelenskyy, the one outside Calgary airport. What prompted that? Do you know if he saw it? OB: Yes. Our community really wanted to show a warm welcome to President Zelenskyy. We were speaking with the embassy, communicating and providing a lot of different options of how we could present this warm welcome to the president. Obviously there are restrictions. It was very high-level security. There were a lot of things going on and a lot of leaders coming in, and so we were pretty limited. Our Calgary Congress was amazing. They designed, overnight, this billboard and together the congresses across Alberta had financially chipped in to finance it and put it up. That was the minimum that we felt we could do to welcome and show our support to President Zelenskyy and to show the world that we're welcoming him, and we're grateful. We're grateful for Canada for inviting President Zelenskyy because if Canada didn't invite him, that's a sign of further support that Canada stands with Ukraine. This was another piece showing to the world that Canada stands with Ukraine, Alberta stands with Ukraine. MH: As you look back now on President Zelenskyy's involvement in the G7 summit itself, even the fact that he was not able to meet with the U.S. president, who left early, would you consider the visit a success? OB: One-hundred per cent. The fact that he was invited, that he participated, that Canada gave support. He went home and he received additional support, and the support that he received was more than he received in the past. We're grateful to Canada, we're very hopeful for Ukraine and we're only wishing for peace. We're sending our deepest condolences to those who've lost their lives just as recently as yesterday and the day before and in the past. So we're hopeful for peace very soon indeed.
Winnipeg Free Press
10 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
How the AP decided to refer to the conflict between Israel and Iran as a war
The Associated Press is calling the current conflict between Israel and Iran a war, given the scope, intensity and duration of military activities on both sides. Other news organizations also have decided to refer to the conflict as a war, while some are still sticking with words such as 'conflict' or 'fighting.' Why does it matter? When a conflict in the world spills into military action, it's important to use the correct terms to describe it. Sometimes a one-sided attack occurs without further action, or a conflict bubbles up and then ends quickly Using 'war' widely to describe these kinds of situations can diminish the word's importance. Then, when actual war breaks out, people might not understand its significance. What does the AP consider? The Merriam-Webster definition of war is quite broad: 'A state of usually open and declared armed hostile conflict between states or nations,' or 'a state of hostility, conflict, or antagonism.' The fight between Israel and Iran meets those criteria, though neither has officially declared war. Since Israel launched an air campaign targeting Iran's military and nuclear program, there has been a significant escalation in the conflict. Iran has launched hundreds of missiles and drones into Israel. Israel has assassinated high-level Iranian officials; targeted the country's infrastructure; called for hundreds of thousands of residents to evacuate Iran's capital, Tehran; and said it will continue its offensive. What are previous examples of conflicts where the AP issued guidance to use the word 'war'? The AP provided guidance on the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israel-Hamas war in the days and weeks after fighting began. In both cases, editors considered the number of casualties, the intensity of fighting, the involvement of each party, and what each country was calling the conflict. In both cases, the AP started using the word 'war' to describe the conflicts. Why is it 'war' and not 'War'? AP capitalizes the word 'war' only as part of a formal name, which as of now does not exist. Could the guidance change? Decisions on how AP uses the term 'war' happen in real time. AP's news leaders and standards editors will continue to monitor developments to see whether changes are necessary. At this point, the level of fighting constitutes the countries being at war, no matter what happens next. If fighting were to end soon, AP would continue saying the countries had been at war. News leaders would consider whether the level of fighting at that time amounted to being at war. If other countries intervene in the war, AP would describe the intervention as military action in support of Israel or military support of Iran. AP would also consider whether the action constitutes those countries also being at war.
