logo
All US Forever 21 stores are set to close: Here's what shoppers should know

All US Forever 21 stores are set to close: Here's what shoppers should know

USA Today30-04-2025

All US Forever 21 stores are set to close: Here's what shoppers should know "Retail is changing, and like many brands, Forever 21 is adapting to create the right balance across stores, e-commerce and wholesale," Jarrod Weber said.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Forever 21 files for bankruptcy again
The clothing retailer that was once a centerpiece in malls across America has filed for bankruptcy and plans to close its remaining locations for good.
Scripps News
More than 350 Forever 21 stores are expected to be closed by the start of May, following the fast fashion company's Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing in March.
All of Forever 21's 354 leased stores in the U.S. are to close by May 1, court documents obtained by USA TODAY state. Many began closing their doors as early as April 1.
Forever 21's operator, F21 OpCo, previously said that if a buyer were to come forward with interest in the brand, store closures would pause. But as of the afternoon of Wednesday, April 30, a potential buyer had not been shared by the company.
"Forever 21 is one of the most recognizable names in fast fashion. It is a global brand rooted in the U.S. with a strong future ahead," Jarrod Weber, global president for lifestyle at Authentic Brands, told USA TODAY in March. "Retail is changing, and like many brands, Forever 21 is adapting to create the right balance across stores, e-commerce and wholesale."
Neither Forever 21 nor F21 OpCo immediately responded for comment about the store closures when contacted by USA TODAY on Wednesday afternoon.
Which Forever 21 stores are closing?
All of Forever 21's 354 stores in the U.S. are closing. However, a notice to customers on the Forever 21 website states that international stores will continue operating.
Gift cards, store credit and refunds are no longer accepted
Forever 21 stopped accepting gift cards and store credit on April 15. Refunds and exchanges are also no longer available.
Why did Forever 21 file for bankruptcy?
Forever 21 filed for bankruptcy in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on March 16 due to "competition from foreign fast fashion companies," rising costs, economic challenges and evolving consumer trends, Brad Sell, F21 OpCo chief financial officer, said in a news release.
The historic rise in inflation rates beginning in 2021 led to a significant increase in F21 OpCo's cost of operations, including the cost of inventory, distribution, transportation and employee wages, Stephen Coulombe, co-chief restructuring officer of F21 OpCo, said in a court document supporting the bankruptcy filing.
A "highly competitive retail environment" is also hurting Forever 21, due to the de minimis exemption, which exempts goods valued under $800 from import duties and tariffs, according to Coulombe.
"Certain non-U.S. online retailers that compete with the (F21 OpCo), such as Temu and Shein, have taken advantage of this exemption and, therefore, have been able to pass significant savings onto consumers," Coulombe said in the document. "Consequently, retailers that must pay duties and tariffs to purchase product for their stores and warehouses in the United States, such as the (F21 OpCo), have been undercut."
Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@usatoday.com.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

USTR eases proposed penalties, fees for non-US LNG tankers, vehicle carriers
USTR eases proposed penalties, fees for non-US LNG tankers, vehicle carriers

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

USTR eases proposed penalties, fees for non-US LNG tankers, vehicle carriers

By Lisa Baertlein LOS ANGELES (Reuters) -The U.S. Trade Representative softened fee proposals for non-U.S.-built LNG tankers and car carriers amid its ongoing effort to counter China's dominance on the high seas and revive domestic shipbuilding. The revised proposal, unveiled by USTR on Friday, would remove LNG-related penalties for failing to export a percentage of fuel on U.S.-owned ships. It also would reduce fees when foreign-built car carriers visit domestic ports and exempt those vessels when they are serving the U.S. military. USTR previously exempted ships carrying U.S. exports as well as operators of smaller ships from port fees originally aimed at China-linked vessels. The agency also exempted vessels that service the Great Lakes, Caribbean and U.S. territories. "This is a step in the right direction, and we look forward to working with USTR on a solution that ensures U.S. LNG remains competitive on the global stage," Rob Jennings, vice president of natural gas markets for the American Petroleum Institute, said on Monday. USTR caught the liquified natural gas industry off guard in April with new rules for outbound shipments of that fuel, sparking an outcry. It also surprised the vehicle carrier industry with a plan to impose port fees on all non-U.S.-built vessels in that segment - including U.S.-flagged and U.S.-crewed ships admitted to the U.S. Maritime Security Program (MSP) that supports Washington's military readiness. USTR on Friday removed language saying it could suspend LNG export licenses until its rules for moving a percentage of outgoing shipments on U.S.-built and operated vessels were met. On April 17, USTR said LNG producers would have to transport 1% of their exports on U.S.-built ships starting in April 2029. That percentage would escalate to 15% in April 2047 and beyond. The World Shipping Council, whose members vehicle carriers such as Norway's Wallenius Wilhelmsen, did not immediately comment on the revisions. The vehicle carrier fee effective October 14 was to be $150 per car capacity of a non-U.S.-built ship known as roll-on/roll-offs, or RoRos. Typical RoRos have capacity to carry nearly 5,000 vehicles. In the revision, USTR lowered that fee to $14 per net ton. It also exempted vessels in the MSP, as well as U.S. government cargo - matching previous exemptions made for other vessel segments. Companies with ships in the MSP include Florida-based American Roll-On, Roll-Off Carrier Group, a U.S.-flag operator of vehicle carriers that is part of Wallenius Wilhelmsen Group, which did not immediately comment. The RoRo fees come on top of steep, 25% fees on auto imports imposed by Trump. These affect mainly European vehicles. U.S. exporters also use RoRos to export U.S.-made BMW SUVs, John Deere tractors and other goods. Shipping industry groups and attorneys have said USTR overreached by levying fees on RoRos made in countries that were not part of the Biden administration's fast-track investigation into China. The USTR's revisions continued to reference "non-U.S. built" vehicle carriers. Interested parties, which were not previously given the opportunity to comment on rules for RoRos or LNG tankers, have until July 7 to submit feedback on the revisions. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Sunnova Faces Dealers Push-Back After ‘Whac-A-Mole' Bankruptcy
Sunnova Faces Dealers Push-Back After ‘Whac-A-Mole' Bankruptcy

Bloomberg

time2 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

Sunnova Faces Dealers Push-Back After ‘Whac-A-Mole' Bankruptcy

Residential solar company Sunnova Energy International Inc. 's bankruptcy is facing push-back from dealers as it struggles to raise cash to keep operating and fund its Chapter 11 filing. An ad-hoc group of dealers filed an objection on Monday in which it said a proposed asset sale of solar systems would strip away their claims and that the company has not had any discussions with traders about the terms of the sale, according to court documents. That $15 million , according to Sunnova, would fund the bankruptcy case.

Vehicle mobile app usage rises among EV drivers: JD Power
Vehicle mobile app usage rises among EV drivers: JD Power

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Vehicle mobile app usage rises among EV drivers: JD Power

This story was originally published on Automotive Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Automotive Dive newsletter. As the U.S. electric vehicle market continues to grow, EV drivers expect powerful features from their vehicles, such as fully integrated mobile apps that can unlock their vehicles, plan when to charge and remotely control the air conditioning or heating. Although EV owners are increasingly using their vehicle brand apps, there's room improvement, especially when it comes to connectivity and speed, according to the J.D. Power 2025 U.S. OEM EV App Report, published May 29. Non-Tesla EV drivers are shifting gears in favor of their vehicle's app. Just 17% of non-Tesla EV drivers in 2024 reported using their brand's app each time they got behind the wheel, increasing by 15 percentage points to 32% this year. Tesla drivers are much more likely to use their vehicle's app than other EV drivers, with the report finding 79% of Tesla drivers use the Tesla app each time they drive. That's up from 69% last year. App performance varies across brands, which affects whether drivers choose to rely on their apps. Tesla's high proportion of app usage makes sense, as the J.D. Power report ranked Tesla as the highest performing EV mobile app overall. Among premium EV brands, the Mercedes Benz app ranked second, and the MyBMW app ranked third. MyHyundai with Bluelink was the highest rated mass-market brand app, followed by Kia Access and MINI. 'Top-performing apps deliver fast, consistent remote controls and have desired features,' Violet Allmandinger, mobile apps lead at J.D. Power, said in a statement. 'However, most other apps are still closing that gap.' EV owners surveyed for the report flagged connectivity and app speed as major areas where apps could improve. In fact, app speed was the best predictor of customer satisfaction, J.D. Power said. The majority of EV drivers (70%) also reported interest in app features such as in-app charge payment and trip planning, but many non-Tesla EV drivers had never used such tools, suggesting that they were either unaware of what their apps could do or that their apps had limited features. Indeed, more than half (54%) of non-Tesla EV drivers said they had never tried to pay for a charging session through their vehicle's app. In order to compile the report, J.D. Power surveyed 1,966 EV owners in the U.S. about their EV app usage, the app features they desired and app performance. J.D. Power also assessed apps from 28 EV brands in the United States (as well as 10 in China and 8 in Europe) based on app functionality, features, usability and other indicators of product performance and customer satisfaction. Recommended Reading Hyundai's updated Bluelink app simplifies EV charging Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store