How Blake Lively became a target over her legal battle with Justin Baldoni: ‘It's a perfect storm of misogyny slop'
Rarely has a film been so unpresciently named as
It Ends With Us
. This domestic abuse drama was released in August 2024 and was a huge success, earning more than $350 million worldwide. But that was only the beginning. What has followed is an
off-screen conflagration
that is not only threatening to consume the careers of the film's lead actors,
Blake Lively
and
Justin Baldoni
, but continues to set social media and the entertainment industry ablaze. We've still got a long way to go before it really ends – a trial is set for March 2026.
It's easy to see why this case attracted so much attention initially – everyone loves a good celebrity dust-up – but having begun as just another Hollywood feud destined to be adapted into a prestige miniseries a decade hence, the Lively/Baldoni saga is morphing into something larger and possibly more ominous.
For one thing, the case drags
the dark arts of celebrity public relations
into the spotlight like never before. For another, it has attracted an inordinate amount of attention from rightwing political figures in the US. Combine these two trends and we are seeing a disturbing blurring of lines – between genuine and manufactured 'public opinion', and between celebrity and political discourse.
[
Inside the alleged Hollywood smear campaign against Blake Lively: 'We can bury anyone'
Opens in new window
]
The ins and outs of the saga itself are labyrinthine. In a nutshell, Lively alleges that
Baldoni sexually harassed her
during the making of It Ends With Us (in the story, Lively falls in love with an abusive man, played by Baldoni). He alleges that Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds,
tried to take control of the film
, which Baldoni also directed and co-produced. In a flurry of suits and countersuits, each side has alleged misconduct, and accused the other of orchestrating a 'smear campaign' against them.
READ MORE
Many Hollywood figures and organisations have come out in support of Lively, but America's right wing has taken an inordinate interest in the case, and is overwhelmingly siding with Baldoni. Fox News, for example, has run nearly 80 stories on the case on its website this year.
Joe Rogan
mentioned it on his podcast with comedian Brendan Schaub, accusing Lively and Reynolds of 'trying to take over the movie'. And then there's
Candace Owens
, who has discussed the case at least 25 times this year on her YouTube show and podcast, eagerly responding to each new development in granular detail. Owens's allegiance is unambiguous: 'She has proven herself not to be a kind person,' she said of Lively in January. 'And that's largely due to the fact that she is a modern feminist.'
By focusing on such ostensibly apolitical celebrity content, Owens has boosted her following considerably, appealing to viewers (predominantly female) who may have little interest in rightwing politics, or knowledge of her more extreme beliefs, which range from downplaying the Holocaust, to appearing with Kanye West in a 'White Lives Matter' T-shirt, alleging that Brigitte Macron, wife of French president, Emmanuel, is a man, and calling Volodymyr Zelenskiy a 'welfare queen'. Now we are seeing articles headlined How Candace Owens is Uniting Conservatives and Liberals with her 'It Ends With Us' Coverage – although that appeared in
conservative-leaning women's magazine Evie
, whose coverage has also been largely anti-Lively.
Another rightwing commentator with a newfound interest in the case is
Megyn Kelly
, the former Fox News presenter. In February, at the Conservative Political Action Conference, Kelly made Lively/Baldoni the central topic of her onstage presentation. She described Lively as 'an avatar for leftist overreach', and attempted to tie the case to a broader rightwing grievance narrative: 'You've been gaslit to high heaven every time you've picked up a newspaper in the United States, every time you've turned on CNN ... you have been the victim of overbearing and controlling leftists who think they are the final arbiters of what's best for you and your life.'
In the same way the
'manosphere'
has used male-oriented sports and fitness content as a gateway into far-right politics, some are seeing this new celebrity focus as a way to draw women down the same path – and calling it 'the womanosphere'. Taking to heart Andrew Breitbart's famous dictum that 'politics is downstream from culture', the right's goal has long been to 'take back the culture', as self-tagged #ConservativeInfluencer Abby Shapiro (sister of rightwing commentator Ben) proclaimed in a 2020 YouTube video titled 'Conservative women, it's our time.'
[
Blake Lively accuses director Justin Baldoni of sexual harassment during filming of It Ends With Us
Opens in new window
]
[
Hollywood power couple Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds hit with $400m law suit by Justin Baldoni
Opens in new window
]
'I used to think that that sounded really silly,' says feminist YouTuber
Ophie Dokie
of Shapiro's message, 'and then fast forward to 2025 and that's who people are listening to about things like Hollywood pop-culture gossip, which I did assume, until very recently, would be a more liberal conversation. It truly is not any more. It does feel very dominated by Conservatives, and intentionally so.'
Blake Lively Justin Baldoni in It Ends With Us.Picture credit should read: Photograph: Nicole Rivelli/CTMG, Inc
It's not just rightwing figures weighing in against Lively; everyone seems to be at it. Go on X or YouTube or TikTok and you'll be served up an endless stream of videos discussing and analysing the case in forensic detail, overwhelmingly from an anti-Lively point of view. Content creators have been in a feeding frenzy over the case: there are celebrity gossip 'tea channels', body language experts, AI-powered pseudo-journalism – all supported by an army of 'mommy sleuths', laptop detectives whose examination of every nuance of the case often verges on conspiracy theory. Is Lively out for revenge because she was
secretly in love
with Baldoni? Is Lively's new comms manager, Nick Shapiro, a former CIA agent, using
'black box tricks'
to stifle negative stories? Did she
burp and fart all the time
on the set of Gossip Girl? Content scrutinising Baldoni's behaviour or background in similar detail is much harder to find.
All this activity has whipped up a maelstrom of clickbait: content creators, celebrity media and prominent public figures feeding off each other's output, recycling and regurgitating the same low-quality, primarily anti-woman information – all boosted by engagement-targeting social media algorithms. 'It's a perfect storm,' says Dokie. She calls it the 'misogyny slop ecosystem'.
As an example, she points to a clip followers of the Lively-Baldoni case will doubtless have seen several times: an interview Lively did while promoting a Woody Allen movie in 2016, in which she was judged to have been rude to Norwegian journalist Kjersti Flaa. Flaa says, 'Congrats on your little bump,' to Lively, who was pregnant at the time; 'Congrats on your little bump,' Lively replies to Flaa (who is not pregnant). 'The amount of people who have recirculated that clip and who have spoken about that specific interaction, and then they'll make 20, 30 minutes [of content] about it, and their audience will eat it up because they also thought she was really rude in that clip,' says Dokie. 'And it's like, if everybody wasn't recycling that clip, you wouldn't have known about it, because that happened 10 years ago.' Flaa, incidentally, is now selling 'Justice for Justin' T-shirts on her Etsy site.
'Probably misogyny slop has always existed,' Dokie says, citing figures such as Anita Hill or Monica Lewinsky who were vilified in the predigital media age. 'But I feel like around the time of the Depp v Heard trial, there was this real increase in social clout, almost, in making fun of women who are alleging abuse.'
All of this feels a long way from Lively's original complaint, which was that Baldoni was abusive towards her. When filming of It Ends With Us resumed after the actors' strikes, in January 2024, Lively only agreed to continue if Baldoni signed a 17-point agreement 'for the physical and emotional safety' of her and her team, according to a
legal complaint
she filed with the California Civil Rights Department. The conditions include: 'An intimacy co-ordinator must be present at all times when [Lively] is on set'; 'No discussions of personal experiences with sex or nudity, including as it relates to conduct with spouses or others'; 'No spontaneous improvising of any scenes involving physical touching, simulated sex, or nudity.' The filing also complained that Baldoni criticised Lively's weight and body, that he entered her dressingroom without permission while she was breastfeeding, and, that he claimed he could speak to her dead father.
Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds: Baldoni filed a $400 million lawsuit against the couple. Photograph:Baldoni responded with a $250 million lawsuit against the New York Times, which broke the story, denying team Lively's claims and alleging that they had 'cherry-picked and altered communications stripped of necessary context'. The same day, Lively filed a federal lawsuit against team Baldoni, repeating the allegations made in her initial filing. In response to that, in January this year, Baldoni filed a $400 million lawsuit against Lively, her publicist and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, accusing them of attempting to take control of the film, and detailing a long list of rebuttals and counterallegations. It's become less a matter of 'he said, she said' than 'he sued, she sued'.
We've been here before, and not that long ago. In 2022, the entertainment world was gripped by another 'trial of the century':
Johnny Depp v Amber Heard
. The similarities are striking: a famous woman alleging abuse; a famous man counterclaiming victim status himself, and online opinion apparently coming down heavily in favour of the man. Hashtags such as #JusticeforJohnnyDepp and #AmberHeardIsAnAbuser dominated social media in advance of the US trial. (Depp initially sued the sun newspaper in the UK for calling him a 'wife beater' and lost; he then sued Heard in the US for defamation, and won.)
Data experts later found that much of Depp's social media support was 'inorganic': spread by accounts that were suspiciously co-ordinated, prolific, recently activated and/or single-minded in their focus on Depp/Heard and nothing else. An in-depth investigation by Tortoise media suggested most of the anti-Heard activity was almost certainly manufactured, and pointed fingers at hired troll farms in the Middle East.
A similar picture is emerging with Lively-Baldoni, says Zhouhan Chen, founder of social media data analysts
Information Tracer
. Chen helped investigate the Depp/Heard online activity and he has been looking at Lively-Baldoni. In his analysis of the top 500 tweets on the subject, he found that support is overwhelmingly pro-Baldoni – sharing hashtags like #BlakeLivelyIsALiar and #JusticeForJustinBaldoni – 'by a ratio of 1:150 to 1:300, depending on which metric you use'. Judging by the age of the accounts and the number of times they have posted, 'I would estimate more than 80 per cent of pro-Justin Baldoni posts are inorganic,' Chen says.
As well as the abuse allegations, Lively's legal complaint alleged 'a multitiered plan that Mr Baldoni and his team described as 'social manipulation' designed to 'destroy' Ms Lively's reputation', and that they 'created, planted, amplified, and boosted content designed to eviscerate Ms Lively's credibility'. The filing included text exchanges between Baldoni's publicist, Jennifer Abel, and crisis communications expert, Melissa Nathan. In one exchange, Abel writes to Nathan that Baldoni 'wants to feel like [Lively] can be buried'; Nathan replies, 'You know we can bury anyone.' In another exchange, commenting on a shift in online sentiment against Lively and for Baldoni, Nathan writes to Abel: 'And socials are really really ramping up. In his favour, she must be furious. It's actually sad because it just shows you have people really want to hate on women.'
Baldoni's lawyers argue
that the text exchanges 'lack critical context', and that Lively is using the same PR tactics she is accusing Baldoni's side of implementing.
Hollywood has always used PR and behind-the-scenes media influence to construct or dismantle a celebrity's reputation, says Prof Sarah Banet-Weiser of the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania, who researches gender and media. 'But what happens in the current moment of unregulated, unmoderated digital media that circulates so fast and that has so many nodes? You can make it look like it's grassroots, when, in fact, it's very calculated and very intentional.'
Blake Lively on the red carpet at the UK gala screening for It ends with us. Photograph: Justin Tallis/AFP via Getty Images
From their supporters' perspectives, the victimhood is the other way round, and it is men such as Depp and Baldoni who are being persecuted. One Hollywood crisis-management veteran described Lively-Baldoni to me as a 'come to Jesus moment': 'The #MeToo movement was brought on by liberal progressives who started a movement of 'let's believe all women, all the time, no matter what'. And slowly but surely, that shroud has been breaking.' (In fact, #MeToo's initial slogan was just 'believe women', not 'believe all women'.)
'This is a right-wing multimedia campaign that is about painting women as inherently lying and manipulative,' says Banet-Weiser. 'That's why people say, 'MeToo has gone too far', that's what Andrew Tate says, that's what radicalised young men say: that women are trying to manipulate them, they're liars, they make false accusations, their whole goal is to ruin men. That is the broader cultural context in which this case, and the media attention to this case, starts to make sense.'
While privileged white women such as Lively and Heard might not be the ideal torchbearers for all victims of abuse, in this context they are painted as avatars for 'modern feminism' and 'leftist overreach', all the better to contrast them with a more traditionalist, conservative ideal of femininity. 'That idea of some women being seen as manipulative and lying, and other women being seen as virtuous and responding to a higher calling of motherhood and family and husband, seems to characterise some of the gender cultural dynamics at play right now,' Banet-Weiser observes. 'This demarcation of ideal femininity, at least in the US, is rooted in a very particular reactionary, authoritarian politics.'
Nobody really knows who is telling the truth in the Lively-Baldoni saga. But if the case does come to trial, as well as likely sending the internet into meltdown, it could shed light on far more than simply who said and did what to whom. Whatever the outcome, the battle being fought right now, outside the courtroom, on social and mainstream media, could be more significant: in terms of women coming forward as victims of abuse and sexual violence, especially, but also in terms of how much we trust what's presented as 'popular opinion', and by extension, how easily it can be manipulated, whether in pop culture or in politics – assuming they're still two different things.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
37 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Aftertaste by Daria Lavelle: A brash novel about early 2000s New York that finds treasure in the trash
Aftertaste Author : Daria Lavelle ISBN-13 : 978-1526683946 Publisher : Bloomsbury Guideline Price : £16.99 Ukrainian-American Daria Lavelle's debut novel is a tale of love, loss and horror set against the freakish backdrop of Manhattan's dining scene. Kostya is a chef who can taste the food dead people desire, which he re-creates for ghosts to share with the ones that mourn them. As with many underworld ventures, things go amiss. Already, Aftertaste has summoned quite a stir, with a movie in the works. There's Stephen King in this novel's ancestry, in style as well as scares. Like King, Lavelle is unabashed that her prose can be clumsy and cliched – 'orgasmic eating experience', 'the perfect, crispy crackle of golden fried chicken skin'. What matters is momentum. Lavelle's writing pounds with bada-boom dialogue and the kind of adrenaline found in an over-heated kitchen during service. In the way she uses brands and celebrities as descriptors, Lavelle evokes Bret Easton Ellis in American Psycho. About one Russian kingpin, she writes: 'While his accent was goofy, all Rocky and Bullwinkle … his face was early-era Brad Pitt, the rest of him in an Armani underwear ad, his confidence reeking with too much cologne.' Just as Ellis never escapes the 1980s, Lavelle's New York, although purportedly present-day, is mired in the early aughts. Macho chefs and hidden speakeasies abound; the East Village is still cool, and Anthony Bourdain's Kitchen Confidential very much alive. There's a banquet featuring ingredients that once upon a time might have induced gasps – the endangered songbird ortolan, the potentially lethal fugu fish. Kostya's love interest Maura is by-the-book retro, a manic-pixie dream girl with purple hair. READ MORE Is Afterlife sometimes sloppy and occasionally bad? Perhaps, but to read it is a rush. Besides, one should be suspicious of someone who disdains all junk, be it a McDonald's French fry or Real Housewives marathon. As an elegy to a city where garbage and greatness go hand in hand, it's only appropriate to find a little trash in Aftertaste's soul.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Edmund White: ‘He never broke faith with the nobility of a literary life'
One of the reasons it is difficult to write about Edmund White is that he himself frequently speculated about what people would say about him after he died. Would he be a Genet, a Bowen, an Isherwood? Most artists nurse this vain anxiety somewhere, but generally they try and hide it. It was typical of Edmund to trumpet a vice: it was of a piece with the sometimes-alarming honesty and taste for shamelessness with which he approached his work (and sometimes wounded those who found themselves revealed or distorted in its pages). Entertaining conjectures about his posthumous legacy sprang, paradoxically, from Edmund's ferocious attachment to life, a result of his relentless, forever-unsatisfied curiosity. He could not abide the thought that there was this one piece of literary news he would never receive. Survival was, of course, a fundamental principle in Edmund's life. One of the very few of his generation of gay men in New York to survive Aids, he found himself in the role of witness, one of a handful of voices able to recount the rules, habits and customs of a world that had had only a brief flicker of existence before it was extinguished. READ MORE Being a surviving witness was a job thrust upon Edmund by accident, and he rose to it magnificently. But in any circumstances, he would have been a chronicler of lost ways of life. He had a passion for intergenerational transmission of many kinds, and took great pleasure in details and ideas, both obsolete and useful, passing between one generation and another. I first met him in the late 1990s. Edmund had just moved to Princeton to teach creative writing; I had come there from Ireland to study comparative literature. I already knew his fiction well – so well that meeting him at a party in Princeton felt almost like an encounter with a part of myself. A Boy's Own Story and The Beautiful Room is Empty treated shameful, private longings as noble, universal feelings. They dealt with homosexuality not as a life sentence, but as a predicament that was exciting and filled with possibility. All the gay men in our small, fearful circle in Dublin had passed those novels back and forth. More than anything any of us read or heard or said to each other, those books gave us a vocabulary of feeling, furnished an emotional grammar for our inner lives. I was in Princeton to do a PhD, but I was also working on what would become my first novel. Edmund invited me to dinner in the house he and Michael were renting and suggested I bring some of my manuscript. I thought he was asking me to leave the pages with him, but after dinner, he had me read it aloud while he and Michael sat and listened, and Edmund read from the notebooks that would become his novel The Married Man . Later, it was partly thanks to Edmund's help that my novel found a publisher. Over the years that followed, we dined together regularly, sometimes with his friends in Princeton or with Michael at home in New York. As a student of French literature, I was an especially useful guest on the many occasions Edmund was hosting a visitor from France. He loved speaking French. It energised him, as though he had been plugged into a different power source. As he read French literature, he greedily stockpiled proverbs, idioms and turns of phrase, which he would then use to decorate his conversation. Edmund had learnt French only when he moved to Paris in his 40s, and mastering it, I think, appealed to his passion for self-reinvention. His news was always new: a new boyfriend, a new book, a new obsession with a hitherto overlooked literary figure from the past. He was a person always in the process of becoming, and his fascination with this process, with how his own plot might thicken, was endless. People often compare him to Henry James, because of his interest in the theme of Americans in Paris, or to Proust because of his meticulous observation of the gay underworld and its codes. He and I talked about the characters in Proust as though they were friends we had in common. But in my view, the writer whose sensibility was the most formative for Edmund was Balzac. Like the French novelists, Edmund had a horror of emptiness (the title The Beautiful Room is Empty , taken from Kafka, registered, I always thought, one of his fundamental fears). Humour, as for Balzac, was always immediately available to Edmund, no matter the circumstance. When recounting tales of his lovers, friends or literary activities, he spoke as though we were living in 19th-century Paris. His world was populated with faded 'famous beauties', dastardly but irresistible schemers, conniving dowagers, young men from the provinces with literary ambitions being corrupted by the city, respectable ladies with unspeakable sexual secrets. In Edmund's conception, the social world had a limited repertoire of fixed roles, but one could get to play many of them in one's lifetime. He was capable of translating everything he did himself into these slightly cartoonish Balzacian categories. It gave him a distance and colour that he needed, and it imbued his life with both irony and dignity. This Balzacian world he pretended we all lived in was one of the tools in Edmund's kit of survival smarts. He knew very well that the idea of a literary society where 'everyone' might know your book was a fiction, but he also understood the necessity of acting as though it existed. He saw many things collapse around him over the course of his life, including the old New York publishing world he had made his own career in. But as a survivor himself he expected survival as well as decline. He never broke faith with the truth and resilience of literature, with the nobility of a literary life, and with the solemn, enduring reality of writing as a vocation. These things too, as much as anything else, he made sure to pass on. Barry McCrea is author of The First Verse (2005) ; In the Company of Strangers: Family and Narrative in Dickens, Conan Doyle, Joyce and Proust (2011) ; and Languages of the Night: Minor Languages and the Literary Imagination in 20th-Century Ireland and Europe (2015)
Irish Times
14 hours ago
- Irish Times
You might think it's Your Friends & Neighbors, but And Just Like That... is the only true aspirational show on TV
Sometime in April a new fantasy dropped: a walk-in wardrobe swish enough for Jon Hamm to want to break into it. Hamm's role as Andrew 'Coop' Cooper, a sacked hedge-fund manager turned neighbourhood burglar, in Your Friends & Neighbors has been a rare source of unalloyed television pleasure this year, with each Friday episode notification from Apple TV+ becoming the starting pistol for the weekend. Still, forget what I said about wardrobes. This dark comedy with a dash of Dynasty might be set in a fictional 'exclusive hamlet' in New York state, but no one in their right mind would actually want to be one of the neighbours in Your Friends & Neighbors. They are, as Coop's conspiratorial voiceover tells us, 'assholes'. It makes for a fun blend of soap, satire and farce, but it's not aspirational, not unless you genuinely fancy being in the market for torn jeans that cost more than monthly rent. READ MORE The now completed, already renewed nine-parter, created by Jonathan Tropper, instead fits into the recent vogue for depicting the ultrawealthy as venal, ludicrous and unhappy, prompting chicken-and-egg questions about which came first, the money or the grasping personality. [ Your Friends & Neighbors: Jon Hamm is hilarious in this riotous, satirical romp Opens in new window ] To be clear, I loved it. Rich people have very funny problems sometimes. Perhaps their greatest flaw is their desire to hang around only with other rich people, which in Your Friends & Neighbors means going to parties organised by your ex-wife's new boyfriend. Westmont Village has those eye-popping American proportions going on but is as oppressive as elite enclaves come. Even the 'keeping up with the Joneses' theme-tune refrain is all pressure, no joy. Yes, how nice to have the time to laze about sharing local arrest gossip in a sauna with four other women wearing matching towels, but how claustrophobic, too. And who really wants to be a member of the sort of stultifying country club that won't stick by you when you're charged with murder? But at least Westmont Village isn't a five-star hotel so suffocating it would put you off the entire concept of holidays. In The White Lotus the lifestyles of the rich and tedious have their own hypnotic quality. I certainly felt as if I was being hypnotised into watching the third season's slow depiction of wellness hell. Never mind the gunfire. It was the forced phone-detoxing and poolside man-pests that were the true horror. That third run reaffirmed my long-held belief that there's never been a massage that hasn't been enlivened by some kind of security emergency. By the finale I felt sorry for the Thailand tourism authorities, who got such a raw deal compared to Taormina, in Sicily, the HBO show's second-season star. And that's the essence of this recent fashion for wealth porn. It's not aspirational lives we're watching, it's aspirational scenery. Maybe the more the real world falls apart, the more audiences – and producers – gravitate towards glimpses of picture-postcard unreality. In Netflix's Sirens , for instance, we're presented with an unnervingly pristine shoreline as the camera follows a perky personal assistant skipping up endless flights of beach steps to the Cliff House. This island mansion has a perfectly positioned swimming pool and grounds so enormous you need a buggy to drive around them. I don't recommend Sirens – it's not so much escapist as a series to escape – though it should be noted that it also possesses some enviably spacious walk-in wardrobe action. To access it, however, you must put up with Julianne Moore being creepy for the best part of five episodes. Never work for someone who might suddenly demand you procure a harp. [ Sirens review: An anaemic White Lotus cover that hits the right notes but has no tune of its own Opens in new window ] Speaking of work, it remains gloriously incidental to the only true aspirational show on television: the Sex and the City spin-off And Just Like That... Carrie Bradshaw, the never-knowingly-underwardrobed Manhattanite played by Sarah Jessica Parker , has rats in her back garden, but her back garden is in a Gramercy Park townhouse, where her new apartment is otherwise shaping up delightfully. Because real estate is no bother to Carrie, she has once again moved on from the rent-controlled studio apartment that Elle Decor has dubbed her 'emotional support brownstone'. [ And Just Like That... Season 3 review: Nostalgia served up like a gift box of premium cupcakes Opens in new window ] The women of And Just Like That... occasionally have to contend with woes such as malfunctioning alarms and demanding podcast producers, but they are radically content, in the main, with being rich. They know their money allows them to enjoy everything from eccentric headwear to ballet. They're free. This seems a good time to revisit remarks made in 2022 by Candace Bushnell , the columnist who inspired the original series, about how much she used to be paid. [ Candace Bushnell at the Ambassador: A fun, girly night out for Sex and the City fans Opens in new window ] In the 1990s she received $5,000 a month for writing the People Are Talking About column for Vogue. The New York Observer, home of Sex and the City, 'paid less', but she could afford that because of Vogue. Before these columns she would 'get an assignment for 3,000 words, $2 per word', which she described as 'failing'. Ah. Failure has never sounded so aspirational.
