logo
New treaty could be a ‘game-changer' for environmental crime in Europe

New treaty could be a ‘game-changer' for environmental crime in Europe

Euronews14-05-2025

The Council of Europe has just adopted an international treaty which will help member countries to tackle serious environmental crime. This 46-member international organisation upholds human rights, democracy and the rule of law in Europe.
It adopted the Convention on the Protection of the Environment through Criminal Law at the Committee of Ministers meeting in Luxembourg on Wednesday, 14 May, alongside other key environmental objectives.
But legal experts say the Committee missed the chance to legally protect the right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment for all in Europe.
This legally binding international treaty provides a robust legal framework with which countries can tackle serious environmental crimes that have, at times, gone unpunished or under-prosecuted. Even those that occur across borders.
Developed over two years by experts and stakeholders from the Council's 46 member states, with contributions from the EU, UN, INTERPOL and civil society groups, it defines and criminalises a wide array of environment-related offences.
States will now be able to prosecute intentional acts that result in environmental disasters that are akin to ecocide.
'This Convention is a game-changer for environmental protection,' Council of Europe Secretary General Alain Berset says.
'It tackles today's urgent ecological threats head-on and taps into the strength of criminal justice to defend the planet. The Convention is one of the pillars of our new Strategy on the Environment. Together, they mark a bold step forward, linking environmental action with human rights, democracy, and the rule of law.'
Alongside the treaty to protect the environment through criminal law, the Council of Europe also adopted a new long-term environmental strategy. It includes five key objectives:
To integrate human rights into environmental policies and vice versa.
To strengthen democratic governance in environmental matters.
To support and protect environmental human rights defenders, environmental defenders and whistleblowers.
To prevent and prosecute environment-related crimes.
To protect wildlife, ecosystems, habitats and landscapes.
But environmental law experts say the Council missed a key opportunity to start legally protecting the right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment for all in Europe.
At a time when Europeans are increasingly affected by the triple planetary crisis of pollution, climate change, and biodiversity loss, they say, states refused to act upon the call by parliamentarians, academics, and civil society by taking decisive action to legally protect the right to a healthy environment.
'It's outrageous that in 2025, Europe still hasn't legally recognised the right to a healthy environment as a basic human right,' says Sebastien Duyck, senior attorney for the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL).
Duyck says that throughout the ministerial negotiations, Switzerland and Norway led the opposition against recognising the right to a healthy environment, despite mounting evidence of the devastating impact of environmental harms.
'Europe should be leading - not lagging - when it comes to human rights,' he adds.
'But the tide is turning. Thankfully, following the lead of France, Slovenia, and Portugal, some governments are hearing the call from citizens and experts to step up and ensure that Europe is no longer the only continent whose regional human rights system does not legally recognise the right to a healthy environment as a basic human right.'
Duyck adds that the Council of Europe must begin negotiations for a protocol to protect this right under the European Convention on Human Rights without delay.
'Environmental destruction has victims - real people experiencing real harms - and until their rights are protected and justice is delivered, civil society will not back down.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What is the level of public support for Israel in Western Europe?
What is the level of public support for Israel in Western Europe?

Euronews

timea day ago

  • Euronews

What is the level of public support for Israel in Western Europe?

A new YouGov study shows that the favourability towards Israel in Britain, France, Germany, Denmark, Spain and Italy is at or near its lowest level in Western Europe since 2016. The research interviewed 8,625 people from these six key Western European countries between November 2016 and May 2025. Net favourability towards Israel in Germany (-44), France (-48), and Denmark (-54) has reached its lowest level since YouGov started tracking in 2016, while public sentiment in Italy (-52) and Spain (-55) are likewise at their lowest or joint lowest levels, despite a shorter timespan from 2021 onwards. A number of Europeans across these six countries think Israel was right to send troops into Gaza, but believe they have since gone too far and caused too many civilian casualties. This opinion won the most support in Germany at 40%, followed by Denmark at 39% and Britain at 38%. Israel's military campaign has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Food supplies have also been blocked, with the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC)'s latest report stating half a million people face starvation. Between 7% and 18% of European respondents say they sympathise most with the Israeli side, the lowest figure in most countries since the Hamas attacks. By contrast, between 18% and 33% say they sympathise more with the Palestinian side. Only in Germany are the figures for each side similar, with 17% for Israel and 18% for Palestine. Despite permanent peace in the Middle East seeming distant to Europeans, French people are the most optimistic that both sides will set aside their differences within the next 10 years. Meanwhile, Danes are the least optimistic at 15%. Across all countries, the opinion that peace is realistic has fallen in popularity by between four and ten percentage points. EU member states' representatives voted this week for retaliatory measures against Chinese restrictions on European medical device manufacturers, diplomatic and EU sources confirmed to Euronews. This followed an investigation by the European Commission found "clear evidence" that China unfairly blocked EU-made medical devices from its procurement market. It represents the first countermeasure implemented using an International Procurement Instrument (IPI), which came into force in August 2022, designed to ensure fair access for EU firms to procurement opportunities outside the bloc. Ambassadors adopted the proposal midweek, but the details are expected to be published in the EU's Official Journal in the coming days. 'We had truly hoped that the International Procurement Instrument process would lead to more meaningful dialogue and progress with China, but unfortunately, that hasn't happened yet,' said Oliver Bisazza, CEO of MedTech Europe, the EU's association of medical device manufacturers. Bisazza wants to see the full details before reacting, but he pointed out that medical device companies remain committed to constructive engagement between the EU and China. 'This sector is vital for saving and improving people's lives and maintaining essential healthcare infrastructure, offering crucial services. This is something both parties should consider,' he added. EU companies have long struggled to gain access to China's public procurement market, despite China being one of Europe's largest trading partners for medical devices - accounting for 11% of export destinations in 2022. The Commission's investigation focused on China's government procurement law, which enforces the so-called "Buy China" policy, requiring public entities to prioritise domestic products and services, with limited exceptions. The probe found that EU manufacturers face a range of obstacles, including opaque approval systems, discriminatory certification procedures, vague national interest clauses used to exclude foreign bidders, and pricing pressures that are often unfeasible for European firms. One stark example: in Guangdong Province, the number of 'approved' imported medical devices dropped from 132 in 2019 to just 46 in 2021, highlighting the tightening of market access for EU firms. The China Chamber of Commerce to the EU responded with concern, tweeting that the IPI measures send 'a troubling signal' for bilateral trade ties. In a follow-up statement, the Chamber argued that the targeted use of the IPI risks becoming a de facto trade barrier and urged the EU to reconsider the necessity and long-term impact of such actions. The measures come at a sensitive moment in EU-China relations, which are currently undergoing a tentative diplomatic reset. After years of friction, the two sides have stepped up engagement to manage long-standing disputes. Much of this renewed dialogue is a response to shifting global dynamics, including the Trump-era trade war and broader US-China tensions, which have prompted Brussels to pursue a more balanced approach. A key milestone in this reset is the upcoming EU-China Summit, now confirmed to take place in Beijing in the second half of July 2025. Despite the escalating procurement dispute, a Commission spokesperson downplayed concerns that the IPI measures would damage broader trade relations. 'We've been making very clear to any global partners with whom we believe there is a problem as regards to the level playing field for procurement: should those problems not be removed, we would be forced to take action,' said the spokesperson. On Wednesday, EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič met with Chinese Minister Wang Wentao on the sidelines of the OECD Ministerial Council – their third meeting overall and second in person. According to the Commission, the talks covered a wide range of critical bilateral issues as both sides work to ensure progress ahead of the July summit.

Air travel: Passenger compensation for flight delays set to decrease in Europe
Air travel: Passenger compensation for flight delays set to decrease in Europe

LeMonde

time2 days ago

  • LeMonde

Air travel: Passenger compensation for flight delays set to decrease in Europe

In a rare move, the 27 member states reached an agreement on Thursday, June 5, on an issue that affects millions of Europeans: compensation for flight delays or cancellations. The topic is politically sensitive due to its broad impact, and as it also has major economic consequences for airlines. The issue has proven so contentious that it took member states more than a decade to reach a consensus. Even so, the meeting of transport ministers that was held on Thursday in Luxembourg nearly ended in failure. Currently, passengers can claim up to €600 in compensation when their flight is delayed by at least three hours. In practice, airlines rarely inform customers of their rights, relying on a European Union regulation dating back to 2004, which has been clarified over the years by rulings from the Court of Justice of the European Union. This complex legal landscape has allowed claims agencies to thrive. Member states have now raised the thresholds for compensation. In the future, passengers will need to experience a delay of more than four hours to be eligible for €300 on an intra-European flight. For journeys of more than 3,500 kilometers, compensation will increase to €500, but will only be payable after a delay of more than six hours. Flights to overseas territories are treated as intra-European flights, but delays on these routes qualify for the long-haul compensation rate.

Nato allies agree to raise defense spending to up to 5% of GDP
Nato allies agree to raise defense spending to up to 5% of GDP

LeMonde

time2 days ago

  • LeMonde

Nato allies agree to raise defense spending to up to 5% of GDP

On January 7, two weeks before his return to the White House, Donald Trump stunned Europeans. Not only did the American president threaten to seize Greenland – even by force – but he also demanded that the countries of Western Europe and Canada devote 5% of their gross domestic product (GDP) to defense. At the time, the demand seemed completely far-fetched and unattainable. Six months later, the 31 United States allies in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) were now prepared to offer Trump a diplomatic win. At the most recent meeting of defense ministers on Thursday, June 5, in Brussels, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth confirmed that the allies were "very close" to an agreement to announce at the NATO summit in The Hague, scheduled for June 24 and 25. The new ambition of the allies is to devote 5% of their national wealth to defense. Currently, only two-thirds of the allies dedicate at least 2% of their GDP to this sector, a goal that was set in 2014. Although the timeline to reach this target – which represents more than €1 trillion in additional spending for all the allies – was still under discussion, with estimates ranging from five to 10 years, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte justified this unprecedented effort by stating, "We live in a dangerous world," citing not only Russia, which continued to bomb Ukraine, but also China and the threat of terrorism.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store