International Workplace Group plc's (LON:IWG) market cap dropped UK£115m last week; individual investors who hold 37% were hit as were institutions
International Workplace Group's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
Insiders have bought recently
Our free stock report includes 2 warning signs investors should be aware of before investing in International Workplace Group. Read for free now.
Every investor in International Workplace Group plc (LON:IWG) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 37% to be precise, is individual investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
While the holdings of individual investors took a hit after last week's 5.8% price drop, institutions with their 28% holdings also suffered.
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of International Workplace Group, beginning with the chart below.
View our latest analysis for International Workplace Group
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
We can see that International Workplace Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of International Workplace Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
It looks like hedge funds own 9.6% of International Workplace Group shares. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. The company's CEO Mark Dixon is the largest shareholder with 25% of shares outstanding. Toscafund Limited is the second largest shareholder owning 9.6% of common stock, and Lancaster Investment Management LLP holds about 4.5% of the company stock.
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of International Workplace Group plc. Insiders own UK£457m worth of shares in the UK£1.8b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 37% stake in International Workplace Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with International Workplace Group (at least 1 which is potentially serious) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Should you buy an annuity? Here's 4 times when it doesn't make sense to do so
Annuities can be a solid tool for generating guaranteed income in retirement, but they're not for everyone. Despite promises of financial peace of mind, annuities come with some big trade-offs. They're complex, often expensive and restrict access to your funds. Before you tie up your money potentially for decades, it's worth asking yourself if an annuity truly fits your financial situation. In plenty of cases, it might not. Annuities are essentially a bet that you'll live long enough to make the upfront investment worth it. You give an insurance company a lump sum or series of payments, and in return, they promise to pay you income — sometimes for life. The longer you live, the better your investment pays off, because no matter how long you live, those guaranteed payments keep coming. However, if you have concerns about your health or your family history points to a shorter life expectancy, you may be better off keeping your money elsewhere. You could spend $100,000 or more to buy an annuity and only get a few years of payments before passing away — leaving little to nothing for your heirs. Some annuities include a standard death benefit, which pays out the remaining contributions minus fees and withdrawals. (You contribute $100,000, receive $60,000 in payouts and your heirs inherit $40,000 minus fees.) You can also add a death benefit rider to your annuity, but that protection comes at an added cost — one you could avoid by skipping an annuity altogether. Similarly, since annuities restrict access to your initial investment, it can be costly — if not nearly impossible — to access your money if your health rapidly declines and your financial outlook shifts. In short, if your health isn't solid, keep your cash more liquid and flexible somewhere else. Learn more: Here's what you should know about inheriting an annuity. An annuity is often described as a do-it-yourself pension. If you're lucky enough to have a traditional pension from your job when you retire, you may already have guaranteed lifetime income. Let's say you're set to get $3,000 per month from your pension, and your expenses are $4,000 per month. Maybe an annuity could cover the $1,000 gap — but so could a smart systematic withdrawal plan, not to mention the ultimate source of guaranteed income in retirement, Social Security. If your pension covers all your essential expenses, an annuity contract will only complicate your retirement plan. You're likely better off keeping additional funds in an IRA or a high-yield savings account for emergencies and nondiscretionary spending. Annuities are complex and a bit different than other financial products. Learn how annuity fees and commissions work and the common annuity terms that every investor should know. You may also want to consult with a financial advisor if you're considering an annuity. Annuities are for people who already have their basic financial house in order. If you're still working on building up your emergency fund or paying off considerable debt, buying an annuity could make your overall financial situation worse, not better. Why? Because annuities generally require a large upfront investment in order to produce any sort of meaningful income in retirement — think $100,000 and up. Most financial experts recommend putting no more than 25 percent of your savings into an annuity, so you should have plenty of money elsewhere before signing a contract. Because once you buy an annuity, getting your money out can be difficult. Annuity funds are notoriously difficult to access without getting hit with surrender charges and tax penalties. And once you annuitize your contract, meaning you start receiving payouts from the insurer, you may not be able to take an early withdrawal at all. Annuities also generally don't offer great growth potential or adjust payouts to keep pace with inflation (unless you pay extra). If you're still trying to build wealth, you're likely better off keeping your money in a Roth IRA or a brokerage account. Get started: Match with an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals Annuities are most useful for people who want to outsource some of their retirement planning decisions — particularly when it comes to managing investment risk and timing withdrawals. The insurance company handles the investment, the payouts and manages the risk of outliving your money. But that convenience comes at a cost: high fees, rigid rules and less flexibility. If you feel confident managing your own portfolio, it's not very useful to pay an insurance company to do what you can already handle yourself. You're likely to get better returns and more control by keeping your money invested and drawing it down in a tax-efficient way. If you want a second opinion, a one-time session with a fee-only financial advisor could go a long way and cost only a few hundred dollars — a drop in the bucket compared to the potential hidden fees baked into many annuity contracts. While annuities aren't the right choice for everyone, there are valid reasons why they continue to be part of retirement planning conversations. The trade-offs are real, but so are the benefits — especially if you're focused on long-term financial security. First, not all annuities are expensive or inflexible. Multi-year guaranteed annuities (MYGAs): These are fixed-rate annuities that act more like CDs, but with deferred taxes. They're simple, low-cost and don't require giving up access to your money forever. Longevity annuities: These deferred income annuities are purchased at retirement but don't start paying out until later — usually around age 80 or 85. Because they're designed to cover only the later years of retirement, they require a much smaller upfront investment than annuities with lifetime payouts. Second, you might feel confident managing your investments now — but what about in your 80s or 90s? Cognitive decline is a real possibility, and not everyone has a reliable person to step in and manage their finances. An annuity can automate your income and help protect you from poor decision-making later in life. And finally, while annuities are often seen as rigid, there are ways to build flexibility into your contract. For example, you can add a long-term care rider if you're worried about your declining health. Many contracts also allow annual withdrawals of up to 10 percent before you fully annuitize, giving you access to a portion of your money if you need it. Ultimately, buying an annuity is a deeply personal decision. The best move is to talk through your options with a qualified financial advisor before moving ahead. Annuities are heavily promoted as a solution to retirement planning, especially by sales reps and agents who make commissions selling them. But in reality, they're far from a one-size-fits-all fix and there are plenty of times when buying an annuity simply doesn't make sense. If you're on the fence, ask yourself what problem you're actually trying to solve by purchasing an annuity. If it's peace of mind, reliable income or protection against market volatility, there might be simpler, cheaper ways to get there. Compare advisors: Bankrate's list of the best financial advisors Editorial Disclaimer: All investors are advised to conduct their own independent research into investment strategies before making an investment decision. In addition, investors are advised that past investment product performance is no guarantee of future price appreciation. Sign in to access your portfolio
Wall Street Journal
33 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
How to Get Off the Investing Sidelines - Your Money Briefing
A turbulent spring in the stock market spooked some investors — and now, they're struggling to get back in . Host Julia Carpenter talks with WSJ's The Intelligent Investor columnist Jason Zweig about how these same folks can reshape their investing strategy with some much-needed historical perspective. Full Transcript This transcript was prepared by a transcription service. This version may not be in its final form and may be updated. Julia Carpenter: Here's Your Money Briefing for Friday, June 6th. I'm Julia Carpenter for The Wall Street Journal. What do you think the opposite of FOMO or the fear of missing out is? FOGI. The fear of getting in, and FOGI is all too common among investors these days. Jason Zweig: When people sense a high level of uncertainty in the market, it makes these kinds of decisions more complicated, because often, people are making these judgments partly based on what their peers are doing. And if all your peers are doing is expressing confusion and watching the headlines nonstop, it can be hard to figure out what to do. Julia Carpenter: After such an up and down few months in the stock market, spooked investors know they're probably playing it a little too safe, but what's the first step to jumping back in the fray? We'll talk with WSJ's The Intelligent Investor columnist, Jason Zweig, about how to conquer FOGI and maybe even how to use it to your advantage. That's after the break. Investors haven't had a quiet 2025. After the Trump Administration's tariff plan sent the market into a tailspin earlier this spring, some investors decided to pull out rather than play ball, and others had taken a step back even earlier. But now the market seas have calmed. So how do you get back in? Wall Street Journal's The Intelligent Investor columnist, Jason Zweig, joins me to talk more. Jason, one of your readers, Michael McCowin, wrote to you and coined this new term: FOGI. Or fear of getting in. How did he arrive at this FOGI place? Jason Zweig: Well, he would say a couple of things. First of all, he got old, and he became a FOGI, an old FOGI. And secondly, he has pretty strong views. He's fortunate. He's a former professional investor. He has plenty of assets to see him through. He's 86, and he feels that the potential upside from staying in the market at this point is not as great as the potential downside of staying in and perhaps losing a lot of his money without time to recover. Julia Carpenter: And after such a turbulent period in markets, you talk to some investors who say they think they should be more fully invested, but they still are in that place that Michael is in, that sort of FOGI place. Why do you think so many investors feel this way? Jason Zweig: Uncertainty is always high except at total market turning points, like say, 2020 or in 1987. And when people sense a high level of uncertainty in the market, it makes these kinds of decisions more complicated, because often, people are making these judgments partly based on what their peers are doing. And if all your peers are doing is expressing confusion and watching the headlines non-stop, it can be hard to figure out what to do. Julia Carpenter: FOGI is contagious. Jason Zweig: Yeah, it absolutely is. Julia Carpenter: And your column, which is linked in our show notes, does such a great job of giving us some much-needed historical perspective. How do the last few market cycles fit into the big picture of the last 80 years in markets? Jason Zweig: The key thing to put in perspective as an investor is that, the long run, tells us unambiguously that you should be rewarded for sticking with U.S. stocks if you can stick with them long enough. We've had over 60 instances of stocks losing 5% or more. We've had a couple dozen corrections where they went down 10 or 20%. And, just in the past few years, we've had two severe bear markets where stocks lost 20% or more. And, over time, the markets have always overcome that and delivered ample returns for people who could stick with it. However, it's not a guarantee. And, ultimately, if you try to force yourself to be the kind of investor you're not, you might end up worse off. People who really feel they need to sleep well at night should listen to that intuition, because if you compel yourself against your own gut to stick with the market during times that look tough, when times that actually feel tough come along, you may get shaken out. So, having a little bit higher allocation to cash or bonds might not be a bad thing for someone who is inclined to get spooked out of the market. Julia Carpenter: I wanted to ask you about a hindsight bias. What is it, and how should we be thinking about it as investors? Jason Zweig: Hindsight bias is a fallacy of human reasoning. It essentially trains us to think, after the fact, that what did happen is what we predicted would happen. And just think about presidential elections, for example. People say things like, "Oh, I knew all along it would be a landslide," or, "I knew all along it would be close." But if you go back and look at what they actually were saying before the election, they weren't saying that. And the advantage of what's just happened, particularly in April and the rebound in May, is that it's so fresh in all of our minds, that it's kind of hard to lie to ourselves. And it gives us a great opportunity to look back and say, "What was I actually saying and thinking? Oh, I was actually saying and thinking this was almost the end of the world, and it's turned out not to be, at least so far. So maybe the lesson I should learn is not to be so certain about my forecasts." Julia Carpenter: So thinking about investors like Michael, what would you tell them to consider as they weigh their options and try to conquer this fear of getting in? Jason Zweig: I like to say, if you must panic, panic slowly, panic gradually. Maybe take one percentage point of your allocation to stocks and reduce that each month. And, within a retirement account, where you don't have immediate tax consequences, you can do that quite easily. And making gradual change, first of all, will make you feel better, because you'll feel you're responding to the thing you're afraid of. But more importantly, it prevents you from overreacting to a fear you feel that ultimately doesn't turn out to be actual. Julia Carpenter: And just to emphasize to those who are still sort of spooked, Jason, managing investments is just one part of an overall financial plan, but it's an important one nonetheless. I wonder what would you say to someone about using the market to build wealth and this sense of security? Jason Zweig: So, the thing to keep in mind is that, while there are no guarantees, and it is not actually true that if you hold stocks long enough you're guaranteed to outperform all other assets, it's a bet about probabilities. It's highly likely that you will do extremely well if you hold stocks for the long term. And the fact that the probability isn't a hundred percent, I don't think should really discourage you from doing it. Just as it can rain on a day when the forecast is 100% sunshine, stocks can disappoint people who hold them for decades at a time, but in the long run, it is a very high probability bet. And putting most of your money in stocks, particularly when you're young and your labor income gives you a hedge against fluctuations in the value of your stock portfolio, is a good idea. It's the best bet for long-term investing, even if it's not quite a certain bet. Julia Carpenter: That's Jason Zweig, columnist for WSJ's: The Intelligent Investor. And that's it for Your Money Briefing. Tomorrow we'll have our weekly markets wrap up, What's News and markets, and then we'll be back on Monday. This episode was produced by Ariana Aspuru. I'm your host, Julia Carpenter. Jessica Fenton and Michael LaValle wrote our theme music. Our supervising producer is Melony Roy. Aisha Al-Muslim is our development producer. Scott Saloway and Chris Zinsli are our deputy editors. And Philana Patterson is The Wall Street Journal's head of news audio. Thanks for listening.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Biggest lottery win in UK history up for grabs in £208m EuroMillions draw
A UK ticket-holder could win the biggest lottery prize the country has ever seen tonight if they match the numbers in Friday's EuroMillions draw. The jackpot has rolled over again to an estimated £208 million after Tuesday's £199 million draw, which would also have been a record-breaking amount, had no winners. The jackpot on Friday would be the largest prize the UK has seen, National Lottery operator Allwyn said. Andy Carter, senior winners' adviser at Allwyn, said: 'We are now on the verge of potentially creating the biggest National Lottery winner this country has ever seen – making a single UK winner instantly richer than the likes of Adele and Dua Lipa while also landing them at the number one spot on The National Lottery's biggest wins list.' Here are the 10 biggest UK lottery wins to date – all from EuroMillions draws – and what some of the winners did with their fortunes. Anonymous, £195,707,000 A UK ticket-holder scooped a EuroMillions jackpot of £195 million on July 19 2022. Joe and Jess Thwaite, £184,262,899.10 Joe and Jess Thwaite, from Gloucester, scooped a then record-breaking £184,262,899 with a Lucky Dip ticket for the draw on May 10 2022. At the time, Joe was a communications sales engineer, and Jess ran a hairdressing salon with her sister. Anonymous, £177,033,699.20 A UK ticket-holder became the third biggest National Lottery winner of all time after receiving a £177 million jackpot. The single-ticket holder, who chose to remain anonymous, came forward to claim the EuroMillions jackpot after the draw on November 26 2024. The winner became immediately wealthier than popstar Dua Lipa, who is worth an estimated £104 million, and Michael Buble, worth around £63 million. Anonymous, £171,815,297.80 A UK ticket-holder scooped £171,815,297.80 in the September 23 2022 draw – at the time the country's third biggest National Lottery win. Anonymous, £170,221,000 The fifth biggest winner of the National Lottery to date scooped £170 million in 2019 after matching all the numbers in a Must Be Won draw on October 8. Colin and Chris Weir, £161,653,000 Colin and Chris Weir, from Largs, North Ayrshire, bagged their historic winnings on July 12 2011, making them the biggest UK winners at the time. Colin used £2.5 million of his fortune to invest in his beloved Partick Thistle Football Club, which led to one of the stands at the stadium being named after him. He later acquired a 55% shareholding in the club, which was to be passed into the hands of the local community upon his death. He died in December 2019, aged 71. The couple also set up the Weir Charitable Trust in 2013 and donated £1 million to the Scottish independence referendum in 2014. They divorced in the same year of Colin's death. Adrian and Gillian Bayford, £148,656,000 Adrian and Gillian won 190 million euros in a EuroMillions draw on August 10, 2012, which came to just over £148 million. The couple bought a Grade II-listed estate in Cambridgeshire, complete with cinema and billiards room, but it was sold in 2021, some years after the pair divorced. Anonymous, £123,458,008 The seventh biggest National Lottery winner won a Superdraw rollover jackpot on June 11 2019, and decided not to go public with their success. Anonymous, £122,550,350 After nine rollovers, one lucky anonymous ticket-holder bagged more than £122 million in April 2021. Anonymous, £121,328,187 Another of the UK's top 10 lottery winners found their fortune through a Superdraw jackpot rollover, this time in April 2018.
