The dos and don'ts of venting — avoiding ‘chop-a-dump' behavior is key
Full steam ahead?
Venting tends to get a bad rap, given that it's associated with anger and negative energy. But mental health experts believe it's also necessary — as long as it's done right.
'Venting is what I call letting out the steam, because, by definition, it's a physics term where you have pressure in a system, so you let it out,' psychiatrist Dr. Judith Jones told The Post.
Advertisement
3 Psychiatrist Dr. Judith shares her etiquette manual for letting it all out.
Carla Torres / Floh Studio Corp
'The problem with just venting alone is that, yeah, it feels good immediately, but it doesn't create solutions. And also, when you vent to the wrong person, you're just transferring the stress onto another individual.'
That's why, in her new book 'High Functioning,' she provides a simple cheat sheet — a venting etiquette manual, if you will — that outlines the 'do's and don'ts' of venting.
Do ask first
Advertisement
'When you do vent, you want to ask for consent,' she said.
That means no ambush-ranting to your barista, your dog walker or the coworker who made the mistake of asking, 'How's it going?'
3 Try to avoid 'chop-a-dump' behavior — unloading your emotional baggage without checking if the other person can cope.
Getty Images/iStockphoto
Don't emotionally dump
Advertisement
Dr. Judith warns against what she calls 'chop-a-dump' behavior — unloading your emotional baggage without checking if the other person can actually handle it.
Don't burden your kids
'You want to be mindful of the power hierarchy, so you don't want to necessarily vent to people who are considered in a lower power dynamic than you,' she said.
That includes your children, even if they say they want to help.
'Your kids will listen to you, but they're going to be worried about you when you leave the room,' she said.
Advertisement
'Even if they say, 'Oh, I want to hear you,' they may want to feel close to you,' she added, 'but what you're doing is you're creating stress for them because they worry about you.'
3 'When you do vent, you want to ask for consent,' Dr. Judith said.
Getty Images/iStockphoto
Or your employees…
Even if you're friends, it's important to keep in mind that there's a power hierarchy there too.
'You don't necessarily want to traumatize employees because they have to answer to you. They don't want to be fired by the boss,' she pointed out.
Do check yourself before you wreck someone else
'You want to make sure that you're in a state where you're not just unloading and telling everyone your business,' Dr. Judith advised.
'You want to consider whether or not, in that moment, you're regulated.'
Do try settling down first
In other words, take a beat. Breathe. Go for a walk. Scream into a pillow. Whatever helps.
Advertisement
'You may want to do some of the grounding techniques in my book before you choose one or two people that you can trust,' she said.
So yes, complaining can be cathartic, but like a good spa day, venting needs to come with safety protocols.
Your stress isn't toxic — until you pass it on.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Do you have an ‘office chair butt'? Here's what workers who ‘refuse to fall victim' are doing about it
What's droopy, floppy and sagging around the office? No, it's not your crabby boss — it's your flabby butt. Sitting on one's backside for hours on end, slouched in a seat while staring at a computer screen, is flattening once-rounded heinies. 'I refuse to fall victim,' swore Krystina, a NYC-based content creator, warding off the wicked woes of 'office chair butt.' Advertisement 4 Folks online are worried about contracting the dreaded 'office chair butt' while on their jobs. Andrey Popov – Despite its social media-given nickname, the aforementioned curse is a legitimate plague on patooties — more formally known as atrophy of the gluteal muscle group — caused by chronic sitting, according to the Cleveland Clinic. And yes, it's as bad for your booty as it sounds. Advertisement 'A lack of conditioning in your gluteus maximus and surrounding tissue leads to weakness, making it build up fat tissue and appear flatter or saggy,' explained Michael Milicia, an occupational therapist, in a recent report for the clinic. The doc noted that the actual chair a hireling sits in is not to blame for his or her beleaguered bottom. Instead, the true culprit is their lack of movement while on the clock. 'Sitting too long without breaks isn't particularly good for anything,' Milicia said. Advertisement And his butt advisory is right on the nose. Researchers from Beijing, China, recently reconfirmed the cautionary adage, 'sitting is the new smoking,' finding that employees — namely office workers — are at a high risk of experiencing severe neck pain. 4 Investigators have found that sitting for long periods of time can trigger body aches and neck pains. Kittiphan – Kristianne Egbert, a board-certified professional ergonomist, issued a similar warning to The Post, saying, 'holding any one posture for an extended period — whether sitting or standing — can take a toll on your body.' Advertisement 'Static positions cause muscles to tense, slow blood flow and lead to fatigue,' she added. Still, most 9-to-5ers, especially those who've been called to return the office for long-stretch shifts, are forced to park their hind parts in uncomfortable chairs in cramped cubicles for at least five days per week. 4 Experts warn that constant sitting can cause one's buns to become flabby, saggy, flat and squishy. AS/ – The bootylicious online, however, are working their butts to the bone with mid-day exercises, hoping the avoid the ills of office chair atrophy. 'Me every 30 minutes when I find out what office chair butt is,' Haike, a TikTok user, wrote in the closed-captions of a clip that featured her doing knee-lifts at her desk, running up and down a flight of stairs and doing laps around a conference room in her workplace. Loba, an internet influencer from Chicago, stepped away from her workspace to hit a series of squats after catching a shocking glimpse of her flap-jack fanny. And Nikki, a well-endowed diva, lead her team of fellow employees, comprised of both men and women, in executing several repetitions of lunges, squats, leg-lifts and stair climbs, vowing in her vid, 'No office chair butt for us.' Advertisement 4 Squats, leg exercises and butt clenches are all recommended for counteracting the flattening effects of office chair butt, per Cleveland Clinic. T Mdlungu/ – For a Beyonce-like behind, Milica recommends slaying those exercises and more every day, suggesting folks, 'get up and move every 30 to 90 minutes, as your job allows.' Here are a few derrière-improving workouts to help you avoid looking like you've got pancakes in your work pants. Standing while taking a phone call Placing your filing cabinet or other equipment you use during the day a few feet away from your desk Walking to a colleague's office for a face-to-face talk, rather than sending an email Inviting co-workers for a walking meeting Taking the stairs rather than the elevator Choosing a restroom that's a little farther away Switching to a sit-stand desk Try a walking pad under your desk Butt clenches Marching in place Heel lifts Toe lifts Ankle circles Squeezing a ball (or your fists or other prop) between your legs Trying to hold your knees apart while pushing them together when your hands
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Big Data Can Make America Healthier. How to Do It Right
Credit - Ezra Bailey—Getty Images Big data can help make Americans healthier, and the Trump Administration has stated—in its recently released Make America Healthy Again report and elsewhere—that building a national big-data platform is one of its primary goals. As scientists who use large data sets to study health, we're excited about its potential and the willingness of the federal government to invest in it, particularly since big data has been underutilized in the U.S. compared with other developed countries—and since the number of ways it can be used grows nearly daily. It's a huge opportunity. But there are lots of concerns when assembling sensitive health data and combining it with other sensitive data, like credit scores, tax records, employment, educational records, and more. Some of those concerns with the Administration's plans have already surfaced. The Administration's first goal of assembling big data to studying autism has left some worried that if used inappropriately, such data could lead to harm, rather than help, for those with autism. Others worry that big data could be used to perform and justify shoddy research that supports predetermined conclusions without adhering to rigorous scientific methods—a concern reinforced by the discovery that the Make America Healthy Again report cited non-existent sources to support its claims. So how can we reap the benefits of big data while minimizing its risks? Here are some guiding principles: The health care system already possesses health data on millions of Americans. Medical records are now almost always digitized, permitting doctors' notes, medical imaging, laboratory tests, insurance claims, and more to be linked (in theory) across doctors' offices, hospitals, nursing homes, and any other place people receive care. However, data collected about a patient in one setting often doesn't get connected to data from other settings—making it hard for researchers to get a full picture of what, exactly, is happening to each of us within the larger health care system. Read More: Gun Injuries of All Kinds Go Up During Hunting Season The federal government also has data on us that can be connected to health care data to answer important questions. For example, comprehensive and detailed data on Americans' occupations linked with health, insurance, and other data could help shed more light on relationships between our work and our health—helping to better answer curious questions like why taxi drivers are less likely to die from Alzheimer's disease or why female physicians don't outlive their male colleagues. The first step of making big data more helpful is to simply link the data—which, while possible, is difficult to accomplish without centralized effort. Once linkages have been made, data can be anonymized so that those studying sensitive questions aren't privy to confidential information about specific individuals. In addition to governmental data, many other sources of data can provide insights into our health. For example, smartwatches not only have data on how our hearts are beating (e.g., they can identify abnormal heart rhythms like atrial fibrillation), but they can also identify subtle changes in mobility that might be predictive of early neuromuscular diseases like Parkinson's disease. Meanwhile, grocery stores have data on the foods we eat, and with increasing interest in how diet affects our lives, these data could be linked to detailed measures of health. Read More: Could the Shingles Vaccine Help Prevent Dementia? Similarly, social-media platforms possess data that can offer insights into changes in our mental health, and through large-scale analysis of online photos could even identify, in real time, early visible markers of disease. These are moonshots, of course, and whether we want to use data in this way is an open question. But the potential to improve health could be large. Creating a way for scientists to link outside data to existing government and health data—while responsibly maintaining individual anonymity after the linkage—could open many novel research opportunities. Keeping all of these data sources organized, secure, and accessible to scientists is a tall order. Researchers who use big data often dedicate substantial resources to finding the data they need, organizing it, and ensuring its accuracy; the better the database is maintained, the easier it is for researchers to actually perform their analyses. The secure online platform where Medicare and other government health care data are currently accessed has been described by researchers as 'tedious and prone to system errors' and in need of major improvements. Meanwhile, security concerns have led the government to stop letting researchers store the data on their own secure servers, the easiest and most cost-effective way to actually work with the data. Access to Medicare data by researchers has become prohibitively expensive, costing about $30,000 a year or more for a single user to work on one project using the online platform. Read More: Why We Can't Rely on Science Alone to Make Public Health Decisions Proposals to drastically cut medical research funding have been reported, and if passed, these research funding cuts will come at the cost of discoveries to improve health that will never be made. High-quality research of any kind requires investment, whether it's in a biology lab under a microscope or working with data on powerful computers. A new data platform is only as valuable as researchers' ability to access it in a functional and cost-effective way. Any roadmap to designing a national data platform that links together health care and other sensitive data must consider the many valid concerns about collecting data in the U.S., including privacy concerns and how data will be used. The Pew Research Center finds that large majorities of Americans say they are concerned about how the government uses data collected about them (71%), while also admitting that they have little to no understanding of what the government even does with such data (77%). Here are some strategies—in addition to many of the cybersecurity and privacy safeguards already in place—to both protect the data and help earn the public trust: Mistrust and unease with government data collection is readily traceable to historical abuse of Americans' data (as well as recent allegations of improper access), so it's not surprising that many are wary of the Trump Administration's plans. Ensuring data cannot be weaponized by the government against individuals is perhaps the single biggest barrier to creating a useful database, but it can be done. Those currently using federal health care data must already undergo training and comply with very high data-security standards. Misuse of the data—such as even attempting to figure out the identity of an anonymous individual in the data—or failure to protect patient privacy can lead to criminal penalties. A platform of sensitive data without well-delineated restrictions on who can use it and what they can use it for is a recipe for problems. Other ongoing efforts by the Administration to compile data under the vague goal of 'increasing government efficiency' have been met with pushback and lawsuits from organizations concerned about data being used against members of the public. Current use of federal health data also requires researchers to provide the government detailed plans to justify the use of specific data. This allows the government to ensure that no more data than is needed to answer the specific question is provided to researchers. Read More: Why Do Taxi Drivers Have a Lower Risk of Alzheimer's? Researchers must also obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board prior to accessing and analyzing data, a second checkpoint. These boards, which exist in light of egregious failures of medical research ethics in the 20th century, help ensure that analyses are designed to minimize risk to patients—even if it is only their data, and not their bodies, at risk. Transparency into who is using this sensitive data and what exactly they are doing with it can engender trust between researchers and the American public. Just like researchers already do for clinical trials, those accessing the data platform should specify their plans in advance, and those plans should be easily and publicly available. Transparency around which data were accessed and what computer code was used to analyze it not only promotes trust, but such data- and code-sharing practices among researchers make it easier to appraise the quality of the work, identify mistakes, and root out misconduct. We can only assume that Americans' unease with governmental data use stems from knowledge that, as with all powerful tools, linked data has the potential to be used in potentially harmful ways. But when in the hands of qualified scientists using rigorous scientific methods and privacy safeguards, a robust real-world data platform like this could lead to new discoveries about how all of us can lead healthier lives. Contact us at letters@
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
US children struggle to catch up educationally while poverty further burdens Kentucky's kids
The Annie E. Casey Foundation's latest report on child wellbeing finds a decline in the share of Kentucky kids in preschool. (Photo by Getty Images) This story discusses suicide. If you or someone you know is contemplating suicide, please call or text the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 988. Kentucky's kids are struggling in school more than they did pre-pandemic, according to a new report on child wellbeing from the Annie E. Casey Foundation. While Kentucky children improved in the last few years on a few measures — more have health insurance, for example — every measure of education worsened, according to the KIDS COUNT County Data Book, released Monday. From 2019-2023, about 63% of Kentucky's children ages 3 and 4 were not in school, an increase from 58% from 2014-2018. In 2024, 67% of Kentucky's fourth graders were less than proficient in reading. That's up from 65% in 2019. That same year, most — 76% — of eighth graders in the state weren't proficient in math, up from 71% in 2019. From 2021-2022, 10% of high school students did not graduate on time, an increase from 9% in 2019, according to the report. Terry Brooks, the executive director of Kentucky Youth Advocates, told the Lantern that this new data is a 'very authentic litmus test for legislators and the governor to put up or shut up when it comes to a commitment to kids.' 'The child poverty level is really … the canary in the coal mine. It tells you not just where kids are today, but it tells you where kids are going,' Brooks said. Kentucky is the 44th worst in the nation for child poverty; one in five Kentucky children live in poverty. 'That flat out means that that is an unacceptable condition — if we care, at all, about kids,' Brooks said. Lisa M. Lawson, the president and CEO of The Annie E. Casey Foundation, wrote in the latest national report that 'while progress is uneven, the direction is clear.' 'We know what kids need to grow up healthy and connected: stable homes, strong schools, nutritious food, meaningful relationships and opportunities to learn, play and grow,' Lawson wrote. 'These are shared needs across communities — and meeting them is a shared responsibility.' In several ways, Kentucky's data is similar to the national trends. In both, the education category fared the worst — 'consistent with the pandemic's well-documented toll on student learning and school experiences' — while family and community improved. Democrat Beshear renews push for universal preschool in Kentucky Trends for Kentucky, revealed in the report, include: One in five children live in poverty, ranking them 44th on this measure. From 2019-2023, 63% of young children were not in school. That number was 58% in 2014-2018. Kentucky Youth Advocates says this shows 'a continued need for a robust early childhood education infrastructure that prioritizes early learning and care for our youngest learners.' Last week, Gov. Andy Beshear signed an executive order to establish an advisory committee that will explore support for universal pre-kindergarten programs in Kentucky. There is an 'unprecedented learning loss following the pandemic and the toll of chronic absenteeism on academic performance' resulting in 67% of fourth graders scoring below proficient in reading and 76% of eighth graders not proficient in math. Kentucky has the third highest rate among the states of children who are covered by health insurance; in 2023, 3% of Kentucky children were without coverage. The death rate for children and teenagers ages 1-19 increased by 28% in 2023 from 2019. There are fewer kids living in homes with a household head who doesn't have a high school diploma — the number dropped from 11% in 2019 to 9% in 2023. There were fewer teen births in 2023, with a rate of 21 per 1,000 ages 15-19. Despite the drop, Kentucky Youth Advocates says, 'this remains the Commonwealth's worst-ranked measure relative to other states at 46th in the nation.' In 2023, there were more Kentucky babies born below optimal weight, which can lead to health problems, than in 2019 — an increase from 8.7% to 8.8%. 'This moment calls for focus, creativity and commitment,' Lawson wrote in the national report. 'It calls on leaders at every level to act boldly where improvement is needed and rely on what we know works.' The COVID-19 pandemic, which shuttered school buildings and sent kids home to learn remotely, certainly played a role in delaying youth, Brooks said. But, he added, 'to blame it on COVID is a cop-out.' 'I don't think we can continue to blame a virus for low academic achievement,' he said. 'It may have (been) exacerbated under COVID, but it wasn't created by COVID.' In the 2017-18 and 2018-19 school years, about 17% of Kentucky children were chronically absent, the Lantern previously reported, meaning they missed more than 10% of their enrolled time at school. During the 2022-23 school year, nearly 30% of Kentucky's students were chronically absent. During the 2023-4 year, it was down to 28%. Meanwhile, the Kentucky General Assembly is too focused on 'every hot button social issue there is,' Brooks said. They need to spend more time thinking about deep policy work that can improve education marks, he said. 'It's easy to criticize schools, but it takes some imagination to improve schools,' Brooks said. A retired educator and longtime advocate for children, Brooks said the poor education outcomes Kentucky is seeing now come from multiple factors, including children's poor mental health and an inadequate teaching workforce. Other items could use lawmaker attention, Brooks said, such as the SEEK formula for funding public schools, 'both in terms of adequacy and equity,' and assessment protocols. These aren't trendy policies to work on, Brooks acknowledged: 'The assessment system is deep policy work. It's not a way to grab attention.' 'In a lot of ways, forces around education are playing chicken with one another and seeing who blinks first,' Brooks said. 'And that's not the landscape for positive change.' There are some immediate policies Brooks would like to see Kentucky lawmakers consider in 2026, which is a budget year. Those include a state earned income tax credit and also a dependent child care tax credit to address childhood poverty. 'The '26 budget is probably being crafted in the General Assembly right now. I want to see if there's any dedicated effort to address childhood poverty in this budget, as well as what the governor presents,' Brooks said. 'If there is such an attempt, then kudos go to whoever is proposing that. If not, frankly, Frankfort leaders just need to be quiet about childhood poverty because they don't really care.' Not every issue facing Kentucky's kids can be fixed with a 'magic wand' from Frankfort, Brooks said, including the high mortality rate among children. The death rate for Kentucky youth 1-19 increased by 28% in 2023 from 2019. In 2023, there were 395 deaths per 100,000, the data shows, which includes suicides, accidents and homicides. There were 22,841 deaths nationally per 100,000. The pandemic hit kids hard, leading to high rates of depression and anxiety in those separated from peers and support networks. In addition, as the Lantern has reported, access to guns and medications kill kids. 'What we see is an alarming rise in children dying either because of access to medication — and I'm not talking illicit drugs, I'm talking (about) what they get out of the medicine cabinet in their parents' bathroom — and also unsafe storage of guns,' Brooks said. A variety of medications — including over the counter pain relievers like Tylenol — can hurt kids if not taken according to directions. Experts recommend securing all medications where children cannot access them, keeping bullets separate from guns and using gun locks. 'While there's certainly an abundance of responsibility that (goes) to lawmakers and the governor, there's also an abundance of responsibility to go to moms and dads and grandmas and grandpas,' Brooks said. 'Be diligent. Use common sense when it comes to making sure that little boy or little girl can't get to your gun and shoot themselves, and they can't get to your medication and overdose.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
