
Alastair Campbell's diary: The Rest Is Politics heads to Damascus
So it was quite a moment to be sitting in a huge palace in Damascus, chatting happily with Ahmed al-Sharaa, who might well have ordered the attack, and whose various al-Qaida/Islamic State/al-Nusra/(delete where applicable) organisations were the reason I was advised against travelling.
After 15 years of war, and the recent collapse of the Assad regime, official Foreign Office advice remains not to go here, but a few calls to a few people assured us that 'you would have to be very unlucky' for anything bad to happen. A British security official advised: 'They are trying to show a different face to the world. They will make sure nothing goes wrong.'
And so, instead of seeking to wipe out the No 10 comms man who took so much of the blame for the war in Iraq (the one that led al-Sharaa to go and fight, ending up in American-run jails for five years for his troubles) and the Old Etonian British official given colonial-style powers over vast areas of the country once Saddam was gone, it seems we were now being looked after by him. Strange times.
From terror leader with a $10m bounty on his head, to head of a country of 23 million, with world leaders lining up to meet him; from warrior in battle fatigues two months ago to the smartly dressed, gently smiling president who greeted us in the vast palace until recently occupied by the dictator Bashar al-Assad and his hated British-born wife, Asma.
He had just returned from a visit to Saudi Arabia. We had been on standby all day, hoping to see him at 3pm, but as the day wore on, and the 'still in Saudi' messages piled up, we feared postponement or cancellation.
However, his plane landed at 9pm, and by 10.30pm the interview began. Midnight came and went, and we were still talking.
I suppose the question we were probing was one confronted many times during the Northern Ireland peace process: is it possible for someone who had been so sure that fighting, up to and including car and suicide bombings, was the way to achieving their goals, now to be just as sure that peaceful means are far, far better? Can a man of violence be a man of peace? It is barely possible to make that judgement on one meeting, even one that ran into the early hours.
As you will hear if you listen to the interview, he is definitely saying a lot of the right things. The scale of his victory is immense; the scale of the challenge in a shattered country is even greater. Right now, virtually everyone you meet says they feel happier than they did under Assad.
But we also drove through the Bekaa Valley and saw the shanty towns made of scraps of UN sheeting that have housed some of the million Syrian refugees in Lebanon over the last 14 years. Children have lived their whole lives in these tents.
There are six million Syrians outside the country – mostly in Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey – thinking of returning to their towns and villages, many of them destroyed. In Damascus, we found youth unemployment off the scale, public services close to collapse, nine out of 10 living in poverty, inflation so rampant that we needed a plastic bag to carry the $300 worth of Syrian pounds to pay the film crew.
The capital felt virtually unpoliced, Assad's security forces having largely vanished, while there is also a not inconsiderable security threat from camps housing thousands of men still committed to the jihadist cause, (some of whom would no doubt like to see al-Sharaa taken down and out).
So there is a huge amount on the presidential plate. All the more remarkable, then, that at the end of a ridiculously busy day, he still found time to see us, and seemed pretty calm, reasonably confident, and with no illusions that he has one of the toughest jobs on the planet.
The interview took place in what Assad laughably called 'the Palace of the People,' on Mount Mezzeh, West Damascus (main building 340,000 sq ft, premises overall 5.5m sq ft, presidential hospital included). The palace was the place where Assad famously, after a reasonably polite meeting with Tony Blair, launched into a vicious attack on him when meeting the media later. Thereafter we referred to any unwanted verbal onslaught as 'doing an Assad', or 'going full Assad'.
The security checks to get in were even greater for al-Sharaa than for Assad, and I couldn't help wondering, and indeed asked him, how weird it must feel to have gone from the life he had to the one he leads now. I find it hard to imagine he likes living there. There is only so much marble any one person can take in.
We entered a football pitch-sized hall, thick red carpet running through the middle of it, huge upturned silver domes hanging from the ceiling. What awful taste the Assads had. I would love to know whether their new Russian abode is as large, or as gaudy.
I would love to get them on the podcast, too. If anyone bumps into them in exile, please pass on the message. After all, we landed al-Sharaa by saying on the podcast that we would like to.
Unsurprisingly, overseas tourism has virtually collapsed, which is a shame, because there is so much to see and do; the old city, which has a claim to be the oldest city in the world – continuously inhabited for 7,000 years; beautiful mosques and churches, wonderfully colourful markets, plenty of war tourism if that rocks your boat. But the two most powerful impressions left on me were of people's resilience, especially the children, who seem to find so much to smile about, and warmth.
Twice we tried to buy things for which the seller didn't want to take money. And I lost count of how many times people just said the simple word 'welcome' on seeing the two of us walking along.
One big blot on the Syrian landscape, however… smoking. With the zeal of a convert, as a former heavy smoker I now cannot bear to be anywhere near it. In Damascus, it is hard not to be.
At breakfast this morning, at the next table were six men, five of whom seemed to be involved in a chain-smoking contest. One ate a huge omelette, fork in one hand, cigarette in the other, drawing on the latter as he chewed mouthfuls of the former.
Of the many great things the New Labour government did, banning smoking in workplaces was right up there. Thankfully there seemed to be no smoking allowed in the room where we interviewed the president. I hope this is the first step on the road to his introducing a similar ban in Syria, then a holiday might follow.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Jeremy Corbyn criticises Starmer's ‘island of strangers' speech at festival
Jeremy Corbyn has criticised Sir Keir Starmer for using the phrase 'island of strangers' in a major immigration announcement. The former Labour leader, now an independent MP after he lost the party whip, publicly challenged the Prime Minister's language on Friday. Speaking at the Wide Awake Festival in Brockwell Park, south London, Mr Corbyn said: 'Let's hear no more of this nonsense spoken by some about this being a country of strangers. 'Let's hear no more of the repetition of what the wretched Enoch Powell said when I was a young person in the 1960s. 'Our community, our strength, our joy, our lives, our hope is our diversity, is our different backgrounds.' He added: 'That's what makes London a very special place.' Sir Keir, Mr Corbyn's successor as Labour leader, suggested the UK risked becoming an 'island of strangers' if efforts to tackle migration and integration were not stepped up. Critics compared the language with that of the Conservative politician Enoch Powell, who in an inflammatory address in 1968 known as the 'rivers of blood' speech, claimed that white British people would become 'strangers in their own country' in the future. Elsewhere in his speech on the stage, Mr Corbyn called for an end to all British arms sales to Israel, and urged those attending the festival to join anti-war rallies. He said: 'This country, Britain, has supplied weapons and parts for the F-35 jets that are used to bomb Gaza. 'So when we have the demonstrations in support of the Palestine people – please be there, raise your voice. It matters by giving inspiration to those people going through the most ghastly times of their lives.' In what appeared to be a further broadside at his former colleagues in the Labour Government, Mr Corbyn suggested ministers should hike taxes on the very rich. 'You can't achieve equality and justice if you extol the virtues of billionaires and do nothing about taking money off them to pay for the decent services for the many,' he said. Elsewhere at the festival, Irish rap trio Kneecap performed just days after one of their members was charged with a terror offence. Liam O hAnnaidh, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, was charged over the alleged display of a Hezbollah flag at a gig at the O2 Forum in Kentish Town, north London, in November last year, the Metropolitan Police said on Wednesday. The Wide Awake Festival is one of several taking place in Brockwell Park over the next few weeks. Some local residents are unhappy with the damage the events cause to the park, and the large area of the green open space they take up over the course of a month. They successfully brought legal action against Lambeth Council over the use of parts of the park for the festivals, in a challenge which claimed the authority had bypassed the full planning process. The High Court ruled the council had acted 'irrationally', but the events have continued despite this, after Lambeth received fresh a planning application.


The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Pensions report cuts Reeves' planned growth funds from £160bn to £11bn
Plans to invest £160bn of surplus funds from final salary pension schemes to boost the UK economy over the next 10 years have been dealt a blow by a Whitehall assessment that found there was likely to be little more than £11bn available to spend. In a knock to Rachel Reeves's growth agenda, a report by civil servants at the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) found that the expected surpluses in occupational schemes would be used by businesses to offload their pension liabilities to insurance companies. It could mean that as little as £8.4bn would be available for companies to invest in new equipment or technology, but the figure was likely to be nearer £11bn, the DWP said on Friday. 'It is estimated that an additional £11.2bn surplus will be extracted as a result of the preferred option to legislate over a 10-year period,' the report said. Pension surpluses were a significant pillar of the chancellor's plans to use private sector funds to grow the economy during a period when state funds are likely to be severely restricted. Reeves is expected to lay out her growth plans on Wednesday in the spending review, which will set out the government priorities for the next year. Earlier this year she said about 75% of final salary schemes, also known as defined benefit schemes, were in surplus, worth £160bn, but restrictions have meant businesses have struggled to invest them. In her Mansion House speech in November, Reeves also outlined proposals for pension megafunds to be created from individual defined contribution schemes and a merger of local authority pension schemes to make the pensions industry more cost-effective. A pensions bill going through parliament will allow pension fund trustees to unlock trapped surplus funds that Reeves said would increase investment in British businesses and lift economic growth. Hundreds of final salary schemes, which spent decades in deficit, meaning the value of their obligations to members outweighed their assets, have moved into surplus in recent years after an increase in interest rates. 'Although fewer than 700,000 people are actively saving into a private sector defined benefit scheme, the sector remains a significant market within the UK economic landscape,' the report said. 'Across around 5,000 schemes, around nine million members are being supported with assets of around £1.2tn.' An impact assessment by DWP officials said legislation was needed to overhaul the pension system and give trustees the power to access surplus funds. It said a failure to act would also mean 'an opportunity to benefit members, businesses and to drive economic growth would be missed. Therefore 'do nothing' is not considered a desirable option.' However, a combination of factors means the expected surplus for investment is reduced to no more than £12bn over 10 years, in part because the legislation does not force trustees of defined benefit funds to use surpluses for investment, and that most occupational final salary schemes have reached a level where a buyout is possible. In a note for the Pension Insurance Corporation, an independent expert, John Ralfe, said: 'Forget about £160bn of pension surpluses just waiting, as Rachel Reeves said, to be paid out to 'drive growth and boost working people's pension pots'. 'The DWP figures estimate just a fraction of this – under £12bn – will be paid out over the next 10 years, mainly because most companies want a full buyout with an insurance company. 'And the bill contains no details of how pensions will be protected if cash is withdrawn. Member security must be a priority with strict rules on repaying amounts if funding deteriorates,' he added. Many pension fund trustees are known to be concerned that allowing company boards access to surplus funds could leave their schemes vulnerable after a panic in financial markets. Without strong safeguards, giving businesses access to surplus pension funds could also make them more attractive targets for foreign takeovers. It is understood the new regime will allow trustees to block moves to access surplus funds if they believe it will undermine the safety of the fund. The pensions minister Torsten Bell said: 'I have read the impact assessment, and I am satisfied that, given the available evidence, it represents a reasonable view of the likely costs, benefits and impact of the leading options.' The Treasury and the DWP were contacted for comment.


The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump-Musk feud live updates: Elon deletes tweet claiming the president is in the Epstein files amid public break-up
Elon Musk has deleted his tweet in which he claimed that Donald Trump is in 'the Epstein Files.' Musk initially shared the post on Thursday as the spat between him and the president exploded over a disagreement over Trump's congressional spending bill. The billionaire also suggested that Trump should be impeached. 'The Epstein Files' is a phrase used to describe information that U.S. authorities hold on the disgraced financier and pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who died in a Manhattan jail cell in 2019. By Saturday morning, Musk's post alleging Trump is in the files had been removed. This comes as Trump and Musk don't appear to be speaking, despite earlier rumors that a phone call might occur following their disagreement. The president shrugged off the feud in calls with multiple TV networks on Friday morning, dismissing Musk as a 'man who has lost his mind,' saying he was 'not particularly' interested in reconciliation, and 'the poor guy's got a problem.' Mass deportations from Trump's Big, Beautiful Bill could quietly cost U.S. over $1.4 trillion Mass deportations enabled by the Trump administration's Big, Beautiful Bill spending and tax package could cost the U.S. over $1 trillion in the coming years, as the administration is already reportedly struggling to fund its rapidly expanding immigration crackdown. The package, which the House of Representatives passed last month, directs $168 billion towards immigration and border law enforcement agencies. That spending, combined with the economic impact of removing scores of immigrants and more granular changes, like a potential decline in revenues thanks to the possible deterrent effect of new fees on migrants, could cost the U.S. over $1.4 trillion over the next decade, according to an analysis from the libertarian Cato Institute. Mass deportations from Trump's Big, Beautiful Bill could cost U.S. over $1.4 trillion White House has been fending off attacks from Elon Musk that bill adds too much to deficit Graig Graziosi7 June 2025 14:30 Trump says he's still considering cutting Musk's government subsidies, but "only if its fair" Reporters asked President Donald Trump if he was still considering cutting Elon Musk's government contracts and subsidies after he threatened to do so on Thursday. Trump said that Musk 'gets a lot of subsidy,' and that he was going to 'look at' what he's getting and consider cutting them, but 'only if it's fair for him and for the country.' On Thursday, Trump and Musk were embroiled in a public spat that saw the Tesla CEO agree with a call for the president's impeachment and insinuate that he was on notorious rapist and child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein's client list. Trump responded by threatening to end Musk's government contracts and subsidies, ostensibly as a way to save the American public money, and questioned why former President Joe Biden hadn't done so during his time in office. Graig Graziosi7 June 2025 14:00 Trump-Musk friendship goes from meteoric rise to epic meltdown in under a year Musk was once Trump's critic and became his friend as the Tesla head pushed further right in his political leanings. It hit its apex after the assassination attempt on Trump in July. Musk then joined Trump on the campaign and quickly dubbed himself 'first buddy.' That led to Musk becoming the head of the Department of Government Efficiency, which was tasked with slashing the federal budget. The relationship turned sour as the two disagreed over Trump's spending bill. Musk left the White House and the two remained friendly, at least in public. That changed as Musk posted criticism of the bill online and culminating with the meltdown on social media between the two. Read more here about their history together: A timeline of Donald Trump and Elon Musk's tumultuous relationship Though the tech billionaire quickly rose to the (self-titled) position of 'first buddy,' it ended in a flash, writes Mike Bedigan and Isabel Keane Rebecca Whittaker7 June 2025 13:40 Trumps Tesla spotted parked outside the WhiteHouse President Donald Trump is thinking of getting rid of the red Tesla that he bought from Elon Musk earlier this year. He is considering either selling theModel S electric vehicle, priced at around $80,000, or giving it away, The Wall Street Journal reported, citing a senior White House official. The car was pictured Friday parked outside the West Wing between the White House and the Eisenhower Executive Office Building. It comes after Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, lost $34 billion in net worth on Thursday after his company's stock plummeted in response to the online fight. Rebecca Whittaker7 June 2025 13:20 Kash Patel has live mid-interview 'WTF' moment on Joe Rogan as he learns of Trump vs. Musk FBI Director Kash Patel first learned that the world's richest man had just accused his boss of being in the so-called 'Epstein Files' while taping an episode of Joe Rogan's podcast on Thursday. Patel, who has come under fire from MAGA supporters in recent weeks for backing away from conspiracy theories about disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein now that he leads the FBI, appeared taken aback by Elon Musk's wild tweets about Donald Trump's lengthy past relationship with Epstein. 'That's way outside my lane,' Patel demurred while Rogan wondered 'what the f*ck' was going on between the president and his former 'first buddy.' Justin Baragona reports. Kash Patel has 'WTF' moment on Joe Rogan as he learns of Trump vs. Musk mid-interview 'I'm not participating in any of that conversation between Elon and Trump,' Kash Patel insisted during the interview. Graig Graziosi7 June 2025 13:00 'The Trump and Musk spat is turning them both into billion-dollar losers in every way' The boys are going at it. Like two heavies in the playground, the once richest man on Earth and on who thinks he is the most powerful are locked in a scrap, writes Chris Blackhurst. He added the fallout hit them both. Trump says that Musk and his companies receive 'billions of dollars' in government subsidies and contracts. He could cut them. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social Platform. Read more by Chris Blackhurst here: The Trump and Musk spat is turning them both into billion-dollar losers in every way As the 'first buddy' turns first enemy, Chris Blackhurst looks at the feud between the president and tech billionaire and how much it could cost them in real terms Rebecca Whittaker7 June 2025 12:40 Recap: How the Musk and Trump war of words exploded on social media Rebecca Whittaker7 June 2025 12:22 Trump administration scrambling to rehire workers cut by DOGE Departments and agencies across the federal government are scrambling to fill crucial roles left vacant over the Department of Government Efficiency's mass firings and deferred resignation offers. For months, DOGE has demanded departments and agencies dramatically downsize as part of efforts to cut government spending. Some employees have been incentivized to leave with early retirement offers or buyouts. Others, such as probationary employees, have been dismissed. But now, those same departments and agencies have been left understaffed and are struggling to get workers back. Ariana Baio has the story. Trump team scrambles to rehire workers cut by DOGE to fill critical government roles Rescinding reduction-in-force notices, asking for volunteers, and offering jobs to fired federal workers are some of the ways departments are trying to bulk up staff. Graig Graziosi7 June 2025 12:00 LGBTQ+ people march following rollback of queer rights In a bid show defiance to President Donald Trump's rollback of queer rights, LGBTQ+ people from around the world will march through the streets of Washington on Saturday. It comes after transgender people were banned from serving in the armed forces. While proponents of DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) consider it necessary to correct historic inequities, the White House has described it as a form of discrimination based on race or gender, and said its transgender policy protects women by keeping transgender women out of shared spaces. The parade route will come within one block of the White House grounds in one of the final main events of the weeks-long WorldPride celebration. On Sunday a more political event, dubbed a rally and march, will convene at the Lincoln Memorial, a revered space in the US civil rights movement as the site of Martin Luther King Jr.'s "I Have a Dream" speech in 1963. Rebecca Whittaker7 June 2025 11:45 Voters opinions on the Trump-Musk feud Voters were confident the feud would 'blow over', the BBC reported. Melanie in Georgia told the broadcaster: That the "two very strong, intelligent, brilliant men" approach things from different perspectives and believes it will all "blow over". Emana in New York said it's "very serious" for Musk to be making allegations about the president, but that she is "cautiously optimistic" it will be resolved. While Duke Machado from Texas, said he supports Trump's "big, beautiful bill" because it represents "common sense American priorities... cutting taxes puts money back in the pockets of hard-working families".