Centrist Nicuşor Dan on course to win Romanian presidential election with 99% of votes counted
The centrist mayor of Bucharest, Nicuşor Dan, is set to win
Romania
's pivotal presidential election with 99 per cent of votes counted, according to official figures showing the pro-
European Union
independent eight points clear of his far-right rival, George Simion.
The figures from Romania's central election authority showed Dan, who had cast the second round vote as a battle between 'a pro-western and an anti-western Romania', on 54.2 per cent, while Simion, a self-professed Trump admirer, had 45.8 per cent.
Voters in
Poland
and
Portugal
also cast their ballots in a European electoral 'super Sunday.
Portugal's incumbent, centre-right Democratic Alliance (AD) has won the country's third snap general election in three years – but once again fallen well short of a majority – as the underperforming socialists were left vying for second place with the far-right Chega party, which took a record 22 per cent of the vote.
READ MORE
Democratic Alliance leader and prime minister of Portugal, Luis Montenegro, arrives for the election night count with his wife Carla Montenegro in Lisbon on Sunday. Photograph: Filipe Amorim/AFP via Getty Images
By midnight on Sunday, with 99 per cent of the votes counted, the AD – led by the prime minister, Luís Montenegro – had won 32.2 per cent of the vote and taken 81 seats in the Portugal's 230-seat assembly, leaving it far shy of the 116 needed for a majority. The Socialist party (PS) had taken 23.4 per cent of the vote and 55 seats to Chega's 22.6 per cent and 54 seats.
In Poland, the first run-off poll indicated the presidential election was all to play for. Speaking after the exit poll was announced, centrist Warsaw mayor Rafał Trzaskowski sought to mobilise his voters as he warned that his lead over the radical-right rival, Karol Nawrocki, was 'razor-thin'.
The first poll conducted after Sunday's vote showed that Trzaskowski led Nawrocki by just two percentage points, 46 per cent to 44 per cent when it comes to voting intention ahead of the runoff on June 1st.
In Romania, Bucharest's two-term mayor, who made his name fighting corrupt property developers, said voters seeking 'profound change, functioning state institutions, less corruption, a prosperous economy and a society of dialogue, not hate, have won'.
Simion disputed the results. He said: 'We are the clear winners of these elections. We claim victory in the name of the Romanian people.' He promised a parallel vote count by his supporters would 'ensure the identification of any potential fraud'.
It is unclear what steps the populist candidate could take to contest the outcome. Sergiu Mișcoiu, a political scientist, predicted protests but said that, with several percentage points between the results, it was 'hard to believe he'd be able to challenge them'.
Simion's supporters received messages on Sunday evening telling them to protest 'if the fraud continues' and calling for a 'national protest' on Monday 'if they try to steal the victory of the Romanian people'.
Analysts have described the elections as the most important in the country's post-communist history, with significant implications for the country's strategic orientation and economic prospects as well as for EU unity.
[
Romanian run-off the most crucial vote on Europe's 'Super Sunday' of elections
Opens in new window
]
Simion won the May 4th first round, triggering the collapse of Romania's government of centre-left Social Democrats (PSD) and centre-right Liberals (PNL). The new president will nominate the next prime minister and influence the formation of a new coalition.
The former soccer ultra and ultranationalist agitator, who sees his far-right AUR party as a 'natural ally' of the US Maga movement, scored almost double his rival's total, but polls in recent days had shown the gap between the two narrowing.
Turnout, which totalled 53 per cent in the first round, was almost 65 per cent, with young people and Romanians living abroad in particular voting in significantly higher numbers, official figures showed. Analysts had said a high turnout would favour Dan.
The vote is a rerun of last November's ballot, won by Călin Georgescu, a far-right, Moscow-friendly firebrand, who was barred from standing again after the vote was cancelled amid allegations of campaign finance violations and Russian meddling.
The Romanian foreign ministry said earlier on Sunday it had seen 'a viral campaign of fake news on Telegram and other social media platforms' designed 'to influence the electoral process', adding that this bore 'the hallmarks of Russian interference'.
Simion had promised to nominate Georgescu, who is under formal investigation on counts including misreporting campaign spending, illegal use of digital technology and promoting fascist groups, as prime minister if he became president.
He pledged on Sunday he would keep that promise, adding: 'This is not my victory, but that of the Romanian people, humiliated, robbed and lied to so many times before. It is the victory of a man who should have been president: Călin Georgescu.'
Romanian presidents have a semi-executive role, with considerable powers over foreign policy, national security, defence spending and judicial appointments, and can also dissolve parliament if MPs reject two prime ministerial nominations.
Dan (55) had campaigned on a pledge to fight rampant corruption, to maintain support for Ukraine – where Romania has played an important logistic role – and to keep the country firmly within the European mainstream.
He is backed by the Union to Save Romania (USR), a pro-EU, anti-corruption party that he co-founded, and was endorsed by the PNL. He is thought likely to nominate a USR prime minister and try to form a minority government, possibly backed by the PNL.
Addressing his jubilant supporters in central Bucharest, he said on Sunday he would start talks on forming a new government on Monday but acknowledged his job would be hard. 'There will be a difficult period ahead, needed for economic rebalancing,' he said. 'Please have hope and patience.'
Simion opposed further aid to Ukraine and had sharply criticised the EU's leadership. While he insisted he wants Romania to stay in the EU and Nato, he could have allied with Hungary's Viktor Orbán and Slovakia's Robert Fico as another disruptive force.
Mujtaba Rahman, of the Eurasia Group consultancy, said the outcome was 'a really strong result for the pro-European candidate', reflecting the way 'concerns about political and policy direction moving in a Maga-like way have mobilised voters'.
The founder of the Telegram messaging app, Pavel Durov, earlier appeared to accuse the French government of asking the company to 'silence conservative voices in Romania in the election'. France 'categorically rejected' what it called 'completely unfounded allegations'.
Russian-born Durov, who is now a French national, is being investigated in France over possession of child abuse image, drug trafficking and fraudulent transactions on the app.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Letters to the Editor, June 5th: On immigration, trade union dues and red squirrels
Sir, – Michael McDowell (' EU cannot ignore what's happening in Poland and the Netherlands ,' Opinion, June 4th) presents a cynical view of so called 'EU fragility' in the face of populism. The real threat to European stability is not migration, but far-right nationalism and the failure of democrats to sufficiently oppose it. EU immigration policy is being misrepresented by people like Mr McDowell. According to Eurostat, more than 72 per cent of non-EU immigrants of working age in the EU are employed, a figure that exceeds employment rates in many native-born populations. These individuals are not a burden; they are essential to keeping European economies functioning, particularly in care, construction, and the service and transport industries. READ MORE Instead of platforming opposition to immigration, European leaders should be articulating an opposition to fascist ideologies now resurgent across the world. The lesson of the 1930s was that appeasement emboldens extremists. Migration scapegoating is nothing less than cowardice in the face of this new fascism. The EU faces a demographic crisis. Eurostat projects that by 2050 the EU's working-age population will shrink by nearly 50 million. Without inward migration, welfare systems will become unsustainable. The only viable path forward is a managed migration system that upholds European values while addressing real economic needs. Poland and the Netherlands may be warning signs, but not for the reasons Mr McDowell suggests. The real crisis is not federalism, but the failure to confront the anti-democratic forces undermining it from within. – Yours, etc, DECLAN DOYLE, Kilkenny. Whither the weather? Sir, – In this time of world chaos and such turmoil, I was comforted in my bed early this morning listening to the weather forecast to hear that the showers heading in our direction in the Northwest were organised as opposed to scattered as predicted elsewhere in the country. We always knew we were different up here in Donegal and as regards the weather can we speak urgently with the organiser? – Yours, etc, JOHN O'CONNELL, Letterkenny, Co Donegal. Paying trade union dues Sir, – The trade union Fórsa has called on the Government to 'require workers who benefit from salary deals . . . to pay dues or subscriptions [to trade unions] even if they are not members' in order to prevent them from 'free-riding' on the benefits of those deals (' Public sector union calls for non-members benefiting from salary deals to be forced to pay dues ,' June 2nd). The obvious question is, if the Government was to effectively force workers to join trade unions, then why stop there? Should people also be forced to donate to Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil, to prevent them from 'free-riding' on government decisions which they benefit from? Or what about forcing people to join a church and contribute to it, to prevent them from 'free-riding' on the prayers of others? The possibilities are endless. Would Fórsa also support these outcomes? Thankfully, we have a Constitution which protects freedom of association and prevents the State from forcing anyone to join or contribute directly to any private organisation. The general secretary of Fórsa is paid €186,000 per annum, three times the average salary of the public sector workers who they want to force to fund its operations. The suggestion that the Oireachtas should enforce some form of 'closed shop' to pay for this harks back to a time decades ago when trade unions expected, as of right, a 'cut' of any benefits gained by workers. – Yours etc BARRY WALSH, Clontarf, Dublin 3. Miracle required Sir, – Stephen O'Sullivan reflects on the unhappy fate of 'people who have borne the title of 'tsar' in its myriad linguistic variations' (Letters, June 3rd). Among those he lists is Karl I of Austria-Hungary. While his fate at the end of the first World War was indeed unfortunate, it seems that he enjoys the very best of what the afterlife has to offer, having been beatified by Pope John Paul II in 2004 – and the cause for his canonisation is active. Another miracle is required for his canonisation. Maybe we should pray to him to solve the housing crisis in Ireland. Interceding with him for that miracle would likely be more efficacious than appointing a 'housing tsar'. – Yours, etc, FELIX M LARKIN, Cabinteely, Dublin 18. Funding the arts Sir, – The recent controversy surrounding the Arts Council's €6.6 million spend on a failed IT project invites a deeper conversation – not only about financial oversight, but about how arts funding is structured in this country. Too often, when additional money flows into the sector, it's accompanied by a parallel growth in consultancy, compliance, and oversight roles. These positions are not always filled by those with lived artistic experience, and are rarely held to the performance standards expected in sectors like tech or finance. The result? Those around the arts often prosper more reliably than those who actually make it. While artists are frequently required to demonstrate tangible outcomes or community impact – sometimes before the work even exists – those in administrative or consultancy roles tend to operate with far less visible scrutiny. Much of the current funding model treats art as product, not provocation or inquiry. The application process is often invasive, time-consuming, and artistically irrelevant – better designed to reward those fluent in institutional language than those pushing creative boundaries. The hoops increasingly serve funders more than artists. One wonders whether Joyce or Stravinsky would have made it through. If we are serious about supporting artistic excellence, we must start by trusting artists – with funding, time, space, and mentorship – and by acknowledging that not all valuable outcomes can be measured in neat reports or footfall figures. If a growing share of arts funding is funnelled into administrative structures and underperforming consultancy contracts, while artists continue to struggle for basic support, then we're not just failing artists – we're failing taxpayers too. Public investment in the arts should enable creation, not bureaucracy. – Yours etc, YVONNE O'REILLY, Terenure, Dublin. Killings in Gaza Sir, – Just when we thought it could not get any worse, it does. Killing people who are desperate to secure food for themselves and their families is absolutely appalling and inhuman. One can only assume that this is the plan of the Israeli government, regardless of how they try to justify their behaviour. There is no justification for what they are doing and the international community needs to demand they stop and then hold the Israeli government to account. I suspect that the vast majority of the Israeli people would not support what is happening in Gaza. Unfortunately, they do not see what we see on a daily basis. Of course, we all condemn what happened on October 7th 2023 and we want all the remaining hostages to be released. However, what happened does not and cannot justify what the Israeli government is doing. The US also needs to step up in defence of innocent children, women and men. Their silence is deafening and it is giving the Israeli government the support they need to keep doing these terrible and inhuman acts. – Yours, etc, PAULA MOLLOY, Dublin 13. Use of word 'mongrels' Sir, – I would like to respond to your online headline of Saturday, May 31st, which quotes Prof Bríona Nic Dhiarmada – 'We Irish were never homogeneous. Always hybrids, always mongrels'. The first settlers of Ireland, Western European hunter-gatherers from approximately 8000 BC, were few and were eventually absorbed by Neolithic farmers arriving from 6000 years ago. That small population was in turn replaced by Bronze Age settlement starting around 2500 BC. There is genetic evidence to suggest the farmers were overwhelmed by the metallurgists. Around 80-85 per cent of Irish males carry the R1b-M269 haplogroup from this Bronze Age settlement. This is a simplified example from the hugely complex area of study on genetic variation in Ireland, but nonetheless it is true. Later invasions by Vikings, Anglo-Normans, the English plantations, and normal migration have had modest effects on genetic continuity from the 4500-year-old Bronze Age settlements of Ireland. Distinct ancestral genetic contributions noted among the Japanese population, or the Egyptian population, as random examples, would not lead, I hope, to their people ever being described as mongrels. A wholly homogeneous tribe would be extremely rare on earth, but that doesn't stop us recognising and respecting other people's tribal ethnicities. While the Irish have happily welcomed many to our land, it must be noted that geographical placement and low ancestral mobility has meant that, contrary to the rather startling descriptors used in your headline, we have been for at least four millennia a relatively homogenous, indigenous people. – Yours, etc, DEIRDRE CALLERY, Blacklion, Co Cavan. Sir, – As an Irish woman, I am deeply offended and appalled by the use of the derogatory term 'mongrels' in reference to the Irish people. This language is not only disrespectful but entirely inaccurate. The author of the article in question appears to have a misguided understanding of Irish history. Attempting to portray the Irish as 'mongrelised' – whether as a verb or adjective – is an unacceptable distortion of our heritage. This kind of narrative constitutes a form of historical revisionism that seeks to manipulate public perception and undermine national identity. I strongly urge you to retract this article and replace it with an accurate and respectful representation of Irish history. Our people deserve to have their past told truthfully and with dignity. – Yours, etc, NIAMH HEVERIN, Co Mayo. Forensics and fires Sir, – Your article on the tragic deaths in a Connemara house fire ('Former US death row inmate dies in Connemara House Fire ', June 4th), refers to 'a forensic examination being carried out'. Also included is 'the results of the postmortems, along with the findings of the technical examination, will determine the course of the Garda investigation'. This would appear to relate to a possible criminal investigation. But what if there was no criminality involved? Will the public ever be informed of the cause of the fire so that preventive measures can be taken to avoid any recurrence? Many house fires involving fatalities take place in our country each year, but helpful information gleaned from follow-up investigations rarely finds its way into the public domain. Yours, etc, EAMON O'FLYNN, Merrion Road, Dublin 4 Walkway economics Sir, – It has been calculated that the estimated economic impact on Bray and Greystones of the closure of the 7km cliff walk is an annual reduction in spending of ¤18.4 million. Does this mean our failure to open a 250km coastal walkway from Carlingford to Rosslare is causing a ¤657 million reduction in spending, That would be a total ¤2.6 billion spending reduction over four years. I suspect this idea of a new walkway will be like my new theory of inertia, it just won't gain momentum. – Yours, etc, DERMOT O'ROURKE, Lucan, Dublin. Tomb of Mary O'Connell Sir, I refer to the piece by Justine McCarthy on the tomb of Mary O'Connell on Abbey Island, Derrynane (Opinion, May 30th). As a member of the O'Connell family, we fully agree that the tomb needs restoration and are actively engaged in this task. Work was commissioned over a year ago before being halted in consultation with the OPW on the technical details on the best way to approach such restoration. Indeed, we are in the process of taking advice from various experts who are experienced in this type of project, including advice from the Glasnevin Trust. Funding is not the issue. We would wish this process to go much faster and I take responsibility for its tardiness. Unfortunately, it is turning out to be more complex than a bike shed! This is both a historic monument and a family resting place for my parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles and other members of my family through the ages. Indeed, my wife and I hope to join them in the (hopefully) distant future. We are inordinately proud of the women in the family, including both Mary and The Liberator's grand mother, Mháire Ní Dhuibh O'Donoghue, and their own contributions to Irish history as well as my mother, Dr Una O'Connell, who was an early pioneer as a female consultant in the NHS. I have a great deal of respect for Justine's journalism and her many excellent articles. However, it would have been preferable not to use a family grave for an article about respect of women, however commendable such an objective. I was also surprised that the Liberator's active promotion of women's rights was not mentioned but that is for another (soon) day. – Yours, etc, DANIEL O'CONNELL, Great, great, great grandson of the Liberator, Co Kerry. Squirrel spotting Sir, – Noting recent correspondence about red squirrels, one place where they may be found is the churchyard of St Luke's in Formby, near Liverpool, which is also the burial place of Percy French. Visiting his grave, I have often sat quietly on a bench and watched them - far more appealing than their ubiquitous grey relatives. – Yours, etc , PAUL GRIFFIN, Liverpool.
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Why Poland's dramatic election result is a setback for Europe
Poland is facing political deadlock after pro-Trump candidate Karol Nawrocki, backed by the country's right-wing opposition, won Sunday's presidential by less than two percentage points. He defeated liberal Warsaw mayor Rafal Trzaskowski, who represented the party of Poland's prime minister Donald Tusk. Political observers say Mr Tusk's Sunday election loss was in part a sign of growing discontent with his government's progress in making good on election promises that propelled him to power 18 months ago. The election of Eurosceptic historian Nawrocki also has major implications for the EU. READ MORE On today's podcast Hugh Linehan discusses the outcome with Berlin correspondent Derek Scally.
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Geert Wilders gambles on election at the risk of losing political allies
Geert Wilders 's second taste of power lasted less than a year. Will Europe's veteran populist ever get another? The far-right firebrand brought down the Dutch government on Tuesday, 17 months after winning national elections for the first time and forming one of the most rightwing coalitions in history. But his patience with the constraints of governing snapped as his partners refused to sign up to an immigration policy that they said was almost certainly illegal. 'I will continue and become the next prime minister of the Netherlands,' Wilders told the media as the incumbent, Dick Schoof, tendered his resignation to the king. READ MORE For the anti-Islamic politician, the move was a trademark political gamble: create upheaval, stand out as the authentic voice of the far right, and rely on voters to make his Freedom Party impossible to ignore. But in the notoriously fragmented arena of Dutch politics, where 15 parties claim seats in parliament, it is a gamble that still requires Wilders ultimately finding allies to share power – a task he is making ever more difficult. 'It's unlikely anyone will govern with Wilders again,' said Sarah de Lange, professor of political pluralism at the University of Amsterdam. Wilders's three coalition partners had already scotched his dream to claim the premiership after he won the November 2023 election. They agreed to join a government but only if the volatile Wilders was not in charge. The compromise saw the four party leaders remain in parliament, naming technocrats and other MPs to the cabinet. Wilders picked Schoof, a former spy chief with no political experience. He had no party affiliation and struggled to control the unwieldy coalition. But his old knack for uncovering secrets would have often seemed essential: ministers gathered in party groups before cabinet meetings to agree positions, with Schoof largely kept out of the loop. Even attempts to team build fell flat. One morale-boosting card game was reportedly interrupted when Pieter Omtzigt, the leader and founder of the centre-right New Social Contract, walked out over a budget disagreement. He has since quit politics, handing over to his deputy. Wilders's move to abandon the four-way coalition, where his Freedom party was the biggest group, was interpreted as an attempt to put migration at the heart of any new election campaign. But for his coalition partners and rivals, the abrupt move seemed to reinforce his role as the renegade of Dutch politics. Even his closest government allies rounded on him, including the radical rightwing Farmer-Citizen Movement (BBB), which had backed his campaign to 'put the Dutch first'. 'I think Geert Wilders is betraying the Netherlands,' said Mona Keijzer, the BBB housing minister, on her way into the cabinet meeting. 'He ultimately put himself first, instead of the Netherlands.' Sophie Hermans, of the conservative liberal VVD, said she was 'angry, pissed off, disappointed'. 'How can you do this at such a moment, when you look at what is going on in the world and in our country?' The veteran anti-Islam campaigner, who lives in a safe house because of death threats, had attacked the government repeatedly over asylum policy. 'I signed up for the strictest asylum policy, not for the downfall of the Netherlands,' he said. However, other party leaders said the asylum minister, Marjolein Faber of the Freedom Party, had declined to present proposals on how to cut numbers arriving. 'He's blaming the others for the failure of his own minister,' said a senior member of one of the coalition parties. Immigration policy has become the bane of several Dutch coalition governments. Mark Rutte, the long-time prime minister from the VVD, broke up his own coalition in 2023 for refusing to back tougher migration policies. The Netherlands, one of the world's most densely populated countries, has struggled to accommodate hundreds of thousands of refugees in recent years. Reception centres overflowed and a housing shortage was exacerbated. Wilders responded with a 10-point plan to cut migration and demanded the other coalition leaders signed. It included using the army to patrol the border, closing refugee accommodation centres and sending home all Syrian refugees because the country is now safe. It would also ban family members from joining refugees who were already in the Netherlands. But for all the friction over migration policy within the coalition, polls suggest the Netherlands could return to its more traditional centrist position. The Dutch set the populist pace for the EU in 2022 when the BBB won regional elections and then again when Wilders topped the 2023 poll. But no party has suffered more in polls since the election than Wilders. One person close to the VVD said the current leader, Dilan Yesilgoz, had erred in the last campaign by failing to rule out a deal with Wilders, which boosted his profile. 'Now he's had a chance and blown it. He's heading for opposition. The next election will be about security and defence.' Dutch politics is so volatile that the NSC and BBB are likely to be almost wiped out at the election, expected in September The VVD, which can govern with the centre left or centre right, is polling between 25-31 seats, about the same as the Freedom party. The Labour/Green alliance led by former European Commission vice-president Frans Timmermans is between 25 and 29. The resurgent Christian Democrats, who suffered heavily from defections to the NSC, set up by their former MP Omtzigt, are on 16-20. Any government needs 76 of the 150 MPs in the lower house of parliament. Deniz Horzum, a former Dutch official, said it would be a traditional battle between left and right. 'Expect VVD and Labour/GreenLeft to turn this into a political duopoly: vote for me or you get the crazies on the other side.' He said a coalition led by either would return one of the founder members of the European project to the centre of EU affairs. 'After years of punching above our weight in Brussels, we started shooting ourselves in the foot during this last period. A more traditional, stable and centrist coalition might help restore our position.' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
