BMC serves notices to Vile Parle hotel next to razed Jain temple
Mumbai: A day after the
BMC
inspected
Hotel Ram Krishna
in
Vile Parle
, adjoining the Jain temple site which was demolished, it served two notices to two structures of the hotel.
The notices were served under Section 53 (1) of MRTP Act 1966 for unauthorised construction; the BMC gives a 30-day time period to reply to such notices under the Act.
You Can Also Check:
Mumbai AQI
|
Weather in Mumbai
|
Bank Holidays in Mumbai
|
Public Holidays in Mumbai
A senior BMC official said as the hotel is an old structure dating back to 1977, they also called for detailed plans from the Development Plan (DP) department on it.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Complete protection with iPru All-in-one Term Plan
ICICI Pru Life Insurance Plan
Get Quote
Undo
Over the past two days, civic officers checked whether there were any illegal alterations or additions to the structure. The demand for inspection was also made by the Jain temple trustees.
Meanwhile, a hearing was held at the minority commission, attended by civic officials on Thursday, in which the BMC was asked to put forth its say regarding the demolition of the temple on April 16.
"We presented the facts before the commission on why the action was taken," said a civic official.
Over the past weekend, the BMC had transferred its ward officer, Navnath Ghadge, following an uproar over the demolition of the temple.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Fresh FIR against Nikant Jain for Rs 4 crore bank fraud
1 2 3 Lucknow: Hazratganj police on Tuesday lodged a fresh FIR against Nikant Jain, the alleged kingpin in the Rs 8,000-crore solar commission scam. This is the sixth FIR against Jain, who is currently lodged in Lucknow district jail. Three FIRs were lodged starting March 20 from his arrest in Gomtinagar, then in Wazirgaj on May 26, and then in Hazratganj on June 10. The other FIRs are one each in Meerut, Etah, and one more in Wazirganj lodged in 2019. This new case is linked to a massive financial fraud involving forged property valuations and criminal conspiracy to defraud Indian Bank of Rs 4 crore in 2017–2018. The new FIR was registered on the complaint of Ashish Jindal, branch manager of Indian Bank's Stressed Asset Management Branch, Lucknow. As per the FIR, Jain, along with his co-accused — Sukant Jain and Vaishali Jain —fraudulently obtained a loan of Rs 4 crore in the name of their registered company, M/s SSJ Agrotech Pvt Ltd. The loan was taken against two properties mortgaged by the company. However, later, the company sought permission from the bank to substitute the first property with a third property. This substitution was approved by the bank. Things took a turn in 2018 when the account turned into a Non-Performing Asset (NPA). by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like SNS에서 화제인 그 팔찌, 예쁜데 의미까지... 굿네이버스 더 알아보기 Undo During SARFAESI proceedings, a fresh valuation of the substituted property revealed that its actual market value was significantly lower than earlier presented. The inquiry, led by an internal committee, concluded that M/s SSJ Agrotech grossly inflated the value of the mortgaged properties. The bank declared the account as "fraud" and blacklisted the valuers involved. It initially approached the CBI for action but instead served a final notice to the company on Oct 21, 2024. Later, the bank approached the Economic Offences Wing (EOW), Lucknow, with a formal request to register an FIR, said ACP, Hazratganj, Vikas Kumar Jaiswal.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Fraud PIL filed in court, GDA stalls approvals for 137 plots in Swarn Jayanti Puram scheme
Ghaziabad: Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA) has barred map approvals for 137 plots in the Swarn Jayanti Puram housing scheme, which are currently under litigation in the civil court. The scheme, launched in 1998, sold 1,553 plots of various sizes, but allotment of 137 were cancelled when owners defaulted on instalments. It was alleged that a few GDA officials, in connivance with property dealers, got the allotments of these plots restored between 2005 and 2007 after paying a paltry sum to the original allottees. The officials then got the plots transferred in their names. The irregularities came to light in 2011 when a petition was filed in the high court, alleging that officials had indulged in fraudulent means to restore cancelled plots in the area. The court had directed Moradabad range commissioner to investigate the matter. The inquiry had found some officials, including former secretary and vice chairperson of GDA, were involved in the scam, and FIRs were registered against them in Dec 2017. However, action against officials found involved in the irregularities has been slow. In Oct 2022, Allahabad high court had reprimanded the GDA, saying it "slept over these files without taking any action". by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 경기도 거주자 전용: 무료 영웅 캐릭터를 받으세요! 레이드 섀도우 레전드 Undo Sources said the Authority recently received map approval applications for some of these 137 plots. Subsequently, GDA additional secretary wrote to the town planning department asking it to bar map approvals of any of these 137 plots."There were attempts to get the map approval of 137 plots in the Swarn Jyanti Puram housing scheme, even though there is an ongoing case in the Ghaziabad civil court over plot allotment. The additional secretary has directed the town planner to cancel map approvals for these plots, if any have been cleared already," a GDA official told TOI. The fraud is estimated to have cost the state exchequer a loss of about Rs 3 crore and an additional Rs 30 lakh in stamp duty. TOI earlier reported that the 137 plots were allegedly restored at the sector rate of 1998 — when it ranged between Rs 2,575 per sqm and Rs 2,820 per sqm. But according to the rules, the plots ought to have been restored at the prevailing sector rate of 2005-2007 or 75% of the market value, whichever was higher. The sector rate then was Rs 12,000 per sqm.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Court says even earning childrendeserve compensation, awards Rs 8L
Bengaluru: Nearly two years after a 68-year-old stonecutter lost his life in a road accident, a Bengaluru court has awarded his family Rs 8 lakh in compensation. The order was passed by judge Shreyansh Doddamani of the 21st additional small causes court and motor accident claims tribunal on May 27. The fatal accident occurred on NH-75 near Bethamangala Cross in Kolar district on June 28, 2023. Rajappa, riding pillion on a motorcycle, was critically injured when a speeding car allegedly rammed the two-wheeler from behind. Thrown off the bike, he succumbed to his injuries at RL Jalappa Hospital later that evening. The resident of Shivaramapura in Kolar was a stonecutter and part-time farmer reportedly earning Rs 30,000 a month. His wife Narayanamma, and sons Amarnath SR and Manjunatha R filed a compensation claim of Rs 35 lakh under the Motor Vehicles Act, stating he was their primary breadwinner. While the car's owner, Arun Kumar PR, confirmed valid insurance with Tata AIG General Insurance Co Ltd, both he and the insurer denied negligence. Tata AIG also questioned the validity of the driver's licence and alleged policy violations, claims the tribunal rejected after examining the police chargesheet and supporting evidence. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Police held the car driver responsible for the incident under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving), 337 (causing hurt), and 304A (causing death by negligence). The tribunal noted that the respondents failed to counter these findings or provide contrary evidence. Although the family claimed a monthly income of Rs 30,000 for the deceased, the court accepted a notional income of Rs 16,000 due to a lack of documentary proof, using Karnataka Legal Services Authority guidelines. It awarded Rs 6.4 lakh for loss of dependency. Additional compensation included Rs 48,400 in spousal consortium, Rs 18,150 each for loss of estate and funeral expenses, and Rs 40,000 each to the sons in filial consortium—bringing the total to Rs 8 lakh. The court ordered Tata AIG to deposit the compensation within a month, with 70% allocated to the wife and 15% each to the sons, along with 6% annual interest from the date of filing. Citing Supreme Court and Kerala High Court rulings, the judge affirmed that even adult, earning children are legal heirs entitled to compensation, noting, "Loss of a parent cannot be measured by financial dependence alone."
