Afghans Who Helped US War Effort Snarled by Foreign Aid Freeze
The visa program specifically for Afghans who worked for the U.S. military during America's longest war has been thrown into chaos by the Trump administration's freeze on foreign aid, advocates are warning.
While applications for the program, known as the Special Immigrant Visa, or SIV, program, are still being processed, support services provided by resettlement agencies that receive State Department funding, including flights to the U.S., have been halted by the aid freeze -- all but killing SIV holders' ability to travel and escape the Taliban-controlled country.
"It's clearly a concern, and it sends a message that we're not going to keep our promises and we're not going to stand by our allies. And that's a problem because our allies and partners are the most important aspect of our national security," Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., the ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and one of the Senate's leading proponents of the SIV program, told Military.com on Wednesday.
Read Next: VA Says 44 Programs Will Continue After Review Required by Trump Federal Funding Freeze
The crippling of the SIV program is on top of a freeze in refugee admissions ordered by President Donald Trump on his first day in office that has stranded thousands of Afghans who helped the U.S. war effort but are not eligible for SIVs.
The refugee executive order did not apply to the SIV program, but advocates had already feared SIVs would be targeted next.
Those fears appeared to come to fruition late last week when the State Department announced its implementation of a separate Day One executive order calling for a 90-day pause in foreign aid while the administration reviews whether the funding aligns with its foreign policy goals.
After widespread outrage about the sweeping nature of the foreign aid pause, Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tuesday approved a waiver allowing "life-saving humanitarian assistance" to continue.
But that waiver did not help the programs SIVs rely on, said Shawn VanDiver, a Navy veteran and founder of #AfghanEvac, a coalition of groups that have helped Afghan allies come to the U.S. since the end of the war in 2021.
Among the programs losing funding during the freeze is the International Organization for Migration's travel loans program -- the way most SIV holders pay for their flights.
More than 3,000 SIV holders were already booked on flights before the aid freeze, while another 33,000 were waiting to be booked, a congressional aide told Military.com on condition of anonymity.
SIV holders could theoretically still come to the U.S. if they can afford to pay for their own flights. But once they arrive, the freeze means they won't get any help paying for rent and food, finding a job, learning English or figuring out other basic necessities.
That's because the freeze also cuts off funding for what's known as the Reception and Placement program, which provides federal funding to resettlement agencies to help SIV holders and refugees for the first 30 to 90 days they are in the country.
"The people with the big catcher's mitt at the airport and the welcome sign saying, 'Welcome to America'? Those people can't go there anymore because their funding got cut off," VanDiver said.
Congress first created the SIV program for Afghans in 2009 in order to provide a pathway for them to come to the country if they worked for the U.S. military as interpreters and in other jobs. The work put their lives in danger by making them a target for the Taliban.
The threat to their lives skyrocketed after the U.S. military withdrew from Afghanistan in 2021 and the Taliban swept back into power. Lawmakers in both parties, veterans of the war and other advocates scrambled to get as many Afghan allies out before the last U.S. troops left, but thousands were left behind.
As of the end of September, more than 53,000 completed SIV applications were still pending, according to the State Department's most recent quarterly report on the program.
Rubio was among the lawmakers who pressed the Biden administration to do more to help Afghan allies during the withdrawal.
The State Department did not provide a comment on how the foreign aid freeze is affecting the SIV program by Military.com's deadline. But in a news release Wednesday, it defended the freeze in general as "rooting out waste" and "blocking woke programs."
"Every dollar we spend, every program we fund, and every policy we pursue must make America safer, stronger, and more prosperous," the release said. "And that is exactly what we are doing right now -- prioritizing America's core national interests one dollar at a time."
The news release also outlined the process to obtain a waiver from the freeze and contended that the "process was used successfully dozens of times in the first several days alone." But, the release added, "many requests failed to provide the level of detail necessary to allow a thorough evaluation."
Despite the aid for SIV holders not yet getting a waiver, VanDiver said he remains hopeful that the effects on the SIV program were unintentional and that a waiver will be granted once the process is worked through. In the meantime, though, lives are at stake, he said.
"Exemptions for Afghan allies protect America's credibility on the world stage," he said. "Military and intelligence leaders rely on local partners to win wars, whether in Afghanistan, Iraq or future conflicts. If we break our word, why would anyone take risks for us again?"
Related: 'Friends Begging for Help': Afghan Allies Stranded After Trump Suspends Refugee Program
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
21 minutes ago
- Washington Post
‘Come and get me': Gavin Newsom has entered the meme war
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) has found himself in the center of the internet's spotlight after squaring off with President Donald Trump on social media over the deployment of military troops to counter protesters in Los Angeles. While police deployed tear gas and shot at protesters in Los Angeles with rubber bullets on Monday, Newsom shared a screenshot on TikTok of a Washington Post headline reporting that California would sue Trump over the National Guard's presence, paired with a trending sound sampled from the movie 'Mean Girls. ' The video was captioned 'We will not stand while Donald Trump illegally federalizes the National Guard' and was liked more than 255,000 times.

Associated Press
22 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Judge tosses lawsuit over Trump's firing of US African Development Foundation board members
A federal judge has tossed out a lawsuit over President Donald Trump's dismantling of a U.S. federal agency that invests in African small businesses. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington, D.C., dismissed the case on Tuesday, finding that Trump was acting within his legal authority when he fired the U.S. African Development Foundation's board members in February. In March, the same judge ruled that the administration's removal of most grant money and staff from the congressionally created agency was also legal, as long as the agency was maintained at the minimum level required by law. USADF was created as an independent agency in 1980, and its board members must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. In 2023, Congress allocated $46 million to the agency to invest in small agricultural and energy infrastructure projects and other economic development initiatives in 22 African countries. On Feb. 19, Trump issued an executive order that said USADF, the U.S. Institute of Peace, the Inter-American Foundation and the Presidio Trust should be scaled back to the minimum presence required by law. At the time, USADF had five of its seven board seats filled. A few days later, an administration official told Ward Brehm that he was fired, and emails were sent to the other board members notifying them that they had also been terminated. Those emails were never received, however, because they were sent to the wrong email addresses. The four board members, believing they still held their posts because they had not been given notice, met in March and passed a resolution appointing Brehm as the president of the board. But Trump had already appointed Pete Marocco as the new chairman of what the administration believed to now be a board of one. Since then, both men have claimed to be the president of the agency, and Brehm filed the lawsuit March 6. Leon said that even though they didn't receive the emails, the four board members were effectively terminated in February, and so they didn't have the authority to appoint Brehm to lead the board. An attorney for Brehm did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Another lawsuit over the dismantling of the agency is still pending before the same judge. In that case, two USADF staffers and a consulting firm based in Zambia that works closely with USADF contend that the Trump administration's efforts to deeply scale back the agency wrongly usurps Congress' powers. They also say Marocco was unlawfully appointed to the board, in part because he was never confirmed by the Senate as required. Leon's ruling in Brehm's case did not address whether the Trump administration had the power to install Marocco as board chair on a temporary basis.


Washington Post
22 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump-endorsed Jack Ciattarelli wins Republican primary for New Jersey governor
Jack Ciattarelli easily won the Republican nomination for New Jersey governor on Tuesday with President Donald Trump's endorsement, setting up a November general election expected to be an early national bellwether for voters' views in the first year of Trump's second term. Ciattarelli was projected the winner shortly after the polls closed, the Associated Press reported. The winner of the crowded Democratic primary was not immediately clear Tuesday night, with six candidates splitting the vote in the most expensive election in New Jersey history. Trump played a central role in the Democrats' contest, too, as the candidates vowed to fight the White House and questioned each others' anti-Trump credentials.