1,250-HP Chevrolet Corvette ZR1X Hybrid Runs The Quarter-Mile In Under 9 Seconds
The new Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 is only just now reaching dealerships in the U.S., but that twin-turbo monster is already being usurped by a new even-higher-performance version of the C8 Corvette. Long rumored to be called Zora, this new variant is actually dubbed ZR1X, and it takes the ZR1's powertrain and adds on a similar hybrid system to the one in the E-Ray for a truly ridiculous amount of power and speed.
General Motors senior vice president Ken Morris says the C8's platform was designed from the start with the ZR1X's powertrain in mind — that's probably why we started hearing rumors about it before the C8 even debuted. With 1,250 horsepower and all-wheel drive, the hybrid ZR1X is quicker to 60 mph and in the quarter-mile than any roadgoing Corvette before it, and its on-track performance is sure to be just as impressive. The standard ZR1 will soon be setting an official Nürburgring lap time, and ZR1X prototypes have already been spotted at the 'Ring as well, with the Ford Mustang GTD directly in its sights.
Read more: These Cars Are Police Magnets
At the heart of the ZR1X is the same 5.5-liter LT7 V8 that's in the standard ZR1, which is essentially the Z06's flat-plane-crank motor with a pair of turbochargers attached. All of the LT7's 1,064 horsepower and 828 pound-feet of torque are sent to the ZR1X's rear wheels through an 8-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission. Mounted at the front axle is an electric motor with 186 hp and 145 lb-ft of torque, an increase of 26 hp and 20 lb-ft over the E-Ray, with Chevy saying the ZR1X's motor has strengthened components but the same size and shape as the E-Ray's unit. The 1.9-kWh battery pack located in a central spine in the floor of the chassis has more usable energy and a higher peak operative voltage than the E-Ray's for better on-track capability.
There's no physical connection between the V8 and the electric motor — the former only powers the rear wheels, while the latter only powers the fronts. The electric motor also automatically disconnects once you reach 160 mph, having done its main job of nearly knocking you out with acceleration force. Chevy says the ZR1X will hit 60 mph from launch in under 2 seconds where the ZR1 and E-Ray need 2.3 and 2.5 seconds, respectively, and it'll run the quarter-mile in under 9 seconds at over 150 mph, versus 9.6 seconds in the ZR1 and 10.5 seconds in the E-Ray. That will make the ZR1X easily one of the quickest-accelerating cars you can buy, even among the most powerful EVs. A Lucid Air Sapphire will cover a quarter of a mile in just over 9 seconds, while a Dodge Demon will do it in just under 9 seconds. The standard ZR1 will hit 233 mph, and the ZR1X matches that.
Chevy says the ZR1X's eAWD system has "undergone a significant upgrade" compared to the E-Ray, both when it comes to on-road and on-track driving, and that it's constantly monitoring driver inputs to perfectly manage power delivery and traction. There are three different energy "strategies" for when on track, activated by a button on the steering wheel: Push-to-Pass for maximum power on demand, Qualifying for optimal lap times, and Endurance for longer lap sessions and consistent eAWD output. All 2026 Corvettes have a new PTM Pro setting for the traction management, which disables the traction and stability control systems, but in the ZR1X the regenerative braking torque vectoring remains on, as does the front axle pre-control that "actively manages inside front brake pressure to enable maximum corner-exit traction."
Optional on the normal ZR1 but standard on the ZR1X is the J59 carbon-ceramic brake package, which has Chevy's largest rotors ever at 16.5 inches front and rear paired with 10-piston front calipers and 6-piston rear calipers. Chevy says it's the most resilient braking system ever tested by GM, and engineers saw 1.9G of deceleration from 180 to 120 mph. The standard touring-focused chassis setup uses magnetic ride control and Michelin Pilot Sport 4S tires, but you can option a ZTK Performance package that has firmer springs and grippier Pilot Cup 2R tires.
You'll be able to get the ZR1X in both coupe and convertible body styles, and it'll have the same updated interior design as other 2026 Corvettes, but sadly its exterior doesn't look any different from a normal ZR1, badges aside. Real nerds will be able to spot an extra intercooler in the front bumper. The ZR1X will be available with the same Carbon Aero package as other ZR1s, which adds a gigantic rear wing, dive planes on the front bumper, a gurney lip in front of the hood vent and underbody strakes that all combine to give you 1,200 pounds of downforce at top speed.
Chevy isn't ready to talk money yet, but the ZR1X will surely command a hefty premium over the standard 2026 ZR1's $189,195 starting price. We don't know when it will go into production yet either, but it'll be built at the same Bowling Green, Kentucky, assembly plant as all other Corvettes, with the LT7 being hand-assembled there.
Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox...
Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
34 minutes ago
- CBS News
New Yorker says reporting idling vehicles through city program makes him over six figures
New Yorker says reporting idling vehicles makes him over six figures New York City — Two years ago, a New Yorker who calls himself "Streeter" left his job in marketing to become a soldier in the war on idling. "Shortly after 6, I'm out on my bike, looking for idling trucks," Streeter said. "I'm essentially biking 6, 7, 8, 9 hours a day." In New York City, it's against the law for trucks and non-city buses to idle — keeping the engine running while stationary — for more than three minutes. However, the law is rarely enforced. That's where the big money comes in for Streeter and others who report idlers. Under the Citizens Air Complaint Program, they can record idling trucks or buses, report them and keep 25% of any fines, which typically range from $350 to $600. Streeter says he makes in excess of six figures reporting idlers. George Pakenham, who's spent much of the last two decades working to clean up the air in New York City, helped make the law happen. "It's a public health issue," Pakenham said. A former Wall Street banker, Pakenham watched his brother, a non-smoker, battle Stage 4 lung cancer. Then he started wondering about the number of vehicles sitting idle and polluting the air. "So I walked up to the limo driver, tapped on the window and said, 'How about just shutting your engine off?' And he did," Pakenham said. He took his frustrations to city legislators. In 2017, they passed the law allowing people to report idling vehicles. Other cities are following suit — Los Angeles and Philadelphia are working on similar programs to stop idling. Pakenham says New York City has made just under $70 million off the program. But catching idlers isn't always easy money. And truck drivers feel "abused" over the program, said Zach Miller, a lobbyist for the Trucking Association of New York. "They find this to be a bounty hunter program," Miller said. When asked if truckers could just cut their engine off as a solution, Miller said, "They do not understand the intricacies of driving a truck in New York City. It is very hard work. There are trucks that have to operate their lift gate 15, 20 times a day." "Drive a truck in New York City for a week, and then come back to me and tell me that's an easy solution," he said. Pakenham still believes it's a major health issue. "Would you like to stand behind a bus for five minutes and breathe? I don't think so. I don't think anyone would."
The Verge
39 minutes ago
- The Verge
Mark Walter is buying majority ownership of the Lakers at a $10 billion valuation,
LeBron James, combat drones and Slate Auto? reports ESPN. Walter runs TWG Global, which owns chunks of other sports teams, and also owns a fun grab-bag of other companies, including Shield AI and Slate Auto. LeBron-themed pickup truck when?
Fast Company
40 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Why building bigger from the start is the smarter bet
For two decades, conventional startup wisdom followed a simple mantra: Build one killer feature, win a devoted audience, and expand later. Startup luminaries like Paul Graham and Sam Altman championed this approach. They argued it was better to start small, focus narrowly, and earn the right to grow. Many of today's most iconic companies followed this path, launching with a single tool that eventually evolved into a suite. But what if the problem you're solving doesn't fit neatly into one feature? What if starting small just means setting yourself up to rebuild everything later? In an increasingly complex world, customers no longer have patience for point solutions or disconnected workflows. They expect products to understand how their systems work and to match that reality with integrated, end-to-end experiences. That's why a new model is emerging. The rise of the compound startup The 'compound startup,' a term popularized by Rippling CEO Parker Conrad, describes a company that builds multiple, deeply integrated products from day one. In a January interview with Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan, Conrad explained that the goal of a compound startup is to address systems of problems, not just isolated pain points. It is a model built for how people and businesses actually operate. Most business functions don't exist in a vacuum. In Rippling's case, payroll connects to benefits, onboarding, compliance, IT provisioning, and more. Customers don't want to piece together tools to manage each of those functions. They want a system that works together out of the box. At april, we didn't just stitch together a few tax tools. We built an entire suite of products from the ground up. Filing, forecasting, planning, optimization—all designed to work in sync, and all tailored to distinct taxpayer segments like investors, small business owners, gig workers, and everyday banking customers. We chose to build in tax, one of the most complex, fragmented, and regulated categories in fintech, because the problem demanded a compound solution. Tax laws shift constantly. Each state and jurisdiction operates differently. We could have licensed a white-label provider and shipped faster. Instead, we built our own tax engine, became the first new nationally licensed e-file provider in more than 15 years, and now operate a full-stack platform with fewer external dependencies. That decision has given us speed, adaptability, and product depth our partners can't find elsewhere. Why compound startups make more sense today The shift toward compound startups isn't just philosophical. It's practical. Today's challenges rarely sit in one lane. Managing personal finances touches tax, payroll, planning, and compliance. Running a business involves HR, inventory, scheduling, payments, and reporting—all at once. Point solutions force users to become their own system integrators. They juggle multiple tools, manage disconnected data, and learn mismatched interfaces. Compound startups flip that script. They build coherence into the product architecture itself and unlock several key advantages: Unified data: Integrated platforms break down silos and allow smarter decision making across use cases. At april, data moves with consent across workflows, powering real-time tax insights, planning simulations, and filing automation. Shared UX patterns: A consistent interface builds user trust and reduces friction. Most april users complete their return in under 23 minutes—a far cry from the 13-hour average reported by the IRS. Durable switching costs: When workflows span multiple integrated tools, the platform becomes stickier and more valuable as a whole. Platform-wide network effects: When more users adopt more of the suite, value compounds across use cases. Compound startups don't just solve tasks. They solve workflows. And that makes them more durable, more useful, and more differentiated in crowded markets. The long-term payoff Of course, this approach comes with tradeoffs. Building multiple products in parallel strains focus and burns capital faster. It forces earlier decisions around architecture, compliance, and team structure. It's not the right move for every startup. But for founders tackling systems-level problems, the risk of starting too small is greater. You can't increment your way to coherence. We've seen the payoff at april. Our compound architecture has allowed us to respond faster, deliver richer experiences, and scale without compromise. The future is compound The startup playbook is evolving because the problems we're solving have evolved. Systems are messier. Users expect more. Point solutions can't keep up. Founders shouldn't be afraid to build big from the start. The world doesn't need more single-purpose tools. It needs products that actually solve the full problem. The future isn't just compound. It's integrated, full-stack, and built to scale from day one.
