Android 16's Material 3 Expressive shows just how bad iOS 26's redesign really is
Robert Triggs / Android Authority
Forget summer already; it's software season, and it's positively raining betas. Between Android 16 and the new iOS 26, I've been knee-deep in mobile OSs and, well… I have notes.
If you're a regular reader, you might know that I'm not a huge fan of Google's new Material 3 Expressive. I don't hate it, but certainly don't love its paranoia of anything approaching a right-angle. But compared to what Apple's been cooking up in iOS 26, Material 3 Expressive looks like the modern-day Creation of Adam.
Which UI design is best?
0 votes
Liquid Glass
NaN %
Material 3 Expressive
NaN %
Like Android's latest redesign, iOS 26 and its new 'Liquid Glass' UI are built to be more reactive and responsive to the user's aesthetic preference. It's also designed to unify the look across Apple's product portfolio. However, it falls well short of the mark.
I'm sure you've seen plenty of images of it online already, and it's as positively illegible as everyone says. Excessive use of transparency and refraction makes any overlay menu a headache-inducing mess and, from an accessibility standpoint, it's a disaster.
Material 3 Expressive might look flat by comparison, but its sensible, configurable color palettes avoid these kinds of jarring clashes and eyesores. It's easy to read and navigate, and gets the job done with a splash of simple customization.
A UI needs to be functional first and foremost, a lesson Apple has seemingly forgotten with Liquid Glass. Apple seriously needs to dial the transparency back before this ships. In addition, my iPhone 15 Pro has been incredibly hot and chugs down battery life since updating to iOS 26. It's too early to tell if these graphics-heavy effects are to blame, but there's a reason Windows ditched Vista's Aero Glass theme.
Liquid Glass isn't just headache-inducing, it's an accessibility nightmare.
Apple also introduced icon theming back with iOS 18 and has a new clear option to really cement its Glass design change. However, the lack of any color deprives icons of instant recognition, making the whole UI harder to navigate. While Google's color-themed icon efforts aren't great, at least they're easily distinguished from the background. Android also provides much smarter custom theming across the UI, making settings and options easy to see at a glance, regardless of your color palette. Apple still doesn't do that, and its latest glass icons are too hard to eyeball. It's bad design — plain and simple.
To be fair, the glass effect isn't terrible when paired with apps that offer mostly solid background colors. Still, using it side-by-side with Google's latest tweaks, it's hard not to conclude that Apple isn't interested in improving functionality. The camera app is a prime example; oversized cartoonish bubbles and a labyrinth of hidden layers have replaced the sleek, easily accessible, camera-inspired layout.
Customization is King
Robert Triggs / Android Authority
Putting questionable aesthetic choices aside for a minute, iOS 26 apes Material 3 Expressive with its customizable 'Control Center,' aka Android's Quick Settings menu. You can now rearrange and resize icons, allowing you to fit more or less on screen, depending on your needs.
In some ways, iOS 26 allows for even more customization with the ability to stretch toggles both vertically and horizontally. The media center, for instance, can be made taller or shorter depending on how much information you want to display, and even moved around, which you can't do on Android. However, some toggles can't be resized in every direction, so again, it can look a mess.
However, Apple's UI implementation is the real issue for me. Android 16 separates resizing and repositioning by requiring a long-press on the toggle. iOS attempts to do both simultaneously, meaning it's all too easy to drag instead of resize, causing a Microsoft Word-style cascade of layout chaos. I found it infuriating to use.
Likewise, Android has addressed a significant redundancy bugbear; the Wi-Fi and Bluetooth toggles now directly open a small window for you to configure the required settings. iOS 26 is stuck somewhere between, allowing you to toggle Wi-Fi on/off quickly but not Bluetooth, which requires you to jump through several menus to find the pairing page. Different outcomes depending on press duration or location just add to the madness.
Throwing stones at Apple's glass house
Robert Triggs / Android Authority
After spending an admittedly short time flipping through the latest versions of Android and iOS, I've come away with a significant difference in mind.
While not perfect, Material 3 Expressive is primarily focused on making Android more user-friendly. It's more customizable, tweaked to present information more clearly, and includes new additions like Live Updates. It's a quality-of-life improvement to an OS we already like; an upgrade rather than a redesign.
iOS 26, by comparison, is virtually all about appearances. Cherry-pick Liquid Glass on the right backdrop and it looks great, but the update fixes very little of my long-running bugbears when navigating the OS. Customization is marginally better, but still only skin deep and too often breaks its own aesthetic rules. Menus remain a laborious back-and-forth arm wrestle that's now arguably worse in places, and the glass design hampers rather than helps readability. It's a lick of paint on a creaking foundation.
A flashy redesign can't cover up Apple's lack of AI leadership.
The cynic in me might accuse Apple of trying to divert attention away from its lack of genuine ideas and abysmal state of Apple Intelligence with a shiny new interface. After all, these are the top two improvements in the iOS 26 press kit. However, the implementation is so poor that I am now genuinely concerned about the platform's direction of travel. Seriously, who let this beta pass quality control?
To quote ex-Apple design chief, Jonny Ive, back at the launch of iOS 7 in 2013: 'I think there is a profound and enduring beauty in simplicity; in clarity, in efficiency. True simplicity is derived from so much more than just the absence of clutter and ornamentation. It's about bringing order to complexity.'
I'll leave you to decide which modern mobile OS best lives up to that mantra.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
24 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Voyager Technologies Rises in Debut, Signaling Improving IPO Market
Shares of space and defense technology company Voyager Technologies surged in their New York Stock Exchange debut Wednesday, another sign of an improving market for initial public offerings. The stock ended the regular session at $56.48 and was up 6% after hours to $60.15.
CNET
27 minutes ago
- CNET
Google Releases Android 16 Months Earlier Than Expected. Here's How You Can Download It
A day after Apple announced iOS 26 at WWDC 25, Google has launched one of its most ambitious releases yet with the official launch of Android 16. Rolling out first to most supported Pixel phones, Android 16 lands months earlier than recent major versions, with a focus on productivity features and enhancements. These include Live Updates for tracking deliveries and rideshare cars, streamlined notifications, the ability to use desktop-style windows when your phone's connected to a monitor, new device security features, native controls for hearing aids and more. Shipping the OS in June, instead of the traditional August to September window, lets Google push fresh features into users' hands sooner, and gives phone makers extra runway to preload Android 16 on new phones set to debut in the fall. For Pixel owners, the update begins rolling out at 11 a.m. PT, with support for third-party phones coming later this year. Developers, meanwhile, get a new QPR beta that enables the external-monitor preview so they can start optimizing apps for bigger workspaces. Here's what you need to know. Android 16 arrives first on the Pixel Google is pushing a stable build of Android 16 to most supported Pixel phones today. The update layers a fresh Material 3 Expressive coat of paint on top of the OS and adds several new features, too. Android 16 will run on the Pixel 6 and later. Andrew Hoyle/CNET Live update and streamlined notifications If you're waiting for your sushi to arrive or watching your rideshare slowly inch across town, Android 16 now offers live updates that are pinned to your lock screen, so you don't have to keep opening an app to stay in the know. Also, notifications from the same app are now automatically grouped, reducing clutter on your lock screen from notification-heavy apps like Gmail and Ring. You won't receive individual notifications for a single app anymore. Google One-tap Advanced Protection for everyone A single toggle now bundles Google's toughest defenses, blocking dodgy websites, scam calls and even USB attacks while the phone is locked. Originally built for high-risk users like journalists and politicians, Advanced Protection is free and available for everyone on Android 16. Clearer calls for those with hearing aids If you use Bluetooth LE hearing aids, Android 16 lets you flip a switch that routes your voice through the phone's superior microphones instead of the tiny mics in your hearing aids, perfect for when you're in a bustling coffee shop or windy beach. There's also a new on-device panel for adjusting hearing-aid volume and presets in one place. Android 16 brings improvements for people who use hearing aids. Google Better productivity for tablet owners Tablet owners running Android 16 will get a desktop windowing mode later this year, built in partnership with Samsung. It lets you float, snap or resize multiple app windows on your device, like you would on a desktop, and Android 16 lays the groundwork for that. Android 16's desktop windowing will be released later this year. Google Android 16 supported devices Android 16 is initially rolling out to some Google Pixel devices: How to download Android 16 If you want to download and install Android 16 today, grab your Pixel and go to Settings > System > Software update > Check for update, and the roughly 2GB download should appear. If you don't see the update yet, just wait -- it's slowly rolling out to users today. Before you download, make sure your phone is on Wi-Fi, plug your phone in if the battery's low, and back up anything critical before you install. Once the file finishes, a quick reboot should complete the upgrade. Owners of Samsung, OnePlus and other Android devices will need to wait for their manufacturers' rollout notices later this year, but the process will be the same: Head to the software-update screen and follow the on-screen prompts. If you're on the Android 16 beta, you can turn your Pixel into a plug-and-play desktop Google's latest Android 16 beta (QPR1 Beta 2) lets Pixel 8 and Pixel 9 owners turn their phones into mini desktops. All you need to do is plug your phone to any external monitor with a USB-C cable, and a full task-bar-and-window interface will appear. You can juggle multiple apps side-by-side, pin favorites and even use keyboard shortcuts. You need to enable desktop experience features in the developer settings. Google If you want to try out the Android 16 Beta, you can enroll your Pixel 8 or 9 at then go to Settings > System > Software update to download the Android 16 QPR1 Beta 2 over the air. Non-Android 16 new features also released today Alongside Android 16, Google is releasing half a dozen features across the wider Android ecosystem today: Custom group chats . You can pick an icon and name, see who's on RCS and set a timed mute. . You can pick an icon and name, see who's on RCS and set a timed mute. Smarter Google Photos editor. Use one-tap AI fixes, text-prompt "Reimagine" edits and auto-crop. Use one-tap AI fixes, text-prompt "Reimagine" edits and auto-crop. Room-specific Google Home shortcuts. You can pin a camera to your TV, lights to your phone, thermostat to your watch. You can pin a camera to your TV, lights to your phone, thermostat to your watch. Extend Safety Check timers. Add extra minutes from the phone or Wear OS without restarting the countdown. Add extra minutes from the phone or Wear OS without restarting the countdown. Fresh Emoji Kitchen mash-ups. For more expressive stickers, you can create new combos like pointing pigs and thankful carrots. For more expressive stickers, you can create new combos like pointing pigs and thankful carrots. Faster transit taps on Wear OS. Swipe your watch and pay, even with Google Wallet closed. These are all the new features being released today across the entire Android ecosystem, not just Android 16. Google All six arrive via Play Services and app updates, no upgrade required.
Forbes
30 minutes ago
- Forbes
How AI Is Exposing The Great SaaS Mediocrity Machine
Close-up of a person's hand holding an iPhone and using Google AI Mode, an experimental mode ... More utilizing artificial intelligence and large language models to process Google search queries, Lafayette, California, March 24, 2025. (Photo by Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images) The software-as-a-service industry has grown into a three hundred billion dollar colossus, powering everything from Fortune 500 customer relationships to your neighborhood coffee shop's inventory system. Yet beneath this impressive facade, a growing chorus of industry insiders suggests something troubling: much of this growth may have been built on a foundation of what the late anthropologist David Graeber termed "bullshit jobs" – roles that add little genuine value but consume enormous resources. Now, as artificial intelligence begins automating many of the tasks that filled these positions, the emperor's new clothes are becoming visible to all. David Graeber's 2018 book "Bullshit Jobs: A Theory" argued that modern capitalism had spawned entire categories of meaningless work – jobs that even their holders secretly believed were pointless. His taxonomy included "flunkies" (who exist mainly to make superiors feel important), "duct tapers" (who solve problems that shouldn't exist), and "box tickers" (who create the appearance of meaningful activity). Sound familiar to anyone who's worked in SaaS lately? Consider the typical Series B software company today: layers of growth marketers optimizing conversion funnels that users abandon, customer success managers managing relationships with customers who don't renew, and product managers shipping features that solve no real problems. Industry veteran Charles Grant Powell-Thompson recently wrote that the sector has become "a bloated ecosystem of recycled playbooks, unoriginal hires, and shallow growth hacks." At the heart of what Powell-Thompson identifies as SaaS mediocrity lies an over-reliance on playbooks. Visit any early-stage startup or public SaaS company, and you'll encounter identical practices: OKRs, product-led growth strategies, "land and expand" sales models, and user journey funnels copied wholesale from previous companies. "Product teams build features to meet roadmap commitments, not user needs," Powell-Thompson observes. "Sales teams push demos and discount paths based on generic conversion data. Marketing teams copy HubSpot's inbound strategy from 2014 and declare victory after publishing fifteen listicles." The 2021 wave of startups flooding the "Notion for X" and "Figma for Y" space exemplifies this template thinking. Nearly all adopted identical growth strategies: bottom-up freemium entry with vague "community" layers. Most failed because they misunderstood what made the originals successful – deep product design and obsessive iteration, not surface-level copying. Perhaps nowhere is the bullshit jobs phenomenon more visible than in SaaS hiring patterns. The industry has developed what Powell-Thompson calls "the SaaS hiring loop" – continuously recycling talent from the same pool of failed or plateaued startups. Competence gets assumed based on LinkedIn logos rather than demonstrated outcomes. "A growth marketer who scaled vanity metrics at one mediocre tool is hired to repeat the cycle elsewhere," Powell-Thompson notes, "without ever proving they can build sustainable customer retention or profit." This creates a carousel of recycled talent carrying identical playbooks and assumptions but rarely delivering results that justify their roles. The industry favors "SaaS-native" professionals who speak fluent ARR and OKR but don't question fundamentals or challenge assumptions. The venture capital boom masked much of this inefficiency. When Zendesk launched Zendesk Sell in 2018 – an acquisition of Base CRM – the company spent years trying to wedge it into a Salesforce competitor before sunsetting it in 2023. Evernote, once beloved, spent a decade chasing premium users with poorly built features while ignoring performance and user experience. These weren't scams – they were built by intelligent people. But as Powell-Thompson points out, they 'hired too fast, grew too shallow, and learned too late that real markets don't behave like pitch decks. When capital dried up in 2022-2023, widespread layoffs revealed how many SaaS positions had been consuming resources without contributing meaningful value'. Artificial intelligence isn't just changing how software works; it's revealing which human roles actually mattered in the first place. When AI can generate marketing copy instantly, what value does the growth hacker who spent weeks A/B testing subject lines provide? When algorithms can analyze user behavior patterns in real-time, what's the point of analysts who took days to produce similar insights? The numbers are telling the story. SaaS companies have eliminated hundreds of thousands of positions since 2022, yet many report improved productivity metrics. This suggests that much of what looked like essential work may have been what Graeber would recognize as elaborate theater. Graeber's categories map remarkably well onto modern SaaS organizational charts: The Flunkies: Business development representatives who exist primarily to make actual salespeople feel important, spending days sending LinkedIn messages nobody reads. The Duct Tapers: Customer success managers whose primary function involves fixing problems created by poorly designed products or misaligned sales promises. The Box Tickers: Growth marketers who obsess over vanity metrics like email open rates while customer churn rates remain stubbornly high. The Taskmasters: Middle managers who exist solely to manage other managers, creating elaborate OKR frameworks that nobody follows. Powell-Thompson identifies a particularly troubling aspect of SaaS culture: the near-complete lack of self-awareness. Workers confuse busywork with impact, treating twelve-slide strategy decks and Miro boards as substitutes for real execution. The industry has developed what he calls "a language of legitimacy that sounds impressive but says little." Phrases like "We're building an extensible platform for enterprise workflows" or "Our ICP is mid-market GTM teams in the post-series B range" mask fundamental confusion about customers and value propositions. LinkedIn amplifies this dynamic. The average SaaS employee presents themselves as management guru, life coach, and visionary simultaneously, while often unable to ship a bug fix, close a sale, or explain their product's API in plain English. Ironically, as AI eliminates some forms of meaningless work, it may be creating others. A new class of "AI prompt engineers" has emerged, with some commanding six-figure salaries for sophisticated search operations. Companies are hiring "AI ethics officers" and "automation specialists" who spend more time in meetings about AI than implementing it. This suggests we may be witnessing the birth of what could be called "AI bureaucracy" – jobs that exist primarily to manage, oversee, or optimize interactions with AI systems, potentially as divorced from real value creation as the roles they're replacing. The bullshit jobs critique isn't without its limitations. What appears inefficient may serve important functions that aren't immediately obvious. Redundancy in complex systems often provides resilience. The customer success manager scheduling seemingly pointless check-in calls might prevent million-dollar churn through relationship management that AI cannot replicate. Some of the most successful SaaS companies – Slack, Notion, Figma – emerged from overcrowded markets. The process of hiring diverse perspectives, even if some prove redundant, may be necessary for breakthrough innovation. And behind every critique of meaningless work stands a real person with real financial obligations. The growth marketer whose role seems pointless represents someone's mortgage payment, someone's child's college fund. The solution isn't eliminating all potentially redundant roles – that would be both cruel and counterproductive. Instead, the industry needs conscious evolution guided by several principles: Honest Performance Metrics: Moving beyond vanity metrics to measure actual business impact. Roles that can't demonstrate clear value creation over reasonable time periods should be restructured or eliminated. Skill Depth Over Buzzword Fluency: As Powell-Thompson argues, the industry needs "fewer growth hackers and more grown-ups. Fewer decks, more decisions. Fewer generalists, more expertise." Human-AI Collaboration: Rather than viewing AI as human replacement, smart companies are determining how to combine human judgment with AI capability for genuinely valuable outcomes. Cultural Honesty: Developing organizational cultures capable of honest productivity assessment without corporate speak or fear-based defensiveness. The SaaS industry's AI-driven reckoning previews what's coming for knowledge work broadly. As artificial intelligence becomes more capable, every industry will face similar questions about which roles create genuine value versus which exist primarily to create the appearance of activity. Graeber's insight about bullshit jobs revealed a moral crisis – people trapped in roles they knew were meaningless, maintaining economic survival through elaborate performance. The AI revolution offers an opportunity to escape this trap, but only through honest assessment of what we're escaping from. The SaaS industry's three hundred billion dollar scale means getting this transition right matters far beyond Silicon Valley. The sector employs millions globally and underpins much of the modern economy's digital infrastructure. If Graeber was correct about bullshit jobs' prevalence, then AI's arrival represents more than technological disruption – it's an opportunity for work reform. A chance to align human effort with genuine value creation benefiting both workers and customers. But realizing this opportunity requires something both the SaaS industry and broader business world have struggled with: courage to be honest about what actually works, what doesn't, and why. As Powell-Thompson concludes: "The truth is simple, and brutal. SaaS didn't just scale software – it scaled mediocrity." The question now is whether the industry will use this moment of AI-driven disruption for genuine transformation or simply automate meaningful work while preserving meaningless jobs through increasingly elaborate justifications. The three hundred billion dollar question is which path the industry will choose.
