Scope of each country's defence no longer so neatly defined: Chan Chun Sing
While the business of security has become more complex, it also opens up new opportunities for Singapore to work with more partners, said Defence Minister Chan Chun Sing. PHOTO: LIANHE ZAOBAO
SINGAPORE – Technological and geopolitical changes to the world have intensified security challenges and prompted countries to redefine how they think of their defence in three crucial ways, said Defence Minister Chan Chun Sing.
While this means the business of security has become more complex, it also opens up new opportunities for Singapore to work with more partners, Mr Chan told reporters on May 31.
Speaking to the media after he hosted visiting ministers and representatives to a closed-door ministerial roundtable discussion, Mr Chan said a key topic of discussion was how 'defence and security can no longer be cut up so neatly based on geography, as per the past'.
Instead, there was a strong sense that a geographic concept of security has become inadequate, with European ministers talking about their security being intertwined with that of the Asia Pacific, and vice versa.
A more networked world and greater awareness of threats from the information and cyber domains has also prompted new conversations about securing critical infrastructure, such as the underwater cables that link nations to the Internet, said Mr Chan.
And whereas defence ministers used to be more concerned about kinetic warfare - the deployment of armed forces in combat - they are today equally concerned about the security and resilience of their supply chains and economies, he added.
Mr Chan said a point made at the roundtable discussions was that meeting these challenges would be a long-term endeavour, requiring countries to work together.
Ministerial roundtables are a regular feature of the Shangri-La Dialogue, where ministers engage in informal conversations over lunch.
'If we are really serious about building capabilities for the long haul, it must be a commitment across different political cycles,' he said.
It also opens up new avenues for Singapore to work with countries that are further away but who have shared interests in developing capabilities, such as to secure supply chains and to counter disinformation, he added.
During the 20-minute interview, Mr Chan was also asked about US defense secretary Pete Hegseth's remarks earlier in the day, which included a call for Asian countries to raise their defence spending and to not become economically dependent on China.
Mr Chan said ministers at lunch were 'appreciative of (Mr Hegseth's) candor'. But while the ministers were 'cheered' by the US' commitment to the Indo-Pacific region, they were also keen to see how this would translate into tangible action.
On the Chinese defence minister's absence at this year's forum, Mr Chan said most, if not all ministers at the roundtable, would have hoped for the presence of the Chinese delegation.
This is as participation at the forum has continued to grow, and many countries find it a useful platform to exchange views, he added.
For the first time since 2019, China sent a delegation not led by its defence minister, which meant it could not hold bilateral meetings at the ministerial level with other countries, such as the United States.
The Shangri-la Dialogue allows countries to have side meetings with each other, which helps minimise the chances of miscalculation or the misreading of another country's intentions, said Mr Chan.
'I encourage all my fellow counterparts, all my fellow defense ministers, that notwithstanding China's absence, we should continue to reach out to China,' he said.
'And I'm sure China, in its own time, will also want to reach out to the rest of the world...so that we minimise the chances of misunderstanding.'
To a question by a Chinese media outlet that mentioned Singapore's 'balancing act' between China and the US, Mr Chan said that is not the Republic's approach.
'Singapore is not trying to balance anybody, and we are also not the interlocutor (between other countries),' he said.
Instead, Mr Chan said it sees itself as an open and inclusive platform that allows people to come together for frank and honest conversations.
'Where it's appreciated, we will also share with our partners our perspectives, our interpretations, and likewise we appreciate our partners sharing with us their perspectives and their interpretations of events,' he added.
Mr Chan said one point that came up during the lunch was the importance of trust, without which it will be difficult for countries to work together on matters of defence.
Building trust has to be done at multiple levels: from those in high political office meeting and talking, to soldiers, airmen and sailors having the opportunity to train together and understand each other's concerns, he said.
The more such opportunities exist, the greater the chances that the next generation will work together to overcome new challenges, and Singapore will play its part, he added.
'We will always be an open and inclusive platform for people to come together and exchange notes, to have frank conversations with one another,' he said.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Asia's coal-reliant steel giants stall green transition: panellists
[SINGAPORE] Asia's steel giants are slowing the global green transition, as top producers China and India drag their feet on decarbonisation amid high costs and weak market demand – stalling progress in one of the world's top-emitting industries. During a panel discussion at Singapore International Ferrous Week last week, Claire Chong, senior analyst at shipbroker Thurlestone Shipping, said the steel industry's carbon-cutting efforts are being 'significantly delayed' largely due to the market's continued preference for cheap, low-grade iron ore over higher-grade alternatives essential for cleaner production. 'In the longer run, we are expected to move towards the higher grades. But right now, we are still not really seeing that demand very significantly… especially from China. I think their emphasis is still on cost-cutting,' she added. China, the world's dominant steel producer accounting for more than half of the global output, has been delaying its decarbonisation commitments. It continues to rely on coal-dependent blast furnaces and prefers cheap, low-grade iron ore over the high-grade variety essential for less carbon-intensive steelmaking. Jitendra Nanda, managing partner at Polish trading firm Balta, noted in a panel discussion that India, the world's second-largest steel producer, imported 5.1 million tonnes of metallurgical coke in 2024, up 35 per cent on the year. While the steel industry is responsible for 10 per cent of human carbon dioxide emissions, about 70 per cent of the global steel today is still produced by coal-fired blast furnaces, said Dr Lars Schernikau, shareholder of Germany-based commodity trading firm HMS Bergbau in his keynote speech last week. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 12.30 pm ESG Insights An exclusive weekly report on the latest environmental, social and governance issues. Sign Up Sign Up Alongside this, tepid demand for premium-priced green steel in Asia and the steep capital outlay required to overhaul production methods are further dimming prospects of cleaning up one of the world's most carbon-intensive industries. Industry players told The Business Times that Chinese buyers, a critical market force, have become increasingly 'price-sensitive' and are willing to buy low-grade ore as long as the price is attractive. This has driven up the supply of low-grade iron ore, and further stalled the already sluggish green transition. Not fired up by other options too Shifting to high-grade iron ore to enable steelmaking with cleaner energy sources, such as hydrogen, is widely seen as a viable path forward. The industry could also reduce emissions by recycling steel scrap through electric arc furnaces and capturing carbon from coal-based blast furnaces. However, China still lacks a carbon market, and the creation of one will not be happening anytime soon, highlighted Rodrigo Echeverri, director of Carbon Research. Since there is no penalty for the emissions, low-grade ore will be around for a long while, he noted. Meanwhile, replacing coal-powered furnaces to facilitate scrap recycling remains a costly hurdle, with the high capital expenditure proving prohibitive for many mills. Zhang Xinzhi, trader at Sino Crown International, pointed out that with Chinese steelmakers projecting declining margins, they are not willing to 'invest in air' and, hence, are delaying high-cost efforts that could result in lower returns. Dilemma is bad news for green goals The same story is being told about India. Amita Khurana, group chief of raw material procurement at Tata Steel, noted that relying on coal is still 'the most economical and optimal' way to produce steel. 'Coking coal is here to stay in the foreseeable future,' she said, highlighting the importance of coal for India's energy security and the need for a balance between decarbonisation and industry survival. Other parts of Asia have also been dealing with challenges related to the green transition. Hiromasa Yamamoto, executive vice-president of Japanese trading firm Hanwa, highlighted that securing a sufficient amount of quality scrap for recycling is another impediment given the current production needs. Meanwhile, the demand for green steel is also insignificant in Asia as major steel buyers are unwilling to swallow the premium prices, which could be more than US$200 per tonne. Yamamoto noted that while demand for green steel is high in Europe, it is still soft in the East, including Japan. He added that no country in Asia, except for Singapore, can afford the premiums for green steel.
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
How the US market fell from 4th to 41st for returns – and what it means for stocks in 2025
NEARLY two months after US President Donald Trump roiled markets with his on-again, off-again 'reciprocal' tariffs and universal 10 per cent levy, uncertainty remains. My last column showed the illogic underpinning this – and counselled patience. Here is an update – and how to profit. Trump says America 'wins' through his tariffs, reclaiming 'lost' manufacturing jobs and cutting the trade deficit. No. Tariffs always hammer most the one who imposes them. Don't take my word for it. Look to the markets. For any good capitalist, this is step one. Markets are a lie detector, weighing talk, forecasts and opinions – and rendering verdicts. Non-US stocks were up 8.8 per cent this year to May 22. The Straits Times Index gained 4.9 per cent, a hair's breadth from all-time highs. China? Up 10 per cent. European stocks rose 13.7 per cent. Mexico, up 20.7 per cent. US stocks? Down 5.5 per cent – a striking lag. If we look at it another way: Of the 47 MSCI All-Country World Index (ACWI) nations, America was 41st in the ranking of countries by their year-to-date returns as at May 22. In the same period last year, America was fourth – with its 28.8 per cent return fully seven percentage points ahead of the ACWI. Why did US stocks go from No 4 to 41? The answer is No 47; the 47th president, that is. Trump's vacillations make funds flee America. Markets know that attempts to reduce the trade deficit are senseless. A trade deficit means a capital account surplus by definition – that capital is foreign investment in the US. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Why would reversing that be desirable? Why would the government intervening to favour American firms, instead of letting free markets sort out the most efficient use of capital, be considered positive? Why would policy that seemingly changes on a whim be considered good? Stocks are seeing through the smoke and mirrors. America's lag tells you those things are bad, not good. My last column noted how Trump justified his 90-day reciprocal tariff pause on Apr 9 on the grounds that some 75 nations sought deals. Many claimed that this revealed Trump's true aim. The president's fans could say that tariffs, confusion and uncertainty are solely a leverage to strike a flurry of deals – delivering even freer trade. However, the markets are looking at reality, not armchair psychobabble. Deals to make more deals Since Apr 9, just two tariff 'deals' have emerged – one with Britain and one with China. Both are fluff. Britain's is a one-year, non-binding agreement to mitigate tariffs until a full trade deal happens. A deal to make a deal. It affects only a handful of industries. Crucially, the 10 per cent universal levy remains on most UK goods, just like for those from Singapore. America's China deal looks bigger, but only because the bar was incredibly low. Yes, it cut 145 per cent tariffs on Chinese goods to 30 per cent, while China dropped retaliatory levies from 125 per cent to 10 per cent. However, the 'deal' lasts only 90 days and effectively just buys time. Another deal to make a deal. Plus, tariffs on China remain 30 percentage points higher than in January. Both countries are worse off, but especially America. Who wins from this? Maybe Singapore, via re-exporting. On May 16, Trump flip-flopped again. Boasting that 150 nations now seek 'deals', he said that there isn't time to negotiate them all. His 'solution'? Telling nations what rates they will pay – and offering chances to appeal. Didn't he already do that on 'Liberation Day' on Apr 2? How will it work? Will rates be higher, lower or the same as those on Apr 2? He did not say, further fanning uncertainty. Then, days later, he threatened the European Union with new 50 per cent tariffs – and 25 per cent on Apple products. More uncertainty. Meanwhile, legal challenges to Trump's tariffs progress. Maybe real deals will come that will actually lower trade barriers and uncertainty – a huge potential upside. Then again, maybe not. But as my last column said, even if all tariffs return, the pain will be less than feared – which will be bullish for markets. Importers can readily skirt America's understaffed, overwhelmed tariff-collecting Customs and Border Protection staff via both illegal and legal means. The latter include 'tariff splitting' – stripping out services-related costs such as marketing to reduce goods' values – or storing imports in bonded warehouses. Or, shipping in goods that are valued to be under US$800. And myriad illegal ways such as misclassifying and undervaluing goods. Or, as mentioned, exporters can 'tranship' or re-export via lower-tariff nations – such as Singapore. This is why China's April exports didn't tank despite shipments to America tumbling 21 per cent. South-east Asia gobbled up the difference – and shipped them on. It drove Singapore's huge, 113 per cent year-on-year spike in April re-exports to America. Vietnam and Taiwan are seeing similar surges. Shippers could further tap Canada or Mexico, gaming the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement's tariff exemption. Hence, while April's total tariff collections rose, they missed administration forecasts by 75 per cent. That will persist. Happily, fear exceeds the negative effects, especially outside America. For investors, that is a recipe for a bull market – with non-US stocks continuing to lead. The writer is the founder, executive chairman and co-chief investment officer of Fisher Investments, an independent investment adviser serving both individual and institutional investors globally

Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Israel accuses Europe of ‘anti-Semitic incitement' after Washington shooting
Israel has faced a blizzard of criticism from Europe of late as it has intensified its military campaign in Gaza. PHOTO: REUTERS - Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar accused unnamed European officials on M ay 22 of 'toxic anti-Semitic incitement' he blamed for a hostile climate in which the fatal shooting of two Israeli embassy staffers in Washington took place. Israel has faced a blizzard of criticism from Europe of late as it has intensified its military campaign in Gaza, where humanitarian groups have warned that an 11-week Israeli blockade on aid supplies has left the Palestinian enclave on the brink of famine. Mr Saar did not name any countries or officials, but said the climate of hostility towards Israel was behind the shooting of embassy staffers Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Lynn Milgrim outside a Jewish museum in Washington on May 22 . Mr Saar, at a news conference in Jerusalem, said the attack was a direct outcome of 'toxic anti-Semitic incitement against Israel and Jews around the world' since Hamas militants' cross-border attack on Israel in October 2023. 'There is a direct line connecting anti-Semitic and anti-Israel incitement to this murder,' he said. 'This incitement is also done by leaders and officials of many countries and organisations, especially from Europe.' Mr Saar declined to identify which leader or officials he had in mind. But his remarks came after increasingly tough words from Western allies of Israel including France and Britain, which joined Canada this week in warning of possible 'concrete action' against Israel over its war in Gaza. US officials said a suspect who chanted pro-Palestinian slogans was in custody. US President Donald Trump and a wide range of European and other foreign leaders condemned the attack. Mr Saar said the 'global atmosphere' against Israel had worsened sharply since the Oct 7, 2023, Hamas attack that killed 1,200 people and saw 251 taken as hostage back into Gaza. Since then, Israel's air and ground campaign has killed over 53,000 Palestinians and laid waste to the densely populated territory, drawing mass protests across the world ranging from US university campuses to the streets of European cities. In 2024 , the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take action to prevent alleged acts of genocide in Gaza after a case brought by South Africa that stirred deep anger in Israel. Mr Saar said: 'These libels about genocide, crimes against humanity and murdering babies pave the way exactly for such murders.' REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.